bibleguy
Member
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2018
- Messages
- 234
@Dave M,
Good Question, Sin happens when a person misses the mark. This happen when a person is "justified by the law" and told to keep the law perfectly but breaks it (1John 3:4; Rom. 3:19,20; 7:7).
Dave you or I cannot miss the mark because there is no mark for us to miss; we are under/justified by Grace (Rom. 5:20; 2Cor. 5:19); nonimputation of sin applies. If God was imputing sin unto us, "we would" miss the mark and sin because we would be told to keep the law 100%.
In Christ as long as we develop in the love of God through His commandments (Joh. 15:10), and bring forth His character; 30%, 60% or 100%, we are obedient children and are not considered unfruitful (Mat. 13:23). Anything less than 30% is unfruitful. The unfruitful believer in Christ who does not bring forth at least 30%, will be gathered out of the body of Christ (Kindom of God), judged and condemned to the fire (Mat.13:41; 1Cor.4:5).
So, the question was, do I sin; NO! Do I commit wrong acts, YES! Is God imputing sin unto me for my wrong acts? NO! (Rom. 4:8). Did God impute sin to our Father Abraham for his wrong acts? NO! (Rom. 4:1-8). Was sin in the world in the time of Abraham? YES! (Rom. 5:13). Did Jesus take away the "sin" (singular) of the world, YES (Joh 1:29).
Hi! I need to jump in, here, because I think I found a contradiction in your viewpoint.
You wrote: "So, the question was, do I sin; NO! Do I commit wrong acts, YES!"
And, here's the proof I offer to refute your comment:
1. regibassman57 knows that he sometimes does what is wrong (i.e., not good or right). [from quote above]
2. Knowing what is right to do (and not doing it) is sin (Jas. 4:17).
3. regibassman57 sometimes sins (from 1 and 2).
There it is buddy! I think I nailed you again (in the love of Christ, of course!) Please test these three propositions. How can you escape them? It's another very tight argument, it seems.
You can NOT deny #1 or #2. And, #3 LOGICALLY NECESSARILY follows from #1 and #2 (thus, you can NOT rationally deny #3 either, given the truth of #1 and [HASH=610]#2)[/HASH].
So I don't see any way for you to rationally escape this one.
Agreed?