Howard, your erratic postings show very little self-control. The fruit of the Spirit includes self-control. Shotgunning a million scriptures (many out of context) in a frantic manner is also an unwise manner to reprove, if you really feel called to reprove on this matter.
Also, implicating God in the evil of this world is a very wicked notion you need to repent of. I say this in love. God is light. In Him there is no darkness. His creation, however, has taken its freewill and done evil.
Let's consider the "civil authorities" scripture you pointed to. There isn't one scripture that suggests a person must seek out a civil authority to help them. Not one (the persistent widow is an analogy for how God will deliver much better than a person could) . Those scriptures are about obeying the laws of the civil authorities. God has blessed this nation with the ability to defend oneself. That is a mandated law from the civil authorities, no? It was established by God.
Granted, Satan wants to destroy all these blessings, and many people of this nation have wandered away from God and we are now beginning to reap the harvest of evil we have sown as a nation, but the 2nd Amendment still stands for a reason: Because God ordained it for our nation (one of the most blessed nations in the history of mankind).
There is no measure of change in God, or shadow due to variation. He does not change. In the Book of Exodus, Father God states that:
Exodus 22
2 If a thief is caught breaking in and is struck so that he dies, the defender is not guilty of bloodshed;
He continued:
Exodus 22
3 but if the sun has risen on him, there shall be bloodguilt for him.
Why would Father God suggest this? There are times when a threat to safety can be dealt with deadly force, and there are times when it would not be appropriate.
If you pull into your driveway, and a man is coming out of your home with your television under your arm, and you know your family is safe, you would not be justified in shooting him. On the other hand, if a man (or men) kicked in your back door at 3am, and there were vulnerable women and children the Lord has put in your charge to take care of, you would not only be justified in defending them, you would be obligated to protect them.
Consider this scripture:
1 Timothy 5
8 But if anyone does not provide for his relatives, and especially for members of his household, he has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever.
You see, Howard, you're taking your doctrine too far. You would be much like a man who says, "Forget feeding and clothing my family, I will spend every dime I have on spreading the gospel!" Meanwhile, when your family goes hungry and uncared for, you are actually accounted worse than an unbeliever in the eyes of the Lord.
Knowledge without wisdom is dangerous, Howard. If you presume yourself a teacher, know that you will be judged more strictly.
The doctrine of Christian pacifism only relates to persecution and suffering for His namesake. Wanton violence and random lawlessness are not to be met with apathy and helplessness. And realistically, Christians who own guns certainly don't "live" by their gun like criminals do.
In the end, we are called to be as wise as serpents and as innocent as doves. If this is a conviction for you, perhaps the Lord has a reason. But it's not doctrinally sound to insist all Christians should disarm.