Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!
  • Welcome to Talk Jesus Christian Forums

    Celebrating 20 Years!

    A bible based, Jesus Christ centered community.

    Register Log In

A SERIOUS OMISSION IN THE NEW BIBLES

you’ve only shown that certain words were used by some scribes when copying the manuscripts, while others chose different ones.
You are taking the same position arent you, but thats allowed I guess
Missing words arent the same as certain chosen words are they?
The only way your statement or question makes sense is if you’re now holding one manuscript above all others as the sole standard for determining what’s right or wrong. If that’s the case, could you specify which one it is and explain your reasoning?

With the Love of Christ Jesus.
Moderator
Nick
\o/
 
Dear Member DougE,
If you haven't read the following threads, I suggest that you familiarize yourself with them, before you start arguing about the subject of what is allowed or not allowed.



The members have seen plenty, I’d say. As I have told you this is not the first time, or I dare say, will be the last time, someone has brought of this subject you've been posting on. So, the fact that someone even notices you’re doing this, with the many threads you have originated on the same subject and views it in the same way a “spammer” would act, says it all.

As a Moderator/Staff member on Talk Jesus, there are certain things I can and can’t do. Honestly, I didn’t have to explain my actions if I had simply deleted what I believed was redundant. The fact that I took the time to explain shows that I don’t make decisions on a whim when addressing any perceived or actual issues.

With the Love of Christ Jesus.
Moderator
Nick
\o/
I am merely pointing out the many verses that are found different
I have never said outrightly KJV only positions
Spamming is malicious or advertising is it not?
"The members have seen plenty," so you are the arbitrator of what they should see
 
The only way your statement or question makes sense is if you’re now holding one manuscript above all others as the sole standard for determining what’s right or wrong. If that’s the case, could you specify which one it is and explain your reasoning?

With the Love of Christ Jesus.
Moderator
Nick
\o/
That would be KJV only, God forbid
 
Dear Member DougE,
If you haven't read the following threads, I suggest that you familiarize yourself with them, before you start arguing about the subject of what is allowed or not allowed.



The members have seen plenty, I’d say. As I have told you this is not the first time, or I dare say, will be the last time, someone has brought of this subject you've been posting on. So, the fact that someone even notices you’re doing this, with the many threads you have originated on the same subject and views it in the same way a “spammer” would act, says it all.

As a Moderator/Staff member on Talk Jesus, there are certain things I can and can’t do. Honestly, I didn’t have to explain my actions if I had simply deleted what I believed was redundant. The fact that I took the time to explain shows that I don’t make decisions on a whim when addressing any perceived or actual issues.

With the Love of Christ Jesus.
Moderator
Nick
\o/
Ok I looked up spamming and it can consist of repeated topics of the same topic with moderator intervention
I can see how you can say that
I didnt realize forums were so rigid
Its a shame there is such a lack of freedom
Its a shame it cant be left to members to ignore posts they have to be treated as children lacking discermant
There are many who read my threads and dont reply so how do you know they havent benefited?
I knew this was coming from you, I am not surprised
 
The only way your statement or question makes sense is if you’re now holding one manuscript above all others as the sole standard for determining what’s right or wrong. If that’s the case, could you specify which one it is and explain your reasoning?

With the Love of Christ Jesus.
Moderator
Nick
\o/
I will stop posting differences in verses, but I do protest having to do so
Reminds me of Acts where the disciples were told not to preach the name of Jesus
 
I am merely pointing out the many verses that are found different
I have never said outrightly KJV only positions
Spamming is malicious or advertising is it not?
"The members have seen plenty," so you are the arbitrator of what they should see
Glad you read the threads I pointed out.

With the Love of Christ Jesus.
Moderator
Nick
\o/
 
Ok I looked up spamming and it can consist of repeated topics of the same topic with moderator intervention
I can see how you can say that
I didnt realize forums were so rigid
Its a shame there is such a lack of freedom
Its a shame it cant be left to members to ignore posts they have to be treated as children lacking discermant
There are many who read my threads and dont reply so how do you know they havent benefited?
I knew this was coming from you, I am not surprised
Glad you have been able to see something.

How many threads have you started on the subject? That should speak volumes in and of itself. You have a burr under your saddle, that you can't seem to get rid of. So, you are compelled to write about something that is neither new in Christendom or the world of social media, without letup. That says more about you then it says about the subject in question.

No, you can’t just do whatever you want here or anywhere without consequences. At the very least, reading the two threads about the site should have made that clear.

Using trigger words like "children" and "lacking discernment" when addressing others says more about your character, and in my view, it’s not a positive reflection. Whether or not that matters to you, as a Moderator, I have to take such things into account.

In terms of benefit, you’re right. However, the benefit isn’t coming from what you think it is for others.

You knew? lol So, you were a previous member under another pseudonym. No surprises there if that is the case.

The only way your statement or question makes sense is if you’re now holding one manuscript above all others as the sole standard for determining what’s right or wrong. If that’s the case, could you specify which one it is and explain your reasoning?

With the Love of Christ Jesus.
Moderator
Nick
\o/
I will stop posting differences in verses, but I do protest having to do so
Reminds me of Acts where the disciples were told not to preach the name of Jesus
Up to you.

With the Love of Christ Jesus.
Moderator
Nick
\o/
 
Last edited:
The fact is there were two different manuscripts used. The modern Bible use the MGNT and it says Judea
The KJV uses the TR and it says Galilee

Just to clarify, these two manuscripts are contradictory and both cant be right
I do believe this is one of the ways satan is trying to lead the Lords children away from the Lord n and bring them to him..satan has been studying man for a long time n knows how to bring division among mankind.. instead of people focusing on the Lord and his ways satan knows they will wonder n arguing n fight amongst themselves over who is right n who is wrong in where the Messiah went to preach instead of just focusing on the ways of the Lord..for the road is wide but narrow is the gate..
satan is ancient n hates mankind..

I personally stay focused on the Lord i know the Lord is taking away the Lamp stand because most people dont even appreciate let alone understand that the Son is a precious gift of Mercy that was bestowed upon us..

Hope alls well

ᕙ⁠(⁠☉⁠ਊ⁠☉⁠)⁠ᕗ
 
I will stop posting differences in verses, but I do protest having to do so
Reminds me of Acts where the disciples were told not to preach the name of Jesus

Doug, comparing yourself to Acts is a serious overreach. The apostles were commanded not to preach Christ at all under threat of punishment. You are not in any way in that position.

The issue you are raising is not the preaching of Jesus or defence of the faith, but rather you are harping on selective word-variations across manuscripts and translations. Showing a misunderstanding of how Scripture has been passed down and translated

Ironically, your approach ends up undermining confidence in Scripture by presenting normal translation variation as if it were doctrinal corruption.
 
Doug, comparing yourself to Acts is a serious overreach. The apostles were commanded not to preach Christ at all under threat of punishment. You are not in any way in that position.
I did no such thing
I merely was comparing being silenced
 
So, you are compelled to write about something that is neither new in Christendom or the world of social media, without letup.
Just one last point, I have 4 posts on these verses with 6k views plus hundreds more, which leads me to think it is of interest to a lot of members contrary to your view
Have a good day
 
Last edited:
Back
Top