@B-A-C
Greetings Brother,
thank you for your patience .... about a month and a half of it!
Before i jump in, may i put forth a snippet?
On the 'Day of Pentecost', when Peter stood up and explained what was going on to the hearers of the tongues, could that be understood to be Peter manifesting the gift of Interpretation of Tongues?
back to your post. Please excuse if it comes through a little seedy, as in not yet a full blown yielded meal. I am currently a little light headed and not necessarily too coherent, which some may shrug and say, "well, what's new?!" anyway, Jesus is Lord, let us praise Him.
I will quote your post and add replies to it, so please open the quote and scroll through.
Bless you ....><>
Greetings Brother,
thank you for your patience .... about a month and a half of it!
Before i jump in, may i put forth a snippet?
On the 'Day of Pentecost', when Peter stood up and explained what was going on to the hearers of the tongues, could that be understood to be Peter manifesting the gift of Interpretation of Tongues?
back to your post. Please excuse if it comes through a little seedy, as in not yet a full blown yielded meal. I am currently a little light headed and not necessarily too coherent, which some may shrug and say, "well, what's new?!" anyway, Jesus is Lord, let us praise Him.
I will quote your post and add replies to it, so please open the quote and scroll through.
Yes, I am saying there is a private prayer language of tongues.
THEREFORE, given the 'spiritual gifts' of which tongues and interpretation of tongues are members of, and the seeming instruction(?) that all the 'gifts' are for the building up of the Body, with the so called, "private prayer language of tongues" is that somehow granted some exclusion from the 'rule' and not needing interpretation?
I suppose another way to come at that could be, is there any indication given that tongues should always have interpretation? This of course does also raise the question of the validity of 'personal' gift use... but i am trying to avoid straying too far from the topic into other related points, which historically, become the center stage and the topic gets left in the dust.
Yes and no, you are mixing two different things here. The entire congregation may pray "privately" (somewhat quietly) to God. That's OK.
But no, the entire congregation should not be speaking loudly in tongues in a church service. The Bible say by two, or at the most three. That's far from the entire congregation at my church.
Also it says if tongues are spoken out to the assembly (congregation) there MUST be an interpreter. So if there is no interpretation, there shouldn't be tongues in this case.
MAY i ask, where can we get and clearly get and read and see this in the Bible?
Yes and no, you are mixing two different things here. The entire congregation may pray "privately" (somewhat quietly) to God. That's OK. I ask, because it does seem a little extra Biblical. I know that you do not have the patent on that sort of statement and that it is something commonly 'understood'(?) by some.
That isn't what I see in the Bible, and in visting literally over a hundred Pentecostal/Charismatic churches, I've never seen it done that way.
I gave you at least 4 scriptures that say "to you" or to "the assembly/congregation".
I don't have a problem with tongues being for Jews and Gentiles, in fact it has no bearing at all upon the gift of tongues.
The purpose is definitely edifying.
That isn't what I see in the Bible, what isn't? My point suggested was that it was 'speaking to God' - scroll up^
MAY i cut it this way?1Cor 14:6; But now, brethren, if I come to you speaking in tongues, what will I profit you unless I speak to you either by way of revelation or of knowledge or of prophecy or of teaching?
1Cor 14:7; Yet even lifeless things, either flute or harp, in producing a sound, if they do not produce a distinction in the tones, how will it be known what is played on the flute or on the harp?
1Cor 14:8; For if the bugle produces an indistinct sound, who will prepare himself for battle?
1Cor 14:9; So also you, unless you utter by the tongue speech that is clear, how will it be known what is spoken? For you will be speaking into the air.
1Cor 14:10; There are, perhaps, a great many kinds of languages in the world, and no kind is without meaning.
1Cor 14:11; If then I do not know the meaning of the language, I will be to the one who speaks a barbarian, and the one who speaks will be a barbarian to me.
looking at who is writing, being an Apostle, and also one who would come to congregations/assemblies of Believers to teach and preach the Gospel, it is quite obvious that he would come and talk to hearers. Therefore, verse 6 , if I come to you speaking tongues, how are you going to know what i say, as hearers.... it won't. 'I' would have to "speak to you either by way of revelation or of knowledge or of prophecy or of teaching"
Also, following your reply,
That isn't what I see in the Bible, and in visting literally over a hundred Pentecostal/Charismatic churches, I've never seen it done that way.
I gave you at least 4 scriptures that say "to you" or to "the assembly/congregation".
and my previous comment, "Some might even suggest that speaking in tongues is purely, speaking to God, as in, a way that the LORD has add-ministered, providing a way unique to the Believers/Church to manifest that which was prophesied, in which case, interpretation is a co-worker in the manifold grace of God, to not only Gentiles but Greeks and Jews, too, all of which would definitely be edifying and strengthening."
do we have evidence of times when a man of God speaking to the LORD witnessed to the people?
[and, as a side note, and nothing at all personal, but as an observation to be considered in matters pertaining to things Biblical based, although a man declares what he experiences to be proof or evidence of something, even after hundreds of times, can we say that is a defininite fact? Say, for example, a man claims to have been going to any particular gatherings of any of the many differing doctrinal persuasions, does that immediately and irrevocably determine his experience to be sound and according to the will of God? Pick a denomination or cult or even another religion. It is a case of needing to have universal standard and rule in a matter. If my submission can be validated on my quantative experience, then that becomes the regulation for judging and upholding all peoples views/claims/understandings/proofs. I realise this is potentially debateable and certainly the 'experience' of a Christian does to some degree call out for justification of the faith as opposed, or in contrast, to other 'faiths', or lack of them, but here we enter into the power of God verses the lack of. The testimony of God verses the lack thereof.]
Picture it this way. You are God and you speak Portugese. No one in the church speaks Portugese. (well it's possible someone might)
I tell the congregation what you said in Portugese. Since no speaks Portugese, it's kind of useless unless someone interprets.
Now what I have seen, is usually it's a person who doesn't know the language do the interpretation. In some rare cases, there was a person there that did speak that language.
They interpret what was said in the other language.
BROTHER, can we look also at this way?
an easy way to put it, being 2021, imagine a gathering at the UN headquarters. All ambassadors there from the many countries, begin to praise the LORD [oh how good that would be!!!] and yet, they would need interpretation, which they have.
Not the best example, so i will go again...
Today we are very much used to our language and also, [this is important...] the fact that the Bible has been translated into many different languages and that is because NOW so many people all over the world have heard and believe the Gospel that was preached unto them, so we can easily forget that back then [Pentecost and prior to then] that was NOT the case. The GOD of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob was kept in by the LORD for the nation of Israel ONLY and only they could and did praise the LORD. Perhaps some ex Babylonian exile families and people might have, in whatever language they spoke but they, too, were of Israel. Pentecost saw the nations praising the LORD as a never before event and as a timely revealing of the power of God prophesied many times many years prior to then.
From there, it was when the Apostle Paul was called to go to the Gentiles [Nations] that the Gospel started to be preached around the world. The LORD sent others also in the following times. Tongues and Interpretation of tongues would have been very much a profitable gifting to the Body.
Some say things about cessation etc, but perhaps they overlook the bit about how the locals, who all had their own tongue [mostly] were not seeing any manifestation of Tongues and the Interpretation of Tongues because it was not needed to tell the Gospel and/or praise the LORD... because they had one unified language. People tend to think locally and forget that in the wider world, things are often different from our local experience. We can be very limiting in doing so, but most can be found 'guilty' of it.
I suggest, also, that as assemblies grew in maturity and size, the pattern of the different language speakers grouping together would have been fairly logical and sensible? After all, what would be the sense of attending a Portugese fellowship if, around the town there was a group who spoke Spanish.... or instead of Greek, spoke Swahili? It would be plausible that even then, people from different tongues might attend the meetings and in that case, Interpretation would be needed.
Here at TalkJesus we speak GOD's praise [or we should] in English. Totally unheard of before Pentecost and in fact for hundreds of years after. If i was to write all this in Russian, who would understand? [It is hard enough speaking in Br. Bear language!- hence, sometimes even needing some kind person to interpret what i write for everyone! ]
First of all there shouldn't be un-ruly, un-orderly yelling out in the church in any language. Especially not by the entire congregation. Who knows who said what to who.
The Bible says by 2 or 3. No more.
Now if we are worshiping in English together, singing together, by all means be as loud as you like. But speaking in tongues is another matter.
AGAIN, if we took a couple of dozen languages from around the world today, and everyone spake their speak, what a kerbubble of a kerbabble that would be. It would not edify anyone.
GOD has an order to all things. We see it in the many inventions man makes, also. Cut the wire on your ignition and what can your truck do? Take the chain off your Bike and how far will you ride? Remove all the gaps between the words of a book and try to read it. We see it also in all creation. Take the clouds away, do away will cell walls, remove the sun.... where ever we go in all GOD has made, there is order and purpose for praise and so much is all for us little people, for our good. Sadly we can see that when Jesus is taken out of the equation, disharmony and disorder and violence and evil result.
Let us PRAISE THE LORD
Bless you ....><>