B-A-C
Loyal
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2008
- Messages
- 12,067
It's interesting that we've had so many discussions about predestination and once-saved always-saved and Calvinist points of view about these things.
Something that has been touched on a few times, but I feel never really studied here is the question of "instant sanctification" vs "sanctification as an on-going process".
This seems to be more of a Wesleyan/Armenian/Pentecostal point of view, but it's possible there are more?
The men behind the formation of Pentecostals (mostly Assembly of God) who had come to the conclusion that holiness or sanctification was not a second blessing or a definite experience but instead a lifelong process. This idea of progressive sanctification was believed by many within the Assemblies of God; however, there were adherents who still held to the theology of the holiness movement.
The original language on sanctification in the Fundamental Truths was a compromise between Wesleyan and non-Wesleyan members which allowed the two doctrines to coexist. Under the heading "Entire Sanctification, The Goal For All Believers", it read, "Entire sanctification is the will of God for all believers, and should be earnestly pursued by walking in obedience to God's Word". The term "entire sanctification" is distinctly Wesleyan, but the statement actually called "for an ongoing, process of obedience in reliance on, and cooperation with the Holy Ghost".
In 1961, the General Council revised the statement significantly, giving it its current form. It eliminated some of the Wesleyan language, such as "entire". Stanley M. Horton, who served on the revision committee, stated that the committee "... felt that the word entire was ambiguous because we were using it with a different meaning than that promoted by holiness Pentecostals who taught a second definite work". While the current statement does represent the Pentecostals's position more accurately, the denomination's teaching on sanctification remains ambiguous.
This is slightly different from the "holiness movement". Link below posted with Chad's permission.
Holiness movement - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
On one hand we have quite a few verses like...
Php 2:12; Therefore, my dear friends, as you have always obeyed—not only in my presence, but now much more in my absence—continue to work out your salvation with fear and trembling,
1 Pet 4:18; AND IF IT IS WITH DIFFICULTY THAT THE RIGHTEOUS IS SAVED, WHAT WILL BECOME OF THE GODLESS MAN AND THE SINNER?
It seems that Paul never considered himself "already there" but was always speaking as if he was striving to get there. Not that he wasn't saved, but rather still in the sanctification process.
1 Cor 9:27; but I discipline my body and make it my slave, so that, after I have preached to others, I myself will not be disqualified.
John 17:19; For their sakes I sanctify Myself, that they themselves also may be sanctified in truth.
Rom 15:16; to be a minister of Christ Jesus to the Gentiles, ministering as a priest the gospel of God, so that my offering of the Gentiles may become acceptable, sanctified by the Holy Spirit.
1 Cor 9:9; Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals,
1 Cor 9:10; nor thieves, nor the covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers, will inherit the kingdom of God
1 Cor 6:11; Such were some of you; but you were washed, but you were sanctified, but you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and in the Spirit of our God.
It seems the process of sanctification involves being willing to no longer want to sin.
1 Pet 1:2; according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, by the sanctifying work of the Spirit, to obey Jesus Christ and be sprinkled with His blood: May grace and peace be yours in the fullest measure.
To some this seems to be a foreign idea that effort upon our part is required for sanctification.
Something that has been touched on a few times, but I feel never really studied here is the question of "instant sanctification" vs "sanctification as an on-going process".
This seems to be more of a Wesleyan/Armenian/Pentecostal point of view, but it's possible there are more?
The men behind the formation of Pentecostals (mostly Assembly of God) who had come to the conclusion that holiness or sanctification was not a second blessing or a definite experience but instead a lifelong process. This idea of progressive sanctification was believed by many within the Assemblies of God; however, there were adherents who still held to the theology of the holiness movement.
The original language on sanctification in the Fundamental Truths was a compromise between Wesleyan and non-Wesleyan members which allowed the two doctrines to coexist. Under the heading "Entire Sanctification, The Goal For All Believers", it read, "Entire sanctification is the will of God for all believers, and should be earnestly pursued by walking in obedience to God's Word". The term "entire sanctification" is distinctly Wesleyan, but the statement actually called "for an ongoing, process of obedience in reliance on, and cooperation with the Holy Ghost".
In 1961, the General Council revised the statement significantly, giving it its current form. It eliminated some of the Wesleyan language, such as "entire". Stanley M. Horton, who served on the revision committee, stated that the committee "... felt that the word entire was ambiguous because we were using it with a different meaning than that promoted by holiness Pentecostals who taught a second definite work". While the current statement does represent the Pentecostals's position more accurately, the denomination's teaching on sanctification remains ambiguous.
This is slightly different from the "holiness movement". Link below posted with Chad's permission.
Holiness movement - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
On one hand we have quite a few verses like...
Php 2:12; Therefore, my dear friends, as you have always obeyed—not only in my presence, but now much more in my absence—continue to work out your salvation with fear and trembling,
1 Pet 4:18; AND IF IT IS WITH DIFFICULTY THAT THE RIGHTEOUS IS SAVED, WHAT WILL BECOME OF THE GODLESS MAN AND THE SINNER?
It seems that Paul never considered himself "already there" but was always speaking as if he was striving to get there. Not that he wasn't saved, but rather still in the sanctification process.
1 Cor 9:27; but I discipline my body and make it my slave, so that, after I have preached to others, I myself will not be disqualified.
John 17:19; For their sakes I sanctify Myself, that they themselves also may be sanctified in truth.
Rom 15:16; to be a minister of Christ Jesus to the Gentiles, ministering as a priest the gospel of God, so that my offering of the Gentiles may become acceptable, sanctified by the Holy Spirit.
1 Cor 9:9; Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals,
1 Cor 9:10; nor thieves, nor the covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers, will inherit the kingdom of God
1 Cor 6:11; Such were some of you; but you were washed, but you were sanctified, but you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and in the Spirit of our God.
It seems the process of sanctification involves being willing to no longer want to sin.
1 Pet 1:2; according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, by the sanctifying work of the Spirit, to obey Jesus Christ and be sprinkled with His blood: May grace and peace be yours in the fullest measure.
To some this seems to be a foreign idea that effort upon our part is required for sanctification.