Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!
  • Welcome to Talk Jesus Christian Forums

    Celebrating 20 Years!

    A bible based, Jesus Christ centered community.

    Register Log In

Revelation 2 and 3

It is interesting to consider the notion that all of The Revelation is prophecy. Some have interpreted the seven churches as seven successive ages

Halley, H. H., Halley's Bible Handbook, (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1978) p685
"There is such an amazing parallel between some of the imagery of the book and the course of church history that it seems that one of the objects of the book must have been to foretell it. "
 
Amen Brother Richie.
One day we will bow down before our King and cast our crowns back at his glorious feet. Glory be to God!
Let us go on to the next church. I'll await your post.

Dear Brother Rjones,

Let us go to the seventh Church, and it is the church of the Laodiceans. I would like to bring out a very interesting point regarding this Church:

Revelation 3:15: “I know all the things you do, that you are neither hot nor cold. I wish you were one or the other!

Just like the Church of Philadelphia, this Church was a spirit filled Church. But what brought the difference is, unlike the Church of Philadelphia the people in this Church weren't able to devote their life completely to God (in other words they didn't give their first priority to seek God's presence). They were not able to forsake their worldly life. They gave importance to worldly things rather than spiritual growth.

The reason why Jesus mentioned the word lukewarm is because they are giving importance to two things (or perhaps having 2 spiritual masters) which are contrary to each other:

1) God.
2) Worldly life, pleasures, etc.

Please see this thread: http://www.talkjesus.com/scriptural-answers/205-gambling.html (The reason why I want to share this thread with you is, because there are some Christians who say that there is nothing wrong with gambling, but I believe that Gambling is satanic.)

Now let's come back to the discussion about the Church of Laodiceans:

In other words, they were spiritually trying to maintain a neutral ground. Jesus obviously doesn't like it. Either say Yes to Jesus or No. That is why Jesus says:

Revelation 3:15:.........I wish you were one or the other!

One thing we've got to remember, there is nothing wrong if you are rich, but the riches what you have should not become your spiritual idols. You should be able to glorify God with the riches you have and do His will with the help of the Holy Spirit.

Matthew 6:24: “No one can serve two masters. For you will hate one and love the other, or be devoted to one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and money.

Now let us go to the next verse:

Revelation 3:16: But since you are like lukewarm water, I will spit you out of my mouth!

Jesus obviously didn't like the spiritual condition of this Church because they were not able to say Yes to Jesus completely; and completely surrender to Him. Jesus always likes a straight forward decision, not a wavering decision.

Matthew 5:37: Let your Yes be Yes and No be No, for whatever is more than these is from the evil one.

Now let us go to the next verse:

Revelation 3:17: You say, ‘I am rich. I have everything I want. I don’t need a thing!’ And you don’t realize that you are wretched and miserable and poor and blind and naked.

From this verse it is clearly evident that riches were like their spiritual idols. They were more bothered about their worldly life rather than their spiritual life. That is why Jesus said, "You don't realize that you are wretched and miserable and poor and blind and naked."

They were blind folded by their worldly desires and didn't know that they were doing things which harm their spiritual life. That is why Jesus says these words:

Revelation 3:18: I advise you to buy gold from me, gold that has been purified by fire. Then you will be rich. And also buy white garments so you will not be shamed by your nakedness. And buy ointment for your eyes so you will be able to see.

In other words Jesus is asking them to rely on Him rather than their riches and worldly pleasures. Let us see some more verses where Jesus clearly explained the way God values us:

Matthew 6:25-34:

Verse 25: “So I tell you, don’t worry about everyday life, whether you have enough food, drink, and clothes. Doesn’t life consist of more than food and clothing?

Verse 26: Look at the birds. They don’t need to plant or harvest or put food in barns because your heavenly Father feeds them. And you are far more valuable to him than they are.

Verse 27: Can all your worries add a single moment to your life? Of course not.

Verse 28: “And why worry about your clothes? Look at the lilies and how they grow. They don’t work or make their clothing,

Verse 29: yet Solomon in all his glory was not dressed as beautifully as they are.

Verse 30: And if God cares so wonderfully for flowers that are here today and gone tomorrow, won’t he more surely care for you? You have so little faith!

Verse 31: “So don’t worry about having enough food or drink or clothing.

Verse 32: Why be like the pagans who are so deeply concerned about these things? Your heavenly Father already knows all your needs,

Verse 33: and he will give you all you need from day to day if you live for him and make the Kingdom of God your primary concern.

Verse 34: “So don’t worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will bring its own worries. Today’s trouble is enough for today.


Just look at how clearly and distinctly Jesus explained it to the disciples.

Revelation 3:19: As many as I love, I rebuke and chasten: be zealous therefore, and repent.

I happened to come to this point before. God corrects us to make us realize our mistakes and He gives us a chance to repent.

Revelation 3:20: “Look! Here I stand at the door and knock. If you hear me calling and open the door, I will come in, and we will share a meal as friends.

Here Jesus has made it plain and straight. Either accept Him or reject Him. Even though we are born again, there will be times where we will be tested. If we are lukewarm, it shows that we are keeping spiritual idols. Anything that takes the first and most important priority in our life becomes a spiritual idol.

This is what I want to share with you.

God bless you.
 
Dear brother Richie,
I continue to hold you up in my prayers for your continued success in school.
Your post on this church is great. Your reference to gambling is a good example of pursuit of worldly pleasures. As Christians, we should be sold out to Jesus. We should be as zealous for him as He is for us. The Laodicean church did not allow Jesus to be their Lord. They wanted to rule themselves.

Here is what I have learned.

And to the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write,

The name Laodicea means "rule of the people". This is reflected in Jesus’ address to the church: the church of the Laodiceans (Rev. 3:14). For the other churches, it was the church of Ephesus (Rev. 2:1) or the church in Smyrna (Rev. 2:8) or the church in Sardis (Rev. 3:1). But here, it is the church of the Laodiceans.

Laodicea was an important, wealthy city, with a significant Jewish population. Like other cities in the region, it was a center for Caesar worship and the worship of the healing god Asklepios. There was a famous temple of Asklepios in Laodicea, with a more famous medical school connected with the temple.

After an earthquake devastated the region in 60 a.d. Laodicea refused Imperial help in rebuilding the city, successfully relying on their own resources. They didn’t need outside help, they didn’t ask for it, and they didn’t want it. Tacitus, the Roman historian, said "Laodicea was too rich to accept help from anyone. Laodicea arose from the ruins by the strength of her own resources, and with no help from us".

Laodicea was also a noted commercial center, and some of its goods were exported all over the world. Laodicea prided itself on three things: financial wealth, an extensive textile industry, and a popular eye-salve which was exported around the world.

One of their problems was a poor water supply that made Laodicea vulnerable to attack through siege. If an enemy army surrounded the city, they had insufficient water supplies in the city, and the supplies coming into the city could be easily cut off. Therefore, the leaders of Laodicea were always accommodating to any potential enemy, and always wanted to negotiate and compromise instead of fight.

Their main water supply came on a six-mile aqueduct from the hot springs of Hierapolis. Because the water came from hot springs, it arrived unappetizingly lukewarm.

These things says the Amen: Jesus is the Amen, the “so be it,” the “it is done.” As (2 Cor. 1:20) says, For all the promises of God in Him are “Yes,” and in Him “Amen.” Jesus is the personification and the affirmation of the truth of God.

You are neither cold nor hot: This picture of lukewarmness would immediately strike the Christians of Laodicea because the water they drank every day was lukewarm. Jesus says “Just as the water you drink is disgustingly lukewarm, you are lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot.” In this spiritual sense, lukewarmness is a picture of indifference and compromise. It tries to play the middle, too hot to be cold and too cold to be hot. But in trying to be both things, it ends up being nothing - except to hear the words, “I will vomit you out of My mouth.”

Does Jesus mean to say that these Christians are intrinsically cold, but warmed up by their religious trappings? Or, that they are essentially hot, but cooled down by their apathy and self-reliance? Both are possible, but since He is talking to His church, there is an emphasis on the later.

There is no greater curse upon the earth than empty religion. Is there any soul harder to reach than the one who has just enough of Jesus to think they have enough? The church of Laodicea exemplifies empty religion. Tax collectors and harlots were more open to Jesus than the scribes and Pharisees.

Satan will have us any way he can get us, but he prizes a lukewarm religionist far above a cold-hearted sinner.

I could wish that you were cold or hot: What Jesus wants to change in us as much as anything is the deceptive playing of the middle, trying to please both the world and Jesus.

I could wish that you were cold or hot also points to another aspect of lukewarmness, as a picture of uselessness. Hot water heals, cold water refreshes, but lukewarm water is useless for either purpose. It’s as if Jesus says, “If you were hot or cold I could do something with you. But because you are neither, I will do nothing.” The lukewarm Christian has enough of Jesus to satisfy a craving for religion, but not enough for eternal life.

The thief on the cross was cold towards Jesus and clearly saw his need. The Apostle John was hot towards Jesus and enjoyed an intimate relationship of love. But Judas was lukewarm, following Jesus enough to be considered a disciple, but not giving his heart over to Jesus in fullness.

Deep down, there is no one more miserable than the lukewarm Christian. They have too much of the world to be happy in Jesus, but too much of Jesus to be happy in the world.

In his sermon An Earnest Warning against Lukewarmness, Spurgeon described the lukewarm church:
· They have prayer-meetings, but there are few present, for they like quiet evenings home.
· When more attend the meetings they are still very dull, for they do their praying very deliberately and are afraid of being too excited.
· They are content to have all things done decently and in order, but vigor and zeal are considered to be vulgar.
· They may have schools, Bible-classes, preaching rooms, and all sorts of agencies; but they might as well be without them, for no energy is displayed and no good comes of them.
· They have deacons and elders who are excellent pillars of the church, if the chief quality of pillars be to stand still, and exhibit no motion or emotion.
· The pastor does not fly very far in preaching the everlasting gospel, and he certainly has no flame of fire in his preaching.
· The pastor may be a shining light of eloquence, but he certainly is not a burning light of grace, setting men’s hearts on fire.
· Everything is done in a half-hearted, listless, dead-and-alive way, as if it did not matter much whether it was done or not.
· Things are respectably done, the rich families are not offended, the skeptical party is conciliated, and the good people are not quite alienated: things are made pleasant all around.
· The right things are done, but as to doing them with all your might, and soul, and strength, a Laodicean church has no notion of what that means.
· They are not so cold as to abandon their work, or to give up their meetings for prayer, or to reject the gospel.
“If they did so, then they could be convinced of their error and brought to repentance; but on the other hand they are neither hot for the truth, nor hot for conversions, nor hot for holiness, they are not fiery enough to burn the stubble of sin, nor zealous enough to make Satan angry, nor fervent enough to make a living sacrifice of themselves upon the altar of their God. They are ‘neither cold nor hot.’” (Spurgeon)

I will vomit you out of My mouth: How are churches in the mouth of Jesus?
They are in His mouth because they spread His Word.
They are in His mouth because He prays for them constantly.
What a terrible thing - in either of these ways - to be expelled from the mouth of Jesus!

You say, “I am rich and have become wealthy, and have need of nothing.” The church at Laodicea lacked a sense spiritual poverty. They looked at their spiritual condition and said “rich.” They looked again and said “wealthy.” They looked a third time and said, “We have need of nothing.” They are the opposite of blessed.They are the poor in spirit Jesus spoke of in (Mt. 5:3).

And do not know that you are wretched, miserable, poor, blind, and naked: It wasn’t that the church at Laodicea wasn’t spiritually poor - they were, they were simply blind to it. Jesus looked at their spiritual condition and said, “wretched.” He looked again and said “miserable.” A third time Jesus looked and said “poor.” He looked again and said “blind.” A final time Jesus looked, and He saw that they were spiritually naked.

The city of Laodicea was famous for its wealth, but the Christians of the city were spiritually wretched, miserable, and poor. Laodicea was famous for its healing eye salve, but the Christians of the city were spiritually blind. Laodicea was famous for its fine clothing, but the Christians of the city were spiritually naked.

The contrasts are shocking between what they think they are and what they really are; between what they see and what Jesus sees.; between the wealth and affluence of their city and their own spiritual bankruptcy.

I counsel you to buy from Me: The change in the Laodiceans had to begin with understanding their spiritual poverty. As long as we believe we can meet the need for wealth, clothing, or sight ourselves, we can never receive them from Jesus. We must seek these things from Jesus instead of relying on them ourselves.

Therefore be zealous and repent: He commands them to make a decision to repent, and to continue in zeal. “Turn your way,” Jesus says. “Don’t look to your own riches and resources, because they are really bankrupt. Turn around and look to Me.”

Behold, I stand at the door and knock: Jesus gives to this lukewarm church The Great Invitation. He knocks at the door, asking entry to come and dine with us, in the sense of sharing warm, intimate time. It only happens as we respond to His knock, but the promise is made to all: If anyone hears my voice.

The idea of Jesus at the door applies to the sinner and to the saint just the same. Jesus wants to come in to us, and dine with us, in the sense of having a deep, intimate relationship.

The key to opening the door is to first hear His voice. When we give attention to what Jesus says, then we can be rescued from our own lukewarmness and enter into a “zealous” relationship with Him.

I will come into him: What a glorious promise! If we open the door, He will come in. He won’t ring the bell and run away. He promises to come in, and then to dine with the believer.

If anyone: Notice that Jesus gives the call to individuals. He didn’t say, If any church, but if anyone. “We must not talk about setting the church right, we must pray for grace each one for himself, for the text does not say, ‘If the church will open the door,’ but ‘If any man hear my voice and open the door.’ It must be done by individuals: the church will only get right by each man getting right.” (Spurgeon)

To him who overcomes: Jesus’ promise to the overcomer, even at Laodicea, shows that we don’t have to be Christians who are compromising and lukewarm. If we are, we can change and become one of Jesus’ overcomers.

I will grant to sit with Me on My throne: Those who overcome the battle against indifference, compromise, and self-reliance, receive a special reward. They enjoy a place with the enthroned Jesus.

This is the worst of the seven Churches, and yet the most eminent of all the promises are made to it, showing that the worst may repent, finally conquer, and attain even to the highest state of glory.

Let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches: We must hear what the Holy Spirit says here, because He speaks to the churches - including us. May God deliver us from the self-reliant, compromising lukewarmness that marked the church of the Laodiceans!
 
Dear brother Richie,
I continue to hold you up in my prayers for your continued success in school.
Your post on this church is great. Your reference to gambling is a good example of pursuit of worldly pleasures. As Christians, we should be sold out to Jesus. We should be as zealous for him as He is for us. The Laodicean church did not allow Jesus to be their Lord. They wanted to rule themselves.

Here is what I have learned.

And to the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write,

The name Laodicea means "rule of the people". This is reflected in Jesus’ address to the church: the church of the Laodiceans (Rev. 3:14). For the other churches, it was the church of Ephesus (Rev. 2:1) or the church in Smyrna (Rev. 2:8) or the church in Sardis (Rev. 3:1). But here, it is the church of the Laodiceans.

Laodicea was an important, wealthy city, with a significant Jewish population. Like other cities in the region, it was a center for Caesar worship and the worship of the healing god Asklepios. There was a famous temple of Asklepios in Laodicea, with a more famous medical school connected with the temple.

After an earthquake devastated the region in 60 a.d. Laodicea refused Imperial help in rebuilding the city, successfully relying on their own resources. They didn’t need outside help, they didn’t ask for it, and they didn’t want it. Tacitus, the Roman historian, said "Laodicea was too rich to accept help from anyone. Laodicea arose from the ruins by the strength of her own resources, and with no help from us".

Laodicea was also a noted commercial center, and some of its goods were exported all over the world. Laodicea prided itself on three things: financial wealth, an extensive textile industry, and a popular eye-salve which was exported around the world.

One of their problems was a poor water supply that made Laodicea vulnerable to attack through siege. If an enemy army surrounded the city, they had insufficient water supplies in the city, and the supplies coming into the city could be easily cut off. Therefore, the leaders of Laodicea were always accommodating to any potential enemy, and always wanted to negotiate and compromise instead of fight.

Their main water supply came on a six-mile aqueduct from the hot springs of Hierapolis. Because the water came from hot springs, it arrived unappetizingly lukewarm.

These things says the Amen: Jesus is the Amen, the “so be it,” the “it is done.” As (2 Cor. 1:20) says, For all the promises of God in Him are “Yes,” and in Him “Amen.” Jesus is the personification and the affirmation of the truth of God.

You are neither cold nor hot: This picture of lukewarmness would immediately strike the Christians of Laodicea because the water they drank every day was lukewarm. Jesus says “Just as the water you drink is disgustingly lukewarm, you are lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot.” In this spiritual sense, lukewarmness is a picture of indifference and compromise. It tries to play the middle, too hot to be cold and too cold to be hot. But in trying to be both things, it ends up being nothing - except to hear the words, “I will vomit you out of My mouth.”

Does Jesus mean to say that these Christians are intrinsically cold, but warmed up by their religious trappings? Or, that they are essentially hot, but cooled down by their apathy and self-reliance? Both are possible, but since He is talking to His church, there is an emphasis on the later.

There is no greater curse upon the earth than empty religion. Is there any soul harder to reach than the one who has just enough of Jesus to think they have enough? The church of Laodicea exemplifies empty religion. Tax collectors and harlots were more open to Jesus than the scribes and Pharisees.

Satan will have us any way he can get us, but he prizes a lukewarm religionist far above a cold-hearted sinner.

I could wish that you were cold or hot: What Jesus wants to change in us as much as anything is the deceptive playing of the middle, trying to please both the world and Jesus.

I could wish that you were cold or hot also points to another aspect of lukewarmness, as a picture of uselessness. Hot water heals, cold water refreshes, but lukewarm water is useless for either purpose. It’s as if Jesus says, “If you were hot or cold I could do something with you. But because you are neither, I will do nothing.” The lukewarm Christian has enough of Jesus to satisfy a craving for religion, but not enough for eternal life.

The thief on the cross was cold towards Jesus and clearly saw his need. The Apostle John was hot towards Jesus and enjoyed an intimate relationship of love. But Judas was lukewarm, following Jesus enough to be considered a disciple, but not giving his heart over to Jesus in fullness.

Deep down, there is no one more miserable than the lukewarm Christian. They have too much of the world to be happy in Jesus, but too much of Jesus to be happy in the world.

In his sermon An Earnest Warning against Lukewarmness, Spurgeon described the lukewarm church:
· They have prayer-meetings, but there are few present, for they like quiet evenings home.
· When more attend the meetings they are still very dull, for they do their praying very deliberately and are afraid of being too excited.
· They are content to have all things done decently and in order, but vigor and zeal are considered to be vulgar.
· They may have schools, Bible-classes, preaching rooms, and all sorts of agencies; but they might as well be without them, for no energy is displayed and no good comes of them.
· They have deacons and elders who are excellent pillars of the church, if the chief quality of pillars be to stand still, and exhibit no motion or emotion.
· The pastor does not fly very far in preaching the everlasting gospel, and he certainly has no flame of fire in his preaching.
· The pastor may be a shining light of eloquence, but he certainly is not a burning light of grace, setting men’s hearts on fire.
· Everything is done in a half-hearted, listless, dead-and-alive way, as if it did not matter much whether it was done or not.
· Things are respectably done, the rich families are not offended, the skeptical party is conciliated, and the good people are not quite alienated: things are made pleasant all around.
· The right things are done, but as to doing them with all your might, and soul, and strength, a Laodicean church has no notion of what that means.
· They are not so cold as to abandon their work, or to give up their meetings for prayer, or to reject the gospel.
“If they did so, then they could be convinced of their error and brought to repentance; but on the other hand they are neither hot for the truth, nor hot for conversions, nor hot for holiness, they are not fiery enough to burn the stubble of sin, nor zealous enough to make Satan angry, nor fervent enough to make a living sacrifice of themselves upon the altar of their God. They are ‘neither cold nor hot.’” (Spurgeon)

I will vomit you out of My mouth: How are churches in the mouth of Jesus?
They are in His mouth because they spread His Word.
They are in His mouth because He prays for them constantly.
What a terrible thing - in either of these ways - to be expelled from the mouth of Jesus!

You say, “I am rich and have become wealthy, and have need of nothing.” The church at Laodicea lacked a sense spiritual poverty. They looked at their spiritual condition and said “rich.” They looked again and said “wealthy.” They looked a third time and said, “We have need of nothing.” They are the opposite of blessed.They are the poor in spirit Jesus spoke of in (Mt. 5:3).

And do not know that you are wretched, miserable, poor, blind, and naked: It wasn’t that the church at Laodicea wasn’t spiritually poor - they were, they were simply blind to it. Jesus looked at their spiritual condition and said, “wretched.” He looked again and said “miserable.” A third time Jesus looked and said “poor.” He looked again and said “blind.” A final time Jesus looked, and He saw that they were spiritually naked.

The city of Laodicea was famous for its wealth, but the Christians of the city were spiritually wretched, miserable, and poor. Laodicea was famous for its healing eye salve, but the Christians of the city were spiritually blind. Laodicea was famous for its fine clothing, but the Christians of the city were spiritually naked.

The contrasts are shocking between what they think they are and what they really are; between what they see and what Jesus sees.; between the wealth and affluence of their city and their own spiritual bankruptcy.

I counsel you to buy from Me: The change in the Laodiceans had to begin with understanding their spiritual poverty. As long as we believe we can meet the need for wealth, clothing, or sight ourselves, we can never receive them from Jesus. We must seek these things from Jesus instead of relying on them ourselves.

Therefore be zealous and repent: He commands them to make a decision to repent, and to continue in zeal. “Turn your way,” Jesus says. “Don’t look to your own riches and resources, because they are really bankrupt. Turn around and look to Me.”

Behold, I stand at the door and knock: Jesus gives to this lukewarm church The Great Invitation. He knocks at the door, asking entry to come and dine with us, in the sense of sharing warm, intimate time. It only happens as we respond to His knock, but the promise is made to all: If anyone hears my voice.

The idea of Jesus at the door applies to the sinner and to the saint just the same. Jesus wants to come in to us, and dine with us, in the sense of having a deep, intimate relationship.

The key to opening the door is to first hear His voice. When we give attention to what Jesus says, then we can be rescued from our own lukewarmness and enter into a “zealous” relationship with Him.

I will come into him: What a glorious promise! If we open the door, He will come in. He won’t ring the bell and run away. He promises to come in, and then to dine with the believer.

If anyone: Notice that Jesus gives the call to individuals. He didn’t say, If any church, but if anyone. “We must not talk about setting the church right, we must pray for grace each one for himself, for the text does not say, ‘If the church will open the door,’ but ‘If any man hear my voice and open the door.’ It must be done by individuals: the church will only get right by each man getting right.” (Spurgeon)

To him who overcomes: Jesus’ promise to the overcomer, even at Laodicea, shows that we don’t have to be Christians who are compromising and lukewarm. If we are, we can change and become one of Jesus’ overcomers.

I will grant to sit with Me on My throne: Those who overcome the battle against indifference, compromise, and self-reliance, receive a special reward. They enjoy a place with the enthroned Jesus.

This is the worst of the seven Churches, and yet the most eminent of all the promises are made to it, showing that the worst may repent, finally conquer, and attain even to the highest state of glory.

Let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches: We must hear what the Holy Spirit says here, because He speaks to the churches - including us. May God deliver us from the self-reliant, compromising lukewarmness that marked the church of the Laodiceans!

Dear Brother Rjones,

I'm amazed at the way you interpreted this Church. I loved and enjoyed reading your post. I continue to pray for you as well.

Alright, since we have discussed all the seven Churches, what shall we do?

1) Shall we see if we can learn anything more out of the seven Churches.

(OR)

2) Go for another new bible study thread.

God bless you. I enjoyed this entire thread from the first post, whole heartedly.
 
Last edited:
Dear Brother Richie,
I have also enjoyed this wonderful study and I am looking forward to the next study. But before going on, I have some more interesting information I'd like to share pertaining to Brother Kenod's post.

Putting the Seven Churches of Revelation into Historical Perspective

Many have attempted to make sense of Revelation chapters 2 and 3 by taking them as a unified whole. It is significant that Jesus chose these particular seven congregations to address, though there were other churches in the region which were not written to (such as the church at Collosse). Additionally, some have pointed to the order of the letters as evidence of their significance as a broad explanation of church history in the period between the Ascension and Jesus to His return.

It is also interesting to note that Paul addressed seven churches: Rome, Corinth, Galatia, Ephesus, Colosse, Phillipi, and Thessalonica (some also note with interest that Jesus gives seven “Kingdom Parables”). Early commentators on the Book of Revelation emphasized that as seven is a number of completion and fulfillment, so Jesus and Paul wrote to seven churches as a indication that they were in fact speaking to the complete church, not just these seven congregations. Speaking to seven churches means speaking to the church in perfection, in completion and totality. As one commentator puts it, “The churches of all time are comprehended in seven.”

Here is what some say about each of these periods as they relate to church history:

Henry Morris, The Revelation Record (written in 1983).

“Although it is by no means the dominant theme, there is a sense also in which the seven churches seem to depict the respective stages of development and change of Christ’s churches during the ensuing centuries. History has, indeed, shown such a general development through the years . . . He is not capricious in His selection. There is bound to be some significance in the sequence of the seven, as well as the total.”

A chart from page 66 of The Revelation Record:

Church Period in Church History Dates

Ephesus Apostolic Age Before a.d. 100
Smyrna Age of Persecution 100 to 313 a.d.
Pergamos Imperial Church Age 313 to 590
Thyatira Age of Papacy 590 to 1517
Sardis Reformation Age 1517 to 1730
Philadelphia Missionary Age 1730 to 1900
Laodicea Age of Apostasy 1900 to ?


Joseph Seiss, The Apocalypse (written in 1900).

Ephesian: Warmth and love and labor for Christ; defection beginning with a gradual cooling of love, false professions and clergy/laity distinctions.

Smyrna: Sweet and precious martyrdom, but a progression of clergy and laity distinctions and Judaizing tendencies, with an increasing departure from the simplicity of the gospel.

Pergamite: True faith more and more disappearing; clericalism systematized, union with the world.

Thyatiran: Purple and glory for the corrupt priesthood; false prophets enthroned in a time when truth was exchanged for darkness (up to the Reformation).

Sardian: Separation and return to the rule of Christ; many great names, but also deadness, and lethargy (Protestant centuries).

Philadelphian: Closer adherence to Jesus’ word, more fraternity among Christians (modern evangelical movement of the 19th century).

Seiss does not give much of a description of the Laodicean church along this same pattern, because he felt that in his day (1900), it was yet to really emerge upon the scene.


Clarence Larkin, The Greatest Book on Dispensational Truth in the World (1918).

Ephesian: 70 to 170 a.d. - “The backslidden church.”
Smyrna: 170 to 312 - “The persecuted church.”
Pergamite: 312 to 606 - “The licentious church.”
Thyatiran: 606 to 1520 - “A lax church.”
Sardian: 1520 to 1750 - “A dead church.”
Philadelphian: 1750 to 1900 - “A favored church.”
Laodicean: 1900 to the end - “A lukewarm church.”


Taylor Bunch, The Seven Epistles of Christ (1947).


Ephesian: The “universal church of the days of the apostles, or the first century of Christianity.”

Smyrna: Second and third centuries, “the age of martyrdom, when pagan Roman emperors attempted to destroy Christianity with the violence of the sword.”

Pergamite: Covering 250 years (from Emperor Constantine to Emperor Justinian the Great) “the church was exalted to royal power and kingly authority through a union, or marriage, with the state.”

Thyatiran: 538 to 1520, the corrupt, political church of the Middle Ages.

Sardian: 1520 to the mid 1700’s (“but doubtless embraces the entire history of Protestantism to the end of the gospel dispensation”); the church of the Reformation, and a partial work.

Philadelphian: From the mid 1700’s to the present; the church of 18th and 19th century revivals, worldwide missions movements, and renewed expectation of Jesus’ return.

Laodicean: Middle 1800’s to the end of the Christian dispensation, “a sad comment on modern Christendom.”


Chuck Smith, What the World is Coming To (1977).


Ephesian: The early church, up until the death of John.
Smyrna: 2nd to 4th centuries, Roman persecutions.
Pergamite: Beginning in 316, “development of church-state system under Constantine.”
Thyatiran: The unrepentant, unfaithful church destined to go through the Great Tribulation.
Sardian: Dead Protestantism.
Philadelphian: The faithful church of the last days.
Laodicean: The apostate church of the last days.


This historical approach to the seven churches of Revelation is valid if these periods are seen as broad, imprecise descriptions of the church through history, allowing for generous periods of overlap. For example, it seems that the last four churches will persist until the coming of Jesus (see Rev. 2:25, Rev. 3:3, Rev. 3:11, and Rev. 3:20). If one accepts these seven letters as descriptive of the flow of church history, it does not require that we see them as exclusive, rigidly sequential ages.

It is good to remember that if these letters are a prophecy of the course of church history, this is their secondary significance. First and foremost, the letters were written to real, existing first-century congregations, and to “all who have an ear to hear.” As Morris says,
“Since there is nothing directly said by Christ to require - or even to suggest - such an (prophetic) application, a literalistic approach to the study of Revelation cannot place much emphasis on it.”

As well, we must remember that every age has had some characteristics of all seven churches. Though certain historical periods are marked by the conditions spoken of in these letters, we could never say that “only one letter” applies to us or our age. Joseph Seiss speaks to this well:
“There are Protestant Papists, and Papistical Protestants; sectarian anti-sectarians, and partyists who are not schismatics; holy ones in the midst of abounding defection and apostasy, and unholy ones in the midst of the most earnest and active faith; light in dark places, and darkness in the midst of light.”

We need to hear what the Spirit says to the churches (in the plural sense), not just one church.
 
Dear Brother Richie,
I have also enjoyed this wonderful study and I am looking forward to the next study. But before going on, I have some more interesting information I'd like to share pertaining to Brother Kenod's post.

Putting the Seven Churches of Revelation into Historical Perspective

Many have attempted to make sense of Revelation chapters 2 and 3 by taking them as a unified whole. It is significant that Jesus chose these particular seven congregations to address, though there were other churches in the region which were not written to (such as the church at Collosse). Additionally, some have pointed to the order of the letters as evidence of their significance as a broad explanation of church history in the period between the Ascension and Jesus to His return.

It is also interesting to note that Paul addressed seven churches: Rome, Corinth, Galatia, Ephesus, Colosse, Phillipi, and Thessalonica (some also note with interest that Jesus gives seven “Kingdom Parables”). Early commentators on the Book of Revelation emphasized that as seven is a number of completion and fulfillment, so Jesus and Paul wrote to seven churches as a indication that they were in fact speaking to the complete church, not just these seven congregations. Speaking to seven churches means speaking to the church in perfection, in completion and totality. As one commentator puts it, “The churches of all time are comprehended in seven.”

Here is what some say about each of these periods as they relate to church history:

Henry Morris, The Revelation Record (written in 1983).

“Although it is by no means the dominant theme, there is a sense also in which the seven churches seem to depict the respective stages of development and change of Christ’s churches during the ensuing centuries. History has, indeed, shown such a general development through the years . . . He is not capricious in His selection. There is bound to be some significance in the sequence of the seven, as well as the total.”

A chart from page 66 of The Revelation Record:

Church Period in Church History Dates

Ephesus Apostolic Age Before a.d. 100
Smyrna Age of Persecution 100 to 313 a.d.
Pergamos Imperial Church Age 313 to 590
Thyatira Age of Papacy 590 to 1517
Sardis Reformation Age 1517 to 1730
Philadelphia Missionary Age 1730 to 1900
Laodicea Age of Apostasy 1900 to ?


Joseph Seiss, The Apocalypse (written in 1900).

Ephesian: Warmth and love and labor for Christ; defection beginning with a gradual cooling of love, false professions and clergy/laity distinctions.

Smyrna: Sweet and precious martyrdom, but a progression of clergy and laity distinctions and Judaizing tendencies, with an increasing departure from the simplicity of the gospel.

Pergamite: True faith more and more disappearing; clericalism systematized, union with the world.

Thyatiran: Purple and glory for the corrupt priesthood; false prophets enthroned in a time when truth was exchanged for darkness (up to the Reformation).

Sardian: Separation and return to the rule of Christ; many great names, but also deadness, and lethargy (Protestant centuries).

Philadelphian: Closer adherence to Jesus’ word, more fraternity among Christians (modern evangelical movement of the 19th century).

Seiss does not give much of a description of the Laodicean church along this same pattern, because he felt that in his day (1900), it was yet to really emerge upon the scene.


Clarence Larkin, The Greatest Book on Dispensational Truth in the World (1918).

Ephesian: 70 to 170 a.d. - “The backslidden church.”
Smyrna: 170 to 312 - “The persecuted church.”
Pergamite: 312 to 606 - “The licentious church.”
Thyatiran: 606 to 1520 - “A lax church.”
Sardian: 1520 to 1750 - “A dead church.”
Philadelphian: 1750 to 1900 - “A favored church.”
Laodicean: 1900 to the end - “A lukewarm church.”


Taylor Bunch, The Seven Epistles of Christ (1947).


Ephesian: The “universal church of the days of the apostles, or the first century of Christianity.”

Smyrna: Second and third centuries, “the age of martyrdom, when pagan Roman emperors attempted to destroy Christianity with the violence of the sword.”

Pergamite: Covering 250 years (from Emperor Constantine to Emperor Justinian the Great) “the church was exalted to royal power and kingly authority through a union, or marriage, with the state.”

Thyatiran: 538 to 1520, the corrupt, political church of the Middle Ages.

Sardian: 1520 to the mid 1700’s (“but doubtless embraces the entire history of Protestantism to the end of the gospel dispensation”); the church of the Reformation, and a partial work.

Philadelphian: From the mid 1700’s to the present; the church of 18th and 19th century revivals, worldwide missions movements, and renewed expectation of Jesus’ return.

Laodicean: Middle 1800’s to the end of the Christian dispensation, “a sad comment on modern Christendom.”


Chuck Smith, What the World is Coming To (1977).


Ephesian: The early church, up until the death of John.
Smyrna: 2nd to 4th centuries, Roman persecutions.
Pergamite: Beginning in 316, “development of church-state system under Constantine.”
Thyatiran: The unrepentant, unfaithful church destined to go through the Great Tribulation.
Sardian: Dead Protestantism.
Philadelphian: The faithful church of the last days.
Laodicean: The apostate church of the last days.


This historical approach to the seven churches of Revelation is valid if these periods are seen as broad, imprecise descriptions of the church through history, allowing for generous periods of overlap. For example, it seems that the last four churches will persist until the coming of Jesus (see Rev. 2:25, Rev. 3:3, Rev. 3:11, and Rev. 3:20). If one accepts these seven letters as descriptive of the flow of church history, it does not require that we see them as exclusive, rigidly sequential ages.

It is good to remember that if these letters are a prophecy of the course of church history, this is their secondary significance. First and foremost, the letters were written to real, existing first-century congregations, and to “all who have an ear to hear.” As Morris says,
“Since there is nothing directly said by Christ to require - or even to suggest - such an (prophetic) application, a literalistic approach to the study of Revelation cannot place much emphasis on it.”

As well, we must remember that every age has had some characteristics of all seven churches. Though certain historical periods are marked by the conditions spoken of in these letters, we could never say that “only one letter” applies to us or our age. Joseph Seiss speaks to this well:
“There are Protestant Papists, and Papistical Protestants; sectarian anti-sectarians, and partyists who are not schismatics; holy ones in the midst of abounding defection and apostasy, and unholy ones in the midst of the most earnest and active faith; light in dark places, and darkness in the midst of light.”

We need to hear what the Spirit says to the churches (in the plural sense), not just one church.

Dear Brother Rjones,

I am amazed at the way you were able to interpret Brother Kenod's post. I loved it. When I seen brother Kenod's post, I just couldn't figure it out what it really meant. But after I seen your post, I got the point Brother Kenod was focusing upon.

Ofcourse you did mention the fact that every age has some characteristics of the seven Churches. It is true indeed.

More than anything, Jesus is speaking to the Church as a whole body but not the seven churches individually.

When I first read this I perceived that Jesus was speaking to the seven Churches to show, what kind of people do we have in the body of Christ.

Alright, what shall we study now? I actually loaded the videos on the book of the revelation in the Streaming video forum. There are 22 videos, but unfortunately, the videos are no longer available for me to share them with you. But I'm more interested to study:

>> The book of Romans and the books after that. (can learn a lot things from the book of Romans)

I'm interested to study the rest of the book of revelation too, but the only problem is that I may not be able to interpret some things.

It is your Choice, so as what should we study. But let us start a new study in a new thread.

By the way this thread is the study on the first chapter of the book of the revelation (please see it):

http://www.talkjesus.com/bible-study-hall/8478-book-revelation-study-chapter-1-a.html

God bless you.
 
Last edited:
I think y'all have a pretty good close reading going on, but I wanted to offer a counterpoint to the thought of Revelation as prophecy. NaTmely, that it is not. Not at all, in any sense. Why? Two reasons, the first stronger than the second.

Primarily, because the notion of prophecy is heretical to believers in Christ. Christ came to fufill the prophets and the laws, therefore after Christ there is no further prophecy. The time for prophets was when Israel strayed from the teachings of God and needed his guidance. To suggest, then, that Revelation is prophecy is not only to deny that Christ opened up the house of God to Gentile and Jew, but to suggest that God would guide humanity through some means other than Christ. No man may come through the father but through Him. Thus the only interpretation of the will of God is Christ's.

Secondly, it's not at all like prophecy. What do I mean? Go read books of prophecy in the Old Testament. Now read the Book of Daniel. The Revelation of St. Paul the Devine is Apocalyptic- while the form speaks of the future, it is meant to reflect on end times in order to show something about the present. Thus just as Daniel used end times as a code word to protest the silencing of the Jews, Revelation, which mimics Daniel in form AND NO BOOK OF PROPHECY condemns Roman oppression of the Christians.
 
Dear Brother Laudite,

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John, who testifies to everything he saw—that is, the word of God and the testimony of Jesus Christ. Blessed is the one who reads the words of this prophecy, and blessed are those who hear it and take to heart what is written in it, because the time is near.( Rev. 1:1-3)

Definition of Prophecy

transitive verb
1.To reveal by divine inspiration.
2.To predict with certainty as if by divine inspiration.
3.To prefigure; foreshow.

intransitive verb
1.To reveal the will or message of God.
2.To predict the future as if by divine inspiration.
3.To speak as a prophet.

I don't know what else can be said.
 
Primarily, because the notion of prophecy is heretical to believers in Christ. Christ came to fufill the prophets and the laws, therefore after Christ there is no further prophecy. The time for prophets was when Israel strayed from the teachings of God and needed his guidance. To suggest, then, that Revelation is prophecy is not only to deny that Christ opened up the house of God to Gentile and Jew, but to suggest that God would guide humanity through some means other than Christ. No man may come through the father but through Him. Thus the only interpretation of the will of God is Christ's.

Well Brother Laudite,

How can you say that there is no further prophecy after Christ? You see, prophecy is the work of the Holy Spirit. The prophets didn't speak based on what was in their mind, but they were moved by the Holy Spirit to speak about what God has to say.

2 Peter 1:20-21:

Verse 20: Above all, you must understand that no prophecy in Scripture ever came from the prophets themselves

Verse 21: or because they wanted to prophesy. It was the Holy Spirit who moved the prophets to speak from God.


More than that, if you say that there is no further prophecy, it shows that your denying the work and power of the Holy Spirit. Just look at what Paul says:

1 Corinthians 14:1 ................but also desire the special abilities the Spirit gives, especially the gift of prophecy.

Please do read the entire chapter of 1 Corinthians 14, you will understand more about prophecy.

Secondly, it's not at all like prophecy. What do I mean? Go read books of prophecy in the Old Testament. Now read the Book of Daniel.

Not like prophecy? I'm very surprised that you said this. I never heard any one speak about the book of the revelation like this.

Revelation 22:18-19:

Verse 18: And I solemnly declare to everyone who hears the prophetic words of this book: If anyone adds anything to what is written here, God will add to that person the plagues described in this book.

Verse 19: And if anyone removes any of the words of this prophetic book, God will remove that person’s share in the tree of life and in the holy city that are described in this book.


Just look at these two verses carefully, it is a prophetic book. Now how can you deny the fact that it is prophetic?

I hope I made it clear to you.

God bless you.
 
Dear Brother Richie,
I would be honored to study the book of Romans with you and with whoever else wants to join in.
 
Dear Brother Rjones,

I'm very glad that your interested to study the book of Romans. This time, I want you to start the thread. Let us begin the study in a new thread.

God bless you.
 
Well Brother Laudite,

How can you say that there is no further prophecy after Christ? You see, prophecy is the work of the Holy Spirit. The prophets didn't speak based on what was in their mind, but they were moved by the Holy Spirit to speak about what God has to say.

2 Peter 1:20-21:

Verse 20: Above all, you must understand that no prophecy in Scripture ever came from the prophets themselves

Verse 21: or because they wanted to prophesy. It was the Holy Spirit who moved the prophets to speak from God.


More than that, if you say that there is no further prophecy, it shows that your denying the work and power of the Holy Spirit. Just look at what Paul says:

1 Corinthians 14:1 ................but also desire the special abilities the Spirit gives, especially the gift of prophecy.

Please do read the entire chapter of 1 Corinthians 14, you will understand more about prophecy.



Not like prophecy? I'm very surprised that you said this. I never heard any one speak about the book of the revelation like this.

Revelation 22:18-19:

Verse 18: And I solemnly declare to everyone who hears the prophetic words of this book: If anyone adds anything to what is written here, God will add to that person the plagues described in this book.

Verse 19: And if anyone removes any of the words of this prophetic book, God will remove that person’s share in the tree of life and in the holy city that are described in this book.


Just look at these two verses carefully, it is a prophetic book. Now how can you deny the fact that it is prophetic?

I hope I made it clear to you.

God bless you.

Well said, brothers. I don't mean to suggest that no prophecy can exist (your point on Corinthians is dead on) but rather that prophecy in the sense of what the old testament prophets did is now over. My point is that none may add even a single word to Christ's Truth. The Old Prophets spoke of the future because the Israelites did not know. Since by Christ we know every thing concerning our salvation (none shall come to Him but through me and whatnot) the post christ prophets show the work of the spirit though prophecy (saying what will and will not be) I don't think that they can reveal more truth than Christ (since He is all truth) This does not mean that they can't speak truth! Rather, they have to speak truth about Christ, who indeed has come.

So that was a rather convoluted seperation. I tell you guys what: when I get the chance, I'll compate Revelation to Daniel,and contrast it with Prophecy. There's plenty of truth to Revelation, but I think it has to do with the present (well, past now.) I know that's disappointing, but it is a big task, I promise.
 
Dear Rjones,

Brother I am very impressed with the depth of revelation you show of these two deep and mysterious chapters. The intention of the Holy Spirit to reveal successive ages of the church is I believe quite unmistakable, and a clear indication of the Bible's divinely inspired origins. We cannot imagine man conceiving such a profound and prophetic piece of writing.

Now concerning the first five churches, I agree with you completely. However, I would question whether in fact these are successive ages in the church, rather than successive churches. This is because, whilst you have earmarked Thyatira, Sardis and Philadelphia with definite historical end points, all of the passages of these churches contain a promise relating to the Lord's coming:
2:25 Nevertheless what you have hold fast until I come.
3:3 Remember therefore how you have received and heard, and keep it and repent. If therefore you will not watch, I will come as a thief, and you shall by no means know at what hour I will come upon you.
3:10 Because you have kept the word of My endurance, I also will keep you out of the hour of trial, which is about to come on the whole inhabited earth, to try them who dwell on the earth.

For this reason I would suggest that all four of these churches are extant until the end of the age, whereas the first three are historical and passed. We can see for instance that even today the apostate Catholic church exists synchronously with the Reformed churches, and that prophetically it will exist until destroyed by the antichrist.

Therefore I would offer a differing interpretation of Philadelphia and Laodicea, in fact that they are two forms of the same church. Philadelphia would seem to be the church that the Lord desires to gain as His bride, a church established and built up on the rock of the Lord. Laodicea I suggest is a degradation of that church, but existing simultaneously with it, so serving as a warning to the same believers. Having obtained all of the riches of the Lord, they have become proud and stale, so the Lord adjures them to repent of their spiritual pride.
3:17 Because you say, I am wealthy and have become rich and have need of nothing, and do not know that you are wretched and miserable and poor and blind and naked,

What do you feel about this?
 
Last edited:
Dear Brother cerebus,
Thank you for your kind words.
I have really enjoyed this study and have spent many hours in research and study. I love The Word of God.

In response to your post.

Therefore I would offer a differing interpretation of Philadelphia and Laodicea, in fact that they are two forms of the same church. Philadelphia would seem to be the church that the Lord desires to gain as His bride, a church established and built up on the rock of the Lord. Laodicea I suggest is a degradation of that church, but existing simultaneously with it, so serving as a warning to the same believers. Having obtained all of the riches of the Lord, they have become proud and stale, so the Lord adjures them to repent of their spiritual pride.

I stated earlier in this study something that touched on this.

It is good to remember that if these letters are a prophecy of the course of church history, this is their secondary significance. First and foremost, the letters were written to real, existing first-century congregations, and to “all who have an ear to hear.” As Morris says,
“Since there is nothing directly said by Christ to require - or even to suggest - such an (prophetic) application, a literalistic approach to the study of Revelation cannot place much emphasis on it.”

As well, we must remember that every age has had some characteristics of all seven churches. Though certain historical periods are marked by the conditions spoken of in these letters, we could never say that “only one letter” applies to us or our age. Joseph Seiss speaks to this well:
“There are Protestant Papists, and Papistical Protestants; sectarian anti-sectarians, and partyists who are not schismatics; holy ones in the midst of abounding defection and apostasy, and unholy ones in the midst of the most earnest and active faith; light in dark places, and darkness in the midst of light.”

What your suggesting has validity. Church congregations all over the world today are comprised of people with all the differing elements of the seven churches to some degree. Regardless of the sign on the church door, we are joined by folks from Thyatira. They’re the ones who add to the Gospel: Jesus plus someone or something else, grace plus works, scripture plus tradition. There are also some from Sardis. They subtract from the Gospel. “You don’t need to be born again, just join the church, give some time and money, you’ll be fine.” And then there’s the group from Laodicea. "Jesus was a great man and teacher, and lived a life of such gentleness and grace that it’s ALMOST as if he was God. Just love everybody like he did. The good life you live is an obvious sign of your favor with God".

But if you know you’re a sinner and have given your heart to Jesus because He gave His life for you, then you’re from Philadelphia. We will never really know for sure how many till we all vanish together some day soon. And don’t be surprised when we are joined by some who are Catholic, some who are Protestant, some conservatives, some liberals, and even some who didn’t appear to attend any church at all. After all it's not what you say you are, but what you believe in your heart that matters.
 
Dear Brother cerebus,
Thank you for your kind words.
I have really enjoyed this study and have spent many hours in research and study. I love The Word of God.
I can see that, I am genuinely nourished by your writing.
It is good to remember that if these letters are a prophecy of the course of church history, this is their secondary significance. First and foremost, the letters were written to real, existing first-century congregations, and to “all who have an ear to hear.” As Morris says,
“Since there is nothing directly said by Christ to require - or even to suggest - such an (prophetic) application, a literalistic approach to the study of Revelation cannot place much emphasis on it.”
This is true; however the extreme specificity of the respective churches to their prophetic counterparts indicates to me that we have some grounds to confidently apply a fairly rigorous literal interpretation to each. Certainly each church is an admonition and an encouragement to the entire Body of Christ; nevertheless for instance Thyatira is the Roman Catholic Church; the reference is too clear.

The difficulty of course is that whilst we can see direct parallels with most of the churches, we cannot find one that matches the condition of Philadelphia - a body of believers who hold fast the Lord's testimony against the degradation of the age, who safeguard their first love, and who will be kept out of the Great Tribulation. But I believe and am hopeful that the Lord will raise up such a group of Christians before His Parousia; may we be a part of that blessed group!



What your suggesting has validity. Church congregations all over the world today are comprised of people with all the differing elements of the seven churches to some degree. Regardless of the sign on the church door, we are joined by folks from Thyatira. They’re the ones who add to the Gospel: Jesus plus someone or something else, grace plus works, scripture plus tradition. There are also some from Sardis. They subtract from the Gospel. “You don’t need to be born again, just join the church, give some time and money, you’ll be fine.” And then there’s the group from Laodicea. "Jesus was a great man and teacher, and lived a life of such gentleness and grace that it’s ALMOST as if he was God. Just love everybody like he did. The good life you live is an obvious sign of your favor with God".

But if you know you’re a sinner and have given your heart to Jesus because He gave His life for you, then you’re from Philadelphia. We will never really know for sure how many till we all vanish together some day soon. And don’t be surprised when we are joined by some who are Catholic, some who are Protestant, some conservatives, some liberals, and even some who didn’t appear to attend any church at all. After all it's not what you say you are, but what you believe in your heart that matters.

Praise the Lord.
 
I agree with those who say that we can learn from all seven churches of Rev 2 & 3 what the Lord both commends and condemns. There are lessons for all people of all time in these letters.

For those who also see an historical application in seven successive church ages, I wonder how they understand the reference to the “angel” (or messenger) to each church. Names like Paul, Irenaeus, Martin Luther, and John Wesley jump out of the pages of church history and seem to correlate well with an historical interpretation of the seven churches.
 
I was enjoying this coincidentally this morning and thought I would share it, as it seemed very relevant to our discussion:

A: He saves the believers in the church in Ephesus from the formal church life, which has lost the first love to the Lord, the shining capacity of the lampstand, and the enjoyment of Christ as life, to become overcomers so that they will be rewarded to eat of the tree of life in the Paradise of God - the New Jerusalem in the kingdom age. (Rev. 2:1-7)

B: He strengthens the suffering believers in the church in Smyrna to overcome the persecution by being martyred so that they will be rewarded not to be hurt of the second death during the kingdom age (vv. 8-11).

C: He sanctifies the believers in the church in Pergamos from the union with the world and from the teachings of Balaam and the Nicolaitans to be the overcomers so that they may be rewarded to eat the hidden manna and to have a white stone upon which a new name is written in the kingdom age (vv.12-17).

D: He rescues the believers in the church in Thyatira from idol worship, fornication, demonic teachings, and the deep things of Satan to be the overcomers so that they may be rewarded with the authority over the nations in the kingdom age (vv. 18-29).

E: He revives the believers in the church in Sardis from their dead and dying condition to be the overcomers so that they may be rewarded with walking with the Lord in white and with not having their names erased out of the book of life but confessed by the Lord before the Father and His angels in the kingdom age (3:1-6)

F: He encourages the believers in the church in Philadelphia to hold fast what they have that no one take their crown to be the overcomers so that they may be rewarded to be a pillar in the temple of God and to have the name of God and the name of the New Jerusalem and the new name of the Lord written upon them in the kingdom age (vv. 7-13).

G: He awakens the believers in the church in Laodicea from their lukewarm and Christless condition, exhorting them to pay the price for the refined gold, white garments, and eyesalve and to open the door to the knocking Lord to be the overcomers to sit on the throne of the Lord in the kingdom age (vv. 14-22).

Amen!!
 
I was enjoying this coincidentally this morning and thought I would share it, as it seemed very relevant to our discussion:

A: He saves the believers in the church in Ephesus from the formal church life, which has lost the first love to the Lord, the shining capacity of the lampstand, and the enjoyment of Christ as life, to become overcomers so that they will be rewarded to eat of the tree of life in the Paradise of God - the New Jerusalem in the kingdom age. (Rev. 2:1-7)

B: He strengthens the suffering believers in the church in Smyrna to overcome the persecution by being martyred so that they will be rewarded not to be hurt of the second death during the kingdom age (vv. 8-11).

C: He sanctifies the believers in the church in Pergamos from the union with the world and from the teachings of Balaam and the Nicolaitans to be the overcomers so that they may be rewarded to eat the hidden manna and to have a white stone upon which a new name is written in the kingdom age (vv.12-17).

D: He rescues the believers in the church in Thyatira from idol worship, fornication, demonic teachings, and the deep things of Satan to be the overcomers so that they may be rewarded with the authority over the nations in the kingdom age (vv. 18-29).

E: He revives the believers in the church in Sardis from their dead and dying condition to be the overcomers so that they may be rewarded with walking with the Lord in white and with not having their names erased out of the book of life but confessed by the Lord before the Father and His angels in the kingdom age (3:1-6)

F: He encourages the believers in the church in Philadelphia to hold fast what they have that no one take their crown to be the overcomers so that they may be rewarded to be a pillar in the temple of God and to have the name of God and the name of the New Jerusalem and the new name of the Lord written upon them in the kingdom age (vv. 7-13).

G: He awakens the believers in the church in Laodicea from their lukewarm and Christless condition, exhorting them to pay the price for the refined gold, white garments, and eyesalve and to open the door to the knocking Lord to be the overcomers to sit on the throne of the Lord in the kingdom age (vv. 14-22).

Amen!!

Wow! This is awesome. So short and so simple. Thank you so much for sharing this with us.

God bless you, brother.
 
Back
Top