Who really can determine what is Canon? Is it the RCC, Protestant, or Orthodox?
The main three super powers who wield the Word, have different views on this.
What is the view here? And based on that view what is the proof of surety?
It is fact that all scripture was (first) given to the Jew then gentile. And ALL the books of Hebrew
study were just that , of Hebraic study before the gentile omitted or admitted.
I was asked to answer a question before I logged in, "How many Canonical books are there". I thought on this, knowing
some Orthodox views, RCC views and Protestant views, that question and answer would determine the views of this forum.
When I first came here, I asked - "Even though this forum does not say what it is closely aligned with- what is the dominate
denominational view here", I was mislead into believing there was not one for sure.
Canon means written Law- is scripture the written law or is what man says the law?
The ancient Hebrews studied all of the OC writings, there were no extra canonical , they were all the LAW and the PROPHETS.
For instance Protestants and some of its many sects reject The Maccabees , yet the Hebrews study this and greater , wrote them.
Yet because it does not fit some Protestant sects narrative, they are rejected.Is this because they are not supported in Christ's teachings for sure?, or they do not support a denominational sect's view? And Of course they were several books reject by Luther. And prior to Luther
the RCC too rejected books. The only ones who have preserved ALL the Books are the Jews even if they do not use them all (excluding NT) and the Ethiopians
who do use all the books. Orthodox 81, RCC 73, Protestant(depending on who you come across) 66. I get all the extra Canonical stuff. But Truth is truth.
Extra or not, so how do we know what IS TRUE? Not to mention the Messianic, who converted, by mainly (Protestant groups) reject many of the same books the Protestants do, and do one better(In rejection) and add the Talmud and Kabbalah. So what is what TRULY?????
All Scripture is God-Breathed 2Tomothy 3:15-17
…15From infancy you have known the Holy Scriptures, which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus. 16All Scripture is God-breathed and is profitable for instruction, for conviction, for correction, and for training in righteousness, 17so that the man of God may be complete, fully equipped for every good work.…
My point : many books have been rejected as not reliable for accurate information. Have you as teachers tested this? I say teachers because it has been my experience here in the past that if you do not share the same exact view you are blocked from responding to threads. Even if scripture CLEARLY SUPPORTS arugement.
Scripture can not contradict itself. There are many divisions among all the denominations, so have you study why these division are? I would like to address the bones of contention for the denominations and prove or disprove what is already standing as doctrine, if that is allowed. But if you all feel you know everything , I will leave it alone.
Eyewitnesses of His Majesty 2peter 1:19-21
…19We also have the message of the prophets, which has been confirmed beyond doubt. And you will do well to pay attention to this message, as to a lamp shining in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning star rises in your hearts. 20Above all, you must understand that no prophecy of Scripture comes from the prophet’s own interpretation. 21For no prophecy was ever brought about through human initiative, but men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit.…
And Hello again, Peace in Christ!
The main three super powers who wield the Word, have different views on this.
What is the view here? And based on that view what is the proof of surety?
It is fact that all scripture was (first) given to the Jew then gentile. And ALL the books of Hebrew
study were just that , of Hebraic study before the gentile omitted or admitted.
I was asked to answer a question before I logged in, "How many Canonical books are there". I thought on this, knowing
some Orthodox views, RCC views and Protestant views, that question and answer would determine the views of this forum.
When I first came here, I asked - "Even though this forum does not say what it is closely aligned with- what is the dominate
denominational view here", I was mislead into believing there was not one for sure.
Canon means written Law- is scripture the written law or is what man says the law?
The ancient Hebrews studied all of the OC writings, there were no extra canonical , they were all the LAW and the PROPHETS.
For instance Protestants and some of its many sects reject The Maccabees , yet the Hebrews study this and greater , wrote them.
Yet because it does not fit some Protestant sects narrative, they are rejected.Is this because they are not supported in Christ's teachings for sure?, or they do not support a denominational sect's view? And Of course they were several books reject by Luther. And prior to Luther
the RCC too rejected books. The only ones who have preserved ALL the Books are the Jews even if they do not use them all (excluding NT) and the Ethiopians
who do use all the books. Orthodox 81, RCC 73, Protestant(depending on who you come across) 66. I get all the extra Canonical stuff. But Truth is truth.
Extra or not, so how do we know what IS TRUE? Not to mention the Messianic, who converted, by mainly (Protestant groups) reject many of the same books the Protestants do, and do one better(In rejection) and add the Talmud and Kabbalah. So what is what TRULY?????
All Scripture is God-Breathed 2Tomothy 3:15-17
…15From infancy you have known the Holy Scriptures, which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus. 16All Scripture is God-breathed and is profitable for instruction, for conviction, for correction, and for training in righteousness, 17so that the man of God may be complete, fully equipped for every good work.…
My point : many books have been rejected as not reliable for accurate information. Have you as teachers tested this? I say teachers because it has been my experience here in the past that if you do not share the same exact view you are blocked from responding to threads. Even if scripture CLEARLY SUPPORTS arugement.
Scripture can not contradict itself. There are many divisions among all the denominations, so have you study why these division are? I would like to address the bones of contention for the denominations and prove or disprove what is already standing as doctrine, if that is allowed. But if you all feel you know everything , I will leave it alone.
Eyewitnesses of His Majesty 2peter 1:19-21
…19We also have the message of the prophets, which has been confirmed beyond doubt. And you will do well to pay attention to this message, as to a lamp shining in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning star rises in your hearts. 20Above all, you must understand that no prophecy of Scripture comes from the prophet’s own interpretation. 21For no prophecy was ever brought about through human initiative, but men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit.…
And Hello again, Peace in Christ!