KingJ
Active
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2015
- Messages
- 5,501
Atheist scientists used to discount the bible and its made up creator. The accepted view was that the universe had always existed and thus had no creator. As science progressed and a beginning and end became evident they reluctantly were forced to accept the very uncomfortable now mainstream view of a big bang & big freeze. Now the universe needs a cause which is outside of time itself.
As beings inside time we only know the infinitesimal "now". The past has a length but is only a memory. The future has a length but is only a figment of our imagination. A creator outside of time would only have an infinite "now" that includes everything (no past, no future as we understand it).
The bible gains credibility:
When Moses asked who was speaking the answer came "I AM THAT I AM" and "I AM hath sent me". Also "Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am". This is an incredibly profound answer that could only come from the cause which is outside of time itself.
How can a sin committed by me today be covered by Christ's sacrifice two millennia ago? How can I be crucified with Him and rise in Him two millennia ago when I only believed in Him in recently? To the creator God there is no difference. The wrath of God poured upon Jesus on the cross and each of my sins all happen at his "now". Abraham and you and I have a "was" but Jesus only has an "I am".
We who are in time must be very careful about logic with time based axioms/assumptions when defining the attributes of God who is the "I AM" outside of time.
I think you are reading too much into the “time” issue. No spirit is outside of time. The demons that spoke to Jesus said, “Why torment us before our time?” They may live forever and not worry about age, but there is a clear biblical sequence of events that dictates time.
God can be outside time, sure. I am not sure how the statement “I am” helps anyone better understand His origin. It is merely a statement of fact. It does not reveal anything about His creation or origin. The only profound thing about that statement is the implication that we are too dumb to comprehend anything else.