Rhema
Active
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2021
- Messages
- 4,084
It would be greatly appreciated, and I think you'd really like it.No, I did not. Perhaps I should have!
Since I don't like my time wasted, I don't waste other's either.
God bless,
Rhema
By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!It would be greatly appreciated, and I think you'd really like it.No, I did not. Perhaps I should have!
Just wait until y'all figure out that the hexagonal Dome of the Rock had been an Orthodox church to Mary the Theotokos, removed from its foundation miles away and rebuilt block by block in Jerusalem. The writing inside that Dome of the Rock is about Jesus, not Mohammad. !!!The video is rather interesting and informative.
So, they're actually worshiping Mary a woman....Just wait until y'all figure out that the hexagonal Dome of the Rock had been an Orthodox church to Mary the Theotokos, removed from its foundation miles away and rebuilt block by block in Jerusalem. The writing inside that Dome of the Rock is about Jesus, not Mohammad. !!!
Unlike the Christian (the elect of God). The unbelieving Islam simply fail Christ's test of trying the spirits to see if they are of false apostles', false prophets. They deny the authority of sola scriptura not to add or subtract from the perfect sealed with seven seals till the end of time .Islam is the just wiped Taco bell TP rotting at the bottom of a garbage pile for countless months with other garbage.
Not what I said.So, they're actually worshiping Mary a woman....![]()
So what ? What does that have to do with Biblical truth?Just wait until y'all figure out that the hexagonal Dome of the Rock had been an Orthodox church to Mary the Theotokos, removed from its foundation miles away and rebuilt block by block in Jerusalem. The writing inside that Dome of the Rock is about Jesus, not Mohammad. !!!
I know, I know.Not what I said.
The Dome of the Rock is actually not a Mosque. It's a shrine dedicated to condemning Mary.
One of these days I should take the time to collect my data and start a thread.
(If it would be welcomed.)
Rhema
One would say the same thing about the Quran and Book of Enoch.So what ? What does that have to do with Biblical truth?
No they represent biblical error.One would say the same thing about the Quran and Book of Enoch.
No?
And where do You say One finds pure Biblical Truth?No they represent biblical error.
And where do You say One finds pure Biblical Truth?
They mic Bible scriptures which were given to Isreal only,
And yet that is not what Paul meant. He does not see that there are two gospels.The apostle Paul said that The Student of The Word, should: "Rightly Divide, The Word Of Truth! One must not mix what was given to Isreal Only, and use That for Today! Yet this is what is often done.
Says who?Paul was given to see (that is, to understand) much more than We! He was after all, appointed an apostle TO THE GENTILES by Christ Jesus, on His way to Damascus.
Which Judaism? According to Josephus there were four distinct branches of Judaism that did not agree with one another. Indeed the Pharisees and Sadducees had been assassinating one another over the previous 150 years. One might better say that Paul was attempting to destroy the Messianic Jesus Movement one death at a time when the Damascus event in the desert happened.Before that, He was seeking to destroy The Jews who did no longer accepted Judaism.
There are no "Two Gospels." There was not a gospel for Jews and a gospel for Gentiles. This is a rather new fictional interpretation created by the Dispensationalists and promulgated by Scofield. I'm sure @The Gospel of Christ could direct you to his threads that deal with this heresy.You may also consider the difference between The Two Gospels.
Indeed ! You are correct. There was; The gospel of The Kingdom of Heaven; given to Isreal by Jesus. Then there is; The gospel of God,Says who?
All you are doing right now is parroting the claims of Paul. Peter, however, felt otherwise:
And the apostles and elders came together for to consider of this matter. And when there had been much disputing, Peter rose up, and said unto them, Men and brethren, ye know how that a good while ago God made choice among us, that the Gentiles by my mouth should hear the word of the gospel, and believe.- Acts 15:6, 7 KJV
Peter said this in public at the church council, and NOBODY disagreed.
Paul made a number of claims that should concern anyone who deeply seeks.
The initial accounts of Paul meeting an angel of light calling itself Jesus say absolutely nothing about any Mission to the Gentiles.
The FIRST mention of this is to Ananias:
But the Lord said unto him, Go thy way: for he is a chosen vessel unto me, to bear my name before the Gentiles, and kings, and the children of Israel:- Acts 9:15 KJV
Why do people forget this second part? And then why did Paul REJECT this part?
Then Paul and Barnabas waxed bold, and said, It was necessary that the word of God should first have been spoken to you: but seeing ye put it from you, and judge yourselves unworthy of everlasting life, lo, we turn to the Gentiles.- Acts 13:46 KJV
This was Paul's own decision. The text does not say, "lo, the Lord has directed us to turn to the Gentiles." And if Paul was designated as this Apostle to the Gentiles at the start, why did Paul not obey that but evangelized in the Synagogues instead? Paul just got offended that not enough Jews were listening to his message (and rightly so for reasons that we can't get into at the moment), a message that was quite acceptable to the Pagan.
Which Judaism? According to Josephus there were four distinct branches of Judaism that did not agree with one another. Indeed the Pharisees and Sadducees had been assassinating one another over the previous 150 years. One might better say that Paul was attempting to destroy the Messianic Jesus Movement one death at a time when the Damascus event in the desert happened.
But the motives behind Paul's decisions as his ministry progressed and evolved over time are not as simplistic as one's Sunday School teacher would have you believe.
There are no "Two Gospels." There was not a gospel for Jews and a gospel for Gentiles. This is a rather new fictional interpretation created by the Dispensationalists and promulgated by Scofield. I'm sure @The Gospel of Christ could direct you to his threads that deal with this heresy.
Jesus made absolutely no mention of Two Gospels whatsoever, so NO, I don't need to consider anything that Jesus did not teach.
Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amen.- Matthew 28:19-20 KJV
Afterward he appeared unto the eleven as they sat at meat, and upbraided them with their unbelief and hardness of heart, because they believed not them which had seen him after he was risen. And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature. He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.- Mark 16:14-16 KJV
THE Gospel. Gospel SINGULAR. Not Two Gospels. The Gospel did not change because of the resurrection. Rather, the resurrection of Jesus proved that His teaching (and His teaching alone) was true.
So if you believe Jesus, why should you need to believe anybody else?
That's an adulteration.
Rhema
Yes, I suppose You maybe correct. However, I see that there is a need to keep STUDYING!One would say the same thing about the Quran and Book of Enoch.
No?