Bible Study Question

[El Hombre viejo]

Why are you avoiding the question? You say that commentaries are, let's see how did you put it? Ahhh yes, here it is.


In all fairness, wouldn't Copeland's, Capps', and Hagin's teachings and books (commentaries) be included in your statement above?:wink:

Ok I'll answer since you don't. The teachings of Copeland Capps and Hagin teach lines up with the Word, as much as does the teaching of the original twelve, so we need them as much as the original twelve.

I realize you disagree. I don't really care. Its your right. I'm done arguing. I hate arguing and I won't do it any more. I'll share but if you disagree....ok.

 

[jiggyfly]

Ok I'll answer since you don't. The teachings of Copeland Capps and Hagin teach lines up with the Word, as much as does the teaching of the original twelve, so we need them as much as the original twelve.

I realize you disagree. I don't really care. Its your right. I'm done arguing. I hate arguing and I won't do it any more. I'll share but if you disagree....ok.

Do you think that that's somewhat biased? Hopefully you can see the ludicrousness of your earlier statement that we should stay away from commentaries.

I have really appreciated teachings and commentary of T. Austin Sparks, A.W. Tozer, Martin Luther, Joseph Parker, A.W. Pink, Charles Barclay, Albert Barnes, A.B. Simpson, Alfred Edersheim, J. V. Mcgee, and Jurgen Moltmann to name a few and I think that they have given some tremendous insights concerning understanding the scriptures.