Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!
  • Welcome to Talk Jesus Christian Forums

    Celebrating 20 Years!

    A bible based, Jesus Christ centered community.

    Register Log In

Is Adam and Eve Scientifically Accurate?

Joined
Jun 4, 2026
Messages
193
Modern science has discovered that due to what is called species-crossbreeding and weaker strains along the genetic trail being weeded out, all people living on earth today share a recent ancestor no older than Noah in the Bible and quite possibly, considerably younger. This means that the genealogy of Jesus in the New Testament tracing back to Adam is scientifically accurate as far as modern science knows; it can neither be proven nor disproven by modern science. In search of the Garden of Eden's lost river. Is this Eden's Location?

Cells are so small, the average human adult has 6-8 trillion of them. Yet a single human cell is so overwhelmingly complex, it contains trillions of parts within parts within more parts, all working precisely in tandem together. Pretending such an overwhelmingly complex 'machine' far more advanced than any human invention, somehow randomly self-designed into existence, simply reeks of the worst kind of gross superstition.

Rather than in the comparatively simplistic time of Darwin, today we find ourselves within a universal reality of ever-changing overwhelming complexity; what science "believes" being even less certain since the launch of the James Web Telescope. It seems almost as if science knows far less today than it did back in the black and white, transistor radio, Flintstones cartoon, pre-moon landing American innocence of Buddy Holly and Elvis.

Scientific American: Recent Common Ancestor

From Nature: "These analyses suggest that the genealogies of all living humans overlap in remarkable ways in the recent past. In particular, the MRCA of all present-day humans lived just a few thousand years ago in these models. Moreover, among all individuals living more than just a few thousand years earlier than the MRCA, each present-day human has exactly the same set of genealogical ancestors." Nature: Recent Common Ancestor

Most Recent Ancestor of Modern Humans Surprisingly Recent

From Wikipedia: "The identical ancestors point for Homo sapiens has been the subject of debate. In 2003 Rohde estimated it to be between 5000 and 15,000 years ago. In 2004, Rohde, Olson and Chang showed through simulations that, given the false assumption of random mate choice without geographic barriers, the identical ancestors point for all humans would be surprisingly recent, on the order of 5,000–15,000 years ago.

"Ralph and Coop (2013), considering the European population and working from genetics, came to similar conclusions for the recent common ancestry of Europeans. More recently, however, researchers have estimated the European isopoint to be closer to 1000 A.D." Wikipedia: Identical Ancestors Point

The genealogy of Jesus, who is of mixed ancestry tracing to Adam in Luke, is accurate as far as science knows or likely ever will know. This genealogy of Jesus utterly destroys any and every foolish notion of racism. Jesus died for all people II Corinthians 5:15.

These three links would help anyone with a middle school or higher education easily understand their science textbooks are obviously lying to them.

Why DNA Without Intelligence is Irrational

Cambrian Explosion: The Failure of Darwin's Theory

Random Chance Probability of a Single Protein Forming

These two links would help anyone with a 1st grade or higher education easily grasp why it is 100% scientific, logical, rational and reasonable to believe in God. while on the other hand, it is irrational to pretend the universe somehow magically appeared, no matter how many scientific or other credentials one may, for some unknown "random" "totally by chance" and astronomically overwhelmingly irreducible inexplicable reason, somehow happen to possess.

The Great Math Mystery

Nature by Numbers

This link provides several reasons why many actual practicing scientists believe natural selection is outdated and plainly inadequate to explain the overwhelmingly complexity of our father in heaven's creation.

Does Science Really Know what's True?
 
Back
Top