Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!
  • Welcome to Talk Jesus Christian Forums

    Celebrating 20 Years!

    A bible based, Jesus Christ centered community.

    Register Log In

Alexander the metal-smith

B-A-C

Loyal
Joined
Dec 18, 2008
Messages
12,063
In Acts Paul is passing through Ephesus. He is talking to the people about idols... gods made by men.

Acts 19:26; "You see and hear that not only in Ephesus, but in almost all of Asia, this Paul has persuaded and turned away a considerable number of people, saying that gods made with hands are no gods at all.

Now of course many of the people weren't happy about this.

Acts 19:28; When they heard this and were filled with rage, they began crying out, saying, "Great is Artemis of the Ephesians!"

It seems Artemis was one of the major "gods" in Ephesus at the time.

Acts 19:32; So then, some were shouting one thing and some another, for the assembly was in confusion and the majority did not know for what reason they had come together.
Acts 19:33; Some of the crowd concluded it was Alexander, since the Jews had put him forward; and having motioned with his hand, Alexander was intending to make a defense to the assembly.

Along comes someone named Alexander causing trouble and stirring up the people. Now why were idols so important to Alexander?

If we jump over to 1st Timothy Alexander comes up again.

1 Tim 1:18; This command I entrust to you, Timothy, my son, in accordance with the prophecies previously made concerning you, that by them you fight the good fight,
1 Tim 1:19; keeping faith and a good conscience, which some have rejected and suffered shipwreck in regard to their faith.
1 Tim 1:20; Among these are Hymenaeus and Alexander, whom I have handed over to Satan, so that they will be taught not to blaspheme.

Paul tells Timothy to keep up the good fight. He says some people have made a "shipwreck" of their faith.
He says that Alexander is one of these people. Much like the son in 1 Corinthians 5:5; Paul says he has handed this person over to Satan.

I have sometimes wondered what this phrase means... "handed over to Satan". 1 Tim 1:20 and 1 Cor 5:5; are the only two places I have seen this.

2 Tim 4:14 Alexander the coppersmith did me much harm; the Lord will repay him according to his deeds.

In 2nd Timothy we see that Alexander "the coppersmith". (Most likely the same metal-worker in Ephesus that made idols)

But in 2nd Timothy, he doesn't hand this person over to Satan... he simply says "the Lord will repay him according to his deeds".

It seems the Lord will "repay" us for the evil things we do after a certain point.

I can't prove it... but I have wondered if this the same Alexander who was once a priest.
It says in Acts 4 that Alexander was high-priest descent.

Acts 4:6; and Annas the high priest was there, and Caiaphas and John and Alexander, and all who were of high-priestly descent.

Perhaps this is why Paul says his faith is now a shipwreck.
 
I've just read the selected passages. In the 1 Timothy passage, paul reminds Timothy that he 'threw him out'. This must mean ejected from the church - Paul didn't have authority in any other sphere of life in Ephesus. So Alexander must have been a part of the church at some time, then at some time created division or brought in false teaching and opposed Paul.

I'm not sure it's the same person as in Acts. The text doesn't say here if he opposed Paul, supported him, or was neutral and just tried and failed to calm a potentially riotous crowd.

And I'm not sure why Luke adds this detail - what does it add to the whole story?
 
@Hekuran -- probably because the Holy Spirit directed him to?! :)
Great. Why do you think the Holy Spirit prompted Luke to add the detail about Alexander? What does it add to the bigger and wider story of the Book of Acts?
 
I have no idea --doesn't really bother me one way or the other. The 'detail' is there. It's information.
 
Ok. So a facetious reply first, then a desperate lack of curiosity. Can't see anything beyond a waste of time in either.
 
I've just read the selected passages. In the 1 Timothy passage, paul reminds Timothy that he 'threw him out'. This must mean ejected from the church - Paul didn't have authority in any other sphere of life in Ephesus. So Alexander must have been a part of the church at some time, then at some time created division or brought in false teaching and opposed Paul.

I'm not sure it's the same person as in Acts. The text doesn't say here if he opposed Paul, supported him, or was neutral and just tried and failed to calm a potentially riotous crowd.

And I'm not sure why Luke adds this detail - what does it add to the whole story?


Are you looking for a deep spiritual reason? or for someone to agree with your wondering about it. It's there because it's supposed to be. Or is it a question of manuscripts that add to or subtract from our present Scripture?

Have you been hoping that a couple of the men would join in with a big discussion about it? Just curious.
 
It struck me as an unusual detail to include. Luke - like all the new testament writers - is a very careful composer. Sometimes getting inquisitive about the bits that appear odd can lead to a better understanding of the whole.
 
Okay -- sounds reasonable. There are various areas of Scripture that I get curious about , too
 
Great. Why do you think the Holy Spirit prompted Luke to add the detail about Alexander? What does it add to the bigger and wider story of the Book of Acts?
It struck me as an unusual detail to include.

Not so unusual. Read all the passages again. It clearly shows you, or even warns us, that one can fall away aka lose salvation. If Alexander had faith before, it is clearly evident that he does not anymore (at that time of writing).

It also gives rise and support to scripture such as Hebrews 6:4-6. Teaching that one can, and will, fall from grace should they continue in sin, turning from God and loving the worldly more (see also Demas).

I'd say its rather important information considering the "once saved always saved" doctrine. Verses like this are hard for them to swat away.
 
Back
Top