A lot of things can be inferred or "the most logical reason" without something being spelled out or any kind of evidence.
It's what police and detectives have been doing since they became a thing.
Heaven cannot be accurately experienced or understood by flawed, finite mortal minds so by your insistence why should Hell be? It can't.
I'm not quoting God, Jesus, or anyone else.
Why? God knows more than us and that punishment IS just and right no matter yours, mine, or anyone else's feelings on the matter.
As He is the Creator, Judge, and Authority then if say someone you care about does go to Hell then you can't get angry at God for it.
I imply nothing.
Correct, a lot can be inferred. With hell we just need to:
1. Ensure that we are using actual scriptures to paint a picture and not media outside of it. Otherwise we just may become guilty of the most terrifying verse in the entire bible Rev 22:19.
2. Ensure that what we infer does not incriminate God. We have a job as Christians to be an ambassador for God and if we get that wrong, I doubt He will be pleased with us. One cannot make a bigger error of misrepresentation of God then to state He will torture those He does not have to be nice to, for all eternity. That would be teaching the lost that you believe your God that you love so much and want all to serve, sit a top a list of the most evil beings to ever live.
I highly propose that you read the Geneva convention before you again infer anything with regards to hell. The Geneva convention was stipulations that the good 'unsaved' people of the world put in place. Rules and regulations on how the most evil people in society, those Germans that experimented on children, gassed Jews and sieged Russian cities, should be treated. It stipulated that they will not repay evil with evil. Like for like. The most wicked would receive lethal injection. A quick death. The rest would be isolated to a concentration camp. Receive good food. Receive conjugal visits. Receive doctor visits. Receive pets.
If you want to infer using scripture, consider earth and the four ''curses'' God put on Adam and Eve after their sin. Imagine teaching a baby that when they grow up, the A-Z of their existence will 1. PAIN in childbirth, 2. if they are female the man will RULE over them, 3. The ground will be CURSED 4 . They will DIE, dust to dust. That poor child will jump of a cliff. It would be a 100% incorrect presentation of God and earth. The fact that earth is a relativity nice place is because God is a good God. We can infer that!!! Why don't you?
So lets ask ourselves, if good people can put in place the Geneva convention, Christians should be able to do one BETTER surely? and then what of God who is PURE LOVE 1 John 4:8, light with NO darkness in Him AT ALL 1 John 1:5, righteous in ALL His ways Psalm 145:17.
So, for the love of God, why the hell is it that so many 'Christians' here cannot and do not care to properly represent God on what He will do to the wicked. I will argue that if we incriminate Him, suggest a suffering in hell that no good person on the planet would EVER approve of, we simply DO NOT know God and are very likely
not Christians.
I highly suggest you watch some videos from this guy. A decades long atheist and police detective who in trying to see if God was real and the validity of Christianity became a Christian while doing his research.
God and the Bible doesn't speak on EVERY SINGLE thing yet we can easily infer/conclude what He has said on anything.
Sure, link it.