Says who?
All you are doing right now is parroting the claims of Paul. Peter, however, felt otherwise:
And the apostles and elders came together for to consider of this matter. And when there had been much disputing, Peter rose up, and said unto them, Men and brethren, ye know how that a good while ago God made choice among us, that the Gentiles by my mouth should hear the word of the gospel, and believe.
- Acts 15:6, 7 KJV
Peter said this in public at the church council, and NOBODY disagreed.
Paul made a number of claims that should concern anyone who deeply seeks.
The initial accounts of Paul meeting an angel of light calling itself Jesus say absolutely nothing about any Mission to the Gentiles.
The
FIRST mention of this is to Ananias:
But the Lord said unto him, Go thy way: for he is a chosen vessel unto me, to bear my name before the Gentiles, and kings, and the children of Israel:
- Acts 9:15 KJV
Why do people forget this second part? And then why did Paul REJECT this part?
Then Paul and Barnabas waxed bold, and said, It was necessary that the word of God should first have been spoken to you: but seeing ye put it from you, and judge yourselves unworthy of everlasting life, lo, we turn to the Gentiles.
- Acts 13:46 KJV
This was Paul's own decision. The text does not say, "lo, the Lord has directed us to turn to the Gentiles." And if Paul was designated as this Apostle to the Gentiles at the start, why did Paul not obey that but evangelized in the Synagogues instead? Paul just got offended that not enough Jews were listening to his message (and rightly so for reasons that we can't get into at the moment), a message that was quite acceptable to the Pagan.
Which Judaism? According to Josephus there were four distinct branches of Judaism that did not agree with one another. Indeed the Pharisees and Sadducees had been assassinating one another over the previous 150 years. One might better say that Paul was attempting to destroy the Messianic Jesus Movement one death at a time when the Damascus event in the desert happened.
But the motives behind Paul's decisions as his ministry progressed and evolved over time are not as simplistic as one's Sunday School teacher would have you believe.
There are no "Two Gospels." There was not a gospel for Jews and a gospel for Gentiles. This is a rather new fictional interpretation created by the Dispensationalists and promulgated by Scofield. I'm sure
@The Gospel of Christ could direct you to his threads that deal with this heresy.
Jesus made absolutely no mention of Two Gospels whatsoever, so NO, I
don't need to consider anything that Jesus did not teach.
Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amen.
- Matthew 28:19-20 KJV
Afterward he appeared unto the eleven as they sat at meat, and upbraided them with their unbelief and hardness of heart, because they believed not them which had seen him after he was risen. And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature. He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.
- Mark 16:14-16 KJV
THE Gospel. Gospel SINGULAR. Not Two Gospels. The Gospel did not change because of the resurrection. Rather, the resurrection of Jesus proved that His teaching (and His teaching alone) was true.
So if you believe Jesus, why should you need to believe anybody else?
That's an adulteration.
Rhema
1. “Says who?” – Says Jesus Christ, actually.
“But the Lord said unto him, Go thy way:
for he is a chosen vessel unto me,
to bear my name before the Gentiles, and kings, and the children of Israel.” —
Acts 9:15
You just quoted this verse yourself — and then immediately tried to ignore it.
Jesus didn’t say Paul “claimed” to be an apostle.
Jesus declared it.
And if you don’t trust Jesus’ word to Ananias, then what exactly are you doing pretending to believe the Bible?
2. “Why didn’t Paul go to Gentiles immediately?”
Because
Jesus Himself said:
"It was necessary that the word of God should first be spoken to you [Jews]" —
Acts 13:46
That wasn’t Paul disobeying. That was Paul following divine order:
“To the Jew first, and also to the Greek.” (Romans 1:16)
Paul always honored the covenantal pattern — he
offered the Gospel to the Jews first, but
once they rejected it, the floodgates opened.
3. “Paul was just offended the Jews didn’t listen”
What an idiotic take. Here’s what Paul actually said:
“I have great sorrow and unceasing anguish in my heart. For I could wish that I myself were accursed and cut off from Christ
for the sake of my brothers, my kinsmen according to the flesh.” —
Romans 9:2–3
He wasn’t offended — he was
heartbroken.
But he didn’t twist the Gospel to appease them.
He stayed faithful to
Christ alone, even if it meant being beaten, shipwrecked, stoned, or hated by Jews and Gentiles alike.
4. “Paul saw an angel of light calling itself Jesus”
You just
parroted a New Age, occultist, or Muslim argument — not a Christian one.
If Paul saw a false spirit, then the
entire New Testament collapses, including:
Romans
Corinthians
Ephesians
Galatians
Philippians
Colossians
Timothy
Titus
2/3 of Acts
Which means your Bible is shredded — and so is your theology.
And let’s not forget — it was
Jesus Himself who blinded Paul on the road to Damascus and spoke to him directly.
This isn’t “Paul’s story.”
This is
Christ’s mission — through Paul.
5. “Peter was the one chosen for the Gentiles”
Yes, Peter first
opened the door to Gentiles (Acts 10, Cornelius). That was an
event, not an appointment.
But Paul was
specifically commissioned as the Apostle TO the Gentiles, and Peter
affirmed this clearly:
“They saw that I had been entrusted with the gospel to the uncircumcised, just as Peter had been to the circumcised...”
—
Galatians 2:7
So either accept Scripture or call Peter a liar, too.
6. “There are no Two Gospels!”
Correct — there is
only one Gospel.
But that Gospel is now
fully revealed through Christ crucified and risen, which Paul explains in full:
“Now to him who is able to strengthen you according to my gospel and the preaching of Jesus Christ,
according to the revelation of the mystery that was kept secret for long ages but has now been disclosed...”
—
Romans 16:25-26
Christ didn't preach to Gentiles during His earthly ministry.
Paul did — because that was the plan all along.
And guess what?
Jesus
said this would happen:
“I have other sheep that are not of this fold. I must bring them also...” (John 10:16)
You're not defending Christ. You're undermining Him.
You say, “Why believe Paul if you believe Jesus?”
That’s called
false dichotomy — a classic satanic tactic:
“Did God really say…?”
But Jesus said this about Paul:
“He is a chosen vessel unto Me…”
And Paul said this about Jesus:
“If anyone is preaching to you a gospel contrary to the one you received, let him be accursed.” (Gal 1:9)
Either Paul was a fraud and most of your New Testament is a lie…
Or Paul was sent by Jesus and you need to
repent for denying him.
You are Scofield-confused, and trying to wedge Christ
against Paul. That’s not Christianity. That’s
heresy.
You want Christ without the cross, grace without apostleship, and a Gospel that flatters the flesh instead of crucifying it.
You’re not exposing Paul —
You’re exposing yourself as an enemy of the Gospel.
And if you reject the Apostle Christ appointed,
then you reject the Christ who appointed him.
Worst of all, you’re not just confused —
you’re actively leading others straight to the gates of Hell.
You twist Scripture, pit Christ against His own apostles, and cloak rebellion in pious words.
You deny Paul, ignore Jesus’ own commissioning, and mock the Gospel that saves.
This isn’t harmless error.
This is
spiritual treason.
You need to
repent — not tomorrow, not later —
now.
Because every soul you deceive will rise up and testify against you on the Day of Judgment.
“If anyone preaches a different gospel… let him be accursed.” (Galatians 1:9) -- That's you..
