It's come up more times than I can count here on TJ.
But virtually all Pentecostals believe in something called the "Baptism" of the Holy Spirit.
There are many terms used interchangeably...
Holy Spirit or Holy Ghost,
Infilling, or indwelling of the Holy Spirit vs the Baptism of the Holy Spirit
==================================================================================
It seems virtually all non-Pentecostal/Charismatic denominations do not believe in a separation
of two separate events. They believe when you are saved, you get the Holy Spirit inside you at that moment
and there is no other 'Holy Spirit moment' afterwards. They believe either you have the Holy Spirit, or you
don't. They don't believe you get "part" of the Holy Spirit now, and another part of the Holy Spirit later.
===================================================================================
The other extreme of this is that you don't have the Holy Spirit just because you are saved.
In fact some believe getting the Holy Spirit is an entirely different event than getting salvation.
(Kind of like being water baptized, it may not happen right away when you accept Jesus).
Some even go so far as to say, without some type of external evidence (usually speaking in tongues)
You do not have the Holy Spirit inside you.
======================================================================================
But there is a middle ground. 'Most' (I do not have statistics on this, but just experience with many
different churches over the years) Pentecostals like the Assemblies of God for example, believe that
there are two separate 'Holy Spirit events'. They believe you get the Holy Spirit when you get saved,
but you don't get all of it. It seems the general consensus here is that you should at least have
enough of the Holy Spirit to be showing the fruits of the Spirit (Gal 5)
However at some point later (it could be the same day, but usually it isn't) you receive something
called the "Baptism" of the Holy Spirit (some make a distinction between "in the Holy Spirit" and
"of the Holy Spirit". The people that believe this usually say that some external; evidence
(such as speaking in tongues) should be evident... The believe that speaking in tongues may not be
your 'Spiritual gift' (1 Cor 12) but that you should do it at least the first time you receive the Holy Spirit.
Other Pentecostal denominations do not believe there has to be an external evidence for this immediately,
but at some point after this, you should have the evidence of one of the gifts (1 Cor 12) and they believe
that if you never show evidence of one (or more) of these gifts - you were never baptized in the Holy
Spirit.
==============================================================================================
Some denominations (most Baptists for example) do not believe the gifts of the Holy Spirit apply
anymore. Only the fruit and administrations of the Spirit apply now. So for them, no external evidence
is required, but it's impossible to have the evidence. However the majority of Baptists also do not
believe that receiving the Holy Spirit and being "Baptized" in the Holy Spirit are two separate events.
=============================================================================================
So what do you say?
Is having the Holy Spirit that same thing as being baptized in the Holy Spirit?
Do you receive the Holy Spirit immediately upon salvation?
Is being baptized in the Holy Spirit a separate experience from receiving the Holy Spirit?
Is an external evidence required to prove that you have been baptized in the Holy Spirit?
Do the gifts of the Holy Spirit still apply today?
I am interested in scriptures that support the various points of view here.
But virtually all Pentecostals believe in something called the "Baptism" of the Holy Spirit.
There are many terms used interchangeably...
Holy Spirit or Holy Ghost,
Infilling, or indwelling of the Holy Spirit vs the Baptism of the Holy Spirit
==================================================================================
It seems virtually all non-Pentecostal/Charismatic denominations do not believe in a separation
of two separate events. They believe when you are saved, you get the Holy Spirit inside you at that moment
and there is no other 'Holy Spirit moment' afterwards. They believe either you have the Holy Spirit, or you
don't. They don't believe you get "part" of the Holy Spirit now, and another part of the Holy Spirit later.
===================================================================================
The other extreme of this is that you don't have the Holy Spirit just because you are saved.
In fact some believe getting the Holy Spirit is an entirely different event than getting salvation.
(Kind of like being water baptized, it may not happen right away when you accept Jesus).
Some even go so far as to say, without some type of external evidence (usually speaking in tongues)
You do not have the Holy Spirit inside you.
======================================================================================
But there is a middle ground. 'Most' (I do not have statistics on this, but just experience with many
different churches over the years) Pentecostals like the Assemblies of God for example, believe that
there are two separate 'Holy Spirit events'. They believe you get the Holy Spirit when you get saved,
but you don't get all of it. It seems the general consensus here is that you should at least have
enough of the Holy Spirit to be showing the fruits of the Spirit (Gal 5)
However at some point later (it could be the same day, but usually it isn't) you receive something
called the "Baptism" of the Holy Spirit (some make a distinction between "in the Holy Spirit" and
"of the Holy Spirit". The people that believe this usually say that some external; evidence
(such as speaking in tongues) should be evident... The believe that speaking in tongues may not be
your 'Spiritual gift' (1 Cor 12) but that you should do it at least the first time you receive the Holy Spirit.
Other Pentecostal denominations do not believe there has to be an external evidence for this immediately,
but at some point after this, you should have the evidence of one of the gifts (1 Cor 12) and they believe
that if you never show evidence of one (or more) of these gifts - you were never baptized in the Holy
Spirit.
==============================================================================================
Some denominations (most Baptists for example) do not believe the gifts of the Holy Spirit apply
anymore. Only the fruit and administrations of the Spirit apply now. So for them, no external evidence
is required, but it's impossible to have the evidence. However the majority of Baptists also do not
believe that receiving the Holy Spirit and being "Baptized" in the Holy Spirit are two separate events.
=============================================================================================
So what do you say?
Is having the Holy Spirit that same thing as being baptized in the Holy Spirit?
Do you receive the Holy Spirit immediately upon salvation?
Is being baptized in the Holy Spirit a separate experience from receiving the Holy Spirit?
Is an external evidence required to prove that you have been baptized in the Holy Spirit?
Do the gifts of the Holy Spirit still apply today?
I am interested in scriptures that support the various points of view here.