(Rom. 16-17)
Paul uses homosexuality - both female and male - as an example of God giving them up to uncleanness, in the lusts of their hearts, to dishonor their bodies among themselves. Some say that the Bible nowhere condemns lesbian homosexuality, but the likewise of Rom. 1:27 makes it clear that the sin of homosexuality condemned in Rom. 1:27 is connected to the sin of women mentioned in Rom. 1:26.
Paul doesn’t even use the normal words for men and women here; he uses the words for male and female, using categories that describe sexuality outside of human terms, because the type of sexual sin he describes is outside of human dignity. Paul categorizes the whole section under the idea of vile passions - unhealthy, unholy. Nevertheless, Paul lived in a culture that openly approved of homosexuality. Paul didn’t write this to a culture that agreed with him. He wrote to a culture where homosexuality was accepted as a part of life for both men and women. For some 200 years, men who openly practiced homosexuality, often with young boys, ruled the Roman Empire.
At times, the Roman Empire specifically taxed approved homosexual prostitution and gave boy prostitutes a legal holiday. Legal marriage between same gender couples was recognized, and even some of the emperors married other men. At the very time Paul was writing, Nero was emperor. He took a boy named Sporus and had him castrated, then married him (with a full ceremony), brought him to the palace with a great procession, and made the boy his “wife.” Later, Nero lived with another man, and Nero was the “wife.”
Homosexual practice truly is an abomination in our present culture. Statistics tell us that on average 43% of homosexuals say that they have had 500 or more sexual partners in their lifetime, and only 1% of homosexuals say they have had four or less sexual partners in their lifetime.
According the Unites States Department of Health and Human Services, 77% of homosexuals say they have met sexual partners in a city park; 62% in a homosexual bar, 61% in a theater, 31% in a public restroom. Only 28% of homosexuals said that they had known their partners for at least a week before participating in homosexual sex.
Homosexuals often seem to specialize in anonymous sex with no emotional commitment. At one time, London AIDS clinics defined a woman as promiscuous if she had more than six partners in her lifetime. They gave up trying to apply a workable definition to male homosexuals when it became clear that they saw almost no homosexual men who had less than six sexual partners a year.
Receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which was due: Paul speaks of a penalty for homosexual conduct; Homosexuality has within itself a penalty. This speaks of the self-destructive nature of sin; it often carries within itself it’s own penalty. Sometimes it is the penalty of disease, which is the consequence of violating nature’s order. Sometimes it is the penalty of rebellion, resulting in spiritual emptiness and all it’s ramifications. The term “gay” is wishful thinking; it sends a message that there is something essentially happy and carefree about the homosexual lifestyle - which there is not.
As further judgment, God gives man over to a debased mind, so that things that are disgraceful and sickening are readily accepted and approved. The word debased (or, reprobate in the KJV) meant originally ‘that which has not stood the test’. It was used of coins that were substandard and therefore rejected. The idea is that since man did not “approve” to know God, men came to have an “unapproved” mind.
Our rebellion against God is not only displayed in our actions, but in our thinking. We are genuinely “spiritually insane” in our rebellion against God.
The list in Rom. 1:29-31 gives concrete examples of the kind of things which are not fitting. Notice how “socially acceptable” sins (such as covetousness, envy and pride) are included right along with “socially unacceptable” sins (such as murder and being unloving).
Covetousness is literally the itch for more.
Whisperers: “Secret detractors; those who, under pretended secrecy, carry about accusations against their neighbours, whether true or false; blasting their reputation by clandestine tittle-tattle.” (Clarke)
Is envy a small sin? Envy put Jesus on the cross. Pilate knew that they had handed Him over because of envy. (Mt. 27:18)
Proud: “They who are continually exalting themselves and depressing others; magnifying themselves at the expense of their neighbors; and wishing all men to receive their sayings as oracles.” (Clarke)
Those who either practice or approve of these things are worthy of death: they are the objects of the wrath of God.
Where does all this violence, immorality, cruelty and degradation come from? Men have abandoned the true knowledge of God, and the state of society is a reflection of God’s judgment upon them for this.
Ok, so I don't read this passage in the same way, and I doubt my view will be particularly popular. However, a vigorous debate is a good thing, given that we all stick to the word of the text. First, a few notes where I disagree with your history:
Ancient Rome (and Greece, Egypt, etc) definately did not accept homosexual marriage. You have to understand that marriage was viewed not as a romantic (or, among the more cynical, particularly religious) event, but rather a combination of business arrangement and insurance of family lines. This is the reason for the extreme guarding of women (in Hellenic Greece women couldn't go out in public even with chaperones) because infidelity threatened ******* lines (which was one of the most dishonorable fates imaginable for a family in a soceity where family counted for much more than it does today) You are correct about Nero, but you have to keep in mind that Nero actively cultivated an image of being insane and forcing his insanity on others to solidify his power. It's no more fair to say that Roman culture accepted homosexual marriage than to say that they accepted horses for senators (Nero also forced people to accept his horse as a senator)
I can't really evaluate your claims about statistics because you don't provide the studies from which these statistics come, (I promise I'm not being hostile, it's just an academic requirement and one that makes sense to me) but I can't justify those numbers with my experience.
It seems to me, brother Jones, that your reading of this passage is particularly wide. I take a more specific, limited reading. Paul speaks of the mind warping, so that men lay with men as with women. As I noted in the original post, I read this to be about being so unsound of mind that sex becomes only for the sake of pleasure. Surely there are people like this, I have known some. Intoxication (also present in Paul's theme) tends to be a big factor in the form of drugs and alcohol. This sort of behavior is caustic to the soul, which seems to me to be the punishment of which Paul speaks. (I am wary of reading retribution into disease when Christ so thoroughly rejects this with lepers) I have talked many long hours with multiple friends who went through this and helped them to see the light of Christ's forgiveness. In an entirely different category are several friends of mine who are gay. Several are abstinent, while others have relationships more monogamous than many of my straight friends. They tell me that they have been gay since they had such feelings and have never been interested in the opposite sex. If this is the case, and I have no reason to disbelieve them- indeed I cannot because they speak to me heart to heart- then there is no warping of their minds as they have always only been interested in the same sex. Furthermore, they do not feel the spiritual degradation that my aforementioned lost friends did. In fact, some are excellent teachers of Christ and practicing Christians. I don't think I can find in Pauls words anything condemning them, especially given the lack of homosexuality in Christ's long list of condemnations of sexual practice.