bibleguy
Member
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2018
- Messages
- 234
@bibleguy,
You believe you've seen and proven contradictions in what I say. This is only because you cannot understand the information I've been presenting. I notice you believe you have been forgiven of your sins; but you still sin. The reason I can understand what you’re saying is because it’s no different than the Mosaic Covenant of Atonement for sins. You just believe Jesus paid the price for the penalty of sin and has taken away past and present sins. You do not believe that Jesus has atoned for all men’s sins “once for all” and “acquitted” and “absolved” man of their sins.
You believe New Covenant believers should continue acting as Old Covenant believers where sin is concerned; this is what you’ve been preaching from day one. I realize under the Old Covenant Israel was required to confess their sin, bring an offering to the priest and the priest would atone for the sins of the people. God would then cast their sins as far as the east is from the west. If they continued to sin, which they did, the process would just repeat itself. This is the gist of what you believe. Again, you believe New Covenant believers should do today. I disagree.
I already know you cannot find the scriptures I'm asking for, because it's not possible. I've pointed out over 10 scripture teaching that Jesus did much more than forgave man's sins.
Hi!
And, the counter-argument (grounded in Scripture) which I've set before you proves that there MUST be something wrong with your viewpoint.
Here's the proof:
1. Regibassman57 claims he has Scriptures which confirms that regibassman57 does not sin.
2. Regibassman57 knows that he sometimes does what is wrong (not right). [from his confession]
3. Knowing what is right to do (and not doing it) is sin (Jas. 4:17).
4. Regibassman57 sometimes sins (from 2 and 3).
There you have it!
#2 and #3 and #4 are ALL TRUE!
But #1 and #4 are a CONTRADICTION.
Thus, Regibassman57's claim (in [HASH=655]#1)[/HASH] MUST BE FALSE!
Thus, there MUST be something wrong with regibassman57's viewpoint.
What am I supposed to do? Just IGNORE Jas 4:17 (like you do), and lay down and accept your theological viewpoint instead?
How could you ask anyone to do such a thing?
Should we not accept ALL Scripture?
Yet you give us no good reason for ignoring Jas. 4:17.
You can ignore Jas. 4:17 if you REALLY think you need to do so....but I think that's a bad choice. I think we should integrate ALL Biblical Scripture into our theological viewpoint.
And, of COURSE Jesus atoned for our sins (which we sometimes still commit).
And, of COURSE Jesus acquitted us of our sins (which we sometimes still commit).
And, of COURSE Jesus absolved us of our sins (which we sometimes sitll commit).
You wrote: "I've pointed out over 10 scripture teaching that Jesus did much more than forgave man's sins."
My response: Ok. Please list these 10 Scriptures for me, so that I can try to do a better job of explaining to you my claim that you have not properly harmonized them with Jas. 4:17.
Which 10 Scriptures are you talking about again?
Thanks.
blessings..