I did not say we cannot keep the law perfectly. I said we cannot keep it perfectly 24/7, 365 days a year. If we could, then we wouldn't need a sacrifice or God's grace. But because of God's grace, we can keep the law perfectly, as did also Noah, Job, the parents of John the baptist.
- The "cannot 24/7, 365 days a year" is what I have been quoting to you for some time now.
- No, Noah and Job did not keep the law perfectly. Show me where what you say is written? Only Jesus has that distinction of being perfect and your denial of that is indicative of your lack of understanding grace!
- Noah and Job were not perfect but like Abraham, it was their belief that God credited them with righteousness.....hopefully, just like you James!
Sorry for butting in RJ, but I see something that needs to be addressed, (not that James won't see it, also.)
RJ, there is a difference between one being perfect and one being able to sin. Adam was perfect, yet Adam was able to sin and by sin to corrupt himself, thus rendering himself imperfect.
RJ, what do we learn from the following: Deuteronomy 32:5 "They have corrupted themselves, their spot is not the spot of his children: they are a perverse and crooked generation."
God used that fleshly nation to demonstrate what he is working with us and all the world. God gave that nation the imputed status of the perfection Adam had before he corrupted himself through sin. That meant that those people were beginning with a clean slate before God and could now be judged solely on the basis of how they honored and obeyed that Old Law Covenant.
You, yourself, know and believe that the blood of Christ cleansed of sin. That, RJ, is an imputed status of righteousness or perfection to us, so that like as God demonstrated with that fleshly nation of Israel, we can begin with a clean slate before God and be judged solely based upon how we respond to the education and the law of the love that is in Christ.
So to say that we cannot be perfect is to deny that grace which imputes that perfection to us by blotting out our past and dealing with us afresh.
Now, there has been gross missed understanding of many of Paul's words, even as there has been concerning what David meant at Psalms 51:5, and this has led many to believe in a sin nature that exists apart from our corrupting ourselves through ignorance, thus making it impossible for those believing in that supposedly inescapable sin nature in the flesh to know that they can actually now stand uncorrupted in the essence of who we are in the sight of God by virtue of his grace having erased our past guilt.
Does sin have a nature? Yes. Does sin corrupt our nature when we do not avoid sin? Yes. Does lack of knowledge leave us open to and even likely to sin so that our nature becomes corrupted to sin's nature? Yes.
Hosea 4:6 "My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children."
Thus enters our need for Christ, the righteousness of God, our teacher, our mentor, our redeemer. That is why he was the end of that Old Law for righteousness to all who would believe and so submit to his education of them in God's righteousness.
The reason we die to ourselves and put on the one body with him is so that our flesh which has developed under that time of corruption by sin does not interfere with our education. If God erased that past, no longer holding it against us then we also need to let the past sin lay dead by not living for the whims of the flesh which was during that time corrupted by it.
This is why getting a child into sound Christian training from infancy and getting Christ formed in him right away turns out some very fine men, men who God has groomed and made so that they are perfect in his sight. That is why he began with the prophets from their infancy.
Most of us have to learn to let that flesh die because we have lived in it long enough by ignorance to corrupt it through sin.
Yet, even those prophets whom God groomed from birth, though perfect like as Adam was before he sinned could yet choose to sin. Perfect angels could exercise foolishness in their thinking and turn to sin. The ability to sin has nothing to do with perfection.
But when our love becomes so completely perfected that the likely hood we would ever choose to sin becomes zero, then we have achieved the point of God's blessing with immortality and the saying can then be true, death is swallowed up forever.
I expect you might challenge much of what I said. That is just a part of how any of us learn. Just please be humble to really think about what the spirit (not I of myself) is saying.
1 John 4:1 "Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world."
Added: Heading off the objection that if any were perfect as Adam we would not have needed Christ, let me just explain that we belonged to the first Adam. His death sentence was yet upon all born of him and therefore even when God grooms us from birth to be perfect as Adam it yet requires Christ's sacrifice to make that possible. We yet need the imputation of righteousness by God's grace for him to even begin to perform that wonderful work in us.
Romans 5:14 "Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam's transgression, who is the figure of him that was to come."
Last edited: