Who's Definition you are using as for "the Bible/Traditional Christianity" which one. and please give "reference" and post "Definition" for there are more than one
No, there is only one. Those who follow the Bible 100%, and those who don't. The original church didn't have denominations. They just followed the teachings of Jesus.
And I still do not understand why you posted a link to:
"Oxford Academic"
It wasn't because they were "traditional", it was because they aren't. The article was just a good example of what deconstructed Christianity is. If you have a better/different article, you are certainly welcome to post it here.
Certainly the original church/Christians did not consider the Bible to be fiction. If they did, there would not be Christianity, because no one believed in it from the beginning.
en.wikipedia.org
The is the earliest "complete" example of the Bible as we know it today. It's from the 4th century. I've read all the claims about how the Bible how changed over the years, but every time a group of
scholars compares modern Bibles with the oldest known Bibles, they are amazed how accurate they are. The Codex Sinaiticus is considered the be the standard because it's the oldest.
There are also the dead sea scrolls.
en.wikipedia.org
Which of course, we don't have all the books, and many of the books we do have aren't complete. But of what we do have so far, all of it matches modern translations 100%.
What that means is, if the Bible was really changed.. it was changed before the 1st Century ended. If the Bible can't be trusted, then what do we build our doctrine and faith on?
A remarkably well-preserved, thousand-year-old Book of Psalms has been discovered by a construction worker in an Irish bog, a find archaeologists call "staggering."
www.nationalgeographic.com
Now of course some "Christian" denominations ( there is a reason I put the word Christian in quotes here ) had added their own sources of doctrine. The Book of Mormon and the WatchTower
come to mind. They say these are more accurate than the Bible, and yet for something that is so accurate... the book of Mormon is in it's 31st revision. Hmmmm.
You asked what my definition of traditional Christianity is... simply those who were closest to what the first churches and Christians believed and did.
Mormonism didn't exist until the 1820's. There is no way it can be traditional, simply because it hasn't been around long enough to be a tradition for multiple generations.
The same with the Jehovah's Witnesses. They are a relatively new denomination as well.
So where do we draw the line by date? I don't have a specific date. But as a rule, churches from within 100 years or so of the reformation ( 1520's) would qualify.
But these days we have to qualify that even further. For example, some Lutheran, Methodist, and Anglican churches have split up in the last generation because they have left
their original believes and charters. 100 years ago, all three of these denominations were against homosexuality, pro-choice, transgenderism, and ecumenism.
Now parts of these denominations embrace these things. So because they have changed from their original beliefs, they also don't qualify as "traditional".