The concept of church as providing a spiritual service to man in conducting weddings and funerals is not in the Bible. Neither is the concept of a worship service or communion service biblical. This kind of service thinking originated in the early to middle ages from Roman Catholicism, when church and state was not well divided, when popes, cardinals, bishops, and priests held great power over people's lives and society. People's gifts and callings were severely restricted and the division between laity and clergy appeared. Church became more about man's control rather than freedom in Spirit. The idea of going to a place to receive a spiritual benefit/service is from paganism and Judaism.
You know I've been in a number of buddhist, or hindu temples and there is little difference between a Christian church and buddhist temple in its organisation and structure. A priest or two up the front saying some special things or messages.. hard wooden pews or chairs for people to sit on.. people going there to receive a spiritual service.. and paying some money or donation at the door. And buddhist conduct funeral and wedding services too. But Jesus Christ instructed His followers to worship Him in spirit and in truth, not in any particular place. Protestantism never fully revoked the customs of Roman Catholicism. No where in scripture do we see the apostles or Jesus Himself conducting a wedding or funeral service.
The biblical role of pastor is to shepherd and nourish the sheep in their own relationship with Christ, not to hand feed them from the pulpit, or preach a sermon to make the hearers feel good about themselves. A pastor doesn't need a preaching platform or even a church for that, just lead by example in their own life, nourish others in the Word of God and pray with them. In the Bible the elders appointed by the apostles were the overseers of the church not the pastors. Acts 14:23 "Paul and Barnabas appointed elders for them in each church and, with prayer and fasting, committed them to the Lord, in whom they had put their trust." So when did the pastors overtake the running of the church and stop the function of elders, teachers, apostles, evangelists ?
There's nothing wrong with a bible college or seminary if it points towards a relationship with Christ and provides practical training in how to preach the gospel, how to get along with others etc, and doesn't just teach philosophy, paganism , buddhism or theology. I say paganism or buddhism because a Christian pastor in my local area denomination is also a member of a buddhist seminary...he preaches about Christ but not the Christ of the bible.. a universal cosmic new age Christ. And then there are some churches flying the rainbow coloured budhist flag.. and there is a gay and lesbian church not far from me where the pastor is a lesbian and God is called mother or father so as not to offend the homosexuals. lol. These pastors are all bible college or seminary trained, by the way

. But I am not generalizing here these are just some examples of why a pastoral degree or theological qualification can mean very little.
My church has no pastors and no wedding or funeral or baptism services and anyone can distribute bread and wine not specially trained priest or pastor, and it gets along just fine. Now in some denomination you need a 4 year theology degree before you can even dare to think about distributing bread and wine in church. And then if you spill the wine or drop the bread oh boy you're in big trouble God is going to strike you down for spilling some grape juice. Many are still bound by superstition and religion carried over from Catholicism. Even though God has gifted every member with certain gifts.. if the pastor did not show up for Sunday service in many churches I doubt that anyone would know what to do, they would just sit there and do nothing or get up and go home, or it would just degenerate into a social occasion. They probably couldn't have a service without the pastor, no one mature enough to take the lead and do something without the pastor's presence or approval.
But in my church when we come together we get right to it and start praying and worshipping God, no need to wait for a pastor to lead or tell us what to do. This is the difference between church as a place you go to provide you a spiritual service.. in this one you are waiting for the pastor or priest to give you some spiritual benefit or experience..waiting for someone to 'run the service'...and church as per the bible, where you meet with other Christians because you have a relationship with Christ and want to encourage each other in Christ. In the 'service style' model with clergy-laity separation, it is bondage .. this is the situation of spiritual Babylon with God's people in captivity... but in the biblical model of all brethren being equal and each member functioning , being overseen by group of elders.. is freedom and life in the Spirit... is God's people living in the New Jerusalem.
Now if you want to test this theory, next Sunday go to your pastor and tell him/her you have a message from God that you'd like to share for 15 minutes in the service after or before, or even instead of his sermon, and see if he lets you. If they do, great..things aren't so bad...but maybe a few in the congregation won't like it and tell you that only pastor should be giving messages from the front. If the pastor doesn't let you...or wishes to check or censor your message before you give it... my point is proven.. you have no freedom to do as the Spirit leads... it's Babylonian captivity. In my church, anyone and everyone can share in the meeting at any time, they can prophesy one by one.. and there's no pastor or priest to control the meeting,or to deliver a special sermon... the Holy Spirit is in control, not man. This is the difference.