Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!
  • Welcome to Talk Jesus Christian Forums

    Celebrating 20 Years!

    A bible based, Jesus Christ centered community.

    Register Log In

Is Love the Greatest?

Yet despite his great (God given) wisdom. He still turned to other gods and idolatry in his old age. ( ; ).
Even wisdom alone is not enough to save people.

;

Yes, well said, BAC! It seems a contradiction for the Bible to say no man ever was, nor ever will be wiser than Solomon, and yet he played the fool! So I'm thinking there are different kinds of godly wisdom, or perhaps one kind, which manifests itself in different ways. Solomon might have been rich in one kind or way--discerning truth--but was impoverished in a different kind or way--obeying the truth. Perhaps it is wise to say he was wise in thought, but foolish in deed?
 
Last edited:
The truth revealed by the Holy Spirit about the sinful nature of certain acts is not wisdom? Please explain why it is not.
So are you saying the truth received from the Holy Spirit about how to live more like Christ is not wisdom?

Not really, truth revealed is called revelation or reality, and where it concerns sins, may also involve discernment, or conviction.
Truth received is called guidance, direction or instruction.

I think, perhaps we should consider Socrates guidance for a moment:

“All good counsel begins in the same way: A man should know what he is advising about, or his counsel will all come to nought. But people imagine that they know about the nature of things, when they really don’'t know about them. And not having come to an understanding at first--because they think that they know--they end up as might be expected, in contradicting one another and even themselves! Now you and I must not be guilty of this fundamental error which we condemn in others."

(Phaedrus)

His counsel seems wise to me, but also seems not to be an example of wisdom to you. For he is giving guidance about seeking the truth: One must know what he is talking about. In other words, one must define his terms. Wisdom or not, I think this is good advice in our case.

His counsel may be wise, but his counsel is not wisdom. You said it yourself, it is not wisdom but counsel and guidance.

So please tell me: How do you define wisdom? You have told me what it is not. For you said it is not guidance. You have told me its source. For you said I may receive it only from the Holy Spirit. You have told me what it does. For you said it causes me to comprehend, rather than merely apprehend the truth. But I'm not sure you have explained exactly what wisdom is. You said Jesus is our wisdom, citing this passage:

But to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ is the power of God and the wisdom of God.

(*1 Corinthians‬ *1‬:*24)

But what exactly does that mean? Is my comprehension Jesus? Are my thoughts really him? Or is wisdom something else?


I have already stated in one of my previous posts what wisdom is, that you probably missed, post #154 "Wisdom is the ability to understand (spiritual things, in context of God's wisdom)".
Merely sharing knowledge of how to do something or telling someone what they should do, does not give them the ability to understand, what they are doing or why they are doing it. Wisdom is not the ability to merely apply knowledge, nor the ability to follow directions, not the ability to receive knowledge. Wisdom, is the ability to understand the knowledge that you apply, the ability to understand the directions you are given, the ability to understand, the knowledge you receive.


"For you said I may receive it only from the Holy Spirit. "
I thought we already established in a previous post, to which you agreed, that a person cannot receive wisdom from another person, just as you cannot receive another person's physical strength. So how can you say you may receive it from the Holy Spirit? Instead, you receive the Holy Spirit who is your wisdom (not, your wisdom is the Holy Spirit). "Is my comprehension Jesus?" - no, that is your comprehension. "Are my thoughts really him?" - no, they are your thoughts. But when His comprehension, is your comprehension, and his thoughts, are your thoughts, then you have the mind of Christ (1 Cor 2:16).

Everything I am saying is really a paraphrase of 1 Corinthians 2, it might be worthwhile for you to read it.
In the first few verses the apostle says that he only knew one thing - Jesus Christ. he did not have any wisdom, power or excellency of speech of his own.
You too, as a Christian, should not know Socrates, you should only know Jesus Christ.
This rules out anything of the natural man, including the wisdom of Socrates that comes by the way of teaching and learning.
This also rules out the idea that the Holy Spirit gives us wisdom and knowledge, rather than the Holy Spirit being our wisdom and knowledge. We become no wiser after receiving the Holy Spirit than we are before receiving the Holy Spirit. To become as wise as the Holy Spirit in ourselves, would constitute our spirit becoming the Holy Spirit, and thus a man becoming God, which cannot be. However, God knows all the things about human beings, because God became a human being.

Then Paul says that only the Spirit knows the things of God - the natural man can not achieve knowledge of such things. The human spirit knows human things, the Spirit of God knows God things, but the human spirit cannot know God things, only the Holy Spirit knows.
The Spirit is given so that we may have the knowledge of God and the discernment/understanding of God (i.e. wisdom).
Then he says that he has the mind of Christ. Not that Paul's mind is Christ, but that within Paul lives Christ's mind. What this is, theologically, is a type of hypostatic union. Origen said ""This substance of a soul, then, being intermediate between God and the flesh – it being impossible for the nature of God to intermingle with a body without an intermediate instrument – the God-man is born." ( Origen, De Principiis, Book II, Chapter VI. On the Incarnation of the Christ, 203-250 A.D.)

To explain a little - the soul is intermediate between God (Spirit) and flesh (our physical body).
It is to our soul that the Spirit of God can spread, giving us the "mind of Christ".
It is not that God gives us His mind, or that we become God's mind, but that God's mind and our mind are joined as one.
This is otherwise known as transformation (2 Cor 3:18, Rom 12:2).
This is one reason why God gives believers the Spirit to dwell in them, rather than merely to teach them in an outward way.
But having the indwelling Spirit is not enough, a person must also abide in the Spirit. A consequence of this, is not having a need for anyone to teach us, as we have the mind of Christ by abiding in Him (1 John 2:27).

Some relevant passages below:
1 Cor 2
11 For what man knoweth the things of a man, save the spirit of man which is in him? even so the things of God knoweth no man, but the Spirit of God.
12 Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the spirit which is of God; that we might know the things that are freely given to us of God.
13 Which things also we speak, not in the words which man's wisdom teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth; comparing spiritual things with spiritual.
14 But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.
15 But he that is spiritual judgeth all things, yet he himself is judged of no man.
16 For who hath known the mind of the Lord, that he may instruct him? but we have the mind of Christ.
 
Last edited:
it is not about what is given which is perfect,it is about how you handle that perfection.The flaw is never from God,the flaw is how one chooses to use what they have been given!! hehe ( matt 18:23-35!! the ten talents)
 
it is not about what is given which is perfect,it is about how you handle that perfection.The flaw is never from God,the flaw is how one chooses to use what they have been given!! hehe ( matt 18:23-35!! the ten talents)

Was this reply to James?
 
Not really, truth revealed is called revelation or reality, and where it concerns sins, may also involve discernment, or conviction.
Truth received is called guidance, direction or instruction.

James:

You have given me a good deal of information to digest. As a whole, it seems too much to swallow. Perhaps you won't mind helping me take one bite at a time?

You say truth revealed is revelation. Truth received is guidance. Neither is wisdom.

I have already stated in one of my previous posts what wisdom is, that you probably missed, post #154 "Wisdom is the ability to understand (spiritual things, in context of God's wisdom)".

You also say wisdom is the ability to comprehend, and God's wisdom is the ability to comprehend spiritual things.

Are you saying, then that comprehending a truth received is wisdom, and comprehending a spiritual truth received is godly or spiritual wisdom?
 
Last edited:
James:

Yes, I think you must be saying comprehension is wisdom. But please confirm this before we move on.

If I now possess wisdom about what you say about wisdom, then let me know if this inference is also wise: The ability to apprehend the truth (to believe that something is true but not know why it is true) is not wisdom. Only the ability to comprehend (to believe that something is true and to know why it is true) is wisdom. So we would properly interpret your namesake's words this way:

If any of you lacks wisdom, [which is the ability to comprehend the truth,] you should ask God, who gives generously to all without finding fault, and [this ability] will be given to you.

(James 1:5)

And the truth so comprehended is not wisdom, it is merely that which wisdom acquires for us. Am I getting wiser?
 
Last edited:
James:

But please don't think I'm ignoring the rest of your post. Wise or not, I happen to agree with Socrates: If I misunderstand what you mean when you use the word wisdom, I will misunderstand everything you say about her. Better to not waste your time and mine and correctly comprehend your definition of the word at the get go. Otherwise, you will be talking apples and I will be hearing oranges and I will in no way become wiser!

:)
 
Last edited:
To anyone who cares to consider this. hehe

It seems I lack wisdom regarding what you said. For as James seems to say, wisdom is the ability to comprehend what is said. Please enable me to understand by explaining the meaning of your post. Also tell me how what you said will help me determine what is greater--wisdom or love. For such is the noble purpose of this discussion.

:)
 
Last edited:
Brother Spockrates what is noble is to practice both with the same amount of endurance as you would lead others to do as well. How ones chooses, depends greatly upon what they themselves have to look with. For we cannot give to another,something we ourselves do not have ourselves. If ones mindset is founded upon love( psalm 40:1-3) then wisdom follows him who first loved,then gave wisdom in not only how to love,but also how to stay in that love.But earnestly desire the greater gifts!!( 1 cor 12:31) And i show you a still more excellent way!! Greek word Agape The most excellent way means to me brother an entire manner of life as the result of such love given! For love causes the greater gifts to flow,and stay flowing though out ones own life. All gifts must have a space to be placed into,and love is that space. hope that helps brother.
 
Last edited:
You also say wisdom is the ability to comprehend, and God's wisdom is the ability to comprehend spiritual things.

Are you saying, then that comprehending a truth received is wisdom, and comprehending a spiritual truth received is godly or spiritual wisdom?

Yes. And God's wisdom is Christ. So Christ is our wisdom means that Christ gives us the ability to comprehend spiritual things. But we do not become wiser ourselves, for merely to receive wise teachings, is not to become wiser, but to receive knowledge from someone wiser than ourselves.
 
Last edited:
James:

Yes, I think you must be saying comprehension is wisdom. But please confirm this before we move on.

If I now possess wisdom about what you say about wisdom, then let me know if this inference is also wise: The ability to apprehend the truth (to believe that something is true but not know why it is true) is not wisdom. Only the ability to comprehend (to believe that something is true and to know why it is true) is wisdom. So we would properly interpret your namesake's words this way:

If any of you lacks wisdom, [which is the ability to comprehend the truth,] you should ask God, who gives generously to all without finding fault, and [this ability] will be given to you.

(James 1:5)

And the truth so comprehended is not wisdom, it is merely that which wisdom acquires for us. Am I getting wiser?

Yes agree.
Just adding more detail to this one:

If any of you lacks wisdom, [which is the ability to comprehend spiritual truth, which is Christ,] you should ask God, who gives generously to all without finding fault, and [this ability, which is Christ] will be given to you.(James 1:5)

James's understanding however was actually inferior to the apostle Paul who realized that Christ is wisdom. Paul had more wisdom than James.

Christ is spiritual truth (John 14:6), and Christ is wisdom. If we have Christ, we have both the ability to know the spiritual truth (knowledge), and the ability to comprehend it (wisdom). This is called the mind of Christ (1 Cor 2:16).
 
Last edited:
Brother Spockrates what is noble is to practice both with the same amount of endurance as you would lead others to do as well. How ones chooses, depends greatly upon what they themselves have to look with. For we cannot give to another,something we ourselves do not have ourselves. If ones mindset is founded upon love( psalm 40:1-3) then wisdom follows him who first loved,then gave wisdom in not only how to love,but also how to stay in that love.But earnestly desire the greater gifts!!( 1 cor 12:31) And i show you a still more excellent way!! Greek word Agape The most excellent way means to me brother an entire manner of life as the result of such love given! For love causes the greater gifts to flow,and stay flowing though out ones own life. All gifts must have a space to be placed into,and love is that space. hope that helps brother.

Then let's take the risk and make a stand and say either way what is greater--love or wisdom. We should not fear making the wrong choice. We have nothing to lose but our ignorance! If we choose one and later find the other is greater, we will be all the wiser as a result. But if we so fear being wrong that we dare not make a choice, we will remain in the dark, not really knowing either wisdom or love, and with only ignorance and regret to keep us company.

So what do you say? Please answer this question with only one word so I will know for whom we shall take our stand: What is greater, wisdom or love?
 
Thanks James. Comparing this statement,

So Christ is our wisdom means that Christ gives us the ability to comprehend spiritual things.

with this one,

Yes agree.
Just adding more detail to this one:

If any of you lacks wisdom, [which is the ability to comprehend spiritual truth, which is Christ,] you should ask God, who gives generously to all without finding fault, and [this ability, which is Christ] will be given to you.

I'd ask that we be more precise. The ability is not Christ, because Christ is not an ability. Rather, he is the source, or giver, or enabler of the ability. At least, that is what you appear to say in the former statement. Would you agree that this is a more precise interpretation of the passage?

If any of you lacks wisdom, [which is the ability to comprehend spiritual truth, of which Christ is the source,] you should ask God, who gives generously to all without finding fault, and [this ability, which is enabled by Christ] will be given to you.

()
James's understanding however was actually inferior to the apostle Paul who realized that Christ is wisdom. Paul had more wisdom than James.

But you just said the words, "Christ is wisdom," in reality means, "Christ gives us the ability to comprehend spiritual things." So how does this contradict what James wrote?

Christ is spiritual truth (), and Christ is wisdom. If we have Christ, we have both the ability to know the spiritual truth (knowledge), and the ability to comprehend it (wisdom). This is called the mind of Christ (). [/COLOR]

Can a thing that creates another thing be the same thing it created? I'm thinking that Christ cannot literally be both truth and wisdom, since wisdom--as we agree--is not truth, but is instead the ability to acquire truth. Though I suppose Christ might be symbolically both, if by saying he is truth and wisdom, we actually mean he is the giver of both true opinion and the ability to accurately discern it.
 
Last edited:
No doubt in my mind whatsoever brother!!!! LOVE! is my answer!

Love it is, brother! Let us take up the sword of the spirit and defend her against all assailants! The first assault comes to mind, from a passage quoted by my pastor this weekend:

The Lord loves righteousness and justice; the earth is full of his unfailing love.

(*Psalm‬ *33‬:*5‬)

God loves justice, the psalmist sings. But justice, it seems to me, is sometimes opposed to mercy. Those who refuse God's mercy receive the just consequence, which is hell. They don't receive what they refuse to accept, which is mercy and forgiveness.

Now please tell me. What is justice? Is it an act of love to those who receive it and are sent to hell? Or is it an act of wisdom, since it is wise to keep those who refuse to repent separated from those who do repent and accept God's love? Or is it both, or neither?
 
Last edited:
James and Brighthouse:

Thank you much for the good time discussing the topic. Hope we may all have another thoughtful dialog sometime soon.

:)
 
Now please tell me. What is justice? Is it an act of love to those who receive it and are sent to hell? Or is it an act of wisdom, since it is wise to keep those who refuse to repent separated from those who do repent and accept God's love? Or is it both, or neither?

Justice is simply people getting what they deserve. You could say Christians are the only ones who don't get justice.
And that's a good thing. Because we deserve hell.

The Bible says in multiple places that God disciplines those He loves. It also says a man who doesn't discipline his children does not love them. ( Deut 8:5; Prov 13:24; Heb 12:6; Heb 12:10; etc.. )
So is discipline love? I think so.

As far as being separated from those who don't repent, I don't think this really ever happens for most of us.
Even after the New Jerusalem comes. We will rule and reign with Christ. Rule and reign over who?
It says those in the kingdom will never get sick or die. but it also says the tree of life is needed for the healing of the nations.
Who are these people who need to be healed? Who are these people outside the gates in Rev 22:15;
I know James believes they are Christians who didn't receive the reward of heaven. I do not, but no matter who it is, they still sin.
 
Last edited:
Justice is simply people getting what they deserve. You could say Christians are the only ones who don't get justice.
And that's a good thing. Because we deserve hell.

The Bible says in multiple places that God disciplines those He loves. It also says a man who doesn't discipline his children does not love them. ( ; ; ; ; etc.. )
So is discipline love? I think so.

As far as being separated from those who don't repent, I don't think this really ever happens for most of us.
Even after the New Jerusalem comes. We will rule and reign with Christ. Rule and reign over who?
It says those in the kingdom will never get sick or die. but it also says the tree of life is needed for the healing of the nations.
Who are these people who need to be healed? Who are these people outside the gates in ;
I know James believes they are Christians who didn't receive the reward of heaven. I do not, but no matter who it is, they still sin.

Thanks for the reply, BAC. I hear what you are saying, but I'm trying to contrast those in hell with those in heaven to see if God ever chooses to withhold forgiveness in order to be just--even if the unrepentant in hell turn out to be very few.

When I was a new Christian I asked a Bible teacher, "If God loves everyone, then why does anyone end up in hell?" His answer: "God is a living God, but he is also a just God." I've spent a good deal of time thinking about what he said over many years. It seems to me that those in hell are not receiving God's love as much as they are on the receiving end of God's justice. It is as though the complete love of God stops at the gates of hell.

And although it might not be loving to allow someone to enter hell and remain there forever, it certainly seems wise in at least some imagined circumstances. Allowing cruel and violent and hateful people to inhabit heaven alongside the kind and gentle and caring would in no way be either just or wise. At least, that's how it seems to me.

But how does it seem to you?
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the reply, BAC. I hear what you are saying, but I'm trying to contrast those in hell with those in heaven to see if God ever chooses to withhold forgiveness in order to be just--even if the unrepentant in hell turn out to be very few.

When I was a new Christian I asked a Bible teacher, "If God loves everyone, then why does anyone end up in hell?" His answer: "God is a living God, but he is also a just God." I've spent a good deal of time thinking about what he said over many years. It seems to me that those in hell are not receiving God's love as much as they are on the receiving end of God's justice. It is as though the complete love of God stops at the gates of hell.

And although it might not be loving to allow someone to enter hell and remain there forever, it certainly seems wise in at least some imagined circumstances. Allowing cruel and violent and hateful people to inhabit heaven alongside the kind and gentle and caring would in no way be either just or wise. At least, that's how it seems to me.

But how does it seem to you?
  • Allowing cruel and violent and hateful people to inhabit heaven alongside the kind and gentle and caring would in no way be either just or wise. At least, that's how it seems to me.Your philosophical approach to understanding is absurd....I am quite sure God doesn't care about your understanding. The mere mentioning the idea of cruel and violent and hateful people to inhabit heaven alongside the kind and gentle and caring is an impossibilty because it is in contemp of God's perfection in justice and totally not Bibilical and, therefore, not worthy of discussion.
  • This is a TJ site and I think it would be wise of you to stick to the Saving Grace and partnership of Jesus Christ and certainly the requirement to support any premise with scripture!
  • " At least, tha's how it seems to me" !
  • Colossians 2:8, See to it that no one takes you captive through philosophy and empty deception, according to the tradition of men, according to the elementary principles of the world, rather than according to Christ.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top