The Gospel of Christ
Active
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2025
- Messages
- 253
You’re confusing sequence with separation. “Meta tauta” just means John saw the next part of the vision — not a totally different group of people. Revelation isn’t a newspaper or a Scofield chart; it’s a prophetic vision full of symbols. John hears the number 144,000 — a symbolic picture of the full covenant people of God — and then sees what that actually looks like: a great multitude from every nation, tribe, and tongue standing before the throne. That’s not a second group — that’s the same group, revealed in fullness. This is classic prophetic style — hearing one thing, seeing another that reveals its true meaning. In Revelation 5, John hears that the Lion of Judah has conquered, but when he looks, he sees a slain Lamb. The same thing happens here: he hears 144,000 from the tribes of Israel, but then sees the reality — a redeemed, global Church. You’re treating apocalyptic vision like it’s a courtroom transcript, as if a scene change means new characters. It doesn’t. Trying to split these groups apart just to prop up dispensational theology completely misses the point: this is about fulfillment in Christ, not a divided future between Jews and Gentiles.
Dispensationalists always do this. They chop up the text, isolate the symbols, and force Revelation into a rigid, man-made chart — as if God were writing 'Left Behind', Hollywood fairytales. They miss the prophetic language, the covenant fulfillment, the Christ-centered climax of the entire book. Every time they see the word “Israel,” they slam on the brakes and throw the Gospel out the window, pretending the Church is some last-minute detour instead of the very goal of redemptive history.
They turn apocalyptic poetry into a travel itinerary and then act shocked when none of it lands.
Dispensationalists always do this. They chop up the text, isolate the symbols, and force Revelation into a rigid, man-made chart — as if God were writing 'Left Behind', Hollywood fairytales. They miss the prophetic language, the covenant fulfillment, the Christ-centered climax of the entire book. Every time they see the word “Israel,” they slam on the brakes and throw the Gospel out the window, pretending the Church is some last-minute detour instead of the very goal of redemptive history.
They turn apocalyptic poetry into a travel itinerary and then act shocked when none of it lands.
Last edited: