Butch5
Active
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2019
- Messages
- 3,337
I haven't evaded anything you've said, On the other hand, I've pointed out the numerous fallacies in your arguments. You asked about one. The assumption you've made that God ordains everyone's life hasn't been validated. Your understanding of a passage of Scripture isn't proof unless it's correct. You've mixed up lead with ordain. They mean different things. Your understanding of the word partial is incorrect. It means to show favor. So, even if you were correct that God ordained people's live it wouldn't be partiality unless God choose one of the other through favoritism rather than suitability. Additionally, your argument is based on a passage of Scripture you're taken out of context. In the passage Peter is talking about partiality between Jews and Gentiles. He says nothing about people's lives or God ordering them.I like how you EVADE the entire post with this accusatory line. Insanity Butch!! Utter waste of time discussing with you.
I have given you scriptures and explained it is not an assumption.
I feel you have a terribly warped idea of what Christianity is if you do not believe we are here to ''serve'' God.
Enjoy your day at the park, whilst actual Christians are witnessing to God in areas where the devil is attacking them with all his strength. Trying DAILY to stumble them.
At least in the park, you are in a safe zone where your '''salvation''' / ''''faith''''' is secure right.
If you say ''oh man, me being in the park is an assumption''...is it? If you believe you can lose your salvation and be burnt alive / annihilated, you would be the definition of mad if you did not stay in a permanent safe zone.
I'm not surprised you've spent 10 years debating Atheists. I'd bet not one has been converted, because anyone can see the massive amount of errors in your arguments. You put that post up claiming you couldn't find an anti-osas believer capable of logical though. Really? That's kind of an arrogant statement for a post that is filled with logical fallacies and assumptions.