Rhema
Active
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2021
- Messages
- 4,084
It is absurd to think that God would ensure that the Roman Catholic Bishops would put the Bible together correctly, while NOT ensuring that these very same Bishops could preach a saving grace, as if God was more interested in publishing a book than in saving souls.God knew what would happen and so He sealed his Word as written by the Holy Spirit to thwart both the adversary and human conniving -
I would encourage you to study the origin and development of the New Testament canon, specifically that of the Church of the (far) East.
I am shocked. I would not have expected numerology, an occult superstition, to come from you.Bible Numerics appears to be God's watermark of authenticity.
Russia was not "atheistic" in 1855. This claim in and of itself ought to give you a clue about the author.a native of the world's most renowned atheistic nation, Russia. Ivan Panin was born in Russia on December 12, 1855.
Cite one.the newspapers carried headlines telling of his conversion.
In 1890, the Koine dialect of Greek was unknown.It was in 1890 ... Panin was curious as to why the Greek word for "the" preceded the word "God" in one case and not the other.
As of today, there is no true understanding of how the direct article is used in Greek (Daniel Wallace, I don't have the citation readily at hand). Even now in English, American say "THE hospital" while the British omit the article to say just "hospital" (e.g. I'm going to hospital).
Hebrew or Greek? Your article wasn't clear. However, in ancient Greek, this idea of a word having a "numeric value" is nonsense. Such an idea developed in the middle ages by the Jewish magicians and soothsayers - the mystics who brought you the Kabbalah.The numeric value of a word is the sum total of all its letters.
No it doesn't. 2 Tim. 3:16 states -In 2 Timothy 3:16 it states "All scripture is given by inspiration of God."
πασα γραφη θεοπνευστος και ωφελιμος προς διδασκαλιαν προς ελεγχον προς επανορθωσιν προς παιδειαν την εν δικαιοσυνη
And the KJV is a purposeful mistranslation. The word "IS" is not in that text, and what you read as a verb is actually an adjective. Furthermore verse 16 is a continuation of a sentence starting in verse 15. There are just so many problems with this translation. At some point I shall have to post a new thread that provides a correct translation, but again, this mistake sorely detracts from the credibility of the author of your article.
Yes, that entire article is replete with superstition.Great superstition ...
Cite one.Panin issued a challenge throughout leading newspapers of the world
Oh Waggles... what the heck... have you now become a Flat Earther too?
Rhema