Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!
  • Welcome to Talk Jesus Christian Forums

    Celebrating 20 Years!

    A bible based, Jesus Christ centered community.

    Register Log In

Do Our Spirits Die?

@Butch5
Greetings,

in regards to the post by @Curtis

Man's "spirit" was "created" but man's body was "formed" from the dust of the earth.
Man's spirit was created and then God formed a body for man to live within while on earth.

Gen 1:27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

we are told that God is Spirit

But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship Him. God is a Spirit: and they that worship Him must worship Him in spirit and in truth.
John 4:23-24

so, as we see in Genesis 1:27
So God created man in His own image, in the image of God created He him; male and female created He them.

being created in His image, Who is Spirit, one would conclude that 'in His image' pertains to being as He is?


is that correct @Curtis ?


Bless you ....><>
 
@Butch5
Greetings,

My understanding of those passages is that it's a reference to the whole person or being. I see the same thing in 1 thes. 5:23

1 Thessalonians 5:23 (KJV 1900): And the very God of peace sanctify you wholly; and I pray God your whole spirit and soul and body be preserved blameless unto the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.

He even makes the point here of what he means when he uses the word "wholly"

I can see the 'whole person' in reference to the Scripture I shared and asked about but not (as yet) the reference to the portion from Thessalonians.

It has an extra 'dimension' to it, being 'spirit'.

Does that make sense?


Bless you ....><>
 
@Butch5
Greetings,

in regards to the post by @Curtis
Man's "spirit" was "created" but man's body was "formed" from the dust of the earth.
Man's spirit was created and then God formed a body for man to live within while on earth.

Gen 1:27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.


we are told that God is Spirit

But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship Him. God is a Spirit: and they that worship Him must worship Him in spirit and in truth.
John 4:23-24

so, as we see in Genesis 1:27
So God created man in His own image, in the image of God created He him; male and female created He them.

being created in His image, Who is Spirit, one would conclude that 'in His image' pertains to being as He is?


is that correct @Curtis ?


Bless you ....><>
Hi Br. Bear,

What if we looked at it from the original languages? God is wind or breath. How would you understand that?
 
@Butch5
Greetings,

My understanding of those passages is that it's a reference to the whole person or being. I see the same thing in 1 thes. 5:23

1 Thessalonians 5:23 (KJV 1900): And the very God of peace sanctify you wholly; and I pray God your whole spirit and soul and body be preserved blameless unto the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.

He even makes the point here of what he means when he uses the word "wholly"

I can see the 'whole person' in reference to the Scripture I shared and asked about but not (as yet) the reference to the portion from Thessalonians.

It has an extra 'dimension' to it, being 'spirit'.

Does that make sense?


Bless you ....><>
Hi Br. Bear,
This is how i understand it. In Gen 2:7 we find all three mentioned also. The man, body, and breath, became a soul. The whole is the soul which consists of body and breath. Soul is also often translated life. We could say your whole, body, breath, and life.
 
Greetings,



why be disrespectful when engaged in a genuine discussion?
That does not make any sense.


Whether you are correct or not means nothing if there is no charity, as you have probably read about?


Please treat all as you would like Jesus to treat you

Post in Peace

Jesus is the Lord


Bless you ....><>
My laughter was genuine, and was not meant to be disrespectful.
 
My laughter was genuine, and was not meant to be disrespectful.

Please forgive me - I did not realise that ' lol ' was a genuine thing, but I am perhaps slow with how these things work.

To the reader, who knows not your thoughts or reasons, it did come across as disrespectful - which is why I wrote as i did.

Perhaps more refrain and a little more care by everyone is needed when writing on forums?

Always a good idea to pray before posting --- there is no rush, the posts being replied to are usually there for a long time.

thank you for your reply,


Bless you ....><>
 
Please forgive me - I did not realise that ' lol ' was a genuine thing, but I am perhaps slow with how these things work.

To the reader, who knows not your thoughts or reasons, it did come across as disrespectful - which is why I wrote as i did.

Perhaps more refrain and a little more care by everyone is needed when writing on forums?

Always a good idea to pray before posting --- there is no rush, the posts being replied to are usually there for a long time.

thank you for your reply,


Bless you ....><>
Sorry to offend, but I really did laugh out loud at his rejection of what Jesus said about there being both a body and a soul.

Excuse me for laughing out loud, perhaps I should keep my laughter to myself next time.
 
@Butch5
Greetings,

Hi Br. Bear,

What if we looked at it from the original languages? God is wind or breath. How would you understand that?

if we use that 'terminology' then what @Curtis wrote would read paraphrased:
'Man's breath or wind was created....' and then he (Curtis) continued to point out that man's body was formed.

Is there a difference?

Also, do we then re-read that God is either Wind or Breath rather that Spirit?

Is there a difference between spirit and Spirit?
Do we cease to use the word, Spirit and spirit completely ? Or is there more significance that wind and/or breath when referring to such?

Thank you for your reply - sorry about all the questions! but they all, sort of, are one.


Bless you ....><>
 
@Butch5
Greetings,

in regards to the post by @Curtis



we are told that God is Spirit

But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship Him. God is a Spirit: and they that worship Him must worship Him in spirit and in truth.
John 4:23-24

so, as we see in Genesis 1:27
So God created man in His own image, in the image of God created He him; male and female created He them.

being created in His image, Who is Spirit, one would conclude that 'in His image' pertains to being as He is?


is that correct @Curtis ?


Bless you ....><>
Yep, that is how I see it.
 
Greetings again,

Sorry to offend, but I really did laugh out loud at his rejection of what Jesus said about there being both a body and a soul.

Excuse me for laughing out loud, perhaps I should keep my laughter to myself next time.

no, it is not about needing excusing for laughing.
Forum interaction is / can be tricky at times and often one reading can mis-interpret what is read. It is always good if we remember that what is good and OK for us is good and OK for others to do. At the same time, with more care, we can ALL minimise mis-understandings.

Is someone laughing at me or what i wrote. Can I differentiate between the two? Tricky sometimes.

Grace and Peace


Bless you ....><>
 
@Butch5

Greetings,
Hi Br. Bear,
This is how i understand it. In Gen 2:7 we find all three mentioned also. The man, body, and breath, became a soul. The whole is the soul which consists of body and breath. Soul is also often translated life. We could say your whole, body, breath, and life.


reading the verse from Thessalonians, this part:
"your whole spirit and soul and body be preserved blameless"

changing as you suggest,
'your whole body, breath and life be preserved blameless'
does not really make much sense

particularly if it is God's breath we are talking about, as His breath would not need preserving?

Not sure if you follow my reasoning?


Bless you ....><>

I shall be away for some hours, so will not reply immediately ....><>
 
@Butch5
Greetings,



if we use that 'terminology' then what @Curtis wrote would read paraphrased:
'Man's breath or wind was created....' and then he (Curtis) continued to point out that man's body was formed.

Is there a difference?

Also, do we then re-read that God is either Wind or Breath rather that Spirit?

Is there a difference between spirit and Spirit?
Do we cease to use the word, Spirit and spirit completely ? Or is there more significance that wind and/or breath when referring to such?

Thank you for your reply - sorry about all the questions! but they all, sort of, are one.


Bless you ....><>
Hi Br. Bear,

My first thought or question is, do we find anything that says man's spirit is created? I'm not aware of anything that says that. What I see in Gen 2:7 is that man's spirit is actually God's. It is something breathed out of God. That's the only spirit I see in man. If it's breathed out of God and God is spirit it seems to me that it's not something created, but rather, something from God Himself.

I beleive there is a difference, if man's spirit is created. However, I don't think mans spirit is created.

Regarding capitalization I think people do that simply based on the idea that the Spirit is a third person. Personally I think we shouldn't use the word spirit at all. I think it's best to use the literal definition of these words and let the reader decide if it's literal or figurative. By using the word spirit, the translators are taking it upon themselves to decide what is and isn't figurative rather than letting the reader decide for him/herself.

I think the significance of using wind or breath consistently is that the reader gets a better understanding of what these words mean. This is true for several words in Scripture. Soul is one of them. The KJV translators use about 15 different English words to translate soul. English readers reading 15 different words don't know that they are reading the same Greek or Hebrew word. The Greeks in NT times saw one word psuche. The Hebrews saw one word Nephesh. If it didn't make sense to them literally, they knew it was a figure of speech. We don't see these figures of speech because we're not see the same word in all of these places. Take the word spirit. When used in Scripture it is a figure of speech. However, many, if not most, Christians don't know that. Instead they import the English definition of the word into the Greek and Hebrew and because that has happened so much and for so long it becomes understood as normal.

It's like church history. The Church started out pure. Then over time some doctrines were added, some lost, and Christianity has morphed into something vastly different than what Jesus and the apostles taught. The same thing has happened to our understanding of Scripture. Unless we go back and start digging we won't know this. Look at the Reformation. It was a rejection of many of the doctrines that the church had added over the centuries. It was an attempt to get back to basics. This same thing happens with our understanding of Scripture. It's our understanding or misinderstanding of Scripture that allows these doctrines to be added to the faith. So, I think taking the Scriptures back to their most basic forn and studying them that way helps us to shed some of the baggage that has been added.

Another part of the problem is that Christians don't know what they don't know. If all Christians were forced to do a real and serious study of church history today, Christianity would change vastly. The reason being they would see what was believed at the very beginning. They would see where certain ideas and doctrines entered the church. They'd see how certain people used and manipulated the church for political gain. Theyd see how some ideas and doctrines entered the Church because certain groups had more power and were able to force their perspects.

I think the translators mean well and are trying to help people understand. The problem is that in using all of these words they're actually baking their understanding of Scrioture into the translation. I'll give you an example.

Genesis 3:8 (KJV 1900): And they heard the voice of the Lord God walking in the garden in the cool of the day: and Adam and his wife hid themselves from the presence of the Lord God amongst the trees of the garden.

We read this passage and think of God walking in the cool of the day. That's probably in the morning, or maybe just before dark. However, the word cool in this passage is the Hebrew word Ruach. It's the same word they often translate spirit. Was God walking in the spirit of the day? That doesn't make sense. Was God walking in the wind of the day? Ok,, we can see God walking in the windy part of the day. But, when is the windy part of the day? It could be morning. It could also be afternoon or evening. Well, if it's in the afternoon and the sun is shining hard is it going to be cool? Not likely. It could be quite warm. My point is that by translating ruach as cool instead of windy the translators have baked into the KJV translation the idea of a cool part of the day when that may not be what thr text is actually saying. Now, in this passage it doesn't effect one's theology. However, where else do things like this appear that may or do affect our theology?
 
To the reader, who knows not your thoughts or reasons, it did come across as disrespectful
So why not just ask me my thoughts, instead of accusing me of being disrespectful?
Is someone laughing at me or what i wrote. Can I differentiate between the two?
So if you do not know my thoughts, nor are you able to differentiate between the two; then why am I being judged by another man’s conscience?
 
FAQ: The New Testament says that the lost will be put to death in a lake of
brimstone. (Rev 20:11-15.) If that's so, then why is it commonly believed that they
will suffer till time without end? Don't people have to be alive in order to experience
suffering?

REPLY: I have yet to discover a New Testament passage verifying people's utter and

complete annihilation.

Human life consists of three components: body, soul, and spirit. Matt 10:28 speaks
of destroying people's body and soul while saying nothing about the spirit
component. Genesis 2:7 strongly suggests that the spirit component is what makes
people living beings as opposed to inanimate objects. Luke 16:19-31 and Heb
12:23 suggest that deceased people's spirits are transferred to an afterlife existence.
_
 
I was reading Luke 8:51-56
Where Jesus raised Jairus' daughter.
He referred to her to be sleeping when she was dead, and also seems distinct that she had a spirit, that returned.
 
I was reading Luke 8:51-56
Where Jesus raised Jairus' daughter.
He referred to her to be sleeping when she was dead, and also seems distinct that she had a spirit, that returned.
Hi, The word translated spirit is pnuema. It literally means wind or breath. Couldn't we say that her breath returned to her? Without breath one is dead. If the breath returns one is alive.
 
Hi, The word translated spirit is pnuema. It literally means wind or breath. Couldn't we say that her breath returned to her? Without breath one is dead. If the breath returns one is alive.
I understand where you are coming from. It is a very complicated topic and if I'm wrong I'm wrong because nobody can change the truth.
There are these considerations.
Jesus breathed on them, and said to them, “Receive the Holy Spirit. John 20:22
For what man knoweth the things of a man, save the spirit of man which is in him even so the things of God knoweth no man, but the Spirit of God.1 Corinthians 2:11

The Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God. Romans 8:16

The body cannot function without the breath or spirit. As more than likely the spirit cannot function without the body.

Jesus said " she was asleep"
There is so much about being asleep. Only many different interpretations.

Of course as we agree on the resurrections.
The bible mentions true children of God to have the imperishable seed and will be raised to have an imperishable body.
The bible has not said that about unbelievers. That would mean that all have eternal life but the bible speaks of the second death, which cannot be an existance.
Although many interpret death as seperation. I don't think so.

The body can be destroyed relatively easily but the entire person can only be destroyed by God and some do not have the imperishable seed, in their spirit.

There are so many different views .
I am not sure of the spirit when leaving the body , whether he or she is conscious but I don't think so because of the way they are said to be asleep.
 
I understand where you are coming from. It is a very complicated topic and if I'm wrong I'm wrong because nobody can change the truth.
There are these considerations.
Jesus breathed on them, and said to them, “Receive the Holy Spirit. John 20:22
For what man knoweth the things of a man, save the spirit of man which is in him even so the things of God knoweth no man, but the Spirit of God.1 Corinthians 2:11

The Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God. Romans 8:16

The body cannot function without the breath or spirit. As more than likely the spirit cannot function without the body.

Jesus said " she was asleep"
There is so much about being asleep. Only many different interpretations.

Of course as we agree on the resurrections.
The bible mentions true children of God to have the imperishable seed and will be raised to have an imperishable body.
The bible has not said that about unbelievers. That would mean that all have eternal life but the bible speaks of the second death, which cannot be an existance.
Although many interpret death as seperation. I don't think so.

The body can be destroyed relatively easily but the entire person can only be destroyed by God and some do not have the imperishable seed, in their spirit.

There are so many different views .
I am not sure of the spirit when leaving the body , whether he or she is conscious but I don't think so because of the way they are said to be asleep.
It seems we're in agreement on several points. My position is this. There are four words that are translated spirit or breath. Two Greek and two Hebrew. The Greek words are noe and pneuma. The Hebrew words are neshamah and ruach. The all mean wind or breath. That's the fundamental meaning. Sometimes they are used figuratively, and translated spirit. For example, the Bible says, 'God is Spirit'. Literally, God is wind. We know that God isn't literally moving air. So, it's a figure of speech. So, what would that figure of speech mean? I think Jesus gives us a great definition of it in John 3.

8 The wind bloweth where it listeth, and thou hearest the sound thereof, but canst not tell whence it cometh, and whither it goeth: so is every one that is born of the Spirit. (Jn. 3:8 KJV)

Both bolded words are the same word pneuma. God comes and goes we don't know where He comes from or where He goes. We do see evidence of Him all around. When the Bible says God is wind I think this description Jesus gives of pneuma is accurate of God.

Regarding man, I believe the spirit is that animating force that comes from God. Here is a clip I posted in another thread. I'll pasted it here. It explains how I see the spirit in man. The questions are not directed at you.

And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul. (Gen. 2:7 KJV)

In this passage we have, the body, the spirit, and the soul. These are the three that most people claim that man consists of. Most say that man is body, soul, and spirit. We have all three right here in the passage about the creation of man. So, let's look at them. The man is formed from the dust. That's the body. Moses records that God breathed into the body, the breath of lives. God is breath or spirit. He breathed breath or spirit into the man. When He did that there was a transformation. Moses records that the man "Became" a living soul. Before man had the breath of lives, he was not a soul. After he received the breath of lives, he was a soul. This shows us that the body of dust and the breath of lives combined to form something new, a soul. From this we conclude that a soul consists of two elements, the body and the breath of lives. That's the creation man. In this passage there is only "One" spirit mentioned, it is God's. It's the breath of lives. This passage doesn't say anything at all about any other spirit that "is" or is in man. nothing. We know that this spirit that is in man is God's because it came out of God. In addition the Scriptures tell us that it is God's sprit, breath. Job said that if God retrieved His Ruach and His Neshamah all flesh would die. Paul tells us that God gives, or is giving, it's present tense, life to all things. So, if God stopped giving life all things would die. That tells us that the spirit that is in man, the breath of lives, is God's. However, in Ezekiel 37 He tells us plainly. Ezekiel sees a vision of Israel's resurrection. In it there is a valley of dry bones. After being told to prophesy he sees bones coming together, then skin come on them etc. However, they are not alive. Then he's told to prophesy to the ruach, the wind. after doing this, ruach, breath, comes into them and they live. This is the exact same thing we see in Gen 2:7. However, after seeing the vision God gives him the interpretation. He tells him that the bones are the whole house of Israel and that He is going to bring them out of their graves. And then God say to Israel, I will put "MY' Ruach, spirit, in you and you shall live. So God says plainly here that it is "HIS" spirit that is giving them life. It's not a spirit of the man. It's not "their" spirit. God says it is "HIS" Ruach, spirit, that He puts in them and they live. So, Ezekiel sees the same thing Moses recorded in Gen 2:7. And God said it was "His" Ruach, spirit.

Now, let me ask a question . In all of this that I've written, and please check Ezekiel 37 and Gen 2:7, and in the passages, do you see any other spirit put in man, besides God's spirit? I don't. If you don't, then let me ask, what is this man's spirit that lives on after death?

So, if we have only one spirit in man and that spirit is God's spirit, I have to conclude that the only spirit in man is God's spirit. I see no other spirit, so I have to conclude that man is of the dust of the earth. We're told in Scripture that when man dies, the spirit returns to God who gave it and the body returns to the dust. We've seen from the above passages that the spirit is God's spirit, and it returns to Him. That only leaves the body. The soul has ceased to exist as it's two components, the body and God's spirit have separated. That only leaves the body. The body returns to the dust. All three are accounted for. So, my question is, what lives on?

Here's a link to the other thread. In that thread I've been discussing whether or not the spirit lives on after death. There's been a lot of discussion about the spirit. You may find it interesting.

 
Back
Top