Quantrill
Active
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2018
- Messages
- 869
Before going further this point must be made.
Jesus said to Peter once, "...Get thee behind me, Satan: thou art an offence unto me: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but those that be of men." (Matt. 16:23) Isn't it interesting here that Jesus did not say that satan savoured his things. He said satan savourest the things of men. Now that man has fallen, mans things and ways are contrary to God. And satan now sides with and promotes those things of men.
This is particularly true in the realm of politics and power located in persons over government. Once Daniel prayed to God but received no answer. Three weeks later an angel from God appeared and told him that the prince of Persia stopped him and withstood him from reaching Daniel. And it would not be until a greater class of angels was sent to over come that prince of Persia. And then later that angel would return and fight again with the Prince of Persia and later with the Prince of Greece. (Dan. 10:12-20)
Now, is there any here who thinks that the Prince of Persia or of Greece who withstood this angel for 21 days is a mere man? Remember men as compared to angels are not to much of an hindrance. One angel killed 185,000 in one night. (Is. 37:36) No, the Prince of Persia was the satanic angelic force behind the Persian man. The Prince of Greece would also be the satanic angelic force behind the man of Greece. And because satan savourest the ways of these fallen creatures (man) he lends to them his ways and power in ruling.
So, just like when Jesus spoke directly to satan though speaking to Peter, you find God speaking directly to satan though speaking to the King of Babylon in (Is. 14:12-17) and to the Prince of Tyre in (Eze. 28:11-19). And how powerful this satan is when even the chief angel Michael dared not contend with him alone. He must have the Lord behind him. (Jude 9)
Quantrill
Jesus said to Peter once, "...Get thee behind me, Satan: thou art an offence unto me: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but those that be of men." (Matt. 16:23) Isn't it interesting here that Jesus did not say that satan savoured his things. He said satan savourest the things of men. Now that man has fallen, mans things and ways are contrary to God. And satan now sides with and promotes those things of men.
This is particularly true in the realm of politics and power located in persons over government. Once Daniel prayed to God but received no answer. Three weeks later an angel from God appeared and told him that the prince of Persia stopped him and withstood him from reaching Daniel. And it would not be until a greater class of angels was sent to over come that prince of Persia. And then later that angel would return and fight again with the Prince of Persia and later with the Prince of Greece. (Dan. 10:12-20)
Now, is there any here who thinks that the Prince of Persia or of Greece who withstood this angel for 21 days is a mere man? Remember men as compared to angels are not to much of an hindrance. One angel killed 185,000 in one night. (Is. 37:36) No, the Prince of Persia was the satanic angelic force behind the Persian man. The Prince of Greece would also be the satanic angelic force behind the man of Greece. And because satan savourest the ways of these fallen creatures (man) he lends to them his ways and power in ruling.
So, just like when Jesus spoke directly to satan though speaking to Peter, you find God speaking directly to satan though speaking to the King of Babylon in (Is. 14:12-17) and to the Prince of Tyre in (Eze. 28:11-19). And how powerful this satan is when even the chief angel Michael dared not contend with him alone. He must have the Lord behind him. (Jude 9)
Quantrill