By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!So why not just ask me my thoughts, instead of accusing me of being disrespectful?
So if you do not know my thoughts, nor are you able to differentiate between the two; then why am I being judged by another man’s conscience?
Please forgive me - I did not realise that ' lol ' was a genuine thing, but I am perhaps slow with how these things work.
To the reader, who knows not your thoughts or reasons, it did come across as disrespectful - which is why I wrote as i did.
I was reading Luke 8:51-56
Where Jesus raised Jairus' daughter.
He referred to her to be sleeping when she was dead, and also seems distinct that she had a spirit, that returned.
Hi Br. Bear,
My first thought or question is, do we find anything that says man's spirit is created? I'm not aware of anything that says that. What I see in Gen 2:7 is that man's spirit is actually God's. It is something breathed out of God. That's the only spirit I see in man. If it's breathed out of God and God is spirit it seems to me that it's not something created, but rather, something from God Himself.
I beleive there is a difference, if man's spirit is created. However, I don't think mans spirit is created.
Regarding capitalization I think people do that simply based on the idea that the Spirit is a third person. Personally I think we shouldn't use the word spirit at all. I think it's best to use the literal definition of these words and let the reader decide if it's literal or figurative. By using the word spirit, the translators are taking it upon themselves to decide what is and isn't figurative rather than letting the reader decide for him/herself.
I think the significance of using wind or breath consistently is that the reader gets a better understanding of what these words mean. This is true for several words in Scripture. Soul is one of them. The KJV translators use about 15 different English words to translate soul. English readers reading 15 different words don't know that they are reading the same Greek or Hebrew word. The Greeks in NT times saw one word psuche. The Hebrews saw one word Nephesh. If it didn't make sense to them literally, they knew it was a figure of speech. We don't see these figures of speech because we're not see the same word in all of these places. Take the word spirit. When used in Scripture it is a figure of speech. However, many, if not most, Christians don't know that. Instead they import the English definition of the word into the Greek and Hebrew and because that has happened so much and for so long it becomes understood as normal.
It's like church history. The Church started out pure. Then over time some doctrines were added, some lost, and Christianity has morphed into something vastly different than what Jesus and the apostles taught. The same thing has happened to our understanding of Scripture. Unless we go back and start digging we won't know this. Look at the Reformation. It was a rejection of many of the doctrines that the church had added over the centuries. It was an attempt to get back to basics. This same thing happens with our understanding of Scripture. It's our understanding or misinderstanding of Scripture that allows these doctrines to be added to the faith. So, I think taking the Scriptures back to their most basic forn and studying them that way helps us to shed some of the baggage that has been added.
Another part of the problem is that Christians don't know what they don't know. If all Christians were forced to do a real and serious study of church history today, Christianity would change vastly. The reason being they would see what was believed at the very beginning. They would see where certain ideas and doctrines entered the church. They'd see how certain people used and manipulated the church for political gain. Theyd see how some ideas and doctrines entered the Church because certain groups had more power and were able to force their perspects.
I think the translators mean well and are trying to help people understand. The problem is that in using all of these words they're actually baking their understanding of Scrioture into the translation. I'll give you an example.
Genesis 3:8 (KJV 1900): And they heard the voice of the Lord God walking in the garden in the cool of the day: and Adam and his wife hid themselves from the presence of the Lord God amongst the trees of the garden.
We read this passage and think of God walking in the cool of the day. That's probably in the morning, or maybe just before dark. However, the word cool in this passage is the Hebrew word Ruach. It's the same word they often translate spirit. Was God walking in the spirit of the day? That doesn't make sense. Was God walking in the wind of the day? Ok,, we can see God walking in the windy part of the day. But, when is the windy part of the day? It could be morning. It could also be afternoon or evening. Well, if it's in the afternoon and the sun is shining hard is it going to be cool? Not likely. It could be quite warm. My point is that by translating ruach as cool instead of windy the translators have baked into the KJV translation the idea of a cool part of the day when that may not be what thr text is actually saying. Now, in this passage it doesn't effect one's theology. However, where else do things like this appear that may or do affect our theology?
True that, the breath of life is given to all living breathing creatures that will eventually physically die. But the Holy Spirit is given for eternal life.God's breath and spirit are not the same things, yet both are needed for life.
'For what man knoweth the things of a man,I understand where you are coming from. It is a very complicated topic and if I'm wrong I'm wrong because nobody can change the truth.
There are these considerations.
Jesus breathed on them, and said to them, “Receive the Holy Spirit. John 20:22
For what man knoweth the things of a man, save the spirit of man which is in him even so the things of God knoweth no man, but the Spirit of God.1 Corinthians 2:11
The Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God. Romans 8:16
The body cannot function without the breath or spirit. As more than likely the spirit cannot function without the body.
Jesus said " she was asleep"
There is so much about being asleep. Only many different interpretations.
Of course as we agree on the resurrections.
The bible mentions true children of God to have the imperishable seed and will be raised to have an imperishable body.
The bible has not said that about unbelievers. That would mean that all have eternal life but the bible speaks of the second death, which cannot be an existance.
Although many interpret death as seperation. I don't think so.
The body can be destroyed relatively easily but the entire person can only be destroyed by God and some do not have the imperishable seed, in their spirit.
There are so many different views .
I am not sure of the spirit when leaving the body , whether he or she is conscious but I don't think so because of the way they are said to be asleep.
Thank you for your reply Chris. I had written that down because it was on my mind first thing this morning.'For what man knoweth the things of a man,
save the spirit of man which is in him?
even so the things of God knoweth no man,
but the Spirit of God. '
(1 Corinthians 2:11)
Hi @Lavenderfields,
Funnily enough I have had 1 Corinthians 2:11 on my mind today. In this verse it refers to the spirit of a man (pneuma) referring to him psychologically. Man's pneuma (spirit) is contrasted with God's pneuma (spirit).
Also in 1 Corinthians 2:12 (twice) we read, 'Now we have received not the pneuma of the world, but the pneuma which is from God, that we might know the things that are freely given to us by God.' Here it is the gift of the new nature, which is set in contrast with the natural man, and the rest of the world. It is the spiritual 'understanding' of 1 John 5:20; without which we neither know, nor can we get to know the things of God.
Within the love of Christ our Saviour,
Our Lord and Head.
Chris
Hi @Lavenderfields,
That is your belief, but it is not what Jesus said about there being both a body and a soul.Regarding Revelation 6:9-10, the word 'souls' refers to the whole person.
Yes their physical bodies had been killed, but their living soul remained, as Jesus confirmed they can kill the body but not the soul.It refers to those who had been slain, those martyred saints
Clearly their souls were not dead because they were talking to Jesus. Jesus said God is God of the living, not of the dead.personified as waiting, though they themselves were dead,
Rev 11:4 had nothing to with them, it is about the Lords 2 witnesses.for in Revelation 11:4 John sees them again, and it says, 'they lived again' in the first resurrection.
Yes, Jesus confirms the body can be killed by man, but not the soul, thus proving the soul is still alive after the death of the body. Jesus spoke of both a physical body and a soul, proving they are not the same.'And fear not them which kill the body,
but are not able to kill the soul:
but rather fear Him
Which is able to destroy
both soul and body in hell.'
(Mat 10:28)
Jesus said they could kill the body but not the soul, again proving the soul can live on without the body.* Man can kill the body, but there is no more that they can
Jesus said God is able to destroy BOTH body and soul, showing their is BOTH a body and a soul.but God is able to destroy the soul, or the whole person,
Again Jesus said God is not a God of the dead, but of the Living.They would remain in the grave, the place of the dead.
'But God, Who is rich in mercy,Eph 2:5 that even though we were dead because of our sins, he gave us life when he raised Christ from the dead. (It is only by God’s grace that you have been saved!)
Eph 2:6 For he raised us from the dead along with Christ and seated us with him in the heavenly realms because we are united with Christ Jesus. (NLT)
True or false?
Hello @StewardoftheMystery,That is your belief, but it is not what Jesus said about there being both a body and a soul.
Yes their physical bodies had been killed, but their living soul remained, as Jesus confirmed they can kill the body but not the soul.
Clearly their souls were not dead because they were talking to Jesus. Jesus said God is God of the living, not of the dead.
Rev 11:4 had nothing to with them, it is about the Lords 2 witnesses.
Yes, Jesus confirms the body can be killed by man, but not the soul, thus proving the soul is still alive after the death of the body. Jesus spoke of both a physical body and a soul, proving they are not the same.
Jesus said they could kill the body but not the soul, again proving the soul can live on without the body.
Jesus said God is able to destroy BOTH body and soul, showing their is BOTH a body and a soul.
Again Jesus said God is not a God of the dead, but of the Living.
Jesus Christ is the resurrection and the Life, those who live and believe in him shall never die.
John 11:25
Jesus said unto her, I am the resurrection, and the life: he that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live:
Hi Curtis,Job speaking about God.....
Job 34:13 Who appointed him to rule over the earth? Who put him in charge of the whole world?
Job 34:14 If he really wanted to, he could hold back his spirit and breath.
Job 34:15 Then everyone would die together. They would return to the dust. (NiRV)
God's breath and spirit are not the same things, yet both are needed for life.
Hi Curtis,
The words used there are Neshamah and ruach. They are often used interchangeably. Both neshamah and ruach are used of the breath of life. That passage is what is called a Hebrew Parallelism. It's a literary device. It's where something is stated twice using different words.
Rom 8:8 So then they that are in the flesh cannot please God.'But God, Who is rich in mercy,
for His great love wherewith He loved us,
Even when we were dead in sins,
hath quickened us together with Christ, ( by grace ye are saved )
And hath raised us up together,
and made us sit together in heavenly places
in Christ Jesus: '
(Eph 2:4-6)
Hello @Curtis,
This is wonderfully true in spirit, and by God's reckoning of faith. But you and I are here in the flesh, walking upon the earth: our bodies still have to die, along with everyone else, we still have to be buried, and our bodies will see corruption, but we have the hope of resurrection glory awaiting us.
Thank you
In Christ Jesus
Chris