I don't feel the author of the post was saying that not all scripture holds it's power.
If you actually read the explanation,it's about application of scriptures to the right people at the right time.
Just as we are not under the law as Gentiles the Jews were not released from their previous obligations to maintain their covenant(possibly modified because the Lamb had been offered) and Faith in Jesus Christ was an additional requirement.
This would actually solve many questions about works or faith.
The Jews had an everlasting covenant based on works through faith.
This would continue with an addition or supplemental command to Believe in Jesus.
Acts 15:19 Wherefore my sentence is, that we trouble not them, which from among the Gentiles are turned to God:
Acts 15:20 But that we write unto them, that they abstain from pollutions of idols, and from fornication, and from things strangled, and from blood.
Paul knew he could never sell Judaism+Jesus to the Gentiles,
So it was decided that it would be Jesus by faith alone.
And a few healthy suggestions.
I'm looking into theses things and I believe they have merit.
It solves many puzzles but creates a few new ones.
But if you think that the OP is discounting any scripture then you probably didn't read the explanation carefully.
Peace
huhh????
The Jews have always been looking for a Messiah, they were never supposed to keep doing what they were doing in the OT. The books of Hebrews is called that because it's written to the Hebrews, chapters 7 thru 10 are all about the priesthood changing from the old Levitical way to Christ becoming our high priest.
We are all under the same law, there is no different law for the Jews.
The reason Peter, James, John and Andrew quit following John the Baptist, was because he told them Jesus was the Messiah. All of the apostles were Jews who had been looking for the Christ.
Luke 24:44, Romans 8:4, Matt 5:17-18, Luke 16:17
The law is still in effect, it never stopped being in effect, the only difference is the sacrifice/atonement is now paid for. We have a different high-priest, but the all the rules of the OT still apply to us today.
Jesus wasn't OK with the Jews following the old covenant. ( Hebrews 8:7, Hebrews 9:1 )
This was one of the reason Jesus was always fighting with the Pharisee's, they knew the prophecy of a Messiah, yet they were trying to keep the people under the conditions of the old covenant.
The covenant changed, but the Law didn't.
Think about it, if there was no Law for us, then we (Gentiles) could never sin. We wouldn't even need Jesus.
Rom 8:2 and 1 Cor 15:56 don't invalidate the law, they validate law acknowledging it still has the power of death.
So if the letter of the law kills, and the letter of the Spirit gives life, they doen't mean there is no law, it just means the Spirit is what gives us life, it's what frees us from the Law we were under (it's not saying we never were under a Law )
Rom 3:23, Rom 6:23
P.S.
If there is a "different law" for us Gentiles that didn't come from God and the Bible, where did it come from and how valid is it?