Loyal
Just curious -- nothing more.
Sue...Look at what the Word says. I agree. So from physical evidence too, we know that there were dinosaurs on the Earth. One cannot throw out the evidence. OOParts Or out of place artifacts. I mentioned this one before...the Antikythera mechanism...an analog computer found imbedded in the rock supposedly millions of years old.It's more a question of science agreeing with God's Word. God's Word being the foundation of creation. When science wants to stretch creation into eons of time or ignore the world-wide flood or other Biblical events simply because those events don't 'make sense' scientifically, Then I go with Bible and figure that scientists are merely people who have their agenda's.
And, yes, the Big Bang theory Is simply one of many theories that is false science.
The thing about Old Earth is that it blows evolution right out of the water.Sue...Look at what the Word says. I agree. So from physical evidence too, we know that there were dinosaurs on the Earth. One cannot throw out the evidence. OOParts Or out of place artifacts. I mentioned this one before...the Antikythera mechanism...an analog computer found imbedded in the rock supposedly millions of years old.
Here's one to curl your hair...How about a1.8-Billion-Year-Old Nuclear Reactor?
Nuclear reactor site, Oklo, Gabon Republic. (NASA)
In 1972, a French factory imported uranium ore from Oklo, in Africa’s Gabon Republic. The uranium had already been extracted. They found the site of origin to have apparently functioned as a large-scale nuclear reactor that came into being 1.8 billion years ago and was in operation for some 500,000 years.
Dr. Glenn T. Seaborg, former head of the United States Atomic Energy Commission and Nobel Prize winner for his work in the synthesis of heavy elements, explained why he believes it wasn’t a natural phenomenon, and thus must be a man-made nuclear reactor. For uranium to “burn” in a reaction, very precise conditions are needed.
The water must be extremely pure, for one. Much purer than exists naturally. The material U-235 is necessary for nuclear fission to occur. It is one of the isotopes found naturally in uranium. Several specialists in reactor engineering have said they believe the uranium in Oklo could not have been rich enough in U-235 for a reaction to take place naturally.
*******************************************************
Caves near Mount Baigong in China contain pipes leading to a nearby lake. They were dated by the Beijing Institute of Geology to about 150,000 years ago, according to Brian Dunning of Skeptoid.com.
State-run media Xinhua reported that the pipes were analyzed at a local smeltery and 8 percent of the material could not be identified. Zheng Jiandong, a geology research fellow from the China Earthquake Administration told state-run newspaper People’s Daily in 2007 that some of the pipes were found to be highly radioactive.
********************************************************
John Buchanan, Esq., presented a mysterious object to a meeting of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland on Dec. 13, 1852. A drill bit had been found encapsulated in coal about 22 inches thick, buried in a bed of clay mixed with boulders about 7 feet thick.
The Earth’s coal is said to have formed hundreds of millions of years ago. The Society decided that the instrument was of a modern level of advancement. But, it concluded that “the iron instrument might have been part of a borer broken during some former search for coal.”
Buchanan’s detailed report did not include any signs that the coal surrounding the instrument had been punctured by drilling.
*******************************************************
Here..You dig a little. THE PORT OF PUMA PUNKU; Tiahuanacu; Maccu Pichu.
**************************************************************************
There is evidence of a nuclear war that turned the desert of Lybia into glass in the far distant past. Ancient Sanskrit writings describe powerful weapons that the gods used on Earth thousands—even perhaps tens of thousands—of years ago. “…An incandescent column of smoke and flame, as bright as ten thousand suns, rose in all its splendor. It was an unknown weapon and iron thunderbolt, a gigantic messenger of death, which reduced to ashes the entire race…”
************************************************************************
And on and on and on. Too much evidence to ignore.
Comparing Genesis 1 with what science says about the history of the world ends up doing a disservice to either the Bible or science. They are trying to do completely different things.
Science is about the mechanics. Genesis is about the meaning and purpose of the world.
The creation/evolution debate always seems futile to me.
Forgive me sue. I'll answer more on the computer tomorrow. I said earlier that Old Earth or Gap theory totally negates evolution whereas the young Earth belief does notIt's a very important issue. The 'issue' Being -- Is God powerful enough to have created the world exactly as Genesis says He did or Not?! How did 'we' get God's Word in the first place. God inspired real people Through the Holy Spirit -- to write down exactly what He wanted written. In the case of Genesis -- Moses was the human person being used. And I've found it interesting that the names of the rivers are used. chapter 2:10-14.
How can this world have meaning and purpose without knowing how it got here in the first place. Genesis tells us that. On what day the various animals, etc. were spoken into existence and that the 'evening and the morning' were , in fact talking about a 24-hr day. It's saying that 'the day before' such and such did happen.
We have 24-hr days Now. The rotation of the earth around the sun. Do we really believe that That 'just happened' by chance?!
In response to a couple of other posts. So -- apparently Curtis believes in the Gap Theory. The supposed 'gap' between Genesis 1:1 and 1:2. But, is there any Real basis for that?!
Bendito -- doesn't the old earth idea Promote evolution. The older the earth the more time --millions of years -- for 'whatever' To develop?!
Apparently dinosaurs were created the same time the land animals were.
The word "apparently" was included in that one post. And "might have been". Speculation should Not be assumed to be Fact.
'We' tend to assumed that because there is a 'Dr' in front of a person's name, that everything they say is absolutely right. That there is no 'agenda'. Well -- Everyone has an agenda - it's part of being human.
And, yes, I will look up about the nuclear reactor.
Dear Lady....now you're speculating....Here! Put aside, for the moment, all preconceived ideas, and theories. Read what the Word says only. In the beginning, God created (created- past tense- finished) the heavens and the Earth. 2 And the earth was tohu vavohu (The first word for "was" is the word for "BECAME ) So God created, the Earth became without form and void.It's a very important issue. The 'issue' Being -- Is God powerful enough to have created the world exactly as Genesis says He did or Not?! How did 'we' get God's Word in the first place. God inspired real people Through the Holy Spirit -- to write down exactly what He wanted written. In the case of Genesis -- Moses was the human person being used. And I've found it interesting that the names of the rivers are used. chapter 2:10-14.
How can this world have meaning and purpose without knowing how it got here in the first place. Genesis tells us that. On what day the various animals, etc. were spoken into existence and that the 'evening and the morning' were , in fact talking about a 24-hr day. It's saying that 'the day before' such and such did happen.
We have 24-hr days Now. The rotation of the earth around the sun. Do we really believe that That 'just happened' by chance?!
In response to a couple of other posts. So -- apparently Curtis believes in the Gap Theory. The supposed 'gap' between Genesis 1:1 and 1:2. But, is there any Real basis for that?!
Bendito -- doesn't the old earth idea Promote evolution. The older the earth the more time --millions of years -- for 'whatever' To develop?!
Apparently dinosaurs were created the same time the land animals were.
The word "apparently" was included in that one post. And "might have been". Speculation should Not be assumed to be Fact.
'We' tend to assumed that because there is a 'Dr' in front of a person's name, that everything they say is absolutely right. That there is no 'agenda'. Well -- Everyone has an agenda - it's part of being human.
And, yes, I will look up about the nuclear reactor.
Forgive me sue. I'll answer more on the computer tomorrow. I said earlier that Old Earth or Gap theory totally negates evolution whereas the young Earth belief does not
The Antikythera mechanism is a 2,000-year-old computerYou've referred to 'it' as a computer. It's actually called the Antikythera Mechanism. And it's origin is between 200 - 70 BCE. That's what you were referring to? I've been trying to relocate your post.
Sue...'Created' and 'made' are not the same thing. Created means to bring into being from nothing...Made means to assemble ingredients/ materials to bring something into existence. God did not assemble the Earth...He created it. His Words became fact. It became solidOkay -- how about 'this' -- "In the beginning .......(this morning) ..... God created ....(I made)..... the heavens and the earth......( a cake). Now the bowl was empty -- but it was made out of (whatever a bowl is made out of) and then I put in an egg -- but it separated -- the yoke and the egg were 'taken apart'. And then the flower was added --a little at a time -- then salt and butter were added. And it was All mixed together -- and it became a 'cake'.
So -- I'm sharing the fact that I made a cake and then I started explaining the process of -- used an empty bowl and explained what I put into the bowl until I had all the ingredients needed and Then it became the cake that I started out telling that I made.
God created this world -- He did it His way -- and has told us step by step how He did it. Sometimes what God does, doesn't make complete sense to us. The words 'was' and 'became' are two different words and meanings.
Does a person Want a gap between vs 1 and 2 ? that leaves all sorts of 'room' for lots of things and finally a re-creation?
The Google article doesn't call it a computer.
The fact that the universe will grow cold and dead is an assumption, speculation...There is nothing to make it a fact....
If the universe continues long enough (really long) it will become dark and frozen because the stars, including our Sun, will eventually use up all their nuclear fuel.
My initial reaction to that fact was to assume that the universe was designed that way; but I'm not so sure because it appears to me that Rom 8:19-21 is saying that the cosmos wasn't supposed to wear out; just as human life was not supposed to expire.
_
LOLOL During the white throne judgement the Earth is actually a ball of flame wandering around space...Where the Earth is now is where the 'court' is held. the Great White Throne Judgment. Then God remakes the Earth. Yeah...no mountains, no oceans. Its not that strange though....Before the flood there was never any rain,.
● Rev 20:11 . .Then I saw a great white throne and him who was seated on it. Earth and sky fled from His presence, and there was no place for them.
● Rev 21:1 . .Then I saw a new heaven and a new Earth, for the first heaven and the first Earth had passed away, and there was no longer any sea.
Those are interesting passages. They indicate that not only will the current Earth be utterly annihilated, but there will be no vast deposit of water on the new Earth as there is now. How will life on land survive without a regular supply of fresh water evaporated from the ocean? Plus, without an ocean, there can be no rivers.
The future Earth is very peculiar.
_
.
● Rev 20:11 . .Then I saw a great white throne and him who was seated on it. Earth and sky fled from His presence, and there was no place for them.
● Rev 21:1 . .Then I saw a new heaven and a new Earth, for the first heaven and the first Earth had passed away, and there was no longer any sea.
Those are interesting passages. They indicate that not only will the current Earth be utterly annihilated, but there will be no vast deposit of water on the new Earth as there is now. How will life on land survive without a regular supply of fresh water evaporated from the ocean? Plus, without an ocean, there can be no rivers.
The future Earth is very peculiar.
_