B-A-C
Loyal
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2008
- Messages
- 12,066
Bought — But Does That Guarantee Eternal Security?
There is no dispute that Jesus purchased us. The Scripture is unambiguous on this point.
1 Corinthians 6:20 — "For you were bought with a price: therefore glorify God in your body."
1 Corinthians 7:23 — "You were bought with a price; do not become slaves of men."
Acts 20:28 — "the church of God which He purchased with His own blood."
1 Peter 1:18-19 — "you were not redeemed with perishable things like silver or gold, but with precious blood, as of a lamb unblemished and spotless, the blood of Christ."
The word translated "bought" in 1 Corinthians is the Greek agorazō — slave market language. A price was paid. Ownership transferred. No argument there.
But here is the question this thread wants to examine — does being bought, being owned, being purchased by Jesus automatically guarantee eternal security regardless of what follows?
Who exactly is "bought"?
Consider two parables.
In Matthew 25, the Parable of the Talents, a master entrusts three slaves with his resources. All three are his slaves — why else would he entrust his talents to them? The third slave buries his talent and is cast into outer darkness. He was the master's slave. He was still cast out.
In Luke 13, a man has a fig tree in his vineyard that bears no fruit. He comes looking for fruit three years running and finds none. The owner says cut it down. Note — it is his tree, in his vineyard. He is not looking for fruit from someone else's tree. The tree belongs to him. And it is still in danger of being cut down if it remains unfruitful.
In Exodus 5:1, God tells Moses to say to Pharaoh — "Let MY people go." My people. Ownership language, directly from God. And yet the writer of Hebrews uses that same generation — God's own people, redeemed from Egypt — as a warning to believers. They never entered the promised land. The rest was available. They did not enter because of unbelief.
These were not outsiders. They were not unbought people. They were owned, entrusted, called "My people" — and still did not arrive.
Being bought does not prevent denial or rebellion
2 Peter 2:1 is perhaps the most direct verse on this question —
"But false prophets also appeared among the people, just as there will also be false teachers among you, who will secretly introduce destructive heresies, even denying the Master who bought them, bringing swift destruction upon themselves."
Read that carefully. Peter does not say these were people who appeared to be bought, or were bought in some lesser sense. He states plainly — the Master bought them. And in the very same verse — they denied that Master and brought swift destruction upon themselves.
This is not describing unbought people perishing. This is describing bought people who denied the One who bought them and destroyed themselves by their own action. Peter's grammar is deliberate — they brought it upon themselves. The Master did not revoke the purchase. They denied Him.
1 Corinthians 7:23 adds another dimension — "You were bought with a price; do not become slaves of men." Paul is warning bought people against a real possibility. You cannot meaningfully warn someone against becoming something they are categorically incapable of becoming. The warning is real because the danger is real.
Romans 6:16 — the present tense test
"Do you not know that when you present yourselves to someone as slaves for obedience, you are slaves of the one whom you obey — either of sin resulting in death, or of obedience resulting in righteousness."
Paul does not say you are slave to whoever purchased you. He says you are slave to whoever you obey — right now, present tense, ongoing. Slavery in Paul's framework is tested by present obedience not only by past transaction.
Which brings us to the words of Jesus Himself in Luke 6:46 —
"Why do you call Me Lord, Lord, and do not do what I say?"
Lord. Kyrios. Master. Owner. If He is truly your Lord then His word governs your life. Confessing His lordship while ignoring His commands is a contradiction Jesus Himself identified and confronted directly.
The question this thread is raising
The purchase is real. The blood price is real. The ownership is real. None of that is in dispute.
But the third slave was the master's slave — and was cast out. The fig tree was the master's tree — and was threatened with removal. The Exodus generation were God's own people — and did not enter the rest. The false teachers of 2 Peter 2 were bought by the Master — and brought destruction upon themselves.
If being bought alone guaranteed eternal security regardless of what followed — how do we account for any of these?
There is no dispute that Jesus purchased us. The Scripture is unambiguous on this point.
1 Corinthians 6:20 — "For you were bought with a price: therefore glorify God in your body."
1 Corinthians 7:23 — "You were bought with a price; do not become slaves of men."
Acts 20:28 — "the church of God which He purchased with His own blood."
1 Peter 1:18-19 — "you were not redeemed with perishable things like silver or gold, but with precious blood, as of a lamb unblemished and spotless, the blood of Christ."
The word translated "bought" in 1 Corinthians is the Greek agorazō — slave market language. A price was paid. Ownership transferred. No argument there.
But here is the question this thread wants to examine — does being bought, being owned, being purchased by Jesus automatically guarantee eternal security regardless of what follows?
Who exactly is "bought"?
Consider two parables.
In Matthew 25, the Parable of the Talents, a master entrusts three slaves with his resources. All three are his slaves — why else would he entrust his talents to them? The third slave buries his talent and is cast into outer darkness. He was the master's slave. He was still cast out.
In Luke 13, a man has a fig tree in his vineyard that bears no fruit. He comes looking for fruit three years running and finds none. The owner says cut it down. Note — it is his tree, in his vineyard. He is not looking for fruit from someone else's tree. The tree belongs to him. And it is still in danger of being cut down if it remains unfruitful.
In Exodus 5:1, God tells Moses to say to Pharaoh — "Let MY people go." My people. Ownership language, directly from God. And yet the writer of Hebrews uses that same generation — God's own people, redeemed from Egypt — as a warning to believers. They never entered the promised land. The rest was available. They did not enter because of unbelief.
These were not outsiders. They were not unbought people. They were owned, entrusted, called "My people" — and still did not arrive.
Being bought does not prevent denial or rebellion
2 Peter 2:1 is perhaps the most direct verse on this question —
"But false prophets also appeared among the people, just as there will also be false teachers among you, who will secretly introduce destructive heresies, even denying the Master who bought them, bringing swift destruction upon themselves."
Read that carefully. Peter does not say these were people who appeared to be bought, or were bought in some lesser sense. He states plainly — the Master bought them. And in the very same verse — they denied that Master and brought swift destruction upon themselves.
This is not describing unbought people perishing. This is describing bought people who denied the One who bought them and destroyed themselves by their own action. Peter's grammar is deliberate — they brought it upon themselves. The Master did not revoke the purchase. They denied Him.
1 Corinthians 7:23 adds another dimension — "You were bought with a price; do not become slaves of men." Paul is warning bought people against a real possibility. You cannot meaningfully warn someone against becoming something they are categorically incapable of becoming. The warning is real because the danger is real.
Romans 6:16 — the present tense test
"Do you not know that when you present yourselves to someone as slaves for obedience, you are slaves of the one whom you obey — either of sin resulting in death, or of obedience resulting in righteousness."
Paul does not say you are slave to whoever purchased you. He says you are slave to whoever you obey — right now, present tense, ongoing. Slavery in Paul's framework is tested by present obedience not only by past transaction.
Which brings us to the words of Jesus Himself in Luke 6:46 —
"Why do you call Me Lord, Lord, and do not do what I say?"
Lord. Kyrios. Master. Owner. If He is truly your Lord then His word governs your life. Confessing His lordship while ignoring His commands is a contradiction Jesus Himself identified and confronted directly.
The question this thread is raising
The purchase is real. The blood price is real. The ownership is real. None of that is in dispute.
But the third slave was the master's slave — and was cast out. The fig tree was the master's tree — and was threatened with removal. The Exodus generation were God's own people — and did not enter the rest. The false teachers of 2 Peter 2 were bought by the Master — and brought destruction upon themselves.
If being bought alone guaranteed eternal security regardless of what followed — how do we account for any of these?
