Jesus did not do what He liked but always did the Father's will. He had the ability to choose but He gave that ability up and took the Father's will even to the cross. It is yourself suggesting that Jesus was a robot, not me. Perhaps you do not understand the concept of being a "slave" to God. A slave is not a free agent, it only does what its master tells it to do. But the slave does have choice, but the choice is surrendered completely to the Master's will. Calvinism does not deny choice it denies the Pelagian idea that original sin did not affect human nature and that men can choose what is truly good without the aid of God. It is not a question of having choice or not, but a question of having the power to make the right choices and do good deeds. If you have the power to make the right choices and do good deeds, then you may save yourself. But if not, then only God can enable you to make the right choices and hence it is not dependant upon your choice but the decision of God. Clearly your continued misrepresentation of Calvinism proves you do not yet understand it. Regarding Jesus's blood-sweating, presumably Jesus was afraid of the process of dying, the pain and suffering he was to endure (hence him saying "cup of suffering"). You say Jesus willingly laid down His life and you are correct. But unfortunately you (wrongly) believe His will was separate from His Person, His nature. But Jesus was the Son of God, even God Himself, so how could Jesus ever go against Himself by not willingly laying down His life? That is, His choice was constrained by His nature. Because Christ had a perfect nature, He could never not do the Father's will. To suggest that Christ could deny the Father's will is to say that Christ did not have perfect nature and that there was some sin within Him. IF Christ was a fallen human being such as ourselves, the probability of Him doing the Father's will may have been 50/50. But since He is the Son of God and even God incarnate in the flesh, the probability of doing the Father's will to not, was 100 to 0. So He was not a robot, because the Father was not forcing Him to make any choices, yet He was a slave, in that He denied His own will and did the Father's, because He had a perfect nature.