Just a few thoughts:
Hebrews 8:7 For if that first covenant had been faultless, then should no place have been sought for the second.
Hebrews 8:8 For finding fault with them, he saith, Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah:
Hebrews 8:9 Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt; because they continued not in my covenant, and I regarded them not, saith the Lord.
Hebrews 8:10 For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord;
I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people:
This is part of the new covenant: What laws are being referred to here? And what is the purpose of putting them into the hearts and minds of the people, if not for them to be obeyed?
Hebrews 8:11 And they shall not teach every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the Lord: for all shall know me, from the least to the greatest.
Hebrews 8:12 For I will be merciful to their unrighteousness, and their sins and their iniquities will I remember no more.
Hebrews 8:13 In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away.
jiggyfly: Quote:
<table border="0" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" width="100%"><tbody><tr><td style="border: 1px inset;" class="alt2"> Originally Posted by
Eccl12v13
I implied nothing. I simply quoted scriptures. Jesus gave us the conditions for eternal life by answering the question as such;
Matt.19
17. "......but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments."
If you do not agree, it is not with me; it's with Jesus and the answer that your saviour gave you!
.
</td></tr></tbody></table>
Jesus was speaking to those who were still under the old covenant wasn't He?
Jesus was almost always speaking to those under the old covenant. He was speaking to them when He said this too:
John 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
But it keeps no one from using the verse when it's relevant to their argument. Should we assume that Jesus spent three years preaching things just to void it all out when He died on the cross?
Matthew 5:18 For verily I say unto you,
Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
Has this day happened yet? And, there are still things from the law that are yet to be fulfilled.
Are we, or are we not supposed to keep this particular commandment: Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself?
Romans 13:8 Owe no man any thing, but to love one another: for he that loveth another hath fulfilled the law.
Which law are we trying to fulfill here? And why?
Romans 13:9 For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not covet; and if there be any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
If we steal something from someone, we are breaking the 'Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself ' commandment. Also when we commit adultery or bear false witness.
Romans 13:10 Love worketh no ill to his neighbour: therefore love is the fulfilling of the law.
If Paul were preaching grace and not law, I wonder what his intentions were with these verses to the people of Ephesus:
Ephesians 6:1 Children, obey your parents in the Lord: for this is right.
Ephesians 6:2 Honour thy father and mother; (which is the first commandment with promise
Ephesians 6:3 That it may be well with thee, and thou mayest live long on the earth.
quoting one of the ten commandments to them as though it were still relevant?
I Timothy 5:17 Let the elders that rule well be counted worthy of double honour, especially they who labour in the word and doctrine.
I Timothy 5:18 For the scripture saith, Thou shalt not muzzle the ox that treadeth out the corn. And,
The labourer is worthy of his reward. The first part of this verse is from Deuteronomy, then what Jesus said in red, and now Paul, in this day of grace, is using it here in his letter to Timothy. If the law is no longer valid, why does Paul keep quoting from it?
james g, what do you think about king Saul having the Spirit taken from him?
I Samuel 16:14 But the Spirit of the LORD departed from Saul, and an evil spirit from the LORD troubled him.