Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!
  • Welcome to Talk Jesus Christian Forums

    Celebrating 20 Years!

    A bible based, Jesus Christ centered community.

    Register Log In

Trinity: Is Jesus really God?

Hi Nick,

I know you have been lenient on this subject. I've noticed that in past discussions. My point is that almost everywhere I go this doctrine is protected behind a wall. Not just in forums but even in churches. Take my pastor for instance, I've shown time and time again, from Scripture where this doctrine is not Biblical. He skips right by all it, not engaging with any of the evidence. This is a teacher of God's word and he's not engaging with the Scriptures on this subject. That makes me wonder why. Is he embarrassed? Does he not want to change his view? Does he not want to be seen as being wrong? I don't know. I just know he doesn't engage the text. I have looked at this doctrine in depth over about a year and am more convinced than ever that this doctrine is not what the Bible teaches.

I agree with you about the way people treat one another. There is no excuse for being rude. As Christians we are called to edify one another not belittle one another. Sadly the old self comes out sometimes.
Dear Brother,
I'd make an appointment with your Pastor or take him out for a cup of coffee. Hopefully, it would be constructive to both of you.

However, what I've come to find out it's either my way or the highway, because both sides are so entrenched in what they believe that anything but capitulation by the other side is unacceptable. This is not how it should be, but sadly it is.

But it says here...
But that word actually means...

The beat goes on and on and on...

In the end you must come to accept, or not, the answer he gives you and what will you do with it if it's not the one you can accept as being right/truth (are they really the same :) ). Because if he says, no, and he explains it but does change the belief you have, you'll have to decide...

The beat goes on and on and on...

The early church had the simplicity of believing what they heard, and it for being true. They had the OT, and later some letters written to them. Otherwise, they had the Spirit of the Lord to go to and by. Believing/submitting to those who were put there to teach, lead them in fulfilling the will of God for them and the church.

No some much anymore when data is at everyone's fingertips to find, pray upon (hopefully), and to find an answer that is true...and acceptable to them...

The beat goes on and ono and on...

The focus must be Jesus, because no matter how you translate it...John 14:6 Greek Interlinear: Says to him Jesus: I am the way and the truth and the life; no one comes to the Father except through me.

Which depending on your position on a Triune God, supports it or doesn't...

...thump, thump, thump...

With the Love of Christ Jesus.
YBIC
Nick
\o/
<><
 
Dear Brother,
I'd make an appointment with your Pastor or take him out for a cup of coffee. Hopefully, it would be constructive to both of you.

However, what I've come to find out it's either my way or the highway, because both sides are so entrenched in what they believe that anything but capitulation by the other side is unacceptable. This is not how it should be, but sadly it is.

But it says here...
But that word actually means...

The beat goes on and on and on...

In the end you must come to accept, or not, the answer he gives you and what will you do with it if it's not the one you can accept as being right/truth (are they really the same :) ). Because if he says, no, and he explains it but does change the belief you have, you'll have to decide...

The beat goes on and on and on...

The early church had the simplicity of believing what they heard, and it for being true. They had the OT, and later some letters written to them. Otherwise, they had the Spirit of the Lord to go to and by. Believing/submitting to those who were put there to teach, lead them in fulfilling the will of God for them and the church.

No some much anymore when data is at everyone's fingertips to find, pray upon (hopefully), and to find an answer that is true...and acceptable to them...

The beat goes on and ono and on...

The focus must be Jesus, because no matter how you translate it...John 14:6 Greek Interlinear: Says to him Jesus: I am the way and the truth and the life; no one comes to the Father except through me.

Which depending on your position on a Triune God, supports it or doesn't...

...thump, thump, thump...

With the Love of Christ Jesus.
YBIC
Nick
\o/
<><
Hi Nick,

My issue with the pastor is not one of who is right or wrong. It's that he won't engage the text. He essentially avoids having to deal with the issue. he's the pastor, if I'm wrong show me how I'm wrong. How does one not even engage when they're in that position. He's not the first pastor. Years ago, I attended a Baptist church that taught OSAS. I told the pastor I didn't see that in the Scriptures. He gave me a list of passages to study. I looked over the list and when I next saw him said that I didn't see OSAS in those passage. He looked at me and said, "Ok" and then turned and walked away. He never even tried to explain to me how he saw OSAS in those passages. This is the kind of thing that I find troubling from those who are supposed to be the ones teaching God's word. It's fine if they don't agree with me, but to just ignore these subjects in God's word is most troubling.

I also wanted to ask if you know anything about one of my posts being offensive and moved to "Further Understanding"? What is that?
 
Hi Nick,

My issue with the pastor is not one of who is right or wrong. It's that he won't engage the text. He essentially avoids having to deal with the issue. he's the pastor, if I'm wrong show me how I'm wrong. How does one not even engage when they're in that position. He's not the first pastor. Years ago, I attended a Baptist church that taught OSAS. I told the pastor I didn't see that in the Scriptures. He gave me a list of passages to study. I looked over the list and when I next saw him said that I didn't see OSAS in those passage. He looked at me and said, "Ok" and then turned and walked away. He never even tried to explain to me how he saw OSAS in those passages. This is the kind of thing that I find troubling from those who are supposed to be the ones teaching God's word. It's fine if they don't agree with me, but to just ignore these subjects in God's word is most troubling.

I also wanted to ask if you know anything about one of my posts being offensive and moved to "Further Understanding"? What is that?
Well, your pastor and others will fall under the category of James 3:1 and will be held to a higher standard/account. There is so much to go by that they are to be held to account for. It is easier for the lay person, to focus on certain doctrines and address that without taking into consideration the rest that goes with the calling (if they've been called vs just job) they've been called to do.

Rarely do we as lay people consider the denomination that the Pastor falls under. If we do, why do we address it to the Pastor, when we know they don't set the standard for the doctrine they teach? Why not go to the very Headquarters of said denomination and address it with them? Say, your Pastor does agree with your stance. What do you expect him to do? Start a new teaching that goes against what he has been ordained to do? Leave the church?

And the beat goes on and on...

If this untenable for you, then find another church/denomination that satisfies your inquiries and doctrine you believe to be true or start your own house church and go from there. Why stay and make the man's ministry any harder than it already is? Do, you believe as some do that those who believe in the Trinity are not Saved and are of Satan?

And the beat goes on and on...

That is why I state up front to look to the Statement of Faith, and/or Conditions/Terms of Talk Jesus. Yes, TJ is a Triune believing site. Don't like it then you are welcome to leave. Just like Atheist, or people from other Religions are welcomed, but in time if they don't come to Jesus, they'll make themselves unwelcomed and leave of their own accord or be sent packing for this or that. I've sent a few packing since I've become Moderator for this very thing. It was more important to be right in their own eyes, then to leave well enough alone, and continue to enjoy the fellowship and growth of God's Word or learn of Christianity. Difficult as I knew it would be for them, for I knew that eventually it would leave them unsatisfied as it pertains to the Doctrine of the Trinity and their own stance, and they'd have to come to a decision "should I stay or should I go". Some I considered Brothers & Sisters in Christ, and were dear to me, but they left anyway.

I also wanted to ask if you know anything about one of my posts being offensive and moved to "Further Understanding"? What is that?
They were moved to allow you to continue to discuss with the other member on the subject, without disrupting the thread as a whole. It was not because it was offensive. Sometimes doing that makes it easier for all concerned.

With the Love of Christ Jesus.
YBIC/Moderator
Nick
\o/
<><
 
Well, your pastor and others will fall under the category of James 3:1 and will be held to a higher standard/account. There is so much to go by that they are to be held to account for. It is easier for the lay person, to focus on certain doctrines and address that without taking into consideration the rest that goes with the calling (if they've been called vs just job) they've been called to do.

Rarely do we as lay people consider the denomination that the Pastor falls under. If we do, why do we address it to the Pastor, when we know they don't set the standard for the doctrine they teach? Why not go to the very Headquarters of said denomination and address it with them? Say, your Pastor does agree with your stance. What do you expect him to do? Start a new teaching that goes against what he has been ordained to do? Leave the church?

And the beat goes on and on...

If this untenable for you, then find another church/denomination that satisfies your inquiries and doctrine you believe to be true or start your own house church and go from there. Why stay and make the man's ministry any harder than it already is? Do, you believe as some do that those who believe in the Trinity are not Saved and are of Satan?

And the beat goes on and on...

That is why I state up front to look to the Statement of Faith, and/or Conditions/Terms of Talk Jesus. Yes, TJ is a Triune believing site. Don't like it then you are welcome to leave. Just like Atheist, or people from other Religions are welcomed, but in time if they don't come to Jesus, they'll make themselves unwelcomed and leave of their own accord or be sent packing for this or that. I've sent a few packing since I've become Moderator for this very thing. It was more important to be right in their own eyes, then to leave well enough alone, and continue to enjoy the fellowship and growth of God's Word or learn of Christianity. Difficult as I knew it would be for them, for I knew that eventually it would leave them unsatisfied as it pertains to the Doctrine of the Trinity and their own stance, and they'd have to come to a decision "should I stay or should I go". Some I considered Brothers & Sisters in Christ, and were dear to me, but they left anyway.


They were moved to allow you to continue to discuss with the other member on the subject, without disrupting the thread as a whole. It was not because it was offensive. Sometimes doing that makes it easier for all concerned.

With the Love of Christ Jesus.
YBIC/Moderator
Nick
\o/
<><
HI Nick,

It's not about me. I'm not offended, and it doesn't bother me. My point is in the addressing of the scriptures. I hear Christians quoiting Jesus' words, 'you shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free.' But then when something challenges their position it becomes a personal matter instead of a Scriptural one. Suddenly they're not looking at the truth (scripture). It becomes a matter of "I can't be wrong." I've said on these forums many times that when Scripture runs up against church doctrine, church doctrine always wins. In this particular instance there was an appeal to orthodoxy. He didn't want to go against orthodoxy. Firstly, orthodoxy isn't Scripture. But I pointed out if we didn't challenge orthodoxy, we'd all be Catholics. To which I got no reply. That's the point I'm trying to make. Tradition triumphs over Scripture and it shouldn't be that way for those who are tasked with teaching God's word. I realize they're busy. However, I know a pastor who studies God's word deeply, has time to prep, and still can minister to his congregation. In addition, he's often out working the fields with his tractor. It can be done.


OK, thanks! When I saw the notification it said the offending post was moved. I thought it was inferring that the post itself was offensive.
 
HI Nick,

It's not about me. I'm not offended, and it doesn't bother me. My point is in the addressing of the scriptures. I hear Christians quoiting Jesus' words, 'you shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free.' But then when something challenges their position it becomes a personal matter instead of a Scriptural one. Suddenly they're not looking at the truth (scripture). It becomes a matter of "I can't be wrong." I've said on these forums many times that when Scripture runs up against church doctrine, church doctrine always wins. In this particular instance there was an appeal to orthodoxy. He didn't want to go against orthodoxy. Firstly, orthodoxy isn't Scripture. But I pointed out if we didn't challenge orthodoxy, we'd all be Catholics. To which I got no reply. That's the point I'm trying to make. Tradition triumphs over Scripture and it shouldn't be that way for those who are tasked with teaching God's word. I realize they're busy. However, I know a pastor who studies God's word deeply, has time to prep, and still can minister to his congregation. In addition, he's often out working the fields with his tractor. It can be done.


OK, thanks! When I saw the notification it said the offending post was moved. I thought it was inferring that the post itself was offensive.
Dear Brother,
That could be said about just about anything and anyone! lol

I understand the point you are trying to make, but is it your position that with the original autographs, we'd know the fullest of what was then actually written and know the truth without quarreling?

Take a look at Matthew 5:48 and tell me how many variances of what it means in a standalone fashion or in its entirety you won't come across some significant difference that would say; are we there yet, process, completion, need to be so...And yet we are to know the fullness of God through writings on a manuscript? Even in Jesus' day, in talking John 5:39 to the religious leaders He talked of it was of more interest to them the Written Word, then the personage of Him.

And the beat goes on and on...

I love your desire/passion and all those who want to know the truth perfectly, and I do believe you'd be of the belief that the burden you carry would be lifted from you, once knowing it for a surety. You'd also be free of the burden you carry with your pastor if you have it in fullness, but and this is a big one. You'll not find it in what one calls the Written Word of God but will have it when you abide in the fullness of the Word of God who is Jesus/Yeshua the Son of God. There is nothing like that freedom Brother.

So, you mention a Pastor who is able to do so much with the time given, which begs then the question of what holds you from being in that congregation that I'm sure you'd think you'd find the answers you seek, and at the very least be in agreement in that one? I'd even pose the question on why be here on Talk Jesus when other sites exist that I'm sure are like minded to what you believe is true? Not that I would want you to leave, but it truly makes one wonder that one who believes in an overriding truth existing is now willing to seek it in those who in their eyes do not have it?

And the beat goes on and on...

Scripture has always been used to address differences, and sadly to create them as well. When in truth many cannot even agree what the construes the Word of God in order to have the discussion in the first place. :(

I've said on these forums many times that when Scripture runs up against church doctrine, church doctrine always wins.
Naturally, people seek a foundation upon which they can base their lives, believing they are fulfilling God's will without bearing the responsibility or so they think. Can or do they want to they truly find it when each individual holds their own truth? You think that with the subdivisions that now exist in both Triune and Anti-Trinitarians (for lack of better word) that each person seeking the truth would help all find it, in this world, that has active enemies to battle against, and find success? If you see the Book of Revelation as the Word of God, you know that's not happening.

Why would you believe it to be otherwise, when even what is the Word of God is disputed? (Not all believe the Book of Revelation is the Word of God.) You have so many subdivisions of what the meaning of a word means, that it becomes almost impossible to hold a theological discussion without conflict. Add to that context, which doesn't necessarily even take into account a person's leanings, be it Liberal or Conservative, level of education, and you have a lack of unity unseen even in at any other time of history of the church. I would almost have to agree with the Catholics back in the day on keeping the Word of God from the lay people!

I guess the problem ultimately lies with the belief that people have the view that if they have a theological discussion with a person/s, and they have held their position or have gotten the better of the other person, then they must be right!!! When in truth it might not be the case at all!!! Still, it allows them to agree to disagree which may not solve anything, but at least it allows for fellowship to continue. In truth I don't see much of the later happening here on TJ.

And the beat goes on and on...

With the Love of Christ Jesus.
YBIC
Nick
\o/
<><
 
Dear Brother,
That could be said about just about anything and anyone! lol

I understand the point you are trying to make, but is it your position that with the original autographs, we'd know the fullest of what was then actually written and know the truth without quarreling?
No. That would take the apostles. However, there is a saying, "you don't know what you don't know." This statement is incredibly true. The reason Christians quarrel over the Scriptures is becasue many don't know what they don't know.
Take a look at Matthew 5:48 and tell me how many variances of what it means in a standalone fashion or in its entirety you won't come across some significant difference that would say; are we there yet, process, completion, need to be so...And yet we are to know the fullness of God through writings on a manuscript? Even in Jesus' day, in talking John 5:39 to the religious leaders He talked of it was of more interest to them the Written Word, then the personage of Him.
But see, that's the problem, the variances. Jesus didn't mean 10 different things when He said that. He meant one. If 10 people have 10 variations, then 9 of them are wrong. That's where the 10 should come together and figure out who is correct.
And the beat goes on and on...

I love your desire/passion and all those who want to know the truth perfectly, and I do believe you'd be of the belief that the burden you carry would be lifted from you, once knowing it for a surety. You'd also be free of the burden you carry with your pastor if you have it in fullness, but and this is a big one. You'll not find it in what one calls the Written Word of God but will have it when you abide in the fullness of the Word of God who is Jesus/Yeshua the Son of God. There is nothing like that freedom Brother.
My goal is to understand what God has revealed to us. That is His word. Everything else is subjective. That's not to say we can't learn of God through the Spirit, it's just subjective. I can't even count the number of times I've heard Christians claim that the Holy Spirit revealed something to them and yet that something was directly opposed to what is stated in Scripture. God's Spirit isn't going to oppose His word. However, these Christians, convinced that what they've understood is from the Spirit reject even the possibility that it could be wrong. Thus they will never come to the truth on that subject because they are certain God it to them.

The burden for the pastor is that, as Paul says, his works may be burned up. There is also the consideration for the congregation. Many cannot even defend their faith.
So, you mention a Pastor who is able to do so much with the time given, which begs then the question of what holds you from being in that congregation that I'm sure you'd think you'd find the answers you seek, and at the very least be in agreement in that one? I'd even pose the question on why be here on Talk Jesus when other sites exist that I'm sure are like minded to what you believe is true? Not that I would want you to leave, but it truly makes one wonder that one who believes in an overriding truth existing is now willing to seek it in those who in their eyes do not have it?
I was in that congregation. However, he retired to start an internet ministry, which I do follow. As for finding a church or forum that has like beliefs, why would I do that? Then I would, like much of Christendom, just be in an echo chamber. I'd just be around a bunch of people who echo my beliefs. In that situation iron cannot sharpen iron. In that situation growth doesn't happen. That only brings about stagnation. Growth comes from having my beliefs challenged and in challenging the beliefs of others.

The reason I'm in the church that I am is the help others grow. The circumstances that lead me there were rather peculiar and I suspect orchestrated by God. I believe He has urged me to go here. And, I believe He has purpose for me being here.
And the beat goes on and on...

Scripture has always been used to address differences, and sadly to create them as well. When in truth many cannot even agree what the construes the Word of God in order to have the discussion in the first place. :(


Naturally, people seek a foundation upon which they can base their lives, believing they are fulfilling God's will without bearing the responsibility or so they think. Can or do they want to they truly find it when each individual holds their own truth? You think that with the subdivisions that now exist in both Triune and Anti-Trinitarians (for lack of better word) that each person seeking the truth would help all find it, in this world, that has active enemies to battle against, and find success? If you see the Book of Revelation as the Word of God, you know that's not happening.
But why do so many hold their own truth? I would submit that in large part it is what I posted above. "You don't know what you don't know."
I would also submit that if everyone on this forum had an extensive understanding of the history of ancient Israel and early church history the beliefs of many would be vastly different than they are now. Many people hold the views that they do because, "they don't know what they don't know."
Why would you believe it to be otherwise, when even what is the Word of God is disputed? (Not all believe the Book of Revelation is the Word of God.) You have so many subdivisions of what the meaning of a word means, that it becomes almost impossible to hold a theological discussion without conflict. Add to that context, which doesn't necessarily even take into account a person's leanings, be it Liberal or Conservative, level of education, and you have a lack of unity unseen even in at any other time of history of the church. I would almost have to agree with the Catholics back in the day on keeping the Word of God from the lay people!
I've though that too. However, that doesn't change the truth. It just means a lot of people are wrong. Paul knew this.

17 Now in this that I declare unto you I praise you not, that ye come together not for the better, but for the worse. 18 For first of all, when ye come together in the church, I hear that there be divisions among you; and I partly believe it. 19 For there must be also heresies among you, that they which are approved may be made manifest among you.

The Holy Bible: King James Version, Electronic Edition of the 1900 Authorized Version. (Bellingham, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc., 2009), 1 Co 11:17–19.

Even in Paul's day there were heresies among the people. Paul said they must be there so that those who were approved would be made manifest. Just because we have so much error today doesn't mean we can't know the truth. We can know the truth if we are humble. 'God resists the proud but gives grace to the humble.' I think a lot of the problem for some is that our humanity gets in the way. People don't want to be wrong. People have egos. People have pride. People don't want to be embarrassed. I think a lot of times it's things like this that keep us from coming together to find the truth.
I guess the problem ultimately lies with the belief that people have the view that if they have a theological discussion with a person/s, and they have held their position or have gotten the better of the other person, then they must be right!!! When in truth it might not be the case at all!!! Still, it allows them to agree to disagree which may not solve anything, but at least it allows for fellowship to continue. In truth I don't see much of the later happening here on TJ.

And the beat goes on and on...

With the Love of Christ Jesus.
YBIC
Nick
\o/
<><
That goes back to people being people. egos, embarrassment, pride, etc. I believe these things are the problem that causes the breakdown in discussion. That in itself is a problem because Christians are called to be humble, not prideful.


Also, I forgot to answer your question in the last post. No, I don't think people who hold the Trinity doctrine aren't Christians or are of Satan. They are Christians. I may think they're wrong, but they are Christians.
 
No. That would take the apostles. However, there is a saying, "you don't know what you don't know." This statement is incredibly true. The reason Christians quarrel over the Scriptures is becasue many don't know what they don't know.
Does that "don't know what they don't know" include you? Because this type of reasoning leaves us all chasing our tails. For the saying of "God only knows." might be a more appropriate way of saying it. Even Jesus used this particular saying. :)

So, if there are questions as to the "who wrote" a particular book, you would exclude it as canon or do you trust other Godly men to make that determination?

But see, that's the problem, the variances. Jesus didn't mean 10 different things when He said that. He meant one. If 10 people have 10 variations, then 9 of them are wrong. That's where the 10 should come together and figure out who is correct.
There was much more I was going to add here, but it would only confuse the issue the more. My answer must be is to Trust the Holy Spirit to know which one. For me the minute you think "you" have it by your own reasoning, is the time someone else comes along who knows more and is willing to tell you that you don't!

My goal is to understand what God has revealed to us. That is His word. Everything else is subjective. That's not to say we can't learn of God through the Spirit, it's just subjective. I can't even count the number of times I've heard Christians claim that the Holy Spirit revealed something to them and yet that something was directly opposed to what is stated in Scripture. God's Spirit isn't going to oppose His word. However, these Christians, convinced that what they've understood is from the Spirit reject even the possibility that it could be wrong. Thus they will never come to the truth on that subject because they are certain God it to them.

The burden for the pastor is that, as Paul says, his works may be burned up. There is also the consideration for the congregation. Many cannot even defend their faith.
We are going almost back to the beginning. But let's go. "Revealed to us" how and to what purpose? All the while knowing that not all that we would consider the Word of God is revelation, but also by inspiration. Except the Gospels, and possibly Acts you have to believe the rest is mostly subjective. Where does that leave us, but with some who believe in Jesus' words only when it comes to the Word of God of course! Is that who you are? We've had them here on Talk Jesus before. Anyway, if you are not, how then but by the Holy Spirit do you know what is subjectively communicated is true?

I won't get into what people much less Christians are convinced of by the spirit that certain things are true. Probably happens in every church that believes that the Holy Spirit is alive, well, and working through us in this day. Much damage has been done by folks like that.

Now, all you have to do is look at Mormons and their story of what they believe is true and what it leads to as a belief system to have you scratching your head. In fact, what just came to me is that most of the offbeat denominations are the ones who do not believe in the Trinity. Make a list of those who do, and those who don't. Makes for interesting lists. lol

And the beat goes on and on...

I've though that too. However, that doesn't change the truth. It just means a lot of people are wrong. Paul knew this.

17 Now in this that I declare unto you I praise you not, that ye come together not for the better, but for the worse. 18 For first of all, when ye come together in the church, I hear that there be divisions among you; and I partly believe it. 19 For there must be also heresies among you, that they which are approved may be made manifest among you.

The Holy Bible: King James Version, Electronic Edition of the 1900 Authorized Version. (Bellingham, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc., 2009), 1 Co 11:17–19.

Even in Paul's day there were heresies among the people. Paul said they must be there so that those who were approved would be made manifest. Just because we have so much error today doesn't mean we can't know the truth. We can know the truth if we are humble. 'God resists the proud but gives grace to the humble.' I think a lot of the problem for some is that our humanity gets in the way. People don't want to be wrong. People have egos. People have pride. People don't want to be embarrassed. I think a lot of times it's things like this that keep us from coming together to find the truth.
I agree subjectively with much of what you say here. Still, in Paul's day, these churches were newly established and pretty much leaderless, and if they had them were more acclimated to the Jewish or gentile beliefs for the way things were one in a religious setting. How do you see the church you attend, is it as heretical and leaderless to address the issues you believe need attending to?

That goes back to people being people. egos, embarrassment, pride, etc. I believe these things are the problem that causes the breakdown in discussion. That in itself is a problem because Christians are called to be humble, not prideful.
Both are in short supply in these days. (heavy sigh)

Also, I forgot to answer your question in the last post. No, I don't think people who hold the Trinity doctrine aren't Christians or are of Satan. They are Christians. I may think they're wrong, but they are Christians.
Maybe just heretical ones, if they were in a church... :)
Sometimes my humor gets the better of me. Apologies.

With the love of Christ Jesus.
YBIC
Nick
\o/
<><
 
Hi Nick,

I know you have been lenient on this subject. I've noticed that in past discussions. My point is that almost everywhere I go this doctrine is protected behind a wall. Not just in forums but even in churches. Take my pastor for instance, I've shown time and time again, from Scripture where this doctrine is not Biblical. He skips right by all it, not engaging with any of the evidence. This is a teacher of God's word and he's not engaging with the Scriptures on this subject. That makes me wonder why. Is he embarrassed? Does he not want to change his view? Does he not want to be seen as being wrong? I don't know. I just know he doesn't engage the text. I have looked at this doctrine in depth over about a year and am more convinced than ever that this doctrine is not what the Bible teaches.

I agree with you about the way people treat one another. There is no excuse for being rude. As Christians we are called to edify one another not belittle one another. Sadly the old self comes out sometimes.

Butch, with all due respect, those who disagree with you can say the same of you. There are many scriptures proving the trinity that you ignore and do a cute little dance around. The Messiah was always referred to as and linked to being, almighty God. Then there is absolute Christian and language logic which you completely ignore too.

Wise Christians would not overly argue this with someone as not believing Jesus is Lord is according to 1 Cor 12:3 evidence of not knowing the Holy Spirit. IE Not knowing Jesus. IE Not being a Christian.

Jesus is Lord = Christianity 101

1 Cor 12:3 Therefore I want you to know that no one who is speaking by the Spirit of God says, “Jesus be cursed,” and no one can say, “Jesus is Lord,except by the Holy Spirit.
 
Butch, with all due respect, those who disagree with you can say the same of you. There are many scriptures proving the trinity that you ignore and do a cute little dance around. The Messiah was always referred to as and linked to being, almighty God. Then there is absolute Christian and language logic which you completely ignore too.

Wise Christians would not overly argue this with someone as not believing Jesus is Lord is according to 1 Cor 12:3 evidence of not knowing the Holy Spirit. IE Not knowing Jesus. IE Not being a Christian.

Jesus is Lord = Christianity 101

1 Cor 12:3 Therefore I want you to know that no one who is speaking by the Spirit of God says, “Jesus be cursed,” and no one can say, “Jesus is Lord,except by the Holy Spirit.
High Kingj!

Actually, I don't ignore people's arguments. I surely don't ignore logic. You won't find too many people more logically based than I am. Regarding Scripture, no, there is nothing in Scripture. If there was the debate would have been over a long time ago. You're welcome to make a case if you think there is one to be made.
 
Does that "don't know what they don't know" include you? Because this type of reasoning leaves us all chasing our tails. For the saying of "God only knows." might be a more appropriate way of saying it. Even Jesus used this particular saying. :)
Absolutely it includes me. It includes everyone. Actually, it seems more one learns the more they realize how much they don't know. My point is that arguments people make often change over time due to the fact that they learn more. When they learn things they didn't know previously it often changes the way they understand the Scriptures.
So, if there are questions as to the "who wrote" a particular book, you would exclude it as canon or do you trust other Godly men to make that determination?
I believe the early church put that to rest.
There was much more I was going to add here, but it would only confuse the issue the more. My answer must be is to Trust the Holy Spirit to know which one. For me the minute you think "you" have it by your own reasoning, is the time someone else comes along who knows more and is willing to tell you that you don't!
God gave us minds to reason. God could easily have poured complete understanding of His word into the believe when he believed. Yet, He didn't do that. Instead, He left us His word. How are we to understand it. Two Christians look at a passage of Scripture and come to opposing positions on it. Both claim to have received their position from the Holy Spirit. What are we to make of that? Surely the Holy Spirit doesn't contradict. Surely the Spirit doesn't contradict the word of God. The only logical conclusion is that at least one of those two, could be both, didn't get his position from the Spirit. If one did, it begs the question, which one? How are we to know unless we use reason to conclude which is correct?

It seems to me that if Christians were getting their doctrine from the Holy Spirit, we'd all be in agreement. Yet, we are far apart as a community. That makes me wonder where we're getting our doctrine.
We are going almost back to the beginning. But let's go. "Revealed to us" how and to what purpose? All the while knowing that not all that we would consider the Word of God is revelation, but also by inspiration. Except the Gospels, and possibly Acts you have to believe the rest is mostly subjective. Where does that leave us, but with some who believe in Jesus' words only when it comes to the Word of God of course! Is that who you are? We've had them here on Talk Jesus before. Anyway, if you are not, how then but by the Holy Spirit do you know what is subjectively communicated is true?
What's revealed is the word of God, the Scritpures. I don't believe the Scriptures are subjective at all. I believe people may come to different positions but it's not because the Scriptures are subjective but rather, people don't know what they don't know, thus they are drawing conclusions without having, either all of the evidence or a lack of understanding of the evidence. The way I see it is that when Paul writes something to the Corinthians, it only means one thing. It's up to us to correctly determine what that one thing is. We are either right or we are wrong.
I won't get into what people much less Christians are convinced of by the spirit that certain things are true. Probably happens in every church that believes that the Holy Spirit is alive, well, and working through us in this day. Much damage has been done by folks like that.

Now, all you have to do is look at Mormons and their story of what they believe is true and what it leads to as a belief system to have you scratching your head. In fact, what just came to me is that most of the offbeat denominations are the ones who do not believe in the Trinity. Make a list of those who do, and those who don't. Makes for interesting lists. lol

And the beat goes on and on...
But who determines what is an offbeat denomination? What would we say is offbeat. Couldn't we say that modern Christianity is offbeat when four of its most universally accepted doctrines are not Biblical? Orthodoxy doesn't necessarily equal truth. Remember, there was time when Purgatory and prayers to the Saints was orthodox.
I agree subjectively with much of what you say here. Still, in Paul's day, these churches were newly established and pretty much leaderless, and if they had them were more acclimated to the Jewish or gentile beliefs for the way things were one in a religious setting. How do you see the church you attend, is it as heretical and leaderless to address the issues you believe need attending to?
I agree that the churches were primarily Jewish in leadership. It was Paul's method to go into a new town and head to the Synagogue. He took converts from the Synagogue and use them to lead the churches. Early Christian worship was modeled after the Synagogues.

Regarding my church, and most I've attended, they aren't necessary leaderless. However, they are not being lead in the right direction. From my study of early Christianity, it seems to me that there are almost two different Christianity's. We have that which was taught by Jesus and the apostles, and we have what we have today which is a far cry from what was in the beginning. It's so different I've often wondered if it's not a different religion.
Both are in short supply in these days. (heavy sigh)
Agreed
Maybe just heretical ones, if they were in a church... :)
Sometimes my humor gets the better of me. Apologies.

With the love of Christ Jesus.
YBIC
Nick
\o/
<><
lol
 
Absolutely it includes me. It includes everyone. Actually, it seems more one learns the more they realize how much they don't know. My point is that arguments people make often change over time due to the fact that they learn more. When they learn things they didn't know previously it often changes the way they understand the Scriptures.
So, you would agree "God only knows". :)

I believe the early church put that to rest.
I do believe that you'd find after it was totaled, you'd have different listings of what that canon is. :(

God gave us minds to reason. God could easily have poured complete understanding of His word into the believe when he believed. Yet, He didn't do that. Instead, He left us His word. How are we to understand it. Two Christians look at a passage of Scripture and come to opposing positions on it. Both claim to have received their position from the Holy Spirit. What are we to make of that? Surely the Holy Spirit doesn't contradict. Surely the Spirit doesn't contradict the word of God. The only logical conclusion is that at least one of those two, could be both, didn't get his position from the Spirit. If one did, it begs the question, which one? How are we to know unless we use reason to conclude which is correct?

It seems to me that if Christians were getting their doctrine from the Holy Spirit, we'd all be in agreement. Yet, we are far apart as a community. That makes me wonder where we're getting our doctrine.
It must be judged individually and then in unity we go to Him that He may confirm it. Got to go to Him, and I do believe He wants us to. This way as a parent He can say well done.

But who determines what is an offbeat denomination? What would we say is offbeat. Couldn't we say that modern Christianity is offbeat when four of its most universally accepted doctrines are not Biblical? Orthodoxy doesn't necessarily equal truth. Remember, there was time when Purgatory and prayers to the Saints was orthodox.
You've already left behind your own reasoning when you think like this.
Oh, your example is true, but did that universal belief allow for all to have the Word of God to reason with?

Regarding my church, and most I've attended, they aren't necessary leaderless. However, they are not being lead in the right direction. From my study of early Christianity, it seems to me that there are almost two different Christianity's. We have that which was taught by Jesus and the apostles, and we have what we have today which is a far cry from what was in the beginning. It's so different I've often wondered if it's not a different religion.
Give it a generation or two and it won't be much different.

With the Love of Christ Jesus.
YBIC
Nick
\o/
<><
P.S. Off to breakfast, so made it quick! God bless you and yours. :)
 
High Kingj!

Actually, I don't ignore people's arguments. I surely don't ignore logic. You won't find too many people more logically based than I am. Regarding Scripture, no, there is nothing in Scripture. If there was the debate would have been over a long time ago. You're welcome to make a case if you think there is one to be made.

You literally ignored the scripture in the post you quoted. In our prior posts you did not deal with a number of scriptures and the fact that a non-trinitarian belief incriminates God.

It is mostly a literal waste of time and energy discussing with someone who does not grasp the trinity as it is a spiritual truth as the scripture I quoted confirms. It is on par with convincing an atheist of a God creator when the human mind cannot grasp origin from nothing as we work within the confines of the laws of physics.

I will just end with the painful logical truth of a belief in no trinity, hoping that you are able to take a worthwhile stab at Christian logic.

Jesus did not sin. Punishing someone for sin they did not commit is both unjust and foolish. Unjust is evil. God is not evil or a fool.

--------------------------------

When people hear the gospel from you, they believe Jesus drew the shortest straw and that God is evil, demented, foolish and does not love us as much as some extremely unlucky person called Jesus.
 
Heb 1:6 And again, when he bringeth in the first-begotten into the world, he saith, And let all the angels of God worship him.
Heb 1:7 And of the angels he saith, Who maketh his angel's spirits, and his ministers a flame of fire.

Heb 1:8 But unto the Son he saith, Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever: a sceptre of righteousness is the sceptre of thy kingdom.
 
You literally ignored the scripture in the post you quoted. In our prior posts you did not deal with a number of scriptures and the fact that a non-trinitarian belief incriminates God.

It is mostly a literal waste of time and energy discussing with someone who does not grasp the trinity as it is a spiritual truth as the scripture I quoted confirms. It is on par with convincing an atheist of a God creator when the human mind cannot grasp origin from nothing as we work within the confines of the laws of physics.

I will just end with the painful logical truth of a belief in no trinity, hoping that you are able to take a worthwhile stab at Christian logic.

Jesus did not sin. Punishing someone for sin they did not commit is both unjust and foolish. Unjust is evil. God is not evil or a fool.

--------------------------------

When people hear the gospel from you, they believe Jesus drew the shortest straw and that God is evil, demented, foolish and does not love us as much as some extremely unlucky person called Jesus.
This statement

"It is mostly a literal waste of time and energy discussing with someone who does not grasp the trinity as it is a spiritual truth as the scripture I quoted confirms."

is just a way to sidestep the issue. The passage you quoted says nothing about a Trinity. Please, make your case.
 
Heb 1:6 And again, when he bringeth in the first-begotten into the world, he saith, And let all the angels of God worship him.
Heb 1:7 And of the angels he saith, Who maketh his angel's spirits, and his ministers a flame of fire.

Heb 1:8 But unto the Son he saith, Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever: a sceptre of righteousness is the sceptre of thy kingdom.
This passage doesn't prove a Trinity. It simply proves that Jesus can be called God. I would ask you to define the word God.
 
So, you would agree "God only knows". :)
No. What I'm saying is that we learn. When I first became a Christian, I didn't know the Bible and I believed in the Trinity doctrine. Over the years I learned things I didn't previously know. Having learned them I no longer believe in the doctrine. When I first became a Christian and believed in the doctrine, I didn't know what I didn't know. However, today, concerning this doctrine, I now know many things I didn't know at the beginning.
I do believe that you'd find after it was totaled, you'd have different listings of what that canon is. :(
I'm sure. People will make claims. That happens all the time. However, I do believe the early church pretty much settled this issue. Luther tried to take out the book of James.
It must be judged individually and then in unity we go to Him that He may confirm it. Got to go to Him, and I do believe He wants us to. This way as a parent He can say well done.
But my point is that both Christians believe what they received was from the Spirit. They both believe that what they believe has been confirmed by God. That still leaves us with the dilemma. At least one, if not both, of them are wrong. How do we confirm which it is. Would you assert that the Trinity doctrine has been confirmed by God?
You've already left behind your own reasoning when you think like this.
Oh, your example is true, but did that universal belief allow for all to have the Word of God to reason with?
Not at all. It seems to me that what is "offbeat" is what doesn't agree with us. It makes me wonder. If four of the major Christian doctrine can't be Biblically proven, where are we getting our doctrines from? It can't be the Bible if the doctrines aren't Biblical. That makes me wonder, why do many Christians believe these doctrines have been confirmed? Many Christians believe these doctrines are from God.
Give it a generation or two and it won't be much different.
I'm afraid the two will just continue to separate.
With the Love of Christ Jesus.
YBIC
Nick
\o/
<><
P.S. Off to breakfast, so made it quick! God bless you and yours. :)
Enjoy!
 
So, you would agree "God only knows". :)
No. What I'm saying is that we learn. When I first became a Christian, I didn't know the Bible and I believed in the Trinity doctrine. Over the years I learned things I didn't previously know. Having learned them I no longer believe in the doctrine. When I first became a Christian and believed in the doctrine, I didn't know what I didn't know. However, today, concerning this doctrine, I now know many things I didn't know at the beginning.
I guess for me it was not believing but accepting it even though I didn't understand it. It wasn't until about 5 or so years ago that the Holy Spirit allowed me to understand it. Clear as day while I was looking something else up, I hear "Hierarchy" and I was like "huh". Then whatever I was researching went away, and I understood it. At least up to a point, of understanding roles without the personal intimacy I believe that God wants us to have with Him. Good thing we'll have Eternity to get to know God. :)

I'm sure. People will make claims. That happens all the time. However, I do believe the early church pretty much settled this issue. Luther tried to take out the book of James.
Yes they will, but so will churches from as early as 300's held to a different conical listing. Some here have even argued for them as being so. I guess the easiest differences are which books Catholicism vs Protestantism hold to. Add the Eastern Orthodox and as I've been saying you do have to realize that clearly there is no one size fits all when it comes to Scripture. :(

But my point is that both Christians believe what they received was from the Spirit. They both believe that what they believe has been confirmed by God. That still leaves us with the dilemma. At least one, if not both, of them are wrong. How do we confirm which it is. Would you assert that the Trinity doctrine has been confirmed by God?
For me it has, as I mentioned above. I can't do it for you, and you can't do it for me, or in truth for anyone else that is not moved to understand it by the Holy Spirit.

For the rest you now see why denominations have sprung up like weeds! Reminds me of the Tower of Babel in many ways.

Not at all. It seems to me that what is "offbeat" is what doesn't agree with us. It makes me wonder. If four of the major Christian doctrine can't be Biblically proven, where are we getting our doctrines from? It can't be the Bible if the doctrines aren't Biblical. That makes me wonder, why do many Christians believe these doctrines have been confirmed? Many Christians believe these doctrines are from God.
Or that you've experienced yourself. I've studied under JW as a teen for a couple of years of personalized study. Christian Scientist for a couple of years as well. Talked with Mormons for a while, and I'm friends with one for a few years now. New Age, etc. I've been Baptized 4 times, Lutheran (baby), Catholic (won't accept the Lutheran one though I believe I've been told they should have), Baptist (full emersion except for a plastic bag around my leg), Pentecostal (because that plastic bag around my leg always played on my mind). lol

So, yes many believe they come from God, and most doctrines do that are found in scripture, but then how they are to be applied or how they are understood again can create the separation that we see. Are they all wrong, right, or a little of this or that? Does, being a little bit off in one, mean that you are not now a believer, and so Saved? Sadly, some folks seem to think so.

I do end this with one question. Do you believe Jesus is divine?
Some go either way in the non-triune belief. Some believe yes, while others do not, and is why I ask. I would think you do, because you did believe in the Trinity at one time but just wanted to check to make sure. :)

With the Love of Christ Jesus.
YBIC
Nick
\o/
<><
 
This statement

"It is mostly a literal waste of time and energy discussing with someone who does not grasp the trinity as it is a spiritual truth as the scripture I quoted confirms."

is just a way to sidestep the issue. The passage you quoted says nothing about a Trinity. Please, make your case.

You want me to waste more energy making more of a case when you are already dancing around two facts already made :). Shall I get some popcorn?

1. 1 Cor 12:3 Therefore I want you to know that no one who is speaking by the Spirit of God says, “Jesus be cursed,” and no one can say, “Jesus is Lord,except by the Holy Spirit.

In this verse, scripture is quite clear that the Holy Spirit will reveal Jesus as Lord, to us.

What do you think the word 'Lord' means?

2. Jesus was punished when not guilty of sin

Now scripture is VERY clear that God is NOT evil. God is NOT unjust. As such if Jesus was somebody other than the Creator, the Creator would be both unjust and evil.

Job 34:12 Unthinkable that God do what is evil or pervert justice.

----------------------

There is a lot of scripture linking the Messiah to God, but I will not waste my time with you going there. The above two facts cannot be debunked. You are dancing around them and for some reason unable to grasp that you have already lost the debate.
 
In the work of creation. God the Father spoke the creative words to bring the universe into being. But it was God the Son, the eternal Word of God, who carried out these creative decrees. “All things were made through him, and without him was not any thing made that was made” (John 1:3). Moreover, “By him all things were created, in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities—all things were created through him and for him” (Col. 1:16; see also Ps. 33:6, 9; 1 Cor. 8:6; Heb. 1:2). The Holy Spirit was active as well in a different way, in “moving” or “hovering” over the face of the waters (Gen. 1:2), sustaining and manifesting God’s immediate presence in his creation (cf. Ps. 33:6, where “breath” should perhaps be translated “Spirit”; see also Ps. 139:7). In the work of redemption there are also distinct functions performed by each member of the God head.

God the Father planned redemption and sent his Son into the world (John 3:16; Gal. 4:4; Eph. 1:9–10). The Son obeyed the Father and accomplished redemption for us (John 6:38; Heb. 10:5–7, et al.). God the Father did not come and die for our sins, nor did God the Holy Spirit. That was the particular work of the Son. Then, after Jesus ascended back into heaven, the Holy Spirit was sent by the Father and the Son to apply redemption to us. Jesus speaks of “the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name” (John 14:26), but Jesus also says that he himself will send the Holy Spirit, for he says, “If I go, I will send him to you” (John 16:7), and he speaks of a time “when the Helper comes, whom I will send to you from the Father, the Spirit of truth” (John 15:26). It is especially the role of the Holy Spirit to give us regeneration or new spiritual life (John 3:5–8), to sanctify us (Rom. 8:13; We see these different functions in the work of creation. God the Father spoke the creative words to bring the universe into being. But it was God the Son, the eternal Word of God, who carried out these creative decrees. “All things were made through him, and without him was not any thing made that was made” (John 1:3). Moreover, “By him all things were created, in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities—all things were created through him and for him” (Col. 1:16; see also Ps. 33:6, 9; 1 Cor. 8:6; Heb. 1:2). The Holy Spirit was active as well in a different way, in “moving” or “hovering” over the face of the waters (Gen. 1:2), apparently sustaining and manifesting God’s immediate presence in his creation (cf. Ps. 33:6, where “breath” should perhaps be translated “Spirit”; see also Ps. 139:7). In the work of redemption there are also distinct functions.

God the Father planned redemption and sent his Son into the world (John 3:16; Gal. 4:4; Eph. 1:9–10). The Son obeyed the Father and accomplished redemption for us (John 6:38; Heb. 10:5–7, et al.). God the Father did not come and die for our sins, nor did God the Holy Spirit. That was the particular work of the Son. Then, after Jesus ascended back into heaven, the Holy Spirit was sent by the Father and the Son to apply redemption to us. Jesus speaks of “the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name” (John 14:26), but Jesus also says that he himself will send the Holy Spirit, for he says, “If I go, I will send him to you” (John 16:7), and he speaks of a time “when the Helper comes, whom I will send to you from the Father, the Spirit of truth” (John 15:26). It is especially the role of the Holy Spirit to give us regeneration or new spiritual life (John 3:5–8), to sanctify us (Rom. 8:13; 15:16; 1 Peter 1:2), and to empower us for service (Acts 1:8; 1 Cor. 12:7–11). In general, the work of the Holy Spirit seems to be to bring to completion the work that has been planned by God the Father and begun by God the Son.

Wayne Gruden:
 
Last edited:
Back
Top