Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!
  • Welcome to Talk Jesus Christian Forums

    Celebrating 20 Years!

    A bible based, Jesus Christ centered community.

    Register Log In

The Beast

Could the prostitute be the Church?
Simply put, No, the prostitute is not the Church. Here's why: Read Rev 17:1-6. Read the first few verses for context then pay attention to verse 6. Verse 6 says the woman (prostitute) was drunk with the blood of the saints. The church is/are the saints, therefore the prostitute who is drunk on blood of the saints cannot possibly be the church.

The beast hates the church and it is in the process of being destroyed. It use to be pure, now it is filled with immoralities to please the world and what man wants
Yes, the beast hates the church, but as of yet, the beast is not on the scene. So don't panic about it. The church which began pure, has been corrupted from the beginning. Peter, Paul, and the rest fought tooth and nail against the heresies in their day. Heresies which continue today. Revelation Chapter 2 reveals the teaching of the Nicolaitans was intolerable in Jesus's message to Ephesus and Pergamum; The teaching of Baalam was equally abhorrent. Those messages are as relative to us today as they were to those churches 2000 years ago. Fear not though, the Holy Spirit has kept the message pure to us today if we but listen to Him. The immoralities only serve to winnow out the believers and they will continue unabated until Jesus returns. Just don't take part, keep yourself pure. Jesus will save you.

Could the beast be a Nation, a Super Power who will take over the earth and control the people.
Yes, but that's for another discussion.

IMHO,
just-a-servant
 
The woman in revelation 17 is JERUSALEM. She will be trodden under foot for 42 months by the beast and his army. This is the abomination that will make her desolate. Zechariah 14:1-9
The seven heads are seven kings out of Rome in John time when he wrote Revelation 5 had fallen one was, and when seven comes he will continue for a short time . Then number 8 he is of the seven or of Rome he is the Antichrist. He is the little horn in Daniel that came up amost the ten subdue 3 that left 7, plus the little horn that makes 8 . Then ten kings in revelation have power one hour with the beast and will hate the ***** and burn her cause God put it in their heart to fulfil his will. The the Lord will come fight against them which is the battle if Armageddon Revelation 16: 16-21, Zechariah 14:1-9
 
I would like to say what I was taught about this from the time I was a Jehovah's Witness, but I am concerned that I might portray it as my beliefs instead of an experience of my youth.
 
The woman in revelation 17 is JERUSALEM.
There's no evidence to suggest the prostitute IS Jerusalem, on the contrary, verse 18 of Chapter 17 (Rev 17:18) says clearly she is the great city which rules over the kings of the earth. Furthermore, in verse 5 of that same chapter, she is identified as "Babylon the Great, Mother of Prostitutes . . ."

She will be trodden under foot for 42 months by the beast and his army.
Yes, but this is from a different scripture specifically targeting Jerusalem and has no bearing on the woman in Rev 17

This is the abomination that will make her desolate. Zechariah 14:1-9
The seven heads are seven kings out of Rome in John time when he wrote Revelation 5 had fallen one was, and when seven comes he will continue for a short time .(Huh?) Then number 8 he is of the seven or of Rome he is the Antichrist.(Huh?) He is the little horn in Daniel that came up amost the ten subdue 3 that left 7, plus the little horn that makes 8 .(Huh?) Then ten kings in revelation have power one hour with the beast and will hate the ***** and burn her cause God put it in their heart to fulfil his will.(Huh?) The the Lord will come fight against them which is the battle if Armageddon Revelation 16: 16-21, Zechariah 14:1-9 (Huh?)

I have a hard time following your writing because you run your sentences together and fail to use punctuation to your advantage. This paragraph makes little sense because I can't decipher what it is you're trying to say - everything just runs together. Please edit it and I'll respond. I'm not saying this to be mean, I just can't make heads nor tails of what you're getting at.

IMHO
just-a-servant
 
just-a-servant, post: 249738, member: 21294"]There's no evidence to suggest the prostitute IS Jerusalem, on the contrary, verse 18 of Chapter 17 (Rev 17:18) says clearly she is the great city which rules over the kings of the earth. Furthermore, in verse 5 of that same chapter, she is identified as "Babylon the Great, Mother of Prostitutes . . ."


Yes, but this is from a different scripture specifically targeting Jerusalem and has no bearing on the woman in Rev 17
Sorry that its has been a while
You said there is no prove that the woman, in Revelations is Jerusalem, that she was called Babylon The Great, The mother of Harlots and Abomination the earth.
But its says MYSTERY, Babylon
So this is not the Babylon of before.
You also said this was the great city
But Jerusalem as always been a great city in scripture
Revelation 10:8 says And their dead bodies shall lie in the street
of ( the great city ) which spiritually is called Sodom and
Egypt, where also our Lord was
crucified.
Do you know where the Lord was
crucified ? ( Jerusalem )
Here in verse 8 it is called the
great city

Galatians 4:22-27
If you read these verse's close ,
you will see that Jerusalem, that
now is is the bond woman, which

is the mother of the children of the
flesh.
But JERUSALEM which is above (
the new Jerusalem the free
woman) its the mother of us all.
That are of the spirit.

Revelation 17:6
The woman was drunken , with the
blood if the saints
Matthew 23:37-39
O Jerusalem, Jerusalem , thou that
killest the prophets
Luke 13:34-35
Matthew 21:33-41
Matthew 24:15-19
Why are they warned to flee
Judae?
If you knew what the abomination of desolation, was then you could see it has everything to do with
Jerusalem.
The AC set's abomination up
there, he will take the city trod it underfoot ,' 3 1/2 years with his army.
See this is what Zechariah 14:2
Is talking about, the AC taking over
Jerusalem
The verse 3 is when the Lord returns to fight the AC and his army
In verse 2 the Lord said he would, gather all nations against Jerusalem, that he would, so people wander how will the Lord, do this, and why.
Revelation 17:16-18
See God will put it in their heart, of the ten kings, that serve the beast
To destroy her
This how he draws all nations against Jerusalem, in Zechariah

See Jerusalem has had more people, die , fight , and war over, then any city from the beginning of the world. The city that represent the nation of Israel of the flesh.
Not the Israel of God, of the Spirit, cause we are the children of the free woman, which is Jerusalem above.



 
That's a good point, I am hoping to get into more about that when I get to Rev 17 and Daniel. Sometimes it's semantics.
For example, Adolph Hitler might be the of the eight beasts ( Rev 17:11; ) so I guess the question would be, was Nazi Germany the beast, or was
Adolph Hitler the beast? Would there have been a Nazi Germany without Adolph Hitler?
The beast is satin he comes in peacefully and prosperously... He isn't gonna be someone like Hitler.. It is written the whole world will be deceived except those written in the lambs book of life .. He will be pretending to be Jesus.. he was created full of beauty.. He will look like people expect Jesus to look .. He looks like the lamb but has the voice of the dragon... if he comes in killing everybody. I don't think that would deceive to many people.. He was made wiser than Daniel.. He is not an idiot... every one will know when that time comes.. He will try to get as many people as he can to worship him because he knows he has but a short time.. Think about mark 13.. Matt 24.. Luke 21.. parents will betray sons and daughters to death... brother will betray brother to death and so on... Why would a patent betray there own children to death.. Death is satin .. Christ came to this earth to die on the cross to defeat death which is to say the devil.. Now if satin deceives a parentand they think it is Christ but their children know it is Satan.. The parent is going to anything they can to save there child.. They will try to get you to worship Him.. but that's how I think God's elect will be delivered up before Satan for a testimony.. but it won't be you speaking it will be the Holy Spirit.. like on Pentecost day when the disciples spoke in tongues.. it came out in every language of the world.. then the people that were deceived are going to realize they have been worshiping satin .. that is why Christians are praying for mountains to fall on them when Christ returns... They are to ashamed to meet Christ.. Sad.. .... Just my point of view!!! Let me know what you think ... God bless!!!!
 
Brother I would like to explain the beast to you. If you would like I can explain Daniel's prophecy in King Nebuchadnezzar's dream, but that is very lengthy.

What I will tell you is that the beast is centered in Rome. The parts of the statue actually represent 4 kingdoms, which are directly parallel will the bear, the leopard, and the beast.

Let us take a look at Revelation 17, The Great Prostitute.

2 With whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication, and the inhabitants of the earth have been made drunk with the wine of her fornication.

4 And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication:

5 And upon her forehead was a name written, Mystery, Babylon The Great, The Mother Of Harlots And Abominations Of The Earth.

6 And I saw the woman drunken with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus: and when I saw her, I wondered with great admiration.

7 And the angel said unto me, Wherefore didst thou marvel? I will tell thee the mystery of the woman, and of the beast that carrieth her, which hath the seven heads and ten horns.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Actually brothers, this "woman" is the same as the beast. Daniels prophecy actually leads into Revelation 17. The woman, as it appears, is not actually a physical woman.

In the Bible, woman, commonly means, church.

Lets take a look at the prostitute, who is an impure woman.
Impure = False
Woman = Church

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Actually there is one church that is adorned in gold, silver, jewels, their colors are scarlet and purple, and the head of it wields a golden goblet filled with abominations.. Every king (or president) has at some time come to shake hands with this figure. Thus committing adultery (against God).

Can you guess who this church is?

I agree .. without Danial and some help from Hosea revelation is impossible to understand. Danial establishes the meanings of prophetic words used throughout revelation. Hosea touches on prophetic time a day a week ect.... To study revelation Danial is the place to start. The quote is a no brain er but for the sake of not dividing the fellowship ......... lets leave it be
 
The beast is satin he comes in peacefully and prosperously... He isn't gonna be someone like Hitler.. It is written the whole world will be deceived except those written in the lambs book of life .. He will be pretending to be Jesus.. he was created full of beauty.. He will look like people expect Jesus to look .. He looks like the lamb but has the voice of the dragon... if he comes in killing everybody. I don't think that would deceive to many people..

Do you think the word really wants Jesus? Or do they want someone who promises them riches, prosperity, and to let the do whatever they want?
The killing won't be at the beginning,it will come later once he has the authority.
 
greetings;
there is not a "house made with hands" that is made, that was not born out of the Great ***** (Prostitute).
 
just-a-servant, post: 249738, member: 21294"]There's no evidence to suggest the prostitute IS Jerusalem, on the contrary, verse 18 of Chapter 17 (Rev 17:18) says clearly she is the great city which rules over the kings of the earth. Furthermore, in verse 5 of that same chapter, she is identified as "Babylon the Great, Mother of Prostitutes . . ."
Yes, but this is from a different scripture specifically targeting Jerusalem and has no bearing on the woman in Rev 17

You said there is no prove that the woman, in Revelations is Jerusalem, that she was called Babylon The Great, The mother of Harlots and Abomination the earth.
You're mixing things up. Let me be clear about what you said and what I said:
Your comment was:
The woman in revelation 17 is JERUSALEM.
My comment was: There's no evidence to suggest the prostitute IS Jerusalem.
I went on to cite Rev 17:18 where the woman you emphatically referenced as being Jerusalem clearly was not. She IS identified as the great city which rules over the kings of the earth. Note: NO MENTION OF JERUSALEM Later in the same context in the same chapter of Revelation, at verse 5, she is identified as "Babylon the Great, Mother of Prostitutes . . ." Those are not my words and note again, NO MENTION OF JERUSALEM.


But its says MYSTERY, Babylon
So this is not the Babylon of before.
This logic totally escapes me. You will have to explain how you arrive at this conclusion. I do agree this is not the former Babylon, but for reasons which are not explained here.

You also said this was the great city (Again, not my words.)
But Jerusalem as always been a great city in scripture
Jerusalem has been a great city in the eyes of Israel but not necessarily in the world. There is a significant difference. Add to that she is not a great city which rules over the kings of the earth and your identity of the woman becomes problematic. Contrast the significance of Jerusalem to Damascus under the Assyrians, Babylon of Babylonia, Rome of the Romans, Athens of Greece, or say Washington, DC of the US. Did Jerusalem ever rule over the kings of the earth in the manner of any of those cities?

Revelation (11)10:8 says And their dead bodies shall lie in the street of ( the great city ) which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was crucified. Do you know where the Lord was crucified ? ( Jerusalem ) Here in verse 8 it is called the great city
Here the reference is clearly Jerusalem, but it is entirely a different context. One cannot be compared to the other. For example: Suppose I told you the weather report was for nothing but blue sky today. In another conversation a few days later I told you I bought a business - inventory and a lot of blue sky. Would the words "blue sky" have the same meaning? The answer is clearly "no" because of the context of the conversation. In the same way the words "great city" have unequal meaning in these two passages.

As near as I can tell, the rest of these references are to show that Jerusalem is mentioned many times in scripture; there's no argument from me that that is true. I fail to see what impact that has on the identity of the woman in Rev 17.

Galatians 4:22-27 If you read these verse's close , you will see that Jerusalem, that now is is the bond woman, which is the mother of the children of the flesh. But JERUSALEM which is above (the new Jerusalem the free woman) its the mother of us all. That are of the spirit.
Revelation 17:6 The woman was drunken, with the blood if the saints
Matthew 23:37-39 O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets
Luke 13:34-35
Matthew 21:33-41

Matthew 24:15-19 Why are they warned to flee Judae? If you knew what the abomination of desolation, was then you could see it has everything to do with Jerusalem.
The AC set's abomination up there, he will take the city trod it underfoot ,' 3 1/2 years with his army.
See this is what Zechariah 14:2 Is talking about, the AC taking over Jerusalem
The verse 3 is when the Lord returns to fight the AC and his army In verse 2 the Lord said he would, gather all nations against Jerusalem, that he would, so people wander how will the Lord, do this, and why.
Revelation 17:16-18 See God will put it in their heart, of the ten kings, that serve the beast To destroy her
This how he draws all nations against Jerusalem, in Zechariah

See Jerusalem has had more people, die , fight , and war over, then any city from the beginning of the world. The city that represent the nation of Israel of the flesh.
Not the Israel of God, of the Spirit, cause we are the children of the free woman, which is Jerusalem above.

Truth be told, I can't make heads nor tails about what you're saying here. I know about each of your points but am mystified by how you get from point A to point B and can't draw any conclusions as to their meaning.

IMHO
just-a-servant
 
Just-a-servant its all about what will happen to Jerusalem before the Lord returns
Zechariah 14:2
Its why Jesus warns Jerusalem, their house is left desolate.
Matthew 23:37-38
Its about the abomination of
desolation, why they should flee
Judea to the mountains
Matthew 24:15-19
Its about knowing when the
Antichrist , surrounds Jerusalem
what will take place by him , and
his army.
Luke21:20-24
Its about knowing the time the
Antichrist, takes over Jerusalem,
he will trodden her under foot, for
31/2 years.
This is why Jesus warns them to
flee , when they see the
abomination of desolation,
spoken of by Daniel.
Cause like in Zechariah 14:2 God
said he would gather all nations
against Jerusalem
Also in Revelation 17:16-17
These kings who shall help the Antichrist destroy Jerusalem, then the Lord shall come , and fight against then , and the beast
Revelation 17:14

Its OK you can't make heads or tails, but would you at least study these scriptures. And ask why flee Jerusalem.
Where will the Antichrist try to establish his kingdom?
 
Just-a-servant its all about what will happen to Jerusalem before the Lord returns Zechariah 14:2
Its why Jesus warns Jerusalem, their house is left desolate. Matthew 23:37-38
Its about the abomination of desolation, why they should flee Judea to the mountains Matthew 24:15-19
Its about knowing when the Antichrist , surrounds Jerusalem what will take place by him , and his army. Luke 21:20-24
Its about knowing the time the Antichrist, takes over Jerusalem, he will trodden her under foot, for 31/2 years.
This is why Jesus warns them to flee , when they see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel.
Cause like in Zechariah 14:2 God said he would gather all nations against Jerusalem Also in Revelation 17:16-17
These kings who shall help the Antichrist destroy Jerusalem, then the Lord shall come , and fight against then , and the beast Revelation 17:14

Its OK you can't make heads or tails, but would you at least study these scriptures. And ask why flee Jerusalem.
Where will the Antichrist try to establish his kingdom?

Okay, I think I see what you're getting to and it appears to be more of a question rather than a statement. One of the problems of end times prophecy is having too much information on seemingly similar subjects then combining that info trying to reach a conclusion that doesn't lead to confusion and error. I'll say this here knowing it will raise the hackles of many: The pre-trib rapturists and others are guilty of this very phenomena. By saying that I'm not trying to be controversial, just speaking the truth.

Now to your post: The comment made by you which caused this conversation was that the woman in Rev 17 was Jerusalem. I think I have shown this is an errant belief in my previous comments to this thread. What I believe to be "MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH" is none other (in my opinion) than New York City and not Jerusalem. Why I believe that is the topic of another thread and comes from my own research, lest anyone say I believe it because someone else says so, i.e., I'm a follower of ______ (fill in the blank).

What you are talking about in your scripture references is the actual city of Jerusalem and more importantly, what will happen to Jerusalem before the Lord returns. Zechariah 14:2 speaks clearly about the events leading up to the return of the Lord but understand this: the events don't happen in one day, they happen over a period of time. How much time will elapse is anyone's guess. The 42 month period is a good candidate, but it takes time to rape, pillage and exile the people. One thing is certain, when the Lord returns it will not take long to make things new again.
In Matthew 23:37-38, the reason the "house" of Jerusalem was left desolate was because He (Jesus) was to be crucified and gone from them. This has already occurred.
Matthew 24:15-19 talks about the "abomination that causes desolation" and what residents of JUDEA (not just Jerusalem) should do when they see it. It has little to do with Jerusalem specifically other than the place where the abomination would be seen (the Temple). This is an event specific to the last days. It is interesting to note that this clue is placed in the scriptures for ALL to see and heed - the Jews in Judea and as a flag of bad things to come for all of us Christians who are there to see it.
Luke 21:20-24 combines the events mentioned in the previous scriptures. This sack of Jerusalem takes a period of time and won't happen overnight.

Your references in Rev 17 about the ten kings lending their power to the AC to destroy Jerusalem are predicated on the identity of the prostitute being Jerusalem. The true identity of this Rev 17 city must contain the description: "great city that rules over the kings of the earth." Jerusalem does not have that descriptor (whereas it can be said New York does).

In summary, your references are about different things. While similar in some aspects, the context of each concerns dissimilar subjects. Don't be confused by attempting to combine them into a logical scenario. These pieces don't fit together unless you hit them with a hammer. I believe the pieces of the puzzle will slide together with great ease as they are revealed to us.

IMHO,
just-a-servant
 
Can you give me some scripture, to why you believe this?
Thanks
Here goes . . .

First a couple of housekeeping items: For the most part, I’ve used the King James Version of the bible when quoting scripture. I do this because most reference materials such as Strong’s Concordance use the KJV as the basis for their word studies, definitions, and commentaries. I’m not one of those who demand that the KJV is the only real version in fact, I usually read the NIV for understanding. Next, I want any reader to know that the subject matter I’m writing about is my work and my opinion. I’ve not relied on any other teacher’s work (other than reference materials) to form the basis of my conclusion. Keep in mind it is an opinion and is not offered as an absolute solution to the mystery of the scripture. It is open for discussion, review, and revision as appropriate.

Why I believe New York City is the Woman of Revelation 17 & 18

Let’s begin with the relevant scripture:

Rev 17:5 “And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.” (KJV)

Certainly this is not a scripture you can draw any real conclusion from on its own. These words are descriptive in nature and taken as a whole, are but adjectives describing the woman. These words give the woman a name and in this name are clues as to her identity. The fact the name is written on her forehead tells me it is out front – almost glaring at you. Her identity should be obvious to anyone and everyone. You shouldn’t have to look for who she is because it is “written all over her face,” so to speak.

The word “MYSTERY” tells me her identity would be shrouded until the proper time where it would become obvious who she is. At the time this was written, would John have known what that great city of Rev 17:18 was? John would have been intimately familiar with Jerusalem and would have recognized it immediately, yet he did not identify it. He was told to write what he saw. Since he did not identify Jerusalem, doesn’t it stand to reason he saw something else?

“BABYLON THE GREAT” is a metaphor drawing on the grand and negative image of Babylon in ancient times and coupling it with a new and imposing image of a revived Babylon. Notice I didn’t say it was a revived physical Babylon. Babylon of ancient times lies in rubble – destroyed by God never to be rebuilt. (That’s not to say efforts to rebuild it aren’t being made, however all efforts have been thwarted.) This is the “who” she is.

“THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH” tells us she will sleep with whoever pays the highest price (greatest harlot) and the result of her alliances is evil of the greatest proportions (abominations). The word “MOTHER” doesn’t necessarily mean she is the matriarch of the abominations, it could mean she is the source of the biggest and worst abominations. For example, Saddam Hussein proclaimed before the first Gulf War that the invasion would produce the “mother” of all battles and I believe the word used here is similar in meaning. This is the “what” she is.

At this time it is necessary to bring other scriptures into the discussion. I’m not one who just makes a list of them; I believe if you use a scripture, you should explain why it’s important and relevant to the topic. First I will bring in Rev 17:1-4

17 And there came one of the seven angels which had the seven vials, and talked with me, saying unto me, Come hither; I will shew unto thee the judgment of the great ***** that sitteth upon many waters:
2 With whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication, and the inhabitants of the earth have been made drunk with the wine of her fornication.
3 So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns.
4 And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication:

The first two verses set the stage for the rest of the chapter. They are a statement of what John will be seeing and what the outcome will be. The next two verses (3 & 4) give John a visual of the woman, her surroundings, and the condition she finds herself in. They too, help to set up the dialog in the remainder of Rev 17. Verse 1 introduces the fact there will be a judgment of the great ***** (the HARLOT) of v. 5. This ***** is the same “woman” found in the rest of chapter 17 and who is finally identified in v. 18. Verse 2 indicates why there will be a judgment – fornication. The word fornication which is used here is not necessarily illicit sexual relations, rather it is used metaphorically as worshipping idols, which the Lord abhors. (See Strong’s G4202 “porneia” and Thayer’s Greek Lexicon for these citations). There are many word pictures in these four verses and instead of dissecting them now, I will address them as we go on. Next, Rev 17:6-7

6 And I saw the woman drunken with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus: and when I saw her, I wondered with great admiration.
7 And the angel said unto me, Wherefore didst thou marvel? I will tell thee the mystery of the woman, and of the beast that carrieth her, which hath the seven heads and ten horns.

Notice in v.6 the woman is drunk (meaning she has had a lot to drink) with the blood of the saints and the martyrs of Jesus. This statement indicates a contemporary identity for Babylon the Great and not a reference to ancient Babylon because the people who are martyrs of Jesus would absolutely be persons killed after his death and resurrection and the destruction of Babylon. The statement that he wondered in great admiration may indicate that what he saw was different than anything he was familiar with. I submit that most any major modern city would cause that wonderment to any 1st century person. Again, John would have been familiar with Jerusalem and there are many portions of the city which he would recognize even today. The angel promises to explain the mystery John sees and begins to do so in the next verses: (I omit v. 8 because it does not reference the woman)

9 And here is the mind which hath wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman sitteth.

This passage is one many scholars use to claim Rome is the city identified as the Harlot discussed here. This claim centers on the presence of 7 hills and the city of Rome being referred to as the City of Seven Hills. While true the city is referred to in that manner what is also true is there are at least three other hills not counted among the seven. The seven counted are: Aventine, Caelian, Capitoline, Esquiline, Palatine, Quirinal, and Viminal. The three not mentioned are: Vatican, Pincian, and Janiculum. Seems rather convenient these are not part of the scholarly debate. I counted no fewer than 70 modern cities who claim they are also built on seven hills (Wikipedia). Among them is Jerusalem with this disclaimer: “This important religious center is situated on seven hills, but considering the various changes of the landscape over the centuries, it has not been possible to locate the hills on which the city rests.” Yonkers, New York also makes the list. It is just up the Hudson river from Manhattan. In my view, all of these claims of the “seven hills” are confusion foisted on us to obscure the true identity of the city which the woman is.

The word rendered “mountains” in the KJV is the Greek word “oros.” In the scriptures it is rendered as “mountain” 41 times, “mount” 21 times, and “hill” only three times. In the three times it is rendered “hill” none of the references are in Revelation. Because of this, I am lead to believe the word rendered “mountain” cannot be identified as a geographic location having seven hills. What I believe is the word “mountain” is more likely a description of a ruler – a ruler who is very large or has enormous power, wealth, and influence.

Using definitions of the words mountain (Greek, oros): resembling or suggesting a mountain, as in size, and head (Greek, kephale): metaphorically anything supreme, chief, prominent, (ruler), one can compare the scripture as written to determine its possible meaning:

The scripture as written: “. . . seven heads are seven mountains . . .”
Written as an equation: seven heads = seven mountains
Substitute “rulers” for heads
Substitute “a mountain, as in size” for mountains
Result: Seven rulers = seven mountains, as in size​

Now if you consider mountains only as upward thrusts of the earth’s crust then the equation cannot be true. Geography does not equal a ruler, but if you consider the mountain to be a large government or kingdom, then the equation works.

The remainder of the verse can also be reconciled to this because the woman is sitting on or controlling the seven heads (rulers) or the seven ruling mountains (governments) as defined in v. 18 (“The woman is. . . that great city, which reigneth over the Kings of the earth.”) Does Rome reign over anything other than Catholicism at this time in history? Does it have the capacity or inclination to do so? Is it a city on many waters (people)? I submit there are other candidates for this city. (I omit vs. 10-14 because they have no mention of the woman.)

15 And he saith unto me, The waters which thou sawest, where the ***** sitteth, are peoples, and multitudes, and nations, and tongues.

The definition of the waters here is relevant to my hypothesis because the woman/city/***** sits on or controls many people, in fact multitudes of them from every nation and who speak every kind of language. This is not a small undertaking and doesn’t have to be in any specific venue. By that I mean the control can be governmental (as in one world government, though unlikely), religious control (as in one world religion), or economic control (as is most easily obtained and most likely). In fact there are only a handful of cities who can claim economic domination or control over any large segment of the world’s population. Other scriptures which I will present point to the economic aspect of this cities control.

16 And the ten horns which thou sawest upon the beast, these shall hate the *****, and shall make her desolate and naked, and shall eat her flesh, and burn her with fire.
17 For God hath put in their hearts to fulfil his will, and to agree, and give their kingdom unto the beast, until the words of God shall be fulfilled.

I think these verses are summed up by saying the ten kings represented by the ten horns don’t care too much for the city which has its thumb on their kingdoms. Since they don’t like the city (woman) they conspire to give all their power (economic and/or military) to the beast in order to destroy her. This confederation is successful until Christ’s return. This doesn’t happen overnight – it takes a while to get it done as evidenced by other scriptures I will recite shortly.

18 And the woman which thou sawest is that great city, which reigneth over the kings of the earth.

The only comment I will make on this verse is on the word “that.” It’s interesting to note the word is not “the.” Why is this significant? Because if it was written “the great city” it would be describing a city of the day, i.e. Jerusalem, Rome, Corinth, etc., but because it says “that great city,” it can be describing a city yet in the future and unknown to the people of the day. Basically it gives a future tense to the verse.

Now that I’ve postulated neither Jerusalem nor Rome is that great city mentioned in verse 18, I ask you to read all of chapter 18 and substitute “New York City” for the word “Babylon.” As you read, think of what the words are saying and ask yourself if the description accurately portrays the state of or condition in New York City. (I’m not re-writing scripture here, the allegory used by John requires you to substitute a city name in the passage. I’m just suggesting which city name to use.) If when you’re done, you think another city name should be read in there, feel free to do so, but when you’ve finished, if it doesn’t fit, it isn’t right. I believe NYC will fit in all aspects.

Chap 18
1 And after these things I saw another angel come down from heaven, having great power; and the earth was lightened with his glory.
2 And he cried mightily with a strong voice, saying, Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird.
3 For all nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication, and the kings of the earth have committed fornication with her, and the merchants of the earth are waxed rich through the abundance of her delicacies. (Describes NYC pretty good)
4 And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.
5 For her sins have reached unto heaven, and God hath remembered her iniquities.
6 Reward her even as she rewarded you, and double unto her double according to her works: in the cup which she hath filled fill to her double.

7 How much she hath glorified herself, and lived deliciously, so much torment and sorrow give her: for she saith in her heart, I sit a queen, and am no widow, and shall see no sorrow. (Describes NYC pretty good)
8 Therefore shall her plagues come in one day, death, and mourning, and famine; and she shall be utterly burned with fire: for strong is the Lord God who judgeth her. (Nuclear bomb?)
9 And the kings of the earth, who have committed fornication and lived deliciously with her, shall bewail her, and lament for her, when they shall see the smoke of her burning,
10 Standing afar off for the fear of her torment, saying, Alas, alas that great city Babylon, that mighty city! for in one hour is thy judgment come. (For fear of radiation?)
11 And the merchants of the earth shall weep and mourn over her; for no man buyeth their merchandise any more:
12 The merchandise of gold, and silver, and precious stones, and of pearls, and fine linen, and purple, and silk, and scarlet, and all thyine wood, and all manner vessels of ivory, and all manner vessels of most precious wood, and of brass, and iron, and marble,
13 And cinnamon, and odours, and ointments, and frankincense, and wine, and oil, and fine flour, and wheat, and beasts, and sheep, and horses, and chariots, and slaves, and souls of men.
14 And the fruits that thy soul lusted after are departed from thee, and all things which were dainty and goodly are departed from thee, and thou shalt find them no more at all.
15 The merchants of these things, which were made rich by her, shall stand afar off for the fear of her torment, weeping and wailing,

16 And saying, Alas, alas that great city, that was clothed in fine linen, and purple, and scarlet, and decked with gold, and precious stones, and pearls! (Same as the woman in Rev 17:4)
17 For in one hour so great riches is come to nought. And every shipmaster, and all the company in ships, and sailors, and as many as trade by sea, stood afar off,
18 And cried when they saw the smoke of her burning, saying, What city is like unto this great city!
19 And they cast dust on their heads, and cried, weeping and wailing, saying, Alas, alas that great city, wherein were made rich all that had ships in the sea by reason of her costliness! for in one hour is she made desolate.
20 Rejoice over her, thou heaven, and ye holy apostles and prophets; for God hath avenged you on her.
21 And a mighty angel took up a stone like a great millstone, and cast it into the sea, saying, Thus with violence shall that great city Babylon be thrown down, and shall be found no more at all.
22 And the voice of harpers, and musicians, and of pipers, and trumpeters, shall be heard no more at all in thee; and no craftsman, of whatsoever craft he be, shall be found any more in thee; and the sound of a millstone shall be heard no more at all in thee;
23 And the light of a candle shall shine no more at all in thee; and the voice of the bridegroom and of the bride shall be heard no more at all in thee: for thy merchants were the great men of the earth; for by thy sorceries were all nations deceived.

24 And in her was found the blood of prophets, and of saints, and of all that were slain upon the earth.​

I didn’t make too many comments in the body of this scripture because I wanted you to come to your own conclusion. It makes sense that the merchants of the sea stand off and watch her burn, she is visible from the ocean (Rome and Jerusalem are not). She trades with everyone in the world daily and has made many rich because of her excess and her size. They would bewail her demise. What city is or has been like her? Even in America, where other cities are similar, NYC stands out as the number one, who is like her? What decadence has she been responsible for? What fornications? Even the greatest assembly of the world’s ambassadors (UN) are quartered here. Neither Rome nor Jerusalem could make these boasts. When the economy of the world goes up or down, who is in control of it? London? Tokyo? Hong Kong? No, New York City!

What about the many waters – the peoples, and multitudes, and nations, and tongues. Isn’t NYC considered the melting pot of all nations? She sitteth on many waters! Go up and down the list; up and down the scripture; find a single adjective or noun that doesn’t describe NYC – then draw your own conclusion.


IMHO
just-a-servant
 
Hello servant.

I was surprised by your comment which I have quoted below.

"MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH" is none other (in my opinion) than New York City and not Jerusalem.

The phrase 'mother of harlots' means what it says, the harlot is the Catholic Church, the mother of so many churches
or offspring, which do not have a relationship with Jesus Christ. A harlot is not obedient to any one husband and the
Catholic Church which for a considerable time ruled over the kings of the earth, has never really been obedient to Jesus.

The Vatican is located in Rome and this city sits on seven hills, what more needs to be said?
 
My comment was: There's no evidence to suggest the prostitute IS Jerusalem.
I went on to cite Rev 17:18 where the woman you emphatically referenced as being Jerusalem clearly was not. She IS identified as the great city which rules over the kings of the earth. Note: NO MENTION OF JERUSALEM Later in the same context in the same chapter of Revelation, at verse 5, she is identified as "Babylon the Great, Mother of Prostitutes . . ." Those are not my words and note again, NO MENTION OF JERUSALEM.



OK just-a-servant you had said this in another post, no mention of Jerusalem.
With that being said , in you post about New York City, being the harolet.
No disrespect, but not one verse you posted, mention New York City.
But you seem fine it OK, to add ,
that phrase to the scripture
But like you said Jerusalem isn't mention either.
Because its a MYSTERY, that's why she is called MYSTERY Babylon
But this I will say, scripture interpretes scripture, so any mystery in scripture, has the answer in scripture.
Now we can say that great city is , what ever city, we want to, but its not our understanding, but Gods
So what city is great in Gods eyes, New York I don't think so,
Was the blood of the prophets , found in her? Revelation 18:24
Or could in be in scripture Matthew 23:33-38
 
You know what else I find amazing
That Jerusalem has a earthquake right when the Lord returns
Revelation 11:13
Zechariah 14:4-5
And Babylon does to Revelation16:18-20
 
Hello servant.
I was surprised by your comment which I have quoted below.
The phrase 'mother of harlots' means what it says, the harlot is the Catholic Church, the mother of so many churches
or offspring, which do not have a relationship with Jesus Christ. A harlot is not obedient to any one husband and the
Catholic Church which for a considerable time ruled over the kings of the earth, has never really been obedient to Jesus.
The Vatican is located in Rome and this city sits on seven hills, what more needs to be said?

DHC,
I'm not surprised you were surprised; what I said is not the conventional wisdom. As you've said, you equate the harlot as being the Catholic Church but there is no direct evidence to prove that hypothesis - it's just what is and what has been taught. That doesn't make it correct. Further, the harlot of Rev 17 is not a religious group nor a political division of any continent. Very clearly in Rev 17:18 it states the woman (harlot) is a CITY. If indeed it is a city, then it cannot be the Catholic Church. In a previous post to this thread, I showed evidence (not proof mind you) that the seven hills on which the woman sits could be seven rulers whom she has great or total influence over (Rev 17:9) instead of the more popular interpretation you've proffered.

To your statement about the Vatican being located in Rome, a city which sits on seven hills, I would submit to you Rome actually sits on ten hills. The original seven hills lie east of the Vatican across the Tiber river. The Vatican and the Catholic Church DO NOT sit on seven hills. The remainder of your response does not apply to this scripture.

IMHO,
just-a-servant
 
OK just-a-servant you had said this in another post, no mention of Jerusalem.
With that being said , in you post about New York City, being the harolet.
No disrespect, but not one verse you posted, mention New York City.
But you seem fine it OK, to add ,
that phrase to the scripture
But like you said Jerusalem isn't mention either.
Because its a MYSTERY, that's why she is called MYSTERY Babylon
But this I will say, scripture interpretes scripture, so any mystery in scripture, has the answer in scripture.
Now we can say that great city is , what ever city, we want to, but its not our understanding, but Gods
So what city is great in Gods eyes, New York I don't think so,
Was the blood of the prophets , found in her? Revelation 18:24
Or could in be in scripture Matthew 23:33-38
norapture,
You're quite right, I said there was no mention of Jerusalem in the 17th & 18th Chapters of Revelation and I also said there was no mention of New York City as well. What I did say was there was a very good description of New York City in Rev 18 which I wanted you to compare to what you knew. My position in this debate is that I believe it is correct to make the connection between the scripture and the description written for us. In the absence of any definitive evidence, we can and should look at the alternatives to the traditional teaching as new and more detailed evidence becomes available. 500 years ago New York City didn't exist, therefore scholars would not have been able to point to it's possibility of being the Harlot of Babylon. 100 years ago, computers didn't exist. Scholars could not imagine how the AC would be able to control buying and selling with just a mark (666). I could go on, but I hope you see my point.
The next issue you need to look at is your reading of the scripture. In Revelation 17:5 it says: "And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH." Notice the comma between the word "Mystery" and "Babylon." While this may seem insignificant, it does mean the the word "Mystery" is not connected to the phrase "Babylon the Great." Therefore the phrase "MYSTERY Babylon" as you've used above is incorrect. These words are not used together, they are separate. It is a MYSTERY; one that God has not revealed completely yet. Who Babylon the Great is is the mystery. What she is is the Mother of Harlots and abominations.
Now knowing that - that she is the Mother of Harlots and Abominations (or Jerusalem as you think) - is there any reason why God would have chosen her as being the place of his abode, the place where He would choose to have His Temple built? The place he would describe as "having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication." Likely not, in my opinion.
Re your comment on Rev18:24 concerning the blood of the prophets: The description is of a city who is metaphorically called Babylon the Great. In this description there is a passage declaring the blood of the prophets is found in her. Does that description limit the identity to ONLY Jerusalem or are there other cities who have the blood of the prophets on their hands? I remember the scripture you reference in Matthew 23:33-38 to be a condemnation on the current generation whom Jesus was talking to and one which was fulfilled in A.D. 70 when Titus destroyed Jerusalem. Taking the scripture out of context is dangerous.

IMHO,
just-a-servant
 
Back
Top