Dobbs_Head
Member
- Joined
- May 2, 2007
- Messages
- 1
I have read many strong claims about what will happen to me if I do not accept Jesus Christ as my savior. It seems that the risks of being a non-believer are great, and I would not like to (edited by LLJ) myself to hell. So I am here asking for your help.
I encountered an argument once, and it stuck with me. I can find no logical fallacy, nothing to break the structure of the argument. I am a scientist and a naturalist, so I cannot accept supernatural claims. The argument goes like this:
Definition 1: existence
A thing exists if it can be demonstrated it has properties of matter or energy.
Definition 2: non-existence
A thing does not exist if it fails definition 1.
Statement: God does not exist.
Proof:
(1) There is no evidence demonstrating God has properties of matter or energy.
(2) God fails definition 1.
(3) God does not exist as per definition 2.
QED
Until this stumbling block can be removed, I cannot be saved.
It may be disproved in two ways:
1) Provide an example of something that exists yet does not have properties of matter or energy. This would invalidate definition 1.
2) Provided evidence for the existence of God. This would invalidate the first statement of the proof.
I am not trying to troll, I simply want an answer and this seemed like a pretty good place with lots of knowledge on the subject.
"To you I am an atheist, to God I am the loyal opposition." -Woody Allen
I encountered an argument once, and it stuck with me. I can find no logical fallacy, nothing to break the structure of the argument. I am a scientist and a naturalist, so I cannot accept supernatural claims. The argument goes like this:
Definition 1: existence
A thing exists if it can be demonstrated it has properties of matter or energy.
Definition 2: non-existence
A thing does not exist if it fails definition 1.
Statement: God does not exist.
Proof:
(1) There is no evidence demonstrating God has properties of matter or energy.
(2) God fails definition 1.
(3) God does not exist as per definition 2.
QED
Until this stumbling block can be removed, I cannot be saved.
It may be disproved in two ways:
1) Provide an example of something that exists yet does not have properties of matter or energy. This would invalidate definition 1.
2) Provided evidence for the existence of God. This would invalidate the first statement of the proof.
I am not trying to troll, I simply want an answer and this seemed like a pretty good place with lots of knowledge on the subject.
"To you I am an atheist, to God I am the loyal opposition." -Woody Allen
Last edited by a moderator: