By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!Hi Michael. I'll just give you my opinion.The phrase 'Eternal Death' is a fabrication of Babylon.
If the wages of sin was eternal death, Jesus has not yet paid the price for our sin.
Once you move beyond the simplicity of it, it gets complicated.
The phrase 'Eternal Death' is a fabrication of Babylon.
If the wages of sin was eternal death, Jesus has not yet paid the price for our sin.
Once you move beyond the simplicity of it, it gets complicated.
Perhaps some people have a different concept of the meaning of the phrase "eternal death". The reason being is that in the Bible the idea of "death" does not equal the cessation of existence. The first death is the separation of the spirit-man from the physical body (in Sheol or Hades in the Greek). The 2nd death is never ending separation from that spirit-man from the Presence of God (sin cannot remain in His presence). As Isaiah 59:2 points out, our sin separates us from God. If we therefore die in our sin without the redemption He has provided, then in the eternal realm (in which pour spirit-man continues to exist) we remain ever separated from God.
This has nothing to do with the atonement provided by Christ. His atoning sacrifice was for all who will (all who will may come) but alas ALL will not come but some reject God and all He would have provided. His sacrifice indeed does counter-act the eternal death because through it we are RECONCILED with God.
Yup, the wages of sin is death. Christians are dying like all other mortals, they better repent.
Time to start getting serious on what 'salvation' really is.
As is often the case on christian sites, there is much rationalizing and marginalizing, but little to zero scripture given.
Let's see you all rationalize Romans 11:36, I've got 100 more . . but will start here:
For from him and through him and for him are all things. To him be the glory forever! Amen.
Hi Michael, the verse you quote is merely a statement of fact, it doesn't need rationalising. An example of this is the tragedy of a man born blind, the reason he was born blind son is given as 'for God's Glory'.
Now as Jesus passed by, He saw a man who was blind from birth. And His disciples asked Him, saying, “Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?” Jesus answered, “Neither this man nor his parents sinned, but that the works of God should be revealed in him. John 9:1-3 NKJV
Yes, it's like Revelation 21:5 BEHOLD, I make ALL THINGS NEW.
Jesus would be banned here on talkjesus.com for sounding like or being a Universalist.
Maybe if He sounded like a Universalist He would, but then He wouldn't would He? He didn't sound like a Universalist first time, so why do you He's changed tack in the last 2000 years?
Jesus made many references to Heaven and Hell (Hades), judgement, belief and faith and unbelief, glory and places of darkness. You think He's had a rethink?
Some people have weird ideas about what a word means. Reconciliation for example. Some people think this means everything will work out perfectly for everyone.
But that isn't what this word means. For example if someone murders someone in your family. You might even be willing to forgive them, but even if you do... the state
probably won't. Jut because you forgave them doesn't make everything reconciled in the states opinion. They may have this person imprisoned for life, or even executed.
..then.. (and only then) the state will consider everything reconciled.
Many universalists think everything will be reconciled if God lets everyone into heaven. But the Bible clearly states everyone won't.
1Cor 15:28; is a core universalist verse. They like to say God will be "all in all".
1Cor 15:25; For He must reign until He has put all His enemies under His feet.
1Cor 15:26; The last enemy that will be abolished is death.
1Cor 15:27; For HE HAS PUT ALL THINGS IN SUBJECTION UNDER HIS FEET. But when He says, "All things are put in subjection," it is evident that He is excepted who put all things in subjection to Him.
1Cor 15:28; When all things are subjected to Him, then the Son Himself also will be subjected to the One who subjected all things to Him, so that God may be all in all.
However God doesn't become "all in all" until after Jesus abolishes His enemies. There is clearly an order of events here.
Some things will be wiped out, before everything is under subjection to God again.
Many false doctrines fail to take the true meaning of words into account, or they only take one definition of a word. Many times they take part of one verse out of context
and build a doctrine out of it. ( 1Cor 15:28; for example )
Some people have weird ideas about what a word means. Reconciliation for example. Some people think this means everything will work out perfectly for everyone.
But that isn't what this word means. For example if someone murders someone in your family. You might even be willing to forgive them, but even if you do... the state
probably won't. Jut because you forgave them doesn't make everything reconciled in the states opinion. They may have this person imprisoned for life, or even executed.
..then.. (and only then) the state will consider everything reconciled.
Many universalists think everything will be reconciled if God lets everyone into heaven. But the Bible clearly states everyone won't.
1Cor 15:28; is a core universalist verse. They like to say God will be "all in all".
1Cor 15:25; For He must reign until He has put all His enemies under His feet.
1Cor 15:26; The last enemy that will be abolished is death.
1Cor 15:27; For HE HAS PUT ALL THINGS IN SUBJECTION UNDER HIS FEET. But when He says, "All things are put in subjection," it is evident that He is excepted who put all things in subjection to Him.
1Cor 15:28; When all things are subjected to Him, then the Son Himself also will be subjected to the One who subjected all things to Him, so that God may be all in all.
However God doesn't become "all in all" until after Jesus abolishes His enemies. There is clearly an order of events here.
Some things will be wiped out, before everything is under subjection to God again.
Many false doctrines fail to take the true meaning of words into account, or they only take one definition of a word. Many times they take part of one verse out of context
and build a doctrine out of it. ( 1Cor 15:28; for example )
Clearly, you've not 'studied to shew yourself approved' . .especially combined with the spiritual interpretation.
Nothing new to me.
Damnationist's hate the phrase "ALL THINGS" in the Bible, like Acts 3:21 "The Restoration of ALL THINGS".
My interpretation of 'restoration of all things' in this context is the final undoing of the chaos brought about by sin, when there will be a new heaven and earth as described in Revelation 21.
At the risk of sounding like a damnationalist, the snippet you quoted goes on to say -
And it shall be that every soul who will not hear that Prophet (Jesus) shall be utterly destroyed from among the people.’ Acts 3:23 NKJV
23 And it shall come to pass, that every soul, which will not hear that prophet, shall be destroyed from among the people.
Hello @Michel BoryAlis,The phrase 'Eternal Death' is a fabrication of Babylon.
If the wages of sin was eternal death, Jesus has not yet paid the price for our sin.
Once you move beyond the simplicity of it, it gets complicated.
Michael BoryAlis said:
The phrase 'Eternal Death' is a fabrication of Babylon.
If the wages of sin was eternal death, Jesus has not yet paid the price for our sin.
Once you move beyond the simplicity of it, it gets complicated.
I have to conclude this is a sad statement you have made. Are you implying that The Second Death in Revelation is not a real one? Jesus has paid for ALL however not all accept the Gift. The statements of scripture are quite plain and this particular book comes with a reward for its study and condemnation nfor any altering. I take the warning as a fearful thing nre ot to be ignored or dismissed.