Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!
  • Welcome to Talk Jesus Christian Forums

    Celebrating 20 Years!

    A bible based, Jesus Christ centered community.

    Register Log In

Was it an apple that eve did eat?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hi Gary,
18 Now in the morning as he returned into the city, he hungered. 19 And when he saw a fig tree in the way, he came to it, and found nothing thereon, but leaves only, and said unto it, Let no fruit grow on thee henceforward for ever. And presently the fig tree withered away.
Is this his disciples assuming?

That was a errant assumption. Since when do fig trees produce fruit out of season? Must be another explanation. Note that they never asked him what he was doing because they were so taken up with the rapidity in which the tree withered. They never did discover what he was doing because they had about 25 years to think about it before the synoptic Gospels were written. They corrected other assumptions as I will point out a couple of them.

Matthew 16:6-7 (NASB)
And Jesus said to them, "Watch out and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and Sadducees." [7] And they began to discuss among themselves, saying, "It is because we took no bread." And they began to discuss among themselves, saying, "It is because we took no bread." [8] But Jesus, aware of this, said, "You men of little faith, why do you discuss among yourselves that you have no bread? [9] "Do you not yet understand or remember the five loaves of the five thousand, and how many baskets you took up? [10] "Or the seven loaves of the four thousand, and how many large baskets you took up? [11] "How is it that you do not understand that I did not speak to you concerning bread? But beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and Sadducees." [12] Then they understood that He did not say to beware of the leaven of bread, but of the teaching of the Pharisees and Sadducees.

Just another assumption – fortunately Jesus corrected their thinking. They took him literally, which is what I am calling “soulish.” He was speaking spiritually. Jesus' words always spoke directly to people's spirits.

Another...

John 2:19-22 (NASB)
Jesus answered and said to them, "Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up." [20] The Jews therefore said, "It took forty-six years to build this temple, and will You raise it up in three days?" [21] But He was speaking of the temple of His body. [22] When therefore He was raised from the dead, His disciples remembered that He said this; and they believed the Scripture, and the word which Jesus had spoken.

Another assumption, which was not corrected until after the crucifixion.

Here is the greatest assumption of all and it would have destroyed their whole group had not Jesus reappeared to them after his resurrection and corrected their thinking.

Why did the Jews miss their visitation of the Messiah? Everybody knows it was because of their unrealistic expectations. They were looking for a Messiah who would perform great signs as proof of who he was. He would destroy their enemies – the Romans, raise the Jews up to world leadership, and world power. Israel would be the center of the whole world. The Jewish leadership would be elevated to a place of supreme preeminence. The wealth of nations would flow into it. Jesus did none of these things. The NT says that they killed him for envy and blasphemy. The official Jewish position to this very day is that Jesus was a sorcerer and misled Israel. How blind can you get?

Unfortunately, the disciples held this same view during their time with Jesus. However, they recognized him as the true Messiah and changed their Jewish unrealistic belief slightly. They still expected that Jesus was going to set up a literal earthly kingdom in due time. He told them plainly what would really happen, but the scripture says that they didn't believe him.

Then on Passover night he was arrested. They had been arguing among themselves previouly about who would have the greatest position in this coming literal kingdom. When the mob approached them on the Mount of Olives that night - their was a cohort of Roman solders and the Temple guard who came out to them with torches expecting to put down a “rebellion.”

John 18:3 (NASB)
Judas then, having received the Roman cohort[/SIZE], and officers from the chief priests and the Pharisees, came there with lanterns and torches and weapons.

A cohort was 1/10<SUP>th</SUP> of a legion or 600 men. So there could have been as many as 700 in total – who knows? In any case the Disciples were outnumbered by about 60:1 If 60 men armed and skilled at warfare came after me having only a sword – I would run as fast as I could - in absolute terror.

As they approached and inquired of Jesus he said...

John 18:4-6 (NASB)
Jesus therefore, knowing all the things that were coming upon Him, went forth, and said to them, "Whom do you seek?" [5] They answered Him, "Jesus the Nazarene." He said to them, "I am He." And Judas also who was betraying Him, was standing with them. [6] When therefore He said to them, "I am He," they drew back, and fell to the ground.

This was the grand moment that they were all waiting for. Jesus was starting to exercise his power against his enemies when he knocked them all to the ground. This was the peak moment of their exciting expectations and dreams. Judas was a greedy, conniving, dishonest scoundrel. He planned to betray Jesus but never believed that it would happen. He was attempting to create a situation to cause a confrontation between Jesus and the ruling elite of Israel and the Roman government. This confrontation would then cause Jesus to take over by force and establish his new kingdom on earth. All of the Disciples swore allegiance to him the night before - to the death – when they were looking to become the prime minister in this new and exciting kingdom. Peter was so emboldened that when approached by Malchus he cut off his ear. Of course he was fully expecting Jesus to protect him and to seize power and set up this new literal kingdom. It was one of these "God and me" are a majority - except God was not in this he had planned the crucifixion before the foundation of the world.

John 18:10 (NASB)
Simon Peter therefore having a sword, drew it, and struck the high priest's slave, and cut off his right ear; and the slave's name was Malchus.

Then Jesus was arrested and taken to the authorities; and on the next morning He was convicted by the Sanhedrin - who were sitting in the wing of the Temple in the hall of hewn stone – the meeting place of the Grand Sanhedrin.

All their dreams of this literal kingdom were destroyed - totally. Judas's plan failed and he was so distraught that he went out and hung himself - realizing that he had in reality betrayed the Lord. Peter went with Jesus and so did John, but Peter denied that he even knew Jesus three times – just like Jesus said. Do you see how the courage disappeared when Jesus didn't exercise power over the the mob that night? The Disciples all scattered – so much for loyal unto death. Judas never repented of his evil and hung himself, but Peter did and was forgiven.

Just a week before was the triumphal entry of Jesus riding on the foal of a donkey. The crowds shouted “Hosanna” – which means “save us.” Save us from our sins? No - more like save us from the Romans and our tyrannical leadership. Zechariah says that 2/3 of the believers in Jesus would fall away after the crucifixion. The remaining third were brought through the fire.

Today of course this dream of the Jews and the Disciples continues on - except today it has been upgraded and is now called “The Millennium.” This dream will someday come to pass, but not until the Second coming and time and humanity are no more.

I said all of that just to show how wrong they were all the way up to the cross. Afterward they had most things finally figured out. This is what I am calling an “assumption.”

12 And on the morrow, when they were come from Bethany, he was hungry: 13 And seeing a fig tree afar off having leaves, he came, if haply he might find any thing thereon: and when he came to it, he found nothing but leaves; for the time of figs was not yet.[/SIZE] 14 And Jesus answered and said unto it, No man eat fruit of thee hereafter for ever. And his disciples heard it.

Or this?

I have never understood this to mean his disciples were assuming that he was hungry and looking for food. It seems to be straight forward.

Great questions, puzzles me too.

Good - you perceive that there is a problem with this passage mostly because the Disciples have inadvertantly and unintentionally misled us with their assumption. If you have a problem with the cursing of the fig tree then you are perceptive and are half way there. Now you just have to find an alternative interpretation that makes sense as the passage if taken as all true does not.

I have a hard time trusting Jewish tradition as they killed their own Messiah when he came and while he was here he condemned them for their traditions. If this is symbolism for Jesus cursing the tree of knowledge of good and evil for the role it played in the fall of mankind, then the tree was evil in and of itself for just being what God created it to be and was responsible for mans decision to eat from it.

I have problems with Jewish tradition as well, but if it is confirmed by Jesus - as it is in this case – I believe it.

How can this be? God saw all that he created, including the tree of knowledge of good and evil, and saw that it was 'very good'. The tree was very good. The Genesis account says that Eve saw that it was good for food. Is there something wrong with man knowing the difference between good and evil? Or is there just something wrong with disobeying God? A like example: Is there anything wrong with eating pork if your not under the Mosaic Law? How about under the Law? Because God is God something is wrong if he says it is whether it is in and of itself or not.

There was nothing wrong with the two trees – they were just ordinary trees. The only thing different was that God had spoken over them. The sin was not from eating from it - the sin was from doing what God said not to do. Had nothing to do with the tree per Se. Jesus cursed a descendant of that original tree in the garden to symbolically destroy forever the Tree of the knowledge of good and evil, so it could never bring about the fall of mankind ever again. This was a highly significant act – it wasn't just a fig lunch, which means nothing to me. .

What source did you use to figure out the tree of life was the Almond tree? I thought the tree of life bare 12 different fruits and yielded its fruit every month.

Partly the Mishnah. In Revelation that's a symbolic representation of the Tree of Life. Jesus is the tree of life and these attributes belong to Him. There were several items of furniture in the Holy Place in the Tabernacle/Temple. (not the Holy of Holies). There was the table of show bread, the table of incense, and the Menorah. The Menorah is symbolic of the tree of life, which is Jesus - the light of the world. The Menorah was shaped like a seven branched tree. The Menorah was covered with almond buds cast into the body. There was seven lamps on top of the branches. The middle one was never extinguished, it had to be trimmed and refilled while it was still lit. The middle lamp of the Menorah is the one that stands in the middle of the lamp stand in Revelation - who was that? Again it is Jesus. This light was an eternal flame. The book of Revelation is highly symbolic – if you take symbolic texts literally - you will be wrong more times than right.

Thank you for your response to my question,
Gary
 
Hi Gary,


That was a errant assumption. Since when do fig trees produce fruit out of season? Must be another explanation. Note that they never asked him what he was doing because they were so taken up with the rapidity in which the tree withered. They never did discover what he was doing because they had about 25 years to think about it before the synoptic Gospels were written. They corrected other assumptions as I will point out a couple of them.

I have been desperately trying to understand what you have been saying and I haven't been able to follow your train of thought. This whole errant assumption thing, are you saying the writers of the text wrote it in a misleading way due to errant assumptions? Or am I way off the beaten path here? Please help.
 
the fairy tale that eve ate of a apple is just that a lie. the word apple is not in the verse.

<!-- status icon and date -->
Eve listened to the lies of satan this is the fruit she ate of


[URL="http://javascript<b></b>:{}"]Hosea 10:13[/URL]
Ye have plowed wickedness, ye have reaped iniquity; ye have eaten the fruit of lies: because thou didst trust in thy way, in the multitude of thy mighty men.

[URL="http://javascript<b></b>:{}"]2 Corinthians 11:3[/URL]
But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ.

Genesis 3

<SUP id=en-KJV-60 class=versenum>4</SUP>And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:

<SUP id=en-KJV-61 class=versenum>5</SUP>For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.
<SUP id=en-KJV-62 class=versenum></SUP>
<SUP class=versenum>6</SUP>And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.
 
Last edited:
<!-- status icon and date -->
Eve listened to the lies of satan this is the fruit she ate of


.

Gen 2:9 NKJV And out of the ground the LORD God made every tree grow that is pleasant to the sight and good for food. The tree of life was also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.


These are literal trees with literal fruit. How could we possibly say satan's lies grew on a tree ?
 
Gen 2:9 NKJV And out of the ground the LORD God made every tree grow that is pleasant to the sight and good for food. The tree of life was also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.


These are literal trees with literal fruit. How could we possibly say satan's lies grew on a tree ?



agua

Eve spoke to a being not a literal tree

in the verse above is the tree of life a literal tree or is it Jesus?

Lets read Genesis 3

VERSE 1 we have a serpent doing the talking and we have a woman responding. we have a dialogue going on

VERSE 3 we have one tree that man has to stay away from and that tree is the tree of the knoweldge of good and evil. trees are not good nor are they evil.

VERSE 6 we have a tree that can make one wise, trees and fruit don't make people wise

Genesis 3
<SUP class=versenum></SUP>
<SUP class=versenum>1</SUP>Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?


<SUP id=en-KJV-58 class=versenum>2</SUP>And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden:
<SUP id=en-KJV-59 class=versenum></SUP>
<SUP class=versenum>3</SUP>But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.
<SUP id=en-KJV-60 class=versenum></SUP>
<SUP class=versenum>4</SUP>And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:
<SUP id=en-KJV-61 class=versenum></SUP>
<SUP class=versenum>5</SUP>For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil. <SUP id=en-KJV-62 class=versenum></SUP>
<SUP class=versenum>6</SUP>And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.


<SUP id=en-KJV-63 class=versenum>7</SUP>And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together, and made themselves aprons.
<SUP id=en-KJV-64 class=versenum></SUP>
<SUP class=versenum>8</SUP>And they heard the voice of the LORD God walking in the garden in the cool of the day: and Adam and his wife hid themselves from the presence of the LORD God amongst the trees of the garden.
<SUP id=en-KJV-65 class=versenum></SUP>
<SUP class=versenum>9</SUP>And the LORD God called unto Adam, and said unto him, Where art thou?
<SUP id=en-KJV-66 class=versenum></SUP>
<SUP class=versenum>10</SUP>And he said, I heard thy voice in the garden, and I was afraid, because I was naked; and I hid myself.
<SUP id=en-KJV-67 class=versenum></SUP>
<SUP class=versenum>11</SUP>And he said, Who told thee that thou wast naked? Hast thou eaten of the tree, whereof I commanded thee that thou shouldest not eat?
<SUP id=en-KJV-68 class=versenum></SUP>
<SUP class=versenum>12</SUP>And the man said, The woman whom thou gavest to be with me, she gave me of the tree, and I did eat.
<SUP id=en-KJV-69 class=versenum></SUP>
<SUP class=versenum></SUP>
<SUP class=versenum>13</SUP>And the LORD God said unto the woman, What is this that thou hast done? And the woman said, The serpent beguiled me, and I did eat.
<SUP id=en-KJV-70 class=versenum></SUP>
<SUP class=versenum>14</SUP>And the LORD God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast done this, thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life:
<SUP id=en-KJV-71 class=versenum></SUP>
<SUP class=versenum>15</SUP>And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.
<SUP id=en-KJV-72 class=versenum></SUP>
<SUP class=versenum>16</SUP>Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee. <SUP id=en-KJV-73 class=versenum></SUP>
<SUP class=versenum>17</SUP>And unto Adam he said, Because thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree, of which I commanded thee, saying, Thou shalt not eat of it: cursed is the ground for thy sake; in sorrow shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life;


verse 7 can a tree or fruit open one eyes. No

verse 11 the Lord asked Adam and Eve WHO TOLD THEE THAT THY WAS NAKED. we have a question and we know trees or fruit don't talk.


verse 13 we read that the serpent beguiled eve, not a tree or fruit.

who is the serpent?

lets read

Revelation 20:2
And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years,



the tree of the knowledge of good and evil is satan the devil also called the serpent.

satan was in the garden of God

lets read


satan is a anointed Cherub angel


Ezekiel 28:12-14



<SUP id=en-KJV-21170 class=versenum>12</SUP>Son of man, take up a lamentation upon the king of Tyrus, and say unto him, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Thou sealest up the sum, full of wisdom, and perfect in beauty.
<SUP id=en-KJV-21171 class=versenum></SUP>
<SUP class=versenum>13</SUP>Thou hast been in Eden the garden of God; every precious stone was thy covering, the sardius, topaz, and the diamond, the beryl, the onyx, and the jasper, the sapphire, the emerald, and the carbuncle, and gold: the workmanship of thy tabrets and of thy pipes was prepared in thee in the day that thou wast created. <SUP id=en-KJV-21172 class=versenum></SUP>
<SUP class=versenum>14</SUP>Thou art the anointed cherub that covereth; and I have set thee so: thou wast upon the holy mountain of God; thou hast walked up and down in the midst of the stones of fire.


<SUP>15</SUP>Thou wast perfect in thy ways from the day that thou wast created, till iniquity was found in thee.


<SUP id=en-KJV-21174 class=versenum>16</SUP>By the multitude of thy merchandise they have filled the midst of thee with violence, and thou hast sinned: therefore I will cast thee as profane out of the mountain of God: and I will destroy thee, O covering cherub, from the midst of the stones of fire. <SUP id=en-KJV-21175 class=versenum></SUP>
<SUP class=versenum>17</SUP>Thine heart was lifted up because of thy beauty, thou hast corrupted thy wisdom by reason of thy brightness: I will cast thee to the ground, I will lay thee before kings, that they may behold thee.
 
Gen 2:9 NKJV And out of the ground the LORD God made every tree grow that is pleasant to the sight and good for food. The tree of life was also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.


These are literal trees with literal fruit. How could we possibly say satan's lies grew on a tree ?

So tell us.....just where is this "literal" fruit today? Let's read God's word, use just a little common sense and determine if a "literal" tree of life still exist....or could these two trees have represtented the Lord (Tree of life) and Satan (Tree of Good and Evil)....

Gen.3
[24]So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life.

Now let's read where Eden is located....

Gen.2
[10] And a river went out of Eden to water the garden; and from thence it was parted, and became into four heads.
[13] And the name of the second river is Gihon: the same is it that compasseth the whole land of Ethiopia.
[14] And the name of the third river is Hiddekel: that is it which goeth toward the east of Assyria. And the fourth river is Euphrates.
[15] And the LORD God took the man, and put him into the garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it.

So.....we have a location for the Garden of Eden, AND we have the names of rivers and lands that are still around today.

But to this day man has never been able to find those, "...Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life." You would think with Google earth and all of the satelites and exploring man has done, surely by now you would think someone should have run across those flaming swords.

Now let's throw in just a little common sense AND scripture.....

We have the possiblity of a fruit giving wisdom and knowledge, a snake giving wisdom and knowledge, or Satan giving wisdom and knowledge. Now which, using common sense, is more likely to be true here? Well....let's now read scripture.....

Rev.12
[9] And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.
Rev.20
[2] And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years,

So we read that one of the titles God used for Satan was "Serpent".

Ezek.28
[12] Son of man, take up a lamentation upon the king of Tyrus, and say unto him, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Thou sealest up the sum, full of wisdom, and perfect in beauty.
[13] Thou hast been in Eden the garden of God; every precious stone was thy covering, the sardius, topaz, and the diamond, the beryl, the onyx, and the jasper, the sapphire, the emerald, and the carbuncle, and gold: the workmanship of thy tabrets and of thy pipes was prepared in thee in the day that thou wast created.
[14] Thou art the anointed cherub that covereth; and I have set thee so: thou wast upon the holy mountain of God; thou hast walked up and down in the midst of the stones of fire.
[15] Thou wast perfect in thy ways from the day that thou wast created, till iniquity was found in thee.
[16] By the multitude of thy merchandise they have filled the midst of thee with violence, and thou hast sinned: therefore I will cast thee as profane out of the mountain of God: and I will destroy thee, O covering cherub, from the midst of the stones of fire.
[17] Thine heart was lifted up because of thy beauty, thou hast corrupted thy wisdom by reason of thy brightness: I will cast thee to the ground, I will lay thee before kings, that they may behold thee.

We now know that Satan was in the Garden of Eden.

Gen.3
[9] And the LORD God called unto Adam, and said unto him, Where art thou?
[10] And he said, I heard thy voice in the garden, and I was afraid, because I was naked; and I hid myself.
[11] And he said, Who told thee that thou wast naked? Hast thou eaten of the tree, whereof I commanded thee that thou shouldest not eat?

God asked Adam WHO told him he was naked!

John 8
[44] Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

So we know that it was the devil, aka Satan, that was the father of lies. First to those angels that followed him, "...And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation...", and then to man, "...And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:".


Now let's read if God ever said to eat something, but He was really talking about consuming words...

Hosea 10
[13] Ye have plowed wickedness, ye have reaped iniquity; ye have eaten the fruit of lies: because thou didst trust in thy way, in the multitude of thy mighty men.

Not only did God referrence something that was not words, He called it a fruit.

John 6
[47] Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me hath everlasting life.
[48] I am that bread of life.
[55] For my flesh is meat indeed, and my blood is drink indeed.
[56] He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, dwelleth in me, and I in him.
[63] It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life.

Now let's read what this all means...

[68] Then Simon Peter answered him, Lord, to whom shall we go? thou hast the words of eternal life.

So the WORDS that He spoke is what He was speaking about all the time.

Let's read it put another way....

Rev.10
[9] And I went unto the angel, and said unto him, Give me the little book. And he said unto me, Take it, and eat it up; and it shall make thy belly bitter, but it shall be in thy mouth sweet as honey.
[10] And I took the little book out of the angel's hand, and ate it up; and it was in my mouth sweet as honey: and as soon as I had eaten it, my belly was bitter.
[11] And he said unto me, Thou must prophesy again before many peoples, and nations, and tongues, and kings.

So...a book was eaten and THEN he was able to prophesy. What was really consumed here...were WORDS!


So...putting all of this together....is it possible that Eve was beguiled by Satan, who we know was in the Gaden of Eden, the one that was also called a serpent, that spoke to her, lied to her and yet gave her wisdom.......

or..............

could it have been a fruit or a snake?


And let's not forget about that other gift to use that God gave us all;

Common sense!



.
 
the fairy tale that eve ate of a apple is just that a lie. the word apple is not in the verse.

<!-- status icon and date -->
Eve listened to the lies of satan this is the fruit she ate of


[URL="http://javascript<b></b>:{}"]Hosea 10:13[/URL]
Ye have plowed wickedness, ye have reaped iniquity; ye have eaten the fruit of lies: because thou didst trust in thy way, in the multitude of thy mighty men.

[URL="http://javascript<b></b>:{}"]2 Corinthians 11:3[/URL]
But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ.

Genesis 3

<SUP id=en-KJV-60 class=versenum>4</SUP>And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:

<SUP id=en-KJV-61 class=versenum>5</SUP>For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.
<SUP id=en-KJV-62 class=versenum></SUP>
<SUP class=versenum>6</SUP>And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.

So you think that the tree of knowledge of good and evil is Satan?

Satan can make one wise???

Satan is good???

Absolutely ludicrous!:laugh:
 
So tell us.....just where is this "literal" fruit today? Let's read God's word, use just a little common sense and determine if a "literal" tree of life still exist....or could these two trees have represtented the Lord (Tree of life) and Satan (Tree of Good and Evil)....

Gen.3
[24]So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life.

Now let's read where Eden is located....

Gen.2
[10] And a river went out of Eden to water the garden; and from thence it was parted, and became into four heads.
[13] And the name of the second river is Gihon: the same is it that compasseth the whole land of Ethiopia.
[14] And the name of the third river is Hiddekel: that is it which goeth toward the east of Assyria. And the fourth river is Euphrates.
[15] And the LORD God took the man, and put him into the garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it.

So.....we have a location for the Garden of Eden, AND we have the names of rivers and lands that are still around today.

But to this day man has never been able to find those, "...Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life." You would think with Google earth and all of the satelites and exploring man has done, surely by now you would think someone should have run across those flaming swords.

Now let's throw in just a little common sense AND scripture.....

We have the possiblity of a fruit giving wisdom and knowledge, a snake giving wisdom and knowledge, or Satan giving wisdom and knowledge. Now which, using common sense, is more likely to be true here? Well....let's now read scripture.....

Rev.12
[9] And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.
Rev.20
[2] And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years,

So we read that one of the titles God used for Satan was "Serpent".

Ezek.28
[12] Son of man, take up a lamentation upon the king of Tyrus, and say unto him, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Thou sealest up the sum, full of wisdom, and perfect in beauty.
[13] Thou hast been in Eden the garden of God; every precious stone was thy covering, the sardius, topaz, and the diamond, the beryl, the onyx, and the jasper, the sapphire, the emerald, and the carbuncle, and gold: the workmanship of thy tabrets and of thy pipes was prepared in thee in the day that thou wast created.
[14] Thou art the anointed cherub that covereth; and I have set thee so: thou wast upon the holy mountain of God; thou hast walked up and down in the midst of the stones of fire.
[15] Thou wast perfect in thy ways from the day that thou wast created, till iniquity was found in thee.
[16] By the multitude of thy merchandise they have filled the midst of thee with violence, and thou hast sinned: therefore I will cast thee as profane out of the mountain of God: and I will destroy thee, O covering cherub, from the midst of the stones of fire.
[17] Thine heart was lifted up because of thy beauty, thou hast corrupted thy wisdom by reason of thy brightness: I will cast thee to the ground, I will lay thee before kings, that they may behold thee.

We now know that Satan was in the Garden of Eden.

Gen.3
[9] And the LORD God called unto Adam, and said unto him, Where art thou?
[10] And he said, I heard thy voice in the garden, and I was afraid, because I was naked; and I hid myself.
[11] And he said, Who told thee that thou wast naked? Hast thou eaten of the tree, whereof I commanded thee that thou shouldest not eat?

God asked Adam WHO told him he was naked!

John 8
[44] Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

So we know that it was the devil, aka Satan, that was the father of lies. First to those angels that followed him, "...And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation...", and then to man, "...And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:".


Now let's read if God ever said to eat something, but He was really talking about consuming words...

Hosea 10
[13] Ye have plowed wickedness, ye have reaped iniquity; ye have eaten the fruit of lies: because thou didst trust in thy way, in the multitude of thy mighty men.

Not only did God referrence something that was not words, He called it a fruit.

John 6
[47] Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me hath everlasting life.
[48] I am that bread of life.
[55] For my flesh is meat indeed, and my blood is drink indeed.
[56] He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, dwelleth in me, and I in him.
[63] It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life.

Now let's read what this all means...

[68] Then Simon Peter answered him, Lord, to whom shall we go? thou hast the words of eternal life.

So the WORDS that He spoke is what He was speaking about all the time.

Let's read it put another way....

Rev.10
[9] And I went unto the angel, and said unto him, Give me the little book. And he said unto me, Take it, and eat it up; and it shall make thy belly bitter, but it shall be in thy mouth sweet as honey.
[10] And I took the little book out of the angel's hand, and ate it up; and it was in my mouth sweet as honey: and as soon as I had eaten it, my belly was bitter.
[11] And he said unto me, Thou must prophesy again before many peoples, and nations, and tongues, and kings.

So...a book was eaten and THEN he was able to prophesy. What was really consumed here...were WORDS!


So...putting all of this together....is it possible that Eve was beguiled by Satan, who we know was in the Gaden of Eden, the one that was also called a serpent, that spoke to her, lied to her and yet gave her wisdom.......

or..............

could it have been a fruit or a snake?


And let's not forget about that other gift to use that God gave us all;

Common sense!



.

Did God curse the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil or did He curse the serpent?

Can Satan open eyes, give wisdom and knowledge? Can satan help anyone be more like God?

Your post is just as ludicrous as Ozell's.:laugh:
 
Last edited:
So you think that the tree of knowledge of good and evil is Satan?

Satan can make one wise???

Satan is good???


Luke 6
[32] For if ye love them which love you, what thank have ye? for sinners also love those that love them.
[33] And if ye do good to them which do good to you, what thank have ye? for sinners also do even the same.
[34] And if ye lend to them of whom ye hope to receive, what thank have ye? for sinners also lend to sinners, to receive as much again.

Is not Satan a sinner! Does not Satan bless those that worship him. Does not Satan do GOOD to those that serve him?

Did not Satan make Eve wise?

Gen.3
[5] For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.
[6] And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.
[7] And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together, and made themselves aprons.

And which did they listen to to give them the knoledge of Good and Evil?

[22] And the LORD God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:

So let me get this right....you would rather believe that a fruit can give knowledge and that a snake can talk rather than believing that Satan, an angel that CAN speak and has knowledge, was the one that spoke to Eve and told her lies?

And you claim that what I and Ozell post is ludicrous?

Really?


.
 
Luke 6
[32] For if ye love them which love you, what thank have ye? for sinners also love those that love them.
[33] And if ye do good to them which do good to you, what thank have ye? for sinners also do even the same.
[34] And if ye lend to them of whom ye hope to receive, what thank have ye? for sinners also lend to sinners, to receive as much again.

Is not Satan a sinner! Does not Satan bless those that worship him. Does not Satan do GOOD to those that serve him?

Did not Satan make Eve wise?

Gen.3
[5] For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.
[6] And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.
[7] And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together, and made themselves aprons.

And which did they listen to to give them the knoledge of Good and Evil?

[22] And the LORD God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:

So let me get this right....you would rather believe that a fruit can give knowledge and that a snake can talk rather than believing that Satan, an angel that CAN speak and has knowledge, was the one that spoke to Eve and told her lies?

And you claim that what I and Ozell post is ludicrous?

Really?


.

I am not refuting that Satan spoke and lied to Eve, I am refuting that your opinion that Satan is the source of Knowledge of Good and Evil.

The scripture in Genesis clearly distinguishes the Tree of knowledge of Good and Evil and the serpent as two different entities.

And yes I do claim that you and Ozell's posts are ludicrous.

22 Then the Lord God said, “Look, the human beings have become like us, knowing both good and evil. What if they reach out, take fruit from the tree of life, and eat it? Then they will live forever!”
Gen 3:22 (NLT)

You claim that Satan was the source that made man become like God knowing good and evil.

And out of the ground made the Lord God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food; the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil.
Gen 2:9 (KJV)

You obviously believe that Satan is good for food, and that is just plain silliness.
 
I am not refuting that Satan spoke and lied to Eve, I am refuting that your opinion that Satan is the source of Knowledge of Good and Evil.

Where else did Eve receive the knowledge that was given to her? From a piece of fruit? From a serpent?

Let's read God's words....again.

"And the LORD God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:"

So how did man come into the knowledge of good and evil? Who did he listen to?

"You obviously believe that Satan is good for food, and that is just plain silliness."

Is not Jesus good for food also? He tells us he is;

John 6
[47] Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me hath everlasting life.
[48] I am that bread of life.
[55] For my flesh is meat indeed, and my blood is drink indeed.

All food does not mean all GOOD food!

Oh yeah...and just where are those swords of flames?

You are not even aware that those represent the angels that are always around the Lord at all times are you?

.
 
Where else did Eve receive the knowledge that was given to her? From a piece of fruit? From a serpent?

Let's read God's words....again.

"And the LORD God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:"

So how did man come into the knowledge of good and evil? Who did he listen to?



Is not Jesus good for food also? He tells us he is;

John 6
[47] Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me hath everlasting life.
[48] I am that bread of life.
[55] For my flesh is meat indeed, and my blood is drink indeed.

All food does not mean all GOOD food!

Oh yeah...and just where are those swords of flames?

You are not even aware that those represent the angels that are always around the Lord at all times are you?

.

Wait a minute. Lets go back to the word of God as you are making God the author of confusion.

1 Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made.

So as you say, Satan is the Tree of knowledge of good and evil. The serpent was then who?

And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?

The tree, or Satan if you will speaks to no one. But the serpent does. You say the serpent is his words? So the beast of the field are others hmm....angelic beings words?

2 And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden: 3 But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.

OK, now the woman isn't speaking to the tree but speaking to the very words of the tree which is a serpent?

4 And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die: 5 For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.

Now the trees words again say to the woman (by the way why is the woman a woman if everything else is not what it appears to be, confusion)

6 And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.

According to you, this is the woman who is really a woman when nothing else is what it appears to be, considering what has been said and then believing what has been said followed by telling Adam, who probably is just another tree, and he believing it also. All while the bible teaches us that Adam wasn't deceived.

7 And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together, and made themselves aprons.

Now am I to believe that they knew that they were physically naked and they actually sewed leaves from a tree to make clothing to cover their nakedness? And God didn't really kill an animal to clothe them properly?

Eccl, your words are of the devil and I will not eat of them. You are listening to the author of confusion and are snared by him.

Ironically you need your eyes opened so that you can have the knowledge of good and evil which truly is good fruit for food.

Gary
 
Why does man make things so hard to understand?

There were (4) beings in the Garden of Eden; (1) The Lord, who was and is to this day, the Tree of Life, (2) Satan, also called a serpent by God, who was the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil, (3) Adam, and (4) Eve!

Fruit does not make one wise with knowledge and understanding. Serpents cannot talk.

Satan, who God calls a serpent, is the one that spoke to Eve. Just as Jesus is the Tree of Life, Satan is the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil. Eve ate the words of Satan, she consumed those words, thought about those words and then told those same words to Adam and he did the same.

Why is so hard to understand that eating objects sometimes repesents consuming words, when all through the bible God gives us examples?

"Ye have plowed wickedness, ye have reaped iniquity; ye have eaten the fruit of lies: because thou didst trust in thy way, in the multitude of thy mighty men."

"I am that bread of life. For my flesh is meat indeed, and my blood is drink indeed."

"And I went unto the angel, and said unto him, Give me the little book. And he said unto me, Take it, and eat it up; and it shall make thy belly bitter, but it shall be in thy mouth sweet as honey."


And again.........and just where are those swords of flames keeping the Tree of Life hid?


.
 
And again.........and just where are those swords of flames keeping the Tree of Life hid?


.


Do you work at trying not to make sense?

So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life.

It speaks of a sword not swords plural. No mention of hiding it either. Are you somehow eluding that you have information that isn't in the bible that speaks to some fact of more than one sword and those swords then being taken and hidden by God?

I have no problem with the illustrations given about words being spoken of as fruit in other portions of the bible. I just don't see any real evidence to suggest that it is true here. As I stated earlier:

Why is Adam and Eve really people and not some abstract figure when everything else is to you. In that regard why isn't God himself just figurative then? And of course those days listed in the first chapter are not really days either right? Is the whole book of Genesis figurative? Where do you quit? Maybe Jesus was just figurative? The bible just a book of stories to help people get along with each other?

When God expects us to understand something as figurative he is plain about it. You have displayed many verses speaking to the fact of Gods word being spoken of in figurative ways. Which of them was it difficult to understand that he was being figurative? Which ones were massively elaborate that required you pull complex arguments from 6 different books of the bible to understand?
 
So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life.

It speaks of a sword not swords plural. No mention of hiding it either.

I have no problem with the illustrations given about words being spoken of as fruit in other portions of the bible. I just don't see any real evidence to suggest that it is true here.

If you are taking the account in Gen. literal then why has there been no sighting of the flaming sword? With all of the systems man has today and the fact that God gave us the location of the Garden of Eden;

Gen.2
[10] And a river went out of Eden to water the garden; and from thence it was parted, and became into four heads.
[13] And the name of the second river is Gihon: the same is it that compasseth the whole land of Ethiopia.
[14] And the name of the third river is Hiddekel: that is it which goeth toward the east of Assyria. And the fourth river is Euphrates.
[15] And the LORD God took the man, and put him into the garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it.

You would think that somebody would have found the flaming sword by now!

I have no problem with the illustrations given about words being spoken of as fruit in other portions of the bible. I just don't see any real evidence to suggest that it is true here.

So even though there are many accounts of words being spoken of as others objects to consume, you would rather believe that a fruit can give knowledge and that a snake can talk rather than believing that Satan, an angel that CAN speak and has knowledge, was the one that spoke to Eve and told her lies?


.

.
 
If you are taking the account in Gen. literal then why has there been no sighting of the flaming sword? With all of the systems man has today and the fact that God gave us the location of the Garden of Eden;

Gen.2
[10] And a river went out of Eden to water the garden; and from thence it was parted, and became into four heads.
[13] And the name of the second river is Gihon: the same is it that compasseth the whole land of Ethiopia.
[14] And the name of the third river is Hiddekel: that is it which goeth toward the east of Assyria. And the fourth river is Euphrates.
[15] And the LORD God took the man, and put him into the garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it.

You would think that somebody would have found the flaming sword by now!

That is if God has told us of his every action. Did God say that he permanently placed those Cherubs and the sword to keep the way of the tree of life? Did God say that the flaming sword was visible? There is so much that we have not been told for the purpose of keeping us working within the boundaries of that which we have been told.

So even though there are many accounts of words being spoken of as others objects to consume, you would rather believe that a fruit can give knowledge and that a snake can talk rather than believing that Satan, an angel that CAN speak and has knowledge, was the one that spoke to Eve and told her lies?
.

A fruit and a snake can do whatever God enables them to do. Is anything impossible with God? Have you not read of the donkey that spoke? Peter seemed to think that it really did speak.

If I ever hear of a simple explanation from God as to why he would have me understand Genesis as figurative then I will repent and follow his teaching. Otherwise I will believe that God created all things in six literal days, a serpent actually spoke to Eve and God placed 2 Cherub and a flaming sword to keep the way of the tree of life so that man would not eat of it and live forever in his present fallen state.

I know it seems weird but I just believe what God said.
 
What a provoking debates.... Guess some people has to go back to their scriptures and re-read in between line and trust the Holy-Spirit to give them light. "For precepts must be upon precepts, line upon line, a little here, a little there, so that they may go forward and fall back. How then will the Lord speaks to this people? With stammering tongue and in an unknown language.

I see all that you guys have posted but, it seems to me that all of you are saying the same thing but in an unknown language... Some are speaking in Japanese, some in Chinese and while others in Spanish, Latins, french, and other languages. I know it can be a little confusing dwelling in the midst people of unknown tongues....all your words could be counted as a CURSE to those that are hearing you but do not understand your language........

So why can't we do it either this way or that way;

This way

1. It's either Satan slept with Eve literally or in a reality...
2. It's either the word Satan spoke incubated eve womb to be pregnant with sin and brought forth death....just as the word spoken to Mary incubated her to brought forth Christ... or it was the fruit that did that.

That way

It could be that:....
1. None of the above really existed, and they are just frictions......
2. the fruit they ate turned them into sinners..(but how could a fruit become a cancer of the blood for the whole human race, that it would take God himself to died, shed His blood, and resurrect for humanity to be save?........wondering and thinking on that.....)
3. logically, may be Satan deceived Eve to sleep with Adam before God gave commandment about that....( I can't really get the logic here..)..

Ironically, we may be missing something in this issue of eve eating or not eating....

Above all, what matters is...if you are saved, then you are saved, and if you are not, then, you need to be save. The whole emphasis now is not on Sin as it were, but on Son of God, Jesus Christ.

The sins of the whole world today is not whether they were/are born sinner or not rather, it is "Do you believed in the report that I gave concerning my Son, Jesus Christ?" if you believed, then you are save but if you are not, then, I am afraid and fear for you because, you have made God a liar just as Eve did, and God won't hold you guiltless for making Him a liar.

Blessing to all

 
Luke 6
[32] For if ye love them which love you, what thank have ye? for sinners also love those that love them.
[33] And if ye do good to them which do good to you, what thank have ye? for sinners also do even the same.
[34] And if ye lend to them of whom ye hope to receive, what thank have ye? for sinners also lend to sinners, to receive as much again.

Is not Satan a sinner! Does not Satan bless those that worship him. Does not Satan do GOOD to those that serve him?

Did not Satan make Eve wise?

Gen.3
[5] For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.
[6] And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.
[7] And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together, and made themselves aprons.

And which did they listen to to give them the knowledge of Good and Evil?

[22] And the LORD God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:

So let me get this right....you would rather believe that a fruit can give knowledge and that a snake can talk rather than believing that Satan, an angel that CAN speak and has knowledge, was the one that spoke to Eve and told her lies?

And you claim that what I and Ozell post is ludicrous?

Really?


.


Ecc

we really do have people believing that fruit can make them wise.

all we can do is ask them to go down to the local grocery and get a bushel of fruit and have there children eat it and see what happens.

or we can send our children to school or bible study and see which one becomes knowledgeable and wise.

then and only then will we find out who understand Genesis 3 and who pretends.
 
Why does man make things so hard to understand?

There were (4) beings in the Garden of Eden; (1) The Lord, who was and is to this day, the Tree of Life, (2) Satan, also called a serpent by God, who was the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil, (3) Adam, and (4) Eve!

Fruit does not make one wise with knowledge and understanding. Serpents cannot talk.

Satan, who God calls a serpent, is the one that spoke to Eve. Just as Jesus is the Tree of Life, Satan is the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil. Eve ate the words of Satan, she consumed those words, thought about those words and then told those same words to Adam and he did the same.

Why is so hard to understand that eating objects sometimes repesents consuming words, when all through the bible God gives us examples?

"Ye have plowed wickedness, ye have reaped iniquity; ye have eaten the fruit of lies: because thou didst trust in thy way, in the multitude of thy mighty men."

"I am that bread of life. For my flesh is meat indeed, and my blood is drink indeed."

"And I went unto the angel, and said unto him, Give me the little book. And he said unto me, Take it, and eat it up; and it shall make thy belly bitter, but it shall be in thy mouth sweet as honey."


And again.........and just where are those swords of flames keeping the Tree of Life hid?


.


excellent observation Ecc

what you are encountering is denominational doctrine.

it was two trees in the Garden that the Lord commanded man to eat or not eat from.

Jesus singled out 2 trees

the tree of life which is Jesus
the tree of the knowledge of good and evil

this is very simple kindergarten reading and comprehension yet you are encountering the power of denominational doctrine.
 
Ecc

we really do have people believing that fruit can make them wise.

all we can do is ask them to go down to the local grocery and get a bushel of fruit and have there children eat it and see what happens.

or we can send our children to school or bible study and see which one becomes knowledgeable and wise.

then and only then will we find out who understand Genesis 3 and who pretends.

Someone should tell Naman that dipping in the Jordan river cannot cure leprosy. Or Jesus that spitting on clay and smearing it on a guys face can't cure blindness. Or that water cannot be walked on. Maybe you should tell God that he cannot make fruit that will give one the knowledge of good and evil. You act as if God has never or will never do anything miraculous for his own purpose. Or is it only the denominationalists who believe in the miraculous power of God?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top