By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!That's true. But Moses said that to Israel. That’s not the promise to Abraham. The promise to Abraham wasn't fulfilled. In Acts 7 Strphen says Abraham didn't receive any of it, not even enough to set his foot onJoshua 23:14
“And now I am about to go the way of all the earth, and you know in your hearts and souls, all of you, that not one word has failed of all the good things that the Lord your God promised concerning you. All have come to pass for you; not one of them has failed.
That’s not the promise to Abraham. The promise to Abraham wasn't fulfilled
Well, technically the promise to Abraham was his "descendants" would receive the land. Not Abraham himself. Gen 12:7; Gen 24:7; So the promise was fulfilled.
Gen 12-7
And the LORD appeared unto Abram, and said, Unto thy seed will I give this land: and there builded he an altar unto the LORD, who appeared unto him.
Galatians 3;16
Now to Abraham and his Seed were the promises made. He does not say, “And to seeds,” as of many, but as of one, “And to your Seed,” who is Christ.
Actually it's not. God said specifically that Abraham would receive it and in Gal. 3:16 Paul said that the promise to Abraham and his. His seed was referring to Christ, not the Israelites.Well, technically the promise to Abraham was his "descendants" would receive the land. Not Abraham himself. Gen 12:7; Gen 24:7; So the promise was fulfilled.
That's a good point. The Jews understood "seed" in the plural as seeds. This is why they expected to inherit the promises. They thought being the fleshly seed of Abraham guaranteed them the promises that were made to Abraham. We see this with Jesus' statement to Nicodemus. He told Nicodemus that he had to be born again. He said that which is born of the flesh is flesh. Nicodemus thought his birth in the flesh would entitle him to the promises. Jesus corrects that thinking telling him he has to be born again. In other words, being the fleshly offspring of Abraham is not going to again him the promises. The reason is as Paul explains in Galatians 3:16. When God made the promise to Abraham and his seed, He meant seed, singular, not seed plural, and that Seed is Christ. So, the promise wasn't made to all of the fleshly seed of Abraham, It was made to one particular seed and that is Christ. So, anyone who wants to partake of those promises must be "in Christ".That's a good find. I take this to mean Abraham had two sons. (two seeds). But the promise for this particular bit of land ( Canaan )
Was only for Isaac, not Ishmael. The promise was only to one of the seeds, not to both of them.
This is an interesting nuance of the English language. Especially in King James. In modern English I might say something like....
I put bird seed out for the birds. Or... I put grass seed out on my lawn. Does that mean I only put one grain of seed out? Usually not in modern language.
"seed" can be used as singular or plural in modern English.