Are YOU aware of the different gospels given for different Time Periods, to different people?
Dispensationalism is a lie of the devil.
I am quite aware, though, that certain prophecies given to Israel were for certain time periods. That should be obvious to anyone.
But the Word of God (meaning the truth of all reality) stands forever unchanged.
RHEMA, please take time to consider others input here!
I'll take the time when they show critical thinking skills and can give rational discourse. I am under no obligation from God to listen to stupid people, or those truly challenged in their verbal skills. I don't eat word salads.
In order for any understanding to occur between two people, one must consider two things:
1) Presuppositional Foundation.
2) Definitional Framework.
Most people have no clue what these even are.
As a starting point, I would suggest the works of -
Why was it that The Apostle Paul was not sent unto The Gentiles until after all the dealings Jesus had with Isreal? Why was He, appointed an Apostille to The Gentiles instead of Isreal? Why, why?
Because he wasn't. He wasn't appointed to the Gentiles. At least not by God. He was a self proclaimed Apostle because of his own private interpretation of certain events.
The only claims made that Paul was an Apostle to the Gentiles came from Paul.
Peter disagreed when he said:
And when there had been much disputing, Peter rose up, and said unto them, Men and brethren, ye know how that a good while ago God made choice among us, that the Gentiles by my mouth should hear the word of the gospel, and believe.
- Acts 15:7 KJV
This was a claim made in front of the entire church council and not even Paul had the guts to deny this in public.
So who lied? Peter or Paul?
Paul puffed up himself
For I speak to you Gentiles, inasmuch as I am the apostle of the Gentiles, I magnify mine office:
- Romans 11:13 KJV
If I may suggest, though, that this line of query is outside the scope of this particular thread, so I won't continue on here. Perhaps the "Blasphemy" or "Paul - the Apostle" thread might be better suited. (Until I am banned.)
Kindly,
Rhema
after Jesus had dies on The Cross?
Jesus spent FORTY DAYS (40) teaching his disciples
AFTER the cross.
In the first book, Theophilus, I wrote about all that Jesus did and taught from the beginning until the day when he was taken up to heaven, after giving instructions through the Holy Spirit to the apostles whom he had chosen. After his suffering he presented himself alive to them by many convincing proofs, appearing to them during forty days and speaking about the kingdom of God.
- Acts 1:1-3 NRSV
Ten days
AFTER Jesus' ascension, the Holy Spirit of Truth was given at Pentecost. (Remember, Paul wasn't there. Neither was Luke.) The Gospel texts of Matthew Mark Luke and John were written
AFTER the cross,
AFTER the resurrection,
AFTER the 40 days,
AFTER the ascension and even
AFTER Paul's epistles. Yet there is absolutely NOTHING in Matthew Mark Luke or John or even the first part of Acts about any TWO Gospel solution that ever came from the lips of Jesus or his (real) chosen Apostles.
This isn't hard to understand. The Pauline Gospel didn't exist until Paul. And that should give you pause.
Please remember that I won't reply here in this thread. Thanks kindly.
