Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!
  • Welcome to Talk Jesus Christian Forums

    Celebrating 20 Years!

    A bible based, Jesus Christ centered community.

    Register Log In

Imputed Righteousness?

That's because I believe they are sometimes different.
Agreed.
Perhaps "Good works versus sin" may have been a more appropriate title here?

Can you give an example of a work of the law that is sin?
While keeping the ten commandments are not sin, stoning an adulterer is now a sin.

Can you give an example of a "work" of the law that is NOT sin?
Telling the truth and being faithful to your spouse are both "works of the law" and not sinful.

Is murder sin? Is adultery sin? Is fornication sin? Is stealing a sin?
(all those things were sin under the law)
Yes, they are still sin, even in the NT without the Mosaic Law.

.
.. even more to the point.... can you name a sin... any sin at all... that is not defined in the
law (at least indirectly) If not.... how does anyone know if they are sinning?
Hit and run driving. Drug abuse. Smoking tobacco.
As every sin is at opposition to Jesus' commands of "love God above all else and your neighbor as yourself", our conscience will tell us when we run afoul of the Law.
Romans 2:14-15 bear this out.
Everyone has a conscience.

KingJ for example... says he wouldn't call those things sin. Just "bad behavior".
He knows better than that.
Those who indoctrinated him have much practice deluding the masses...(no pun intended)

So he would be one of those who "can't sin"... even he wanted to.
His conscience will over-rule his doctrine, if he allows it.
I will keep him in my prayers, along with all those I love.
 
Hit and run driving. Drug abuse. Smoking tobacco.
As every sin is at opposition to Jesus' commands of "love God above all else and your neighbor as yourself", our conscience will tell us when we run afoul of the Law.
Romans 2:14-15 bear this out.
Everyone has a conscience.

Is drug abuse the same as being drunk? ( Luke 21:34; Rom 13:13; Gal 5:21; 1 Pet 4:3; )

The word "sorcery" in Gal 5:20; is actually ...
φαρμακεία
pharmakeia
far-mak-i'-ah
From G5332; medication (“pharmacy”), that is, (by extension) magic (literal or figurative): - sorcery, witchcraft.
Total KJV occurrences: 3
... from which we get the word "pharmacy" or "drug store".

Is smoking tobacco the same as destroying your "temple"? ( 1 Cor 3:16-17; )

I think God gives everyone a conscience... but some have gotten so comfortable in their sin, that they
can't hear it anymore. It has become "seared over". ( 1 Tim 4:2; )
 
1 John 5:17
All wrongdoing is sin, but there is sin that does not lead to death

I have often wondered about this passage. It says "a" sin in the translations I usually read.
But some versions say "some sins" (or something similar).

AMPC) All wrongdoing is sin, and there is sin which does not [involve] death [that may be repented of and forgiven].
(AMPC+) All wrongdoing is sin, and there is sin which does not [involve] death [that may be repented of and forgiven].
(ASV) All unrighteousness is sin: and there is a sin not unto death.
(ESV) All wrongdoing is sin, but there is sin that does not lead to death.
(ESV+) R13All wrongdoing is sin, but there is sin that does not lead to death.
(GW) Every kind of wrongdoing is sin, yet there are sins that don't lead to death.
(HCSB) All unrighteousness is sin, and there is sin that does not bring death.
(KJV) All unrighteousness is sin: and there is a sin not unto death.
(MKJV) All unrighteousness is sin, and there is a sin not to death.
(MSG) Everything we do wrong is sin, but not all sin is fatal.
(NAS77) All unrighteousness is sin, and there is a sin not leading to death.
(NASB) All unrighteousness is sin, and there is a sin not leading to death.
(NIrV) Every wrong thing we do is sin. But there are sins that do not lead to death.
(NIV) All wrongdoing is sin, and there is sin that does not lead to death.
(NLT) All wicked actions are sin, but not every sin leads to death.
(RV) All unrighteousness is sin: and there is a sin not unto death.

But what is this sin? .. are these sin(s)??

1 Pet 4:8; Above all, keep fervent in your love for one another, because love covers a multitude of sins.
1 Pet 4:9; Be hospitable to one another without complaint.
1 Pet 4:10; As each one has received a special gift, employ it in serving one another as good stewards of the manifold grace of God.

I read this in the context of the "one another"'s. Love one another, serve one another, be hospital to one another.
So I take this mean to mean, "our" love will cover some of their sins.
I think sometimes people are offended at very small things.... possibly even things that aren't really much of a sin.
But.. "it's sin to me!!, if you were me you would feel the same way!!"
The Bible says we are forgiven as we forgive others. ( Matt 6:14-15; )

John 20:23; "If you forgive the sins of any, their sins have been forgiven them; if you retain the sins of any, they have been retained."

Luke 17:3; "Be on your guard! If your brother sins, rebuke him; and if he repents, forgive him.
 
this is the difference between a saved person although he just sinned with that one second of thought he now has the power to over come practicing that sin and not act on it. But since he thought it even if its just for a second he has sinned. this is how I see it just my opinion.

Is being tempted a sin? Jesus was tempted... ( Matt 4:1; Mark 1:13; Luke 4:2; Heb 2:18; )
but He didn't sin. ( Heb 4:15; )

I'm not sure a one or two second thought always constitutes sin. I like what you say above "..and not act on it"

Jas 1:12; Blessed is a man who perseveres under trial; for once he has been approved, he will receive the crown of life which the Lord has promised to those who love Him.
Jas 1:13; Let no one say when he is tempted, "I am being tempted by God"; for God cannot be tempted by evil, and He Himself does not tempt anyone.
Jas 1:14; But each one is tempted when he is carried away and enticed by his own lust.
Jas 1:15; Then when lust has conceived, it gives birth to sin; and when sin is accomplished, it brings forth death.

We are tempted -> We have lust -> We sin -> We die. It is a process, a number of steps here.
But what if we just stop at "we are tempted"? Jesus did.

I personally don't think lust is a "one or two second" sin. An internet page pops up, a magazine page flips open,
a skimpy dressed woman walks in front of you at the store. You can't always control those things.

Now do you turn away from those things... or do entertain those thoughts and keep thinking about them?
Back when I was looking at pornography... it was never for one or two seconds.
 
Back to the OP for a minute... (it may be possible that this thread has drifted slightly :)

Imputed righteousness.....

1 Pet 1:6; In this you greatly rejoice, even though now for a little while, if necessary, you have been distressed by various trials,
1 Pet 1:7; so that the proof of your faith, being more precious than gold which is perishable, even though tested by fire, may be found to result in praise and glory and honor at the revelation of Jesus Christ;
1 Pet 1:9; obtaining as the outcome of your faith the salvation of your souls.

I know know about "greatly rejoicing" when we are going through through the trials of life. But maybe we
should rejoice more often... why do we even have to go through all those 'dumb' trials anyway?

I can't help but think of Job.... I can't imagine any of us have ever been tested more than he was.

These trials are how our faith is tested. Anyone can believe in God and follow Him when things are going great.
But how about when you are going through the fire? This is when "the proof of your faith" is revealed.
In fact.... I believe this is really the primary way our faith IS revealed. ..and it is this proof.
..THIS PROOF... we obtain as the outcome of our faith... which is part of the salvation of our souls.

If this is the case.... then "all" righteous isn't imputed (credited) but some of it depends on how we do
in the trials and tests.

..............

Jas 1:2; Consider it all joy, my brethren, when you encounter various trials,
Jas 1:3; knowing that the testing of your faith produces endurance.
Jas 1:4; And let endurance have its perfect result, so that you may be perfect and complete, lacking in nothing.

The Bible says our faith will be tested. This causes endurance... why do we need endurance?
So that we can be perfect and complete... "lacking in nothing". But again.. it seems the "testing of your faith"
is what eventually results in us being "perfect and complete".

If our faith is already "a done deal"... then why does it need to be tested? Is God being tested... or us?
His faith.. or our faith?
 
With the thought of "imputed righteousness in mind"....

Matt 25:14; "For it is just like a man about to go on a journey, who called his own slaves and entrusted his possessions to them.
Matt 25:15; "To one he gave five talents, to another, two, and to another, one, each according to his own ability; and he went on his journey.
Matt 25:16; "Immediately the one who had received the five talents went and traded with them, and gained five more talents.
Matt 25:17; "In the same manner the one who had received the two talents gained two more.
Matt 25:18; "But he who received the one talent went away, and dug a hole in the ground and hid his master's money.
Matt 25:19; "Now after a long time the master of those slaves *came and *settled accounts with them.
Matt 25:20; "The one who had received the five talents came up and brought five more talents, saying, 'Master, you entrusted five talents to me. See, I have gained five more talents.'
Matt 25:21; "His master said to him, 'Well done, good and faithful slave. You were faithful with a few things, I will put you in charge of many things; enter into the joy of your master.'
Matt 25:22; "Also the one who had received the two talents came up and said, 'Master, you entrusted two talents to me. See, I have gained two more talents.'
Matt 25:23; "His master said to him, 'Well done, good and faithful slave. You were faithful with a few things, I will put you in charge of many things; enter into the joy of your master.'
Matt 25:24; "And the one also who had received the one talent came up and said, 'Master, I knew you to be a hard man, reaping where you did not sow and gathering where you scattered no seed.
Matt 25:25; 'And I was afraid, and went away and hid your talent in the ground. See, you have what is yours.'
Matt 25:26; "But his master answered and said to him, 'You wicked, lazy slave, you knew that I reap where I did not sow and gather where I scattered no seed.

Matt 25:27; 'Then you ought to have put my money in the bank, and on my arrival I would have received my money back with interest.
Matt 25:28; 'Therefore take away the talent from him, and give it to the one who has the ten talents.'
Matt 25:29; "For to everyone who has, more shall be given, and he will have an abundance; but from the one who does not have, even what he does have shall be taken away.
Matt 25:30; "Throw out the worthless slave into the outer darkness; in that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.

The master gave all three servants a talent. He didn't just give two of them a talent.
He expected them to do something with it... He didn't just give it to them so they could look at it.
Two of them invested them and somehow made a profit. He tells these two... "well done".

The third servant he gave a talent to... buried it in the ground. Why wasn't that good enough?
He even tells the master.. "see here is your talent back, I didn't lose it".
But the master says.... "you wicked and lazy servant". If all righteousness is "imputed", why wasn't it
imputed on this servant? What did he do differently than the other two servants?
Could it be... that some righteousness needs to come from us... our efforts?
 
Is drug abuse the same as being drunk? ( Luke 21:34; Rom 13:13; Gal 5:21; 1 Pet 4:3; )
The word "sorcery" in Gal 5:20; is actually ...
φαρμακεία
pharmakeia
far-mak-i'-ah
From G5332; medication (“pharmacy”), that is, (by extension) magic (literal or figurative): - sorcery, witchcraft.
Total KJV occurrences: 3
... from which we get the word "pharmacy" or "drug store".
Is smoking tobacco the same as destroying your "temple"? ( 1 Cor 3:16-17; )
They all are servitude to the flesh.

I think God gives everyone a conscience... but some have gotten so comfortable in their sin, that they
can't hear it anymore. It has become "seared over". ( 1 Tim 4:2; )
Agreed.
 
Is being tempted a sin? Jesus was tempted... ( Matt 4:1; Mark 1:13; Luke 4:2; Heb 2:18; )
but He didn't sin. ( Heb 4:15; )

I'm not sure a one or two second thought always constitutes sin. I like what you say above "..and not act on it"

Jas 1:12; Blessed is a man who perseveres under trial; for once he has been approved, he will receive the crown of life which the Lord has promised to those who love Him.
Jas 1:13; Let no one say when he is tempted, "I am being tempted by God"; for God cannot be tempted by evil, and He Himself does not tempt anyone.
Jas 1:14; But each one is tempted when he is carried away and enticed by his own lust.
Jas 1:15; Then when lust has conceived, it gives birth to sin; and when sin is accomplished, it brings forth death.

We are tempted -> We have lust -> We sin -> We die. It is a process, a number of steps here.
But what if we just stop at "we are tempted"? Jesus did.

I personally don't think lust is a "one or two second" sin. An internet page pops up, a magazine page flips open,
a skimpy dressed woman walks in front of you at the store. You can't always control those things.

Now do you turn away from those things... or do entertain those thoughts and keep thinking about them?
Back when I was looking at pornography... it was never for one or two seconds.

BAC thanks for bringing that to my attention about temptation not being a sin, as the bible clearly says Jesus was tempted and I know he was sinless. I had never given it much thought before. I am going to have to study up on this. Because off the top of my head I would have to say you have to be sinfull in ordered to be tempted, but I know Jesus was not sinful so how can this be?. Because the way I see it is in order to be tempted you want the thing in the first place which makes you sinful. Because there are lots of things that sinful but I have not desire for them at all so they are not tempting to me. I am struggling how Jesus was tempted in the desert as he was perfect and would not even want all the riches in the world so how could he be tempted by them?? I know the bible says he was so I know its true because I believe the bible, but I am struggling understanding this.

Now turning the Rock into Bread, that is not sinful to think of that but being obedient to the Father is resisting the temptation of doing it.

Perhaps there are some temptations that are sinful and some that are not?

because when I look at what the bible says about just looking a women lustfully it is sinful, looking only takes a second so I have to say that is sinful even if its just a glance at a magazine cover for a second, but know we have the power to look the other way through being saved by Jesus.

I know the main thing I took out of studding in the past of Jesus going to the desert for 40 days was the word of God was used to fight the devil, I may have to do another study on this again and see what else God will hopefully revel to me, please pray for me.
 
Dave M will keep praying for you yes Jesus was tempted and Job was too even though he was righteous to test his faith. When you test something or take a test God wants you to pass amen? So dont be fooled by the devils trick questions. Why was Jesus tempted when we know he was sinless, and why was Job tested when God called him righteous and perfect...well the devil tries to get the righteous! He wants to steal kill and destroy them so the way he does that is if he can get them to sin, hes won. Also as Jesus came in the flesh and got hungry and tired just like we do the devil thought he would be easy to take down. Buf he couldnt kill him even if he tried cos he just came back to life in three days.

On imputed righteousness we are justified and them sanctified...the justification is when we believe or put our trust in the Lord and the sanctification part is when God washes us clean. Its not we are sanctified and then justified, its the other way round. At least that is how I understand it also Ezekiel 33 explains how the righteous, if they turn or fall and do wickedness God will see that and judge that and if the wicked repent and do righteousness then God will also see that and forgive their wickedness.

See when God forgives you He really does and does not count your former sins against you because of the blood on the mercy seat, its paid for. If you then sin again God forbid you put Christ to shame. However being tempted to sin is what the devil tries to do all the time just tell himto get lost as you belong to God now.
 
Now turning the Rock into Bread, that is not sinful to think of that but being obedient to the Father is resisting the temptation of doing it.

I believe this has something to do with something called "the doctrine of the son of man".
God gave the earth to man. Gen 1:28-30; to "rule over and subdue"

But man give this to Satan... he is called the "god of this world" ( 2 Cor 4:4; )
A man gave it away... a man had to take it back.

Rom 5:18; So then as through one transgression there resulted condemnation to all men, even so through one act of righteousness there resulted justification of life to all men.
Rom 5:19; For as through the one man's disobedience the many were made sinners, even so through the obedience of the One the many will be made righteous.

When Satan tempted Jesus.... there are only 3 temptations listed,
Turn rocks into bread, throw yourself off the temple so the angels will catch you, and worship Satan.
The first two... are not temptations common to man... we can lie, cheat, steal, lust etc.... but usually
not turn turn rocks to bread or have angels catch us if we deliberately jump from a high place.
I believe Satan was tempting Jesus to do "God things". Not because they are a sin... but because
Jesus had to defeat Satan without using His "God power". Jesus did miracles no one else could do to be sure...
but He didn't do this when He faced Satan. In fact in the garden, when Peter tried to protect Him with a
sword, Jesus said "don't you think I can call 12 legions of angels" (Matt 26:53; )... but He didn't.

He called Himself "the Son of Man" more than any other name. He lived like a man, He felt pain like man,
He died like a Man (He isn't still dead, but you know what I mean)

I take this an example... even though we are "mere men". We can defeat Satan.
I have wondered why (some) unbelievers can quit drinking and quit smoking. (if they want to bad enough)
but yet some "Christians" cannot quit doing these things? (This can be anything, gambling, adultery, etc..)
How can the unsaved be more righteous than the saved? Too many Christians have gotten comfortable
in their sin.
 
Because the way I see it is in order to be tempted you want the thing in the first place which makes you sinful.

In a way you are right, but it is possible to "lusting" for things. Again, if we don't dwell on those
things we won't be tempted.

Jas 1:14; But each one is tempted when he is carried away and enticed by his own lust.
Jas 1:15; Then when lust has conceived, it gives birth to sin; and when sin is accomplished, it brings forth death.

This is why we need to "take every thought captive".

2 Cor 10:5; We are destroying speculations and every lofty thing raised up against the knowledge of God, and we are taking every thought captive to the obedience of Christ,

It's almost like we have to be "re-trained".

I live outside the town I work in about 10 miles. There are some stores close to me that I usually do my shopping at.
But occasionally my wife wants me to take her "to town" to do some shopping. Five days a week I drive to the place
I work. Now it's Saturday, she wants me to drive her to the store. We get in the truck and head to town....
Guess where I drive to? My wife looks at me and says... "Why are we at your office?"

Old habits die hard some times. But I have worked other places in my past... and I had to "break the habit"
of driving to those places. It's 2018, I have to break myself of the habit of writing 2017 on my checks.
 
In a way you are right, but it is possible to "lusting" for things. Again, if we don't dwell on those
things we won't be tempted.
When the devil uses memories of PAST lusts to try enticing us, we need to remember Gal 5:24..."And they that are Christ's have crucified the flesh with the affections and lusts."
Those PAST lusts are as dead as our former selves, thanks be to God.
We are new creatures now!
 
Thank you for that verse, I was looking for it earlier when I was talking about "helping old ladies".
I agree with everything you say here, but even if this is true.... do these works save you?
(I know you already answered this above).

We can't ask if works save us. It is not a valid question. We cannot ignore the fact that there were two homes for the dead in Hades. Did works save those in Abrahams bosom? It appears so. Saved from all sin and death is only possible if we are adopted into God's family / washed clean by Jesus. This is a gift God gave all those in AB and gives to all now who come to Him. There is now no longer a need for AB. But we must not forget that there was an AB!!!!

Jesus said you know someone by their works. This was God advising us on the best manner of discerning someone's heart. Of course God can do better. He can see hope for the future when we can't. It reminds me of an adulterer in the OT, who would repent. Only God would know whether or not to accept His repentance. Us, the people can only see the deed. As such we enforce the death penalty. Of course we are not under the covenant of Moses today but the point of human discernment < God's discernment is made crystal clear. We can apply this fact to those who have not got the fruits we would expect to see.
 
What is an example of a "mortal sin"? What scriptures support this?

Mortal sins would ideally be all those sins that God ordained the death penalty be a fitting punishment for.

Death penalty:

Lev 20:10 And the man that committeth adultery with another man's wife, even he that committeth adultery with his neighbour's wife, the adulterer and the adulteress shall surely be put to death.

Lev 20:11 And the man that lieth with his father's wife hath uncovered his father's nakedness: both of them shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

Lev 20:12 And if a man lie with his daughter in law, both of them shall surely be put to death: they have wrought confusion; their blood shall be upon them.

Lev 20:13 If a man also lie with man, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

Excommunication:

Lev 20:18 And if a man shall lie with a woman having her sickness, and shall uncover her nakedness; he hath discovered her fountain, and she hath uncovered the fountain of her blood: and both of them shall be cut off from among their people.

Die childless:

And if a man shall lie with his uncle's wife, he hath uncovered his uncle's nakedness: they shall bear their sin; they shall die childless.

Note the differing punishments.

If we take these scriptures showing differing punishments and add to this the fact that God does not change Num 23:19, Mal 3:6, Heb 13:8, James 1:17. We should arrive at the obvious fact that God's hatred of these sins has not changed.

Jesus says we know somebody by their fruits. Paul says in 1 Cor 6:1-9 that we should judge and discern better then the unsaved. Well, the unsaved know the difference between a thief stealing candy from a candy store VS a thief stealing $ 1 000 000 from the bank. Yet....we say a liar = murderer. It's truly hilarious.

Most fail at this because that are taught a half truth. Matt 5:28 'thoughts = sin'. Therefore all sins are equal. Uhm no, Jesus qualifies Himself in verse 32 (Matt 5:32). Actual adultery is grounds for divorce.

There is also a theme throughout the bible of God's wrath coming upon mankind when their sin reaches full measure. So the million dollar question is, when does sin reach full measure? Was Sodom obliterated because people were robbing candy stores?????
 
We can't ask if works save us. It is not a valid question. We cannot ignore the fact that there were two homes for the dead in Hades. Did works save those in Abrahams bosom? It appears so. Saved from all sin and death is only possible if we are adopted into God's family / washed clean by Jesus. This is a gift God gave all those in AB and gives to all now who come to Him. There is now no longer a need for AB. But we must not forget that there was an AB!!!!

The "two" options after death are heaven and hell. The later eventually cast into the lake of fire.
I think it a mistake to use Jesus' parable for our picture of the after life.
He was talking to OT Jews, not NT Christians.

BTW...what "works" did Lazarus the leper do to gain comfort in "AB".
I think the point of Jesus' parable were the lack of works by the rich man.

Jesus said you know someone by their works. This was God advising us on the best manner of discerning someone's heart. Of course God can do better. He can see hope for the future when we can't. It reminds me of an adulterer in the OT, who would repent. Only God would know whether or not to accept His repentance. Us, the people can only see the deed. As such we enforce the death penalty. Of course we are not under the covenant of Moses today but the point of human discernment < God's discernment is made crystal clear. We can apply this fact to those who have not got the fruits we would expect to see.
Amen!
 
The "two" options after death are heaven and hell. The later eventually cast into the lake of fire.
I think it a mistake to use Jesus' parable for our picture of the after life.
He was talking to OT Jews, not NT Christians.
Yes He was talking to OT Jews. No, it was not a parable. As discussed in post 131 here What is Sin & is it OK to be Sin Free?.

1 + 1 = 2, not 7.

Rom 3:23 All have sinned + John 14:6 'No one comes to the Father except through me' / Heb 10:1-18 Only Jesus's sacrifice is worthy for covering our sin. + Jesus went to the cross / was raised from the dead AD = All those living in BC did not qualify for God's presence.

I agree that Elijah, Moses and perhaps Joshua did not die and scripture says they were taken to heaven. But we need to apply the above scripture to that scripture. God abides by scripture. He will not bend the rules for a few prophets.

Where do you propose all the other OT prophets, non Jews who repented like those of Nineveh and obedient Jews were placed? Scripture is crystal clear that they were not worthy to be in God's presence.
 
Yes He was talking to OT Jews. No, it was not a parable. As discussed in post 131 here What is Sin & is it OK to be Sin Free?.
I can't find a single mention of Abraham's bosom in Revelations.

Rom 3:23 All have sinned + John 14:6 'No one comes
to the Father except through me'
/ Heb 10:1-18 Only Jesus's sacrifice is worthy for covering our sin. + Jesus went to the cross / was raised from the dead AD = All those living in BC did not qualify for God's presence.
Perhaps you have forgotten Jesus' words to the Sadducees..."I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob? God is not the God of the dead, but of the living." (Matt 22:32)
"Living" where?

I agree that Elijah, Moses and perhaps Joshua did not die and scripture says they were taken to heaven. But we need to apply the above scripture to that scripture. God abides by scripture. He will not bend the rules for a few prophets.
Why do you attempt to use scripture to deny the words you just wrote?
"I believe...were taken to heaven." BUT...?
How can you "believe" both sides of an argument?
One belief trumps the other.

Where do you propose all the other OT prophets, non Jews who repented like those of Nineveh and obedient Jews were placed? Scripture is crystal clear that they were not worthy to be in God's presence.
Their bodies will sleep till the return of Jesus, and will be raised first to be with Him in His return.

It IS a parable.
 
I can't find a single mention of Abraham's bosom in Revelations.
Perhaps you have forgotten Jesus' words to the Sadducees..."I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob? God is not the God of the dead, but of the living." (Matt 22:32)
"Living" where?
Why do you attempt to use scripture to deny the words you just wrote?
"I believe...were taken to heaven." BUT...?
How can you "believe" both sides of an argument?
One belief trumps the other.
Their bodies will sleep till the return of Jesus, and will be raised first to be with Him in His return.
It IS a parable.
'''Revelations does not mention it, so I don't believe it''? Yeah, I think you and I are done discussing this for now.
 
'''Revelations does not mention it, so I don't believe it''? Yeah, I think you and I are done discussing this for now.
You never told us what "works" the man with the open sores did to "achieve" a place of comfort. (Post 34)
 
Back
Top