Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!
  • Welcome to Talk Jesus Christian Forums

    Celebrating 20 Years!

    A bible based, Jesus Christ centered community.

    Register Log In

Is TalkJesus Nineveh?

the temporal historical dying

Maybe you are dying. You seem to be focused on that lately. But I'm not dead yet.

Matt 22:32 'I AM THE GOD OF ABRAHAM, AND THE GOD OF ISAAC, AND THE GOD OF JACOB'? He is not the God of the dead but of the living."
Mark 12:27 "He is not the God of the dead, but of the living; you are greatly mistaken."
Luke 20:38 "Now He is not the God of the dead but of the living; for all live to Him."

God is not God of the dead.

Acts 2:31 he looked ahead and spoke of the resurrection of the Christ, that HE WAS NEITHER ABANDONED TO HADES, NOR DID His flesh SUFFER DECAY.
 
Maybe you are dying. You seem to be focused on that lately. But I'm not dead yet.

Matt 22:32 'I AM THE GOD OF ABRAHAM, AND THE GOD OF ISAAC, AND THE GOD OF JACOB'? He is not the God of the dead but of the living."
Mark 12:27 "He is not the God of the dead, but of the living; you are greatly mistaken."
Luke 20:38 "Now He is not the God of the dead but of the living; for all live to Him."

God is not God of the dead.

Acts 2:31 he looked ahead and spoke of the resurrection of the Christ, that HE WAS NEITHER ABANDONED TO HADES, NOR DID His flesh SUFFER DECAY.

Yes, the wage of sin is dying. In dying mankind comes to an end death. And not reincarnation (returning to the flesh).

If the temporal historical is not mixed with the unseen eternal, then a person receives no gospel rest, the mystery of faith (the unseen) remains hidden in the parable

2 Corinthians 4:18;While we look not at the things which are seen, but at the things which are not seen: for the things which are seen are temporal; but the things which are not seen are eternal.

Hebrews 4Let us therefore fear, lest, a promise being left us of entering into his rest, any of you should seem to come short of it.
2;For unto us was the gospel preached, as well as unto them: but the word preached did not profit them, not being mixed with faith (the unseen eternal power) in them that heard it.

The Lord has given us valuable tools needed to rightly divide parable which without he spoke not

And yes, the Son of man Jesus the temporal historical was never abandoned by the eternal Father.
 
Last edited:
What is the definition of the word "parable"?


1. a simple story used to illustrate a moral or spiritual lesson, as told by Jesus in the Gospels:

2. "the parable of the blind men and the elephant" · "a modern-day parable"

Jesus turning water into wine was not a parable. Jesus feeding the 5,000 was not a parable.
Jesus healing the blind man was not a parable. Jesus raising Lazarus from the dead was not a parable.
Jesus dying on the cross was not a parable. Jesus's resurrection and ascension was not a parable.
Jesus coming back to get His church is not a parable.

Nothing Paul, or James or Jude wrote is a parable.
Nothing Luke wrote in Acts is a Parable. Nothing in 1st, 2nd or 3rd John is a parable.
Nothing in the Old Testament is a parable.

John 16:29–30 (NASB95)
His disciples said, “Lo, now You are speaking plainly and are not using a figure of speech. Now we know that You know all things, and have no need for anyone to question You; by this we believe that You came from God.”

Obviously not everything Jesus said was a parable.

Dear B-A-C,

A parable is an earthly story with a heavenly message.

Love,
Kermos

Hi thanks

I would think just the opposite. As it is faithfully written, without the signified understanding using the temporal historical dying seen mixed with the unseen eternal Christ the Holy Father spoke not.

2 Corinthians 4:18While we look not at the things which are seen, but at the things which are not seen: for the things which are seen are temporal; but the things which are not seen are eternal.

No mixing of the two no gospel rest

I would suggest do not start a Bibel study without using the mixing tool above so that the parable is rightly divided Hebrews 4Let us therefore fear, lest, a promise being left us of entering into his rest, any of you should seem to come short of it.For unto us was the gospel preached, as well as unto them: but the word preached did not profit them, not being mixed with faith in them that heard it.

The signified language of ceremonies shadows that look ahead to the fulfilment.

Hebrew 9:8-10 ;The Holy Ghost this signifying, that the way into the holiest of all was not yet made manifest, while as the first tabernacle was yet standing:;Which was a figure (parable) for the time (temporal) then present, in which were offered both gifts and sacrifices, that could not make him that did the service perfect, as pertaining to the conscience;;Which stood only in meats and drinks, and divers washings, and carnal ordinances,(shadows) imposed on them until the time of reformation.

Dear Garee,

Do you believe that the tabernacle which Moses built, as recorded in the Torah, was an actual edifice on Earth?

Love,
Kermos
 
Dear B-A-C,

A parable is an earthly story with a heavenly message.

Love,
Kermos



Dear Garee,

Do you believe that the tabernacle which Moses built, as recorded in the Torah, was an actual edifice on Earth?

Love,
Kermos
Thanks for the reply

I would offer because God never did live in tabernacles made with human hands the will of dying mankind. Caled the abomination of desolation (The pagan foundation kings in Israel) The removal of our invisible God Christ until the second coming the time of reformation

The tabernacle parable replicated a living moving will as a parable it used the temporal historical things seen as shadow that looked ahead to the first century reformation.

Forty-years God moved his temple made with his hand the priesthood of believers revealing the gospel to one pagan nation after another, Until they reached the promised land. . used to represent the unseen new Jerusalem prepared for his bride the church

1 Peter 9-11;Receiving the end of your (new born again) faith, even the salvation of your souls.;Of which salvation the prophets have enquired and searched diligently, who prophesied of the grace that should come unto you:Searching what, or what manner of time the Spirit of Christ which was in them did signify, when it testified beforehand the sufferings of Christ, and the glory that should follow.. . . . (the return of Christ the Holy Father
 
Now of course, not every place needs to be changed. Not every belief needs to be changed. But some people seem to be hung up
on "fixing" other people.
it sounds as if you only want an echo chamber. People of like minded beliefs with whom one may sing Kum-ba-yah.

But God Himself is hung up on fixing other people. That's the entirety of the Gospel - to fix the sinner. So while the goal is clear, perhaps the methods may be in question.

You don't believe like I believe, so obviously.. YOU.. are wrong and I am right.
It's strange how we can sometimes get so hung up on how right we are, and how wrong everybody else is.
And yet the entire Protestant Reformation (of which I assume you are a part) was started by this very same fundamental belief (YOU.. are wrong and I am right). Martin Luther felt that HE was right and everybody else was wrong. He transformed and re-defined all of Salvation AS believing the right things. (And if you aren't believing the right things, maybe you're just not saved.) It is obvious, though, that if you don't believe like I believe, somebody is wrong, and perhaps, even, both parties, so the details need to be worked out. That was Luther's BIG mistake. He just could not fathom that anyone reading the exact same thing as he did could arrive at a different conclusion, so after exhausting his attempts to use reason, he just resorted to cursing them with a most foul mouth.

Of course Luther was condemned to death by the echo chamber known as the Roman Catholic Church.

Jesus never said, take the log out of your own eye and leave the other guy alone. But as I said above, perhaps the methods may be in question. What is one to do with someone so brainwashed that when shown the colour blue, will always and most stubbornly reply "orange" - to the extent that the person showing blue is vilified as a messenger of Satan?

Now I supposed if I knew for sure God told me to go... I would.
Yet didn't he?

Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amen.​
- Matthew 28:19-20 KJV

And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.​
- Mark 16:15 KJV

Granted, πορευθεντες is not written in the imperative mood, but we find a similar expression here:

But ye shall receive power, after that the Holy Ghost is come upon you: and ye shall be witnesses unto me both in Jerusalem, and in all Judaea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth.​
- Acts 1:8 KJV

But so far, I don't feel
like he has told me to visit any Mormon sites, or jehovah's witneeses sites, or even Roman Catholic sites.
And that may be the case. As for me, I've visited in person with Mormons (both branches) and JW's; with Catholics, and also Evangelicals (who for the most part think Pentecostals are demon possessed). I've traveled extensively throughout Christendom, including all the major Protestant branches, and what all y'all would call cults, including Armstrong-"ism," and the Swedenborgs. While it's hard to find a Christadelphian meeting, the Quakers certainly know how to shut you up.

We have a few universalists, a few aniihilationists, a few non-trinitarians, one or two that disagree with the common Protestant Canon of the Bible.
.. and I wonder... why are they here? I suppose they believe in their minds, they are here to "fix" us. To convert us over to their way of thinking.
(Heaven forbid that you might be wrong about anything.) :innocent:

And I keep thinking who's the other guy?

Maybe they are just trolls, looking for a fight, looking for something to argue about. It's obvious we have a few of those also.
I often wonder if these people are just so lonely... they just want someone to talk to... every if it's just to fight for a while.
But I suspect a few of them genuinely believe what they are saying.
As a Red Letter Christian, others insult me all the time, to the point where it mostly just bounces off. But as one can see from my first post, I came here to share, no matter how distasteful others might find it, and I mean the contents or teachings that I post, not my wonderful personality. :laughing: The three credible death threats I've received in my lifetime were over my content, not my character.

TalkJesus used to have a "What we believe" section, but if they still have it, it's almost impossible to find.
It sounds as if you think it should be a "What you must believe" section in order for someone to post anything. That's the Echo Chamber I mentioned above - "KILL 'EM ALL if they don't believe like we do." (How wonderfully un-American. And how wonderfully Spanish Inquisition-ish.)

That said, I have assiduously campaigned for the Statement of Faith to be linked at the bottom of every page and that it be made clear if one's posts must conform to this, and if so, that such should be part of the Terms and Conditions page. I brought this matter up a number of times, only to have it ignored. I happen to agree with @Christ4Ever that threads on the Trinity can grow like weeds (or kudzu) on this type of forum and that this is the reason such threads are verboten (in general) but again, that's not stipulated on the Terms and Conditions page. (Although I guess if it's just a matter of containment, then the Trinity could just have it's own subsection....)

TalkJesus used to have a "What we believe" section, biut if they still have it, it's almost impossible to find. So then... what do we believe?
What don't we believe? Often it seems like anything goes here. Any belief is valid here, whether it's obviously non-biblical or not.
Maybe the moderator believe in Ecumenism? Maybe they believe in peace at any cost (even heresy and blasphemy). I'm not saying
we all have to agree of everything, but there should be some standards.. some beliefs.
Interesting. Are you trashing the moderators?

Why would you do that? I don't even hold that level of disrespect as to think the moderators should be defending my beliefs. And with regards to heresy and blasphemy, all y'all are heretics and blasphemers to the Catholic. And they've been around a lot longer than you. As Nick once said to me, you could always start your own forum.

Which leads me back to the original question... if you don't believe in these things... why are you here?
The first thought for many of us is... Satan sent you to cause disputes and arguments.
Maybe you need to change your thoughts, if you feel that persecuted.

Maybe we hold to a more fundamental belief in the Gospel that Jesus taught.

If you find yourself uncomfortable, I don't think that your comfort is guaranteed in the Terms and Conditions, but calling others Satan is a violation (not to mention just plain rude). But in that the Jews called Jesus Satan, I guess I should be grateful. I was banned for a year (ONE FULL YEAR) because I proved that you, BAC, changed the words of scripture in order to promulgate your own personal belief.

Is that the kind of forum that you want?

Respectfully,
Rhema

My advice... when in Rome, do as the Romans do. Don't stir up trouble, don't try to change us.
Well then you should be glad that Paul didn't follow your advice, no? He stirred up trouble and riots everywhere he went, to the point of being killed (yes, actually dead-dead) "oft" (according to his own testimony).

Wait.... you mean that we should become Catholics? :confused:
 
If everyone were walking on the same spiritual level of maturity in Christ, then there would be no differences of opinion.
Unfortunately, learning something new many times requires unlearning certain things we thought were true but were not.

Very few want to unlearn to learn something new because that takes a lot of work to reassemble your belief system.
Curtis, this is one of the most wise things I have seen posted here on TalkJesus.
(And not just work, but a lot of heartache.)

No man also having drunk old wine straightway desireth new: for he saith, The old is better.​
- Luke 5:39 KJV

God bless,
Rhema
 
God didnt write the OT, and Jesus didnt write the NT. It was all inspired by the Holy Spirit.
Oh I know that my post here will be reported and likely erased, but C'mon Brad.

If the Holy Spirit is God, then God did write the OT.

(Although I can agree with you that Jesus did not write the NT.)

:innocent:

Rhema
 
And yet the entire Protestant Reformation (of which I assume you are a part) was started by this very same fundamental belief (YOU.. are wrong and I am right). Martin Luther felt that HE was right and everybody else was wrong. He transformed and re-defined all of Salvation AS believing the right things. (And if you aren't believing the right things, maybe you're just not saved.) It is obvious, though, that if you don't believe like I believe, somebody is wrong, and perhaps, even, both parties, so the details need to be worked out. That was Luther's BIG mistake. He just could not fathom that anyone reading the exact same thing as he did could arrive at a different conclusion, so after exhausting his attempts to use reason, he just resorted to cursing them with a most foul mouth.

There is no defense against sola scriptura (all things written in the law and prophets)

The Protestant Reformation is a carbon copy of the first century reformation. Listed in Hebrew 9

The faithless no power as it is written (sola scriptura) That judges mankind outwardly as the racist Pharises with Sadducees two sects that put aside their differences in an attempt at making all things written in the law and prophets (sola scriptura) to no effect

They that had no view of the unseen eternal things of Christ followed the Pagan foundation."Out of sight out of mind" .Murder the mis perceived .

Paul having a Rhema or work of Christ become #1 on the most wanted dead or alive

They discovered there is no defense against the armor of God (sola scriptura)

Act24:4;And I persecuted this way unto the death, binding and delivering into prisons both men and women.As also the high priest doth bear me witness, and all the estate of the elders: from whom also I received letters unto the brethren, and went to Damascus, to bring them which were there bound unto Jerusalem, for to be punished.

Acts 24:13;Neither can they prove the things whereof they now accuse me.But this I confess unto thee, that after the way which they call heresy, so worship I the God of my fathers, believing all things which are written in the law and in the prophets:

They served a gospel after dead men called fathers multiple gospels like the gospel of Thoms or the gospel of Enoch /destroying the purpose of the apostles sent with true prophecy messengers
 
Oh I know that my post here will be reported and likely erased, but C'mon Brad.

If the Holy Spirit is God, then God did write the OT.

(Although I can agree with you that Jesus did not write the NT.)

:innocent:

Rhema
The holy Spirit Christ the Holy Father with his finger he wrote on two tablets written on both sides with no room for the false gospels like of Thomas or Enoch . false gospel will never make sola scriptura without effect.
 
Thanks for the reply

I would offer because God never did live in tabernacles made with human hands the will of dying mankind. Caled the abomination of desolation (The pagan foundation kings in Israel) The removal of our invisible God Christ until the second coming the time of reformation

The tabernacle parable replicated a living moving will as a parable it used the temporal historical things seen as shadow that looked ahead to the first century reformation.

Forty-years God moved his temple made with his hand the priesthood of believers revealing the gospel to one pagan nation after another, Until they reached the promised land. . used to represent the unseen new Jerusalem prepared for his bride the church

1 Peter 9-11;Receiving the end of your (new born again) faith, even the salvation of your souls.;Of which salvation the prophets have enquired and searched diligently, who prophesied of the grace that should come unto you:Searching what, or what manner of time the Spirit of Christ which was in them did signify, when it testified beforehand the sufferings of Christ, and the glory that should follow.. . . . (the return of Christ the Holy Father

Dear Garee and @B-A-C,

Based on Garee's "Forty-years God moved his temple made with his hand the priesthood of believers revealing the gospel to one pagan nation after another, Until they reached the promised land", in effect, he answered "yes" to the question "Do you believe that the tabernacle which Moses built, as recorded in the Torah, was an actual edifice on Earth".

B-A-C, Garee calls the story about the Tabernacle a parable. In fact, Garee calls it a true story - which translates to a historical fact.

In effect, you agreed to the statement "A parable is an earthly story with a heavenly message" by your "Like" of post #23, and Garee uses parable to include non-fiction stories.

There is common ground between you, both.

Love,
Kermos
 
I have been writing out my daily times with the Lord in his word and posting some or all of these writings on the internet for 20 years now, on multiple internet sites, for this is my calling from God. And so I have experienced much in the way of public responses from all different kinds of people. And so I have had to learn to be biblically discerning so as not to get caught in any troll's trickery. And I have had many (I believe) trolls respond to me over the years. And I was thinking about this today, and so I did a Google search on the meaning of "internet troll," and this is what I read:

"An internet troll is someone who intentionally posts inflammatory, offensive, or otherwise disruptive content online, aiming to provoke emotional reactions and disrupt online communities. They often hide behind anonymity or fake accounts, seeking to cause conflict and amusement at the expense of others." "Trolls engage in behavior designed to upset or anger others, often using insults, misinformation, or off-topic comments." "The primary goal of a troll is to create chaos and discord, disrupting conversations and causing emotional distress to others."

And from what I have experienced, there are internet trolls on pretty much most sites where I post, but I believe they have been massively increasing this year, and for the purposes mentioned in this definition I found on Google. And since that topic came up in this discussion, I thought I would share here some of my experiences and this definition, and maybe this might be helpful to other people who are being faced with trolls, but they are not sure what they are about or how to respond to them. And I am still learning how to identify them so I don't get trapped by them. Sue
 
Dear Garee and @B-A-C,

Based on Garee's "Forty-years God moved his temple made with his hand the priesthood of believers revealing the gospel to one pagan nation after another, Until they reached the promised land", in effect, he answered "yes" to the question "Do you believe that the tabernacle which Moses built, as recorded in the Torah, was an actual edifice on Earth".

B-A-C, Garee calls the story about the Tabernacle a parable. In fact, Garee calls it a true story - which translates to a historical fact.

In effect, you agreed to the statement "A parable is an earthly story with a heavenly message" by your "Like" of post #23, and Garee uses parable to include non-fiction stories.

There is common ground between you, both.

Love,
Kermos

Not sure how you are reckoning common ground?

I would call the actual edifice on Earth a shadow edifice

Parables used in ceremonial laws to the unbelieving world. Believers have prophecy sola scriptura till the end of time

The temporal historical a shadow of the unseen eternal.
 
Not sure how you are reckoning common ground?

I would call the actual edifice on Earth a shadow edifice

Parables used in ceremonial laws to the unbelieving world. Believers have prophecy sola scriptura till the end of time

The temporal historical a shadow of the unseen eternal.

Dear Garee,

When you posted "the actual edifice on Earth" here, then you acknowledge that the story about the Tabernacle on Earth is a true account of historical fact.

Based on your writing, you are not conveying the Tabernacle on Earth never existed.

Herein lies the common ground to which I referred, in that, you are not diminishing true history by using the term "parable".

If I interpreted your writing incorrectly, then please let me know.

Love,
Kermos
 
Dear Garee,

When you posted "the actual edifice on Earth" here, then you acknowledge that the story about the Tabernacle on Earth is a true account of historical fact.

Based on your writing, you are not conveying the Tabernacle on Earth never existed.

Herein lies the common ground to which I referred, in that, you are not diminishing true history by using the term "parable".

If I interpreted your writing incorrectly, then please let me know.

Love,
Kermos
Thanks

It existed as a shadow of true, the temporal historical. . the understnding given in parables.

The mixing recipe Corinthians 4:18 must be used when rightly dividing or interpreting parables.

No mix. . . no rest according to Hebrew 4 :1-2

Then the parable remains a mystery of faith. The "let there be" good power witnessed working in the son of man the temporal dying seen

The foremost recipe needed when studying as we seek the approval of the God of sola scriptura.

Corinthians 4:18;While we look not at the things which are seen, but at the things which are not seen: for the things which are seen are temporal; but the things which are not seen are eternal.
 
Oh I know that my post here will be reported and likely erased, but C'mon Brad.

If the Holy Spirit is God, then God did write the OT.

(Although I can agree with you that Jesus did not write the NT.)

:innocent:

Rhema
God wrote on the tablets of stone that Moses carried, directly, and His hand probably wrote directly on the wall in Babylon about the city to soon fall. But I was talking directly, God the Holy Spirit inspired all other scripture though. The Holy Spirit did not write it directly. Come on now, dont be looking for a stupid reason to disagree.
 
God wrote on the tablets of stone that Moses carried, directly, and His hand probably wrote directly on the wall in Babylon about the city to soon fall. But I was talking directly, God the Holy Spirit inspired all other scripture though. The Holy Spirit did not write it directly. Come on now, dont be looking for a stupid reason to disagree.

It would seem in one way he did write it directly. And reveals our part as two working as one. The dynamic dual the Holy Father and Son ministry

The first time he willed two tablets and with his faithful let there will call a finger wrote on both sides of the two with no room for oral traditions of dying mankind. called the letter of the word death (Thou shall not, or you are deader than a door nail )

Exodus 32:15 And Moses turned, and went down from the mount, and the two tables of the testimony were in his hand: the tables were written on both their sides; on the one side and on the other were they written.

Coming down from the mountain the oral tradition of dying mankind had already taken over. Soon as he left paganism began

Exodus 34And the Lord said unto Moses, Hew thee two tables of stone like unto the first: and I will write upon these tables the words that were in the first tables, which thou brakest.

Moses was used to destroy the first set to indicate death then Moses was moved to hewn out two new tablets to represent the convent of grace and again the Holy Father wrote the same words with his finger the two-fold law . Life (new testament) and death (old) One perfect law made from two

Romans 8:2 For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death.
 
God wrote on the tablets of stone that Moses carried, directly, and His hand probably wrote directly on the wall in Babylon about the city to soon fall. But I was talking directly, God the Holy Spirit inspired all other scripture though. The Holy Spirit did not write it directly. Come on now, dont be looking for a stupid reason to disagree.
I wasn't being disagreeable, but just pointing out a fuzzy thinking that I find present, persistent, and pernicious in the mindset of almost all Christians.

While these define God as = (Father, Son, Holy Spirit) when saying "God" they just mean "Father." Semantics? No. I don't think so. I rather think that if we are to present truth, we need to be as clear as possible in our definitional framework and flee from language that inculcates confusion. Nobody ever says God when they mean Jesus. Instead, they mean the Father.

Had you said the Father did not write the OT, there would have been no need for me to comment.

As it stands, though, it was intended to be partly humorous while pointing out a very real problem with fuzzy thinking in the definitional framework.

God bless,
Rhema
 
For example, think of a 5 point Calvinist teaching a kid about Christianity. That poor kid will be so badly stumbled. Believing God is partial and at His core pure evil.
Interesting that your Calvinist would likely think himself to be part of your first category:
1. Older Christians who love the Lord and want to mostly share with the occasional correction.
(And that he might conclude that you are part of your own fourth category: )
4. People who tasted of Christianity, rejected it mostly at some or other level and are now narcissistic trolls.

Who amongst us here claims to be Pope?
 
I'm talking about the out-lyers. The non-mainstreamers. Those people who usually don't belong to any denomination but their own.
Martin Luther didn't belong to any denomination but his own... having only one member - himself.

I've always wondered at what point did he realize that he was no longer Catholic?

Rhema
 
Back
Top