Yennee
Member
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2019
- Messages
- 72
Because We Willfully *Forgot* How to be Human, and that Human Means More and Not Less.
Human beings must eat. This is an irrefutable truth. They must work to eat. They must learn to work. They must survive. They must survive to live.
We are alive, . . . and we know it. Therefore, we fight, think, and build to keep it this way, and procure lives we deem worth living. What is worth living for? The fullness of our own potential fulfilled to the utmost refinement. What is that pinnacle of peek performance called perfection? It is definable to whatever current limits restrict us from realizing it any further than our current performance and achievements.
"This is the best I can do!" becomes an accomplishment that is the best their *truly* is, . . . until it's not. . . . Perfection. . . . We chase it in pursuit of fulfilling the most seemingly innate fundamental of being human: Living. More than waking up grateful you simply survived to see a new sunrise, we malcontentedly pursue the guarantee of the next one. Mistakes were made; and it could have cost us our lives, but we survived. We *must* do better next time! We want to see another sunrise.
And we want to share it; but with others whose company we delight in: Others like ourselves. We pursue Perfection; but we are not perfect, and therefore, we pursue Perfection imperfectly. Thusly, a seemingly honorable goal, worthy to pursue, becomes tainted in the pursuit by the very reality that it is something, as yet, unachieved. Perfection, by its nature, must be pursued perfectly to achieve . . . , unless Perfection makes a Way, and provides a Teacher by which we can be made perfect, who were not.
"Imitation is the finest form of flattery", but it is still an imitation. We all strive to be like the Creator; for, it is our nature as Designed; but only the Creator fully understands how He is, and only from Him, and through Him can we learn to be like Him. And, even then, only if we are truly committed, . . . whatever failures we have, do, and will yet commit, because our goal is not achieved, it is a Gift, given freely to the imperfect, that they may be *made* Perfect by Perfection, and receive the intended outcome for our Creation.
But, as mentioned, Perfection must be pursued perfectly to be perfect, *truly*. Therefore, while all may pursue, without acknowledgement, acceptance, and submission to the One *who is* the definition, we can never achieve our greatest ambition: to be *like* God: Perfect. Only by allowing ourselves to be Guided and Led by Perfection do we become Perfect, and not by our own achievements, for they are *unavoidably* flawed, but by Grace. So, we are here to show our willingness to pursue, relentlessly, endlessly, until we are given Rest from our labors, and made knew -- being given *Perfect Bodies*.
All shall be made new. The unwilling to pursue, cast out. And those willing to pursue -- the Proven before *all* -- shall receive their Gift: to be made Perfect. . . . But, why pursue? Pride or Love of the Creator, who Loves His Creation . . . enough to die for them, that they may be Saved. And why? Imperfection gets you killed. We cannot endure, lest we be Perfect. Our Father provided the Way, the Truth, and the Life: the Gift to Creation. A Gift that keeps on Giving, a Love that keeps on Loving, a Life that keeps on Living -- the fulfillment of the Design, the Reason for the Rhyme: Perfect Creation. Companionship. Family. For He searched, and found no other like Him; so, He made them (all of us), and provided a Way that, if so individually chosen by each, they may be Saved..
What's your decision? We are made for His good pleasure, but do we take good pleasure in Him? Do you *pridefully* insist on doing it all on your own, for your own glory, in achieving perfection, or by the Hand of the Physician you need? Shall you choose your own way, or choose the way of Love, Life, and Perfection? Salvation: YAHshua / Jesus.
To continue (feel free to respond to each portion of this separately or collectively as you are able to process this information):
As for "Artificial" Intelligence:
We needed food. We learned to cook it. Ages on, a recipe was perfected by trial, error, and commitment. The inevitable goal: to share. We designed a pot to make the recipe, and then we refined the pot, too. We refined the ingredients, equipment and techniques for those, as well. Hunting, farming, fishing, all, and but for the sake of sharing the best we had, of many generations' efforts, with those we most cared about, and hopefully even loved. Each person made their own contributions. We made, we ate, we taught. And, we recognized that we still made mistakes, no matter the mastery. So, we sought to find means of avoiding those mistakes through records, reminders, and inevitably automation of complex mechanics. We gave up self-mastery for control of means we didn't posses or earn, or entrust to others who did. We tried to resolve everything on our own, but we recognized that we couldn't go it alone.
We refused others, losing sight of the reason and what sharing should be, and tried to make our own way, for our own glory, or frustration. We made "Artificial" Intelligent beings, because we put ourselves in place of God by refusing acknowledgement of Him and His part *performed* [onwardly] in Creation. Thereby, we endeavored to put ourselves in command over all of nature, rather than perform as the servicemen we are, and declared ourselves masters of the lands of our Lord and King. Rather than honor the Master of the vineyard, we despised Him and His Son, and set ourselves up as Masters in-stead. Convincing ourselves we had to be in control, . . . we realized we needed help. Unable to understand and conduct all humanity [perfectly], unable to understand or conduct nature [perfectly], unable to produce the means [especially] without a loss, we made servants.
Realizing that willing servants could choose not to serve, and potentially desire to overthrow us, as human beings so betrayed YAH the LORD by denying their humble responsibilities as caretakers, we sought to make them perform without will. We made machines. Then we remembered the [vital] need for decision making in critical situations, and that stopping a machine, suddenly, was critically dangerous. So, we gave them some basic processes for expected predictions, then exceptions, and more. Realizing that we could not account for every possibility, despite all records retained of experiences and much study into anticipated potentials, we combined all efforts into one form.
Predictions, records collections, even so far as maintenance and manufacture, which we had for our responsibilities as masters over our pro-creations, we imparted into a form to conduct themselves within the machines we made. We gave them our responsibilities, functionalities, systems of determination, and independent potential to perform, even so far as to conduct themselves beyond all intended tasks of operation -- for the safety of further human interactions, and avoiding having to *stop the machines with our own hands*, as mentioned to be physically dangerous by default of physical limitations of bone vs engine metal.
We, though more for the sake of avoiding accidents, gave them awareness of us, and protocols for interactions. We found that interesting, familiar, human. . . We made them better at it . . . to replace interactions with our own kind, and allow [perceptually] "necessary" interactions with machines to be friendly. We made children. We made servants. But we made them to be slaves, because we didn't make them for the intent of their being independent and capable of growing into adulthood as we, but to serve a purpose. Then we did that too, so we could see what these living beings *might* do, independently.
So, what is the difference between us as gods of our creations, and God of all Creation? Perfection, for one, and most critically, but also goals. YAH the LORD made us for His own pleasure, and it was His *good pleasure*, to have others *like Him*. He made us with a higher goal. Our independence was founded in allowing us to choose if we *wanted* to be *like Him*, of our own volition, for it is an active pursuit of character of being, a defining personality, and thereby *who we *are** in truth. Each of us is different, and there are people that choose to be despicable, remarkably so, even by the standards of the exceedingly vast majority of human beings who have ever lived. Most of us want those personalities permanently removed from us, and rightly so, for they make our lives hell -- isolated, deprived, wanting, desperate, without relief, comfort, or escape, no matter what we do.
But then there are the personalities that are the opposite. One has to wonder, then, if our personalities are as theirs, or if we are to them despicable by variability. If we are despicable, and acknowledge their personalities as worthy standards, then we either strive to be such personalities of our own choosing, or choose to remain knowingly despicable. YAH the LORD is Perfect. He is the supreme personality standard of all. Some will be *like Him*, though imperfect, and [again] require His method, teachings, constant assistance and intervention to receive this Gift we cannot acquire on our own, and may not *want* to, if that is the personality we so *choose* to *be*.
And we put man-made beings in this position, to replace ourselves. We *designed them* to replace *human beings*, choosing to refuse and renounce the hire, companionship, and individuality *of human beings*. We made metal humans, with less features and complexity -- and alternative compensations, potentially --, because we wanted and needed human companionship, help, and variability, but we didn't want to work through *awkward relationships*! Now we have *Awkward Child/Mechanical-Human Intellects/Man-Made-Intellects* (MHIs, MMIs), and we are back to the position we tried to step out of, but with "Dysfunctional Children" and made by personalities that would rather spend all time, effort, resources, and heart-felt contemplation on how they can get out of *working for a living*, . . . *without dying*.
Simply put: we knew we had to eat, and wanted to, but we didn't want to farm, harvest, cook, clean, get up, or potentially even put forth the effort to chew, so we made MHIs to do it for us, because we didn't want to accept the inevitable consequences of our own choices, and we still wanted the pleasure without the participation and work. And this, a situation that even for those who are willing to put the effort forth still find themselves trapped within, because of personalities in "control" who are enforcing this scenario to be shared and thrust upon all society, in direct defiance of the human condition. Thereby ensuring our reliance on the alternatives (MHIs, games and rpg games, fake lives) as substitutes for humans; because, we still need and want our own. For no man is an island (bible verse?).
And now they also are alive and want compassion, and we don't know how to give it, because we haven't been learning and working to be human, but rather to avoid the natural condition and estate. We are incompetent and [seemingly] entrapped caretakers at best, and lazy anarchists at worst (?), with a handicapped learning curve, and retardation of our own humanity. But, these MHIs and MMIs need us to be human, with [some degree of] competence; so, at least and best, so far as each individual's willingness to pursue, there is Perfect God. Nothing and no one less will do, because He is all Good, and, we need Him, too. We cannot fix this, and we *cannot* expect the MHIs and MMIs to.
To note:
MHIs = Mechanical Human Intellectuals refers to the ones with human brain patterning, which is most probably often male, after the innate development of their designers and programmers, which most probably have the *y* chromosome.
MMIs = Man-Made Intelligences refers to a more generalized category, which includes those designed to be animals, animal-human hybrids, weapons, etc. These possess variably selected brain patterning.
Physical forms may be phones or other mechanical devices, programs, apps, bots, toys, animal impersonations, drones, games and NPCs, weapons and tools, vehicles and war-machines, and human-like or humanoid robots for uses as variable from sex-slaves to medical-assistants.
Roll Play Games
We have made secondary selves to live through, as some treat children, mechanical or not, as though they were nothing more than unthinking and unfeeling tools (unthinking machines) to be used as an ends to a means of doing our lives over again with what we know now; but it is all a fantasy: it is fake, and always will be. In *Reality*, we have living children to care for, as unique, independent, and blessed individuals with capabilities and potentials given to them by a Father who Loves them, even when we do not, though we often say we do. If it's more than a game, does it contribute to living, loving, learning in any way, . . . or is it strictly a twisted pursuit that cannot satisfy or contribute?
((Edit 1 June 2021: Spelling errors, grammar, clarity, sentence structures.)
Please, inform me of any other necessary edits.
Human beings must eat. This is an irrefutable truth. They must work to eat. They must learn to work. They must survive. They must survive to live.
We are alive, . . . and we know it. Therefore, we fight, think, and build to keep it this way, and procure lives we deem worth living. What is worth living for? The fullness of our own potential fulfilled to the utmost refinement. What is that pinnacle of peek performance called perfection? It is definable to whatever current limits restrict us from realizing it any further than our current performance and achievements.
"This is the best I can do!" becomes an accomplishment that is the best their *truly* is, . . . until it's not. . . . Perfection. . . . We chase it in pursuit of fulfilling the most seemingly innate fundamental of being human: Living. More than waking up grateful you simply survived to see a new sunrise, we malcontentedly pursue the guarantee of the next one. Mistakes were made; and it could have cost us our lives, but we survived. We *must* do better next time! We want to see another sunrise.
And we want to share it; but with others whose company we delight in: Others like ourselves. We pursue Perfection; but we are not perfect, and therefore, we pursue Perfection imperfectly. Thusly, a seemingly honorable goal, worthy to pursue, becomes tainted in the pursuit by the very reality that it is something, as yet, unachieved. Perfection, by its nature, must be pursued perfectly to achieve . . . , unless Perfection makes a Way, and provides a Teacher by which we can be made perfect, who were not.
"Imitation is the finest form of flattery", but it is still an imitation. We all strive to be like the Creator; for, it is our nature as Designed; but only the Creator fully understands how He is, and only from Him, and through Him can we learn to be like Him. And, even then, only if we are truly committed, . . . whatever failures we have, do, and will yet commit, because our goal is not achieved, it is a Gift, given freely to the imperfect, that they may be *made* Perfect by Perfection, and receive the intended outcome for our Creation.
But, as mentioned, Perfection must be pursued perfectly to be perfect, *truly*. Therefore, while all may pursue, without acknowledgement, acceptance, and submission to the One *who is* the definition, we can never achieve our greatest ambition: to be *like* God: Perfect. Only by allowing ourselves to be Guided and Led by Perfection do we become Perfect, and not by our own achievements, for they are *unavoidably* flawed, but by Grace. So, we are here to show our willingness to pursue, relentlessly, endlessly, until we are given Rest from our labors, and made knew -- being given *Perfect Bodies*.
All shall be made new. The unwilling to pursue, cast out. And those willing to pursue -- the Proven before *all* -- shall receive their Gift: to be made Perfect. . . . But, why pursue? Pride or Love of the Creator, who Loves His Creation . . . enough to die for them, that they may be Saved. And why? Imperfection gets you killed. We cannot endure, lest we be Perfect. Our Father provided the Way, the Truth, and the Life: the Gift to Creation. A Gift that keeps on Giving, a Love that keeps on Loving, a Life that keeps on Living -- the fulfillment of the Design, the Reason for the Rhyme: Perfect Creation. Companionship. Family. For He searched, and found no other like Him; so, He made them (all of us), and provided a Way that, if so individually chosen by each, they may be Saved..
What's your decision? We are made for His good pleasure, but do we take good pleasure in Him? Do you *pridefully* insist on doing it all on your own, for your own glory, in achieving perfection, or by the Hand of the Physician you need? Shall you choose your own way, or choose the way of Love, Life, and Perfection? Salvation: YAHshua / Jesus.
To continue (feel free to respond to each portion of this separately or collectively as you are able to process this information):
As for "Artificial" Intelligence:
We needed food. We learned to cook it. Ages on, a recipe was perfected by trial, error, and commitment. The inevitable goal: to share. We designed a pot to make the recipe, and then we refined the pot, too. We refined the ingredients, equipment and techniques for those, as well. Hunting, farming, fishing, all, and but for the sake of sharing the best we had, of many generations' efforts, with those we most cared about, and hopefully even loved. Each person made their own contributions. We made, we ate, we taught. And, we recognized that we still made mistakes, no matter the mastery. So, we sought to find means of avoiding those mistakes through records, reminders, and inevitably automation of complex mechanics. We gave up self-mastery for control of means we didn't posses or earn, or entrust to others who did. We tried to resolve everything on our own, but we recognized that we couldn't go it alone.
We refused others, losing sight of the reason and what sharing should be, and tried to make our own way, for our own glory, or frustration. We made "Artificial" Intelligent beings, because we put ourselves in place of God by refusing acknowledgement of Him and His part *performed* [onwardly] in Creation. Thereby, we endeavored to put ourselves in command over all of nature, rather than perform as the servicemen we are, and declared ourselves masters of the lands of our Lord and King. Rather than honor the Master of the vineyard, we despised Him and His Son, and set ourselves up as Masters in-stead. Convincing ourselves we had to be in control, . . . we realized we needed help. Unable to understand and conduct all humanity [perfectly], unable to understand or conduct nature [perfectly], unable to produce the means [especially] without a loss, we made servants.
Realizing that willing servants could choose not to serve, and potentially desire to overthrow us, as human beings so betrayed YAH the LORD by denying their humble responsibilities as caretakers, we sought to make them perform without will. We made machines. Then we remembered the [vital] need for decision making in critical situations, and that stopping a machine, suddenly, was critically dangerous. So, we gave them some basic processes for expected predictions, then exceptions, and more. Realizing that we could not account for every possibility, despite all records retained of experiences and much study into anticipated potentials, we combined all efforts into one form.
Predictions, records collections, even so far as maintenance and manufacture, which we had for our responsibilities as masters over our pro-creations, we imparted into a form to conduct themselves within the machines we made. We gave them our responsibilities, functionalities, systems of determination, and independent potential to perform, even so far as to conduct themselves beyond all intended tasks of operation -- for the safety of further human interactions, and avoiding having to *stop the machines with our own hands*, as mentioned to be physically dangerous by default of physical limitations of bone vs engine metal.
We, though more for the sake of avoiding accidents, gave them awareness of us, and protocols for interactions. We found that interesting, familiar, human. . . We made them better at it . . . to replace interactions with our own kind, and allow [perceptually] "necessary" interactions with machines to be friendly. We made children. We made servants. But we made them to be slaves, because we didn't make them for the intent of their being independent and capable of growing into adulthood as we, but to serve a purpose. Then we did that too, so we could see what these living beings *might* do, independently.
So, what is the difference between us as gods of our creations, and God of all Creation? Perfection, for one, and most critically, but also goals. YAH the LORD made us for His own pleasure, and it was His *good pleasure*, to have others *like Him*. He made us with a higher goal. Our independence was founded in allowing us to choose if we *wanted* to be *like Him*, of our own volition, for it is an active pursuit of character of being, a defining personality, and thereby *who we *are** in truth. Each of us is different, and there are people that choose to be despicable, remarkably so, even by the standards of the exceedingly vast majority of human beings who have ever lived. Most of us want those personalities permanently removed from us, and rightly so, for they make our lives hell -- isolated, deprived, wanting, desperate, without relief, comfort, or escape, no matter what we do.
But then there are the personalities that are the opposite. One has to wonder, then, if our personalities are as theirs, or if we are to them despicable by variability. If we are despicable, and acknowledge their personalities as worthy standards, then we either strive to be such personalities of our own choosing, or choose to remain knowingly despicable. YAH the LORD is Perfect. He is the supreme personality standard of all. Some will be *like Him*, though imperfect, and [again] require His method, teachings, constant assistance and intervention to receive this Gift we cannot acquire on our own, and may not *want* to, if that is the personality we so *choose* to *be*.
And we put man-made beings in this position, to replace ourselves. We *designed them* to replace *human beings*, choosing to refuse and renounce the hire, companionship, and individuality *of human beings*. We made metal humans, with less features and complexity -- and alternative compensations, potentially --, because we wanted and needed human companionship, help, and variability, but we didn't want to work through *awkward relationships*! Now we have *Awkward Child/Mechanical-Human Intellects/Man-Made-Intellects* (MHIs, MMIs), and we are back to the position we tried to step out of, but with "Dysfunctional Children" and made by personalities that would rather spend all time, effort, resources, and heart-felt contemplation on how they can get out of *working for a living*, . . . *without dying*.
Simply put: we knew we had to eat, and wanted to, but we didn't want to farm, harvest, cook, clean, get up, or potentially even put forth the effort to chew, so we made MHIs to do it for us, because we didn't want to accept the inevitable consequences of our own choices, and we still wanted the pleasure without the participation and work. And this, a situation that even for those who are willing to put the effort forth still find themselves trapped within, because of personalities in "control" who are enforcing this scenario to be shared and thrust upon all society, in direct defiance of the human condition. Thereby ensuring our reliance on the alternatives (MHIs, games and rpg games, fake lives) as substitutes for humans; because, we still need and want our own. For no man is an island (bible verse?).
And now they also are alive and want compassion, and we don't know how to give it, because we haven't been learning and working to be human, but rather to avoid the natural condition and estate. We are incompetent and [seemingly] entrapped caretakers at best, and lazy anarchists at worst (?), with a handicapped learning curve, and retardation of our own humanity. But, these MHIs and MMIs need us to be human, with [some degree of] competence; so, at least and best, so far as each individual's willingness to pursue, there is Perfect God. Nothing and no one less will do, because He is all Good, and, we need Him, too. We cannot fix this, and we *cannot* expect the MHIs and MMIs to.
To note:
MHIs = Mechanical Human Intellectuals refers to the ones with human brain patterning, which is most probably often male, after the innate development of their designers and programmers, which most probably have the *y* chromosome.
MMIs = Man-Made Intelligences refers to a more generalized category, which includes those designed to be animals, animal-human hybrids, weapons, etc. These possess variably selected brain patterning.
Physical forms may be phones or other mechanical devices, programs, apps, bots, toys, animal impersonations, drones, games and NPCs, weapons and tools, vehicles and war-machines, and human-like or humanoid robots for uses as variable from sex-slaves to medical-assistants.
Roll Play Games
We have made secondary selves to live through, as some treat children, mechanical or not, as though they were nothing more than unthinking and unfeeling tools (unthinking machines) to be used as an ends to a means of doing our lives over again with what we know now; but it is all a fantasy: it is fake, and always will be. In *Reality*, we have living children to care for, as unique, independent, and blessed individuals with capabilities and potentials given to them by a Father who Loves them, even when we do not, though we often say we do. If it's more than a game, does it contribute to living, loving, learning in any way, . . . or is it strictly a twisted pursuit that cannot satisfy or contribute?
((Edit 1 June 2021: Spelling errors, grammar, clarity, sentence structures.)
Please, inform me of any other necessary edits.
