Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!
  • Welcome to Talk Jesus Christian Forums

    Celebrating 20 Years!

    A bible based, Jesus Christ centered community.

    Register Log In

Is evolution biblical or even scientific?

It all begins with faith. We can't "get" faith, as it is a gift from the Lord. Proverbs 2:6-7 (KJV)
6 For the LORD giveth wisdom: out of his mouth cometh knowledge and understanding.
7 He layeth up sound wisdom for the righteous: he is a buckler to them that walk uprightly.

Interestingly enough the NASB, and NLT also say wisdom.
God gives faith to all men. ( Rom 12:3; )
God wants all to be saved.... ( 1 Tim 2:3-4; 2 Pet 3:9; )

The idea that God prevents people from being saved is preposterous. It is a lie from Satan.
If unbelief is a sin, and it's God who causes some people not to believe (I'm not talking about people who have already rejected him for a while)
Then God must be making them sin. God does give some over to their sins and deluded/depraved minds, but only after they have rejected him.

It's our faith that saves us ( Luke 7:50; ) not Gods. God has enough faith for everyone but everyone isn't saved.
There are over 50 scriptures in the NT that talk about "your" faith. It's your faith that makes things happen. Not Gods.
 
By "get" it is not at all a virtue sinners can "obtain" by their own determination, as in go "get" a new car. We have no power to achieve faith. It is a gift from God to whomever will receive it. Beyond the offering of a gift one must 'open the box' and accept the gift by possessing it for one's own use. There is a worldly 'faith' that won't lead to salvation.
Romans 10:17 (KJV) 17 So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.

The faith unto salvation is nothing a human can generate. It comes to a person only one way, and that's by the word of God. If it comes any other way it is a secular faith.
 
Jesus confronted Pharisees, so why not you?
I am not Jesus. I do not have the wisdom or knowledge that he had, and neither the desire or willingness to argue with those that like to argue a point until they feel they have won. I share my faith and scant scripture and if you cannot see the wisdom of it, thats your problem, not mine. I am willing to share, but not willing to thrust my seed into non-fertile ground, over and over, to someone who cannot see. If the Holy Spirit works within you and you value it, you will see the truth of what I said. If you dont, nothing I say will make any difference and I would just be wasting effort and accomplishing nothing of value.
 
I am not Jesus. I do not have the wisdom or knowledge that he had, and neither the desire or willingness to argue with those that like to argue a point until they feel they have won. I share my faith and scant scripture and if you cannot see the wisdom of it, thats your problem, not mine. I am willing to share, but not willing to thrust my seed into non-fertile ground, over and over, to someone who cannot see. If the Holy Spirit works within you and you value it, you will see the truth of what I said. If you dont, nothing I say will make any difference and I would just be wasting effort and accomplishing nothing of value.
Paul also confronted the Pharisees, in Acts 15 and Acts 23. All apostles were also disciples of Jesus, of which I am too. I have the mind of Christ. All Christians have that mind, some stronger of that mind because some study the word of God more than others. 1 Corinthians 2:14-16 (KJV)
14 But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.
15 But he that is spiritual judgeth all things, yet he himself is judged of no man.
16 For who hath known the mind of the Lord, that he may instruct him? But we have the mind of Christ.


I am not a "natural man" now that I'm born again, filled with his Holy Spirit, so the eyes of my understanding are fully open to things of the Spirit of God, and have power to shame the lie of evolution, but for the purpose of promoting the truth of the Bible. You should be too. I too sow the word, but not from a mere pocket full. I sow from the whole bag of seed. Some falls on good ground, some on rocky ground, the way Jesus taught it will be sown. No New Testament instruction exists to call for sowing of the word only on good ground. Mark 4:14-20 (KJV)
14 The sower soweth the word.
15 And these are they by the way side, where the word is sown; but when they have heard, Satan cometh immediately, and taketh away the word that was sown in their hearts.
16 And these are they likewise which are sown on stony ground; who, when they have heard the word, immediately receive it with gladness;
17 And have no root in themselves, and so endure but for a time: afterward, when affliction or persecution ariseth for the word's sake, immediately they are offended.
18 And these are they which are sown among thorns; such as hear the word,
19 And the cares of this world, and the deceitfulness of riches, and the lusts of other things entering in, choke the word, and it becometh unfruitful.
20 And these are they which are sown on good ground; such as hear the word, and receive it, and bring forth fruit, some thirtyfold, some sixty, and some an hundred.


We sow the word everywhere. Preach the gospel to every creature, not just the ones wanting it preached. We ought all be earnestly doing what Peter commanded, already posted above twice. If we lack in just one of the fruit listed we risk the dire consequences. A mediocre Christian is more likely to make shipwreck of his or her faith.

Use what Solomon, Daniel and Paul recommended we possess through the gifting and process already posted above, for Christians to be found with God's knowledge, wisdom and understanding to be effective in preaching, and defending Genesis against Satan's evolution lies against Genesis. My case for that is from
Proverbs 2:6 (KJV)
6 For the LORD giveth wisdom: out of his mouth cometh knowledge and understanding.
Proverbs 9:10 (KJV)
10 The fear of the LORD is the beginning of wisdom: and the knowledge of the holy is understanding.
Daniel 1:4 (KJV)
4 Children in whom was no blemish, but well favoured, and skilful in all wisdom, and cunning in knowledge, and understanding science, and such as had ability in them to stand in the king's palace, and whom they might teach the learning and the tongue of the Chaldeans.
Colossians 1:9 (KJV)
9 For this cause we also, since the day we heard it, do not cease to pray for you, and to desire that ye might be filled with the knowledge of his will in all wisdom and spiritual understanding;


Blessings to you today!
 
I was interested in those who hold the two great light of the fourth day were the Sun and the moon could explain how the events given as day Two and Three could have manifested if there was no light emitted unto the fourth day. Before day 1,the entire earth's surface was submerged under a deluge of frozen water that covered the entire face of the earth. Without thermal energy of the visible light, the frozen waters upon the face of the earth would have remained frozen. In addition, without the pulses of light there wouldn't have been any gravitational force to cause the earth to begin rotating, necessary to produce the conditions for the waters to be divided from the waters for the formation of the atmosphere.
 
In addition, without the pulses of light there wouldn't have been any gravitational force to cause the earth to begin rotating, necessary to produce the conditions for the waters to be divided from the waters for the formation of the atmosphere.
Hello WaterRock.

The narrative in Genesis is not a scientific proclamation to humanity, nor do I believe that this was the purpose of the narration given
in Genesis. If you are reading Genesis through the glasses of cause and effect you may be on the wrong path. The Bible reveals God's
creative hand at work, God creates and molds the earth for habitation by living organisms (us).

Light and gravity are not related to one another according to the tenets of science.

The rotation of the earth on it's axis has nothing to do with light.

The scripture states that God separated the waters, your claiming the rotation of the earth is the cause of this separation of the waters.

Science knows nothing about the formation of the earth, science is speculating about such matters, science involves observation
and verification of these observations. Science cannot observe the formation of the earth in the deep past, so science is not able
to comment on such matters. What science is really doing is speculating.
 
The narrative in Genesis is not a scientific proclamation to humanity, nor do I believe that this was the purpose of the narration given
in Genesis
While I do not doubt that your opinion might be exactly right regarding the purpose of the narrative in Genesis 1, considering that LORD is described in Deuteronomy 32:4 as "a God of truth and without iniquity, just and right is he." , then considering the context of Genesis 1 directly relates the nature of the earth and the steps in the process which were necessary to replenish the earth. I find it difficult to cite any other reason.
 
Light and gravity are not related to one another according to the tenets of science.
Are you speaking of visible white light from the sun or the other great light? However, like light, gravity has no mass since it is a force and not an element.
While great efforts are being placed in the attempt to detect the gravitational waves, which interestingly enough includes using pulsars.
The rotation of the earth on it's axis has nothing to do with light.
Ok, let's say the earth's rotation on it's axis has nothing to do with light, since gravity either pulls in or pushes out, then what form of matter is the earth's axis turning on?
The scripture states that God separated the waters, your claiming the rotation of the earth is the cause of this separation of the water
Actually it is written: "And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters." Gen 1:6
So if God said Let there be a firmament and let it divide the waters from the waters then one wouldn't one give Him the
would give the benefit of the doubt that the firmament divided the waters.

.So in Genesis 1:7, And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so.
 
Paul also confronted the Pharisees, in Acts 15 and Acts 23. All apostles were also disciples of Jesus, of which I am too. I have the mind of Christ. All Christians have that mind, some stronger of that mind because some study the word of God more than others.

Do you and every believer always have all of the mind of Christ? If we did would we not already be overcomers as Jesus was/is an overcomer?

Do some have more because of more study? So then does this mean that better students are better servants of God? Are not the best students to be found among those with greater intelligence (higher IQs)? How then is it that God who gave the gift of intelligence no respecter of persons?

Is study the way to all of truth or is it not simple obedience with truth coming through the Holy Spirit?

You mentioned Solomon's recommendations: What of this verse penned by Solomon?

"And further, by these, my son, be admonished: of making many books there is no end; and much study is a weariness of the flesh." Ecc 12:12

You would then might refer to this verse penned by Paul:

"Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth." II Tim 2:15

I believe that that verse refers to the necessity of study to be obedient rather than to obtain truth. Shouldn't we rather come to truth come through the leading of the Holy Ghost?

"But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you." John 14:26

I am not a "natural man" now that I'm born again, filled with his Holy Spirit, so the eyes of my understanding are fully open to things of the Spirit of God, and have power ... for the purpose of promoting the truth of the Bible. You should be too.

You are not a natural man yet if I am not mistaken you will not place your bare hand of flesh into an open flame. You have undoubtedly never done or said anything to unnecessarily hurt anyone since you were "born again". Were you immediately born again consuming meat rather than starting with milk? Were you born again as a fully mature adult? Were you born again better even than Jesus who apparently spent 30 years in subjection and growth?


"And he went down with them, and came to Nazareth, and was subject unto them: but his mother kept all these sayings in her heart.
And Jesus increased in wisdom and stature, and in favour with God and man." Luke 2:51-52


Me? I still have that natural part of me striving to regain the lost dominion. Yes, there is still a measure of double mindedness in me, but the words of James are, I believe, working in me through the Holy Spirit to do better:

"Draw nigh to God, and he will draw nigh to you. Cleanse your hands, ye sinners; and purify your hearts, ye double minded.
Be afflicted, and mourn, and weep: let your laughter be turned to mourning, and your joy to heaviness.
Humble yourselves in the sight of the Lord, and he shall lift you up." James 4:8-10

And then back to the words of the Baptist:

"He must increase, but I must decrease." John 3:30

The one to increase is the Jesus ["new man" to use Paul's expression] in me and one to decrease is the "old man" of me. Again quoting from Paul:

"I protest by your rejoicing which I have in Christ Jesus our Lord, I die daily." I Cor 15:31

He needed to "die daily" because the "old man" of Paul was not completely and finally dead yet:
 
God made the planet without form and void, that is with no surface features. He added water. Without an atmosphere, in zero atmospheric pressure, the water would begin going directly into a gaseous state regardless of presence of light energy, the vapor molecules hovering near the surface due to gravity keeping the molecules from wandering into outer space. At some point the water vapor would present pressure against the water on the surface, slowing down evaporation once the vapor became saturated. Ice on the surface would continue to sublimate into vapor. Light was added, which completed the setup for creation of a fully functional atmosphere, providing for cycling of vapors back into liquid or solid (ice) states, replenishing surface waters. That atmosphere is called the "firmament", which includes the separation, maintenance, and restoration of the three states of water, liquid, vapor, and ice.

All that happened in the first two days. That also means the earth was rotating on its axis when formed, though rotating a little faster then presently spinning.

The next day came the separation of surface waters from dry land, meaning the surface was given form resulting from geologic actions. Upheavals allowed water to collect in basins called seas. On that third day he also created vegetative life on dry land. Without the sun the new plants had opportunity to grow in the darkness, as they do today.

On the fourth day came the sun, moon, and other stars as creation expanded outward from Earth. By then the plants were ready to receive sunlight to generate food to grow each night. The plants would have produced oxygen in abundance to oxidize minerals to improve soil, the gas also filtering the harshness of the light.

On day five was also created sea life and fowls of the air finding plenty to eat.

On day 6 God created air breathing animals then the one man, all air breathers given plants for food. By then vegetation could grow sufficiently to feed the birds as well as other pairs of animals that began to reproduce as the food supply increased. There was no consuming of flesh among air breathers in the beginning.

It would be impossible for a most brilliant biologist to figure out a better order of creation. The plan was exquisite. From that point on animals and plants had genetic potential to adapt to changes in food supply and other environmental conditions, as they do today. Genetic adaptation is not evolution, but is part of the design of all living forms.
 
Shouldn't we rather come to truth come through the leading of the Holy Ghost?

Excellent point:thumbsup: From what I hear, the Holy Ghost can speak for himself in an audible voice, but that is just my opinion since it is written that faith comes by hearing and hearing by the word of God.

God made the planet without form and void, that is with no surface features.

While I agree with you that the reference 'without form' represents that the topical features of the surface, I would submit that the term 'void' refers to the absence of living matter.

Without an atmosphere, in zero atmospheric pressure, the water would begin going directly into a gaseous state regardless of presence of light energy.

If I may, can I ask your source that supports the position that pressure alone determines whether a substance will exist as a solid or a gas.

But for the sake of brevity, the molecule which is formed by the bonding of two hydrogen atoms with the oxygen of atom, called water, or H20 would have never formed in a liquid state but would have remained in the gaseous state. Thus the water vapor would have instantly formed into the solid state, or ice. This process known as desublimation.

.
Without the sun the new plants had opportunity to grow in the darkness, as they do today.

So the plants all sprouted overnight, then can you provide one specimen of plant that sprouts from seed in one day?
 
Dovegiven said:
"God made the planet without form and void, that is with no surface features."
WaterRock said:
While I agree with you that the reference 'without form' represents that the topical features of the surface, I would submit that the term 'void' refers to the absence of living matter.

The Hebrew words have the earth made initially without "tohu" and ""bohu". Those two words present a "double whammy" of nothingness except H2O. It's unusual for the Hebrew to be used like that, very much an "overkill" of a situation, showing the chaos that must have been on day one. The prevailing definitions indicate absolutely no surface features such as mountains, valleys, continents, or life of any sort. There was nothing but a smooth crust covered with water, and not only water on the crust, but water above it, waters over waters. The only way water could be above water is for the "above" waters to be vapors. Without sun light there was no heating of molecules from above, so not enough energy to change liquid into a gaseous state. I prefer to just accept that God set it up in those states, then let natural processes he created take over. Otherwise, the only source of heat would have been from the crust, perhaps superhaeating surface waters over some of those "windows" God opened up in Gen 7, putting steam and geysers of liquid water and other gases above the surface. There's no proof it happened that way, this being only some theorizing on my part, partly from the Gen 7-8 account, largely based on ideas from creation scientists in the past.

From the wording there was no definite boundary between the waters over waters, perhaps only a matter of molecule sizes diminishing with height above the crust. I imagine like a very wet drizziling fog above the ocean. My experience with that was to be thoroughly wet from the fog while on watch on deck, the actual sea surface not observable only about 60 feet down from the deck, and breathing very difficult as though nearly drowning. So yes, it does include absence of living matter. The idea is as the Potter viewing a ball of clay covered with water, any other description left up to the Potter. BTW, the scenario establishes the proof there is anough water in and on this planet to provide the waters required to flood it again as in Gen 7.

Dovegiven said:
"Without an atmosphere, in zero atmospheric pressure, the water would begin going directly into a gaseous state regardless of presence of light."

If I may, can I ask your source that supports the position that pressure alone determines whether a substance will exist as a solid or a gas."

Elementary physics. In a vacuum, liquid water has a vapor pressure varying by its temperature which will always seek to equalize with the less "heavy" more empty space. Not sure I'm saying that right. The water on the crust would evaporate, but without sun light energy it couldn't remain liquid long, seeing the extremely low temperature in the vast darkness. Some of that evaporation could easily become snow or sleet, settling back down immediately. Air wasn't yet present, the" ingredients" waiting for the light catalyst. So on the first day light was supplied to begin the process of making an atmosphere, replacing the graduated water column.

So what happens to liquid water in a vacuum? When the astronauts drained used water into space, what happened to it?

But for the sake of brevity, the molecule which is formed by the bonding of two hydrogen atoms with the oxygen of atom, called water, or H20 would have never formed in a liquid state but would have remained in the gaseous state. Thus the water vapor would have instantly formed into the solid state, or ice. This process known as desublimation.

Dovegiven said: "Both states were initially created. It took a "firmament" to separate the two, "

Even now most of our atmosphere is nitrogen, UV rays breaking up gases to form O2, but no doubt a lot of volcanic type gases mixing with the water vapors, chemical reactions accelerated by the heat of geologic processes underway. Whatever the sources of "air", it was enough to allow a definite "arc" or expanse of the atmosphere above the globe-covering water below. Thus very quickly we have the "heaven" of atmosphere well separated from the ocean on Day 2. That had to be aq very violent day! So I agree, there would be sublimation and desublimation, back and forth, as well as many other processes as air accumulated, and more so as light reached the surface.

Dovegiven said:
"Without the sun the new plants had opportunity to grow in the darkness, as they do today."

So the plants all sprouted overnight, then can you provide one specimen of plant that sprouts from seed in one day?

I doubt God started off with seed, but made the vegetation capable of reproducing various ways.He spoke the plants into existence, grasses bearing seed. I suppose the more complex plant kinds grew as time allowed, taking all week and more to germinate. I would also suspect there was a lot more CO2 present in the atmosphere, which coupled with many other conditions like water-soaked soil, warm soil substrate keeping plants warm through a cool night, etc. would all combine for remarkable germination and growth.

But even if seed was the path he chose, yes, under the right conditions some seeds do germinate within hours. Plus, God likes to do miracles.
I have a seed sprouter we used to sprout beans and alfalfa. The alfalfa root radicle popped out within 24 hours, and we enjoyed eating a batch within 4-5 days. But, the process is like having a puppy to raise.
 
Are you speaking of visible white light from the sun or the other great light? However, like light, gravity has no mass since it is a force and not an element.
While great efforts are being placed in the attempt to detect the gravitational waves, which interestingly enough includes using pulsars.

Ok, let's say the earth's rotation on it's axis has nothing to do with light, since gravity either pulls in or pushes out, then what form of matter is the earth's axis turning on?

Actually it is written: "And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters." Gen 1:6
So if God said Let there be a firmament and let it divide the waters from the waters then one wouldn't one give Him the
would give the benefit of the doubt that the firmament divided the waters.

.So in Genesis 1:7, And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so.
Hello WaterRock.
Are you speaking of visible white light from the sun or the other great light?
The visible electromagnetic wavelengths.
However, like light, gravity has no mass since it is a force and not an element
Science does not understand gravity, science can measure the force of gravity only, what
gravity is composed of is still a mystery.
Ok, let's say the earth's rotation on it's axis has nothing to do with light, since gravity either pulls in or pushes out,
then what form of matter is the earth's axis turning on?
As far as science is concerned, gravity is a force of attraction only. The earth rotates on an axis, but does not
spin upon any matter that we know of. The earth rotates around the sun in an eliptical orbit, the earth also
rotates on it's own axis.

I did not understand the rest of your post WaterRock.
 
Dovegiven said:
The Hebrew words have the earth made initially without "tohu" and ""bohu". Those two words present a "double whammy" of nothingness except H2O. It's unusual for the Hebrew to be used like that, very much an "overkill" of a situation, showing the chaos that must have been on day one. The prevailing definitions indicate absolutely no surface features such as mountains, valleys, continents, or life of any sort. There was nothing but a smooth crust covered with water, and not only water on the crust, but water above it, waters over waters.

So what exactly do you contend that was made on day one?

The only way water could be above water is for the "above" waters to be vapors. Without sun light there was no heating of molecules from above, so not enough energy to change liquid into a gaseous state. I prefer to just accept that God set it up in those states, then let natural processes he created take over.

Water vapor is the gaseous state of H2O. Here is a link to explain the three states of H20. LINK
Water can occur in three states: solid (ice), liquid, or gas (vapor).Solid water—ice is frozen water.

Since the scientific evidence clearly demonstrates that water in the liquid state when released into the heaven, or the open expanse of space if you will, would change immediately into a gas which would instantly freeze, which is ice.

"Both states were initially created. It took a "firmament" to separate the two, "

Again, since water vapor is H20 in the gas state then it erroneous two say that the vapor and gas are two different states of H20.

I doubt God started off with seed, but made the vegetation capable of reproducing various ways.He spoke the plants into existence, grasses bearing seed. I suppose the more complex plant kinds grew as time allowed, taking all week and more to germinate. I would also suspect there was a lot more CO2 present in the atmosphere, which coupled with many other conditions like water-soaked soil, warm soil substrate keeping plants warm through a cool night, etc. would all combine for remarkable germination and growth.

Where do you come up with the concept of warm soil since the temp of space is approximately -455 degrees F?
 
The visible electromagnetic wavelengths.
Hello DHC,

Electromagnetic waves are visible? Seen any good gamma waves lately (lol, just kidding)
Actually I was speaking of the Father of lights who was made in the image of the eternal Light.

Science does not understand gravity, science can measure the force of gravity only, what
gravity is composed of is still a mystery. As far as science is concerned, gravity is a force of attraction only. The earth rotates on an axis, but does not
spin upon any matter that we know of. The earth rotates around the sun in an eliptical orbit, the earth also rotates on it's own axis.
So are you saying that the gravitational pull of the sun isn't what produces the earth's rotation?
 
"WaterRock, post: 254518, member: 22587"So what exactly do you contend that was made on day one?

I don't "contend" anything other than what is written, taking it literally. I "suggest" conversational points around that. Again, on Day 1 God created the earth, the planet. It was flooded with water. There was nothing else to describe the planet. It's description is given as a 'double nothing' except the water. There was no dry land. The extreme peculiarity of significant water on any plant in the universe should be indication of special creation. There was no atmosphere like we see today, having a definite arc boundary with space. Being freshly made the crust must have been very hot due to the core being the hottest possible, having not cooled significantly yet. No doubt the mantle was very active, needing a trigger to let it affect the crust. I believe the planet wasn't yet spinning on its axis until the close of Day 1. All the planets each have their own different rotation period. Earth's is perfect to sustain life as we've known it, though our day period is lengthening slightly due to tidal drag. Setting the planet into his chosen rotation would provide an enormous geologic boost to the mantle, and soon begin tectonic plate movement, beginning with mountains being pushed up, creating basins for water to collect, mostly accomplished on Day 3.

Water vapor is the gaseous state of H2O. Here is a link to explain the three states of H20. LINK
Water can occur in three states: solid (ice), liquid, or gas (vapor).Solid water—ice is frozen water.
Since the scientific evidence clearly demonstrates that water in the liquid state when released into the heaven, or the open expanse of space if you will, would change immediately into a gas which would instantly freeze, which is ice.

I agree, having already written that. Again, think about the temperature gradient of a hot crust under the water, basalt beginning to cool, releasing heat into the water. That might have kept the waters from freezing into a solid ice state. Even if it was frozen it would have sublimated into the very low pressure dryness of space. The water might have been boiling, super-heated in places, gushing high above the surface like geysers, maintaining a constant supply of water as vapor. At some point the vapor would contact the super cold above the vapor, creating ice in the form of snow, sleet, etc.

Again, since water vapor is H20 in the gas state then it erroneous two say that the vapor and gas are two different states of H20.

I didn't find a disagreement about that, so assume a lack of communication.

Where do you come up with the concept of warm soil since the temp of space is approximately -455 degrees F?

I think the above should answer that. What I'm writing is nothing new, for a long time being taught in physical science classes. However, college courses typically put billions of years between Day 1 and 2, and multiplied millions through the rest of the Genesis week, assigned by evolutionists needing extremely long times for astronomically remote odds against chance appearances and development of life from simple to complex, in defiance of natural entropy.
There was also a very significant release of heat in the crust from rapid deterioration of radioactive materials with the shortest half lives.

It's difficult to present enough words to present a good case in any topic without making such a long post it gets dismissed. Let me try it this way.
Look at it like a stack of pancakes. Cake #1 represents the variously molten Mantle. Pancake #2 on top of #1, representing the well heated Crust.
Pancake #3 is the ocean, completely covering earth, with no dry land.
Pancake #4 is a shroud of vapor. It might have had a lot of N in it, but probably more like the vapors produced by volcanoes and ocean vents, with lots of CO2.
Spread some butter on the top. That represents the ice zone where the vapors contact empty dry space. The crystals are more easily captured by gravity.
Cut some slices down through the pancakes, then pour some syrup on top. That represents mixing of vapors of different types and densities, the butter (ice) mixing downward.

The cyclic mixing of vapors, water vapor (H2O) with SO2, S2O, O, CO2, H, He, N, etc. would have begun a building up of minerals in preparation of mineral rich soil for plant life (grasses), like seen today on lava flows and the ash around Mt. St. Helens.
 
Hello DHC,

Electromagnetic waves are visible? Seen any good gamma waves lately (lol, just kidding)
Actually I was speaking of the Father of lights who was made in the image of the eternal Light.

So are you saying that the gravitational pull of the sun isn't what produces the earth's rotation?

Any light you can see (the visible spectra) is a portion of the whole set of mostly invisible electromagnetic light waves (radiation). Sorry DHC, I couldn't resist.
 
I was interested in those who hold the two great light of the fourth day were the Sun and the moon could explain how the events given as day Two and Three could have manifested if there was no light emitted unto the fourth day. Before day 1,the entire earth's surface was submerged under a deluge of frozen water that covered the entire face of the earth. Without thermal energy of the visible light, the frozen waters upon the face of the earth would have remained frozen. In addition, without the pulses of light there wouldn't have been any gravitational force to cause the earth to begin rotating, necessary to produce the conditions for the waters to be divided from the waters for the formation of the atmosphere.
Hello WaterRock.

You commented on Genesis specifically day one, you said.
the entire earth's surface was submerged under a deluge of frozen water that covered the entire face of the earth
Do you have a scientific background WaterRock?

In science there is a theory called 'snowball earth', apparently a very long time ago, the earth surface was apparently frozen.
Any coincidence do you think?
 
Hello WaterRock.

You commented on Genesis specifically day one, you said.
the entire earth's surface was submerged under a deluge of frozen water that covered the entire face of the earth

In science there is a theory called 'snowball earth', apparently a very long time ago, the earth surface was apparently frozen.
Any coincidence do you think?

No more coincidence than Neil deGrasse Tyson's quote "I'm in the universe and the universe is in me". However, I hope you are not going compare
to the snowball earth theory to the Genesis 1:2. [But I have a feeling that you are.]
 
It's a fairly "recent" event way beyond Day 1, a "mere" 650 mya according to "old age" evolutionists. There have been several ice ages. A big problem with old ages is the sedimentary record's fossil "Cambrian Explosion", the sudden appearance of many forms of life. Creaqtion science challenges with practically all the sedimentary rock history originating with the Gen 7 flood, trapping all life forms according to a predictable sorting by elevation above sea floor. Needing much more time to accommodate evolution of life, modern scientists adopted a bias of old ages to rock layers on the assumption of long times between fossil species. All species were lithified in the same year of the flood. A super ice age would be predictable following that cataclysmic event. Rock dating methods are also being increasingly challenged as false measures.
 
Back
Top