Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!
  • Welcome to Talk Jesus Christian Forums

    Celebrating 20 Years!

    A bible based, Jesus Christ centered community.

    Register Log In

Greetings Brothers and Sisters in Christ

Mr Scripture

Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2011
Messages
2
I have been un-churched for over a year and in that time I have become a Bible only Christian. I see it like this... scripture over doctrine because scripture is the Word of God and doctrine is the invention of man.

Your thoughts?
 
Hello Mr Scriptures,

Sorry no thoughts at the moment but just a warm welcome to TJ. May you be encouraged and blessed here.

Blessings,
Snowrose
 
Attempt at an answer

"I have been un-churched for over a year and in that time I have become a Bible only Christian. I see it like this... scripture over doctrine because scripture is the Word of God and doctrine is the invention of man."

You are right in using the Bible as the primary tool. It is God's record for mankind of HIS perfect plan, for the reconcilliation of man to God.
I would not know Jesus without the Bible.

It also has to be said that without the Holy Spirit an understanding of what the Bible actually says is fraught with peril.

Doctrine is man's attempt to collect scriptural passages to support a theme. Say for example, the diety of Christ. This is a clear and undeniable doctrine of the New Testament. In this case the methodology of doctrine formation is correct.

Now holding to this methodology and keeping the KISS (keep it simple stupid) principle in mind, there are some more doctrines that are rightly doctrines.

But, it may also be said that remaining meek (teachable) while reading the Bible is also invaluable.

So doctrines are necessary to guard against heresy. Further, try to keep the number of doctrines to a minimal level. This avoids strolling into theology. In theology, everthing becomes blurred, as each school exerts its influence. Man in this case cannot resist distorting the Word of God. Which church history is full to the brim of.

Yes you are on the right track. Others will no doubt know much more than I.
 
Welcome MS,
There happens to be flaws in 'your' doctrine,
Luk 4:32And they were astonished at his doctrine: for his word was with power.Jhn 7:16Jesus answered them, and said, My doctrine is not mine, but his that sent me.Jhn 7:17If any man will do his will, he shall know of the doctrine, whether it be of God, or [whether] I speak of myself.
Really, because if it is mans word would it be in the Bible 51 TIMES. Yoo reject Gods Authority for your own,
Hbr 10:25Not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as the manner of some [is]; but exhorting [one another]: and so much the more, as ye see the day approaching.


If actually interested in the truth, respond to my visitor section
 
Last edited:
I have been un-churched for over a year and in that time I have become a Bible only Christian. I see it like this... scripture over doctrine because scripture is the Word of God and doctrine is the invention of man.

Your thoughts?

It is beneficial to gather with other believers from time to time but this can be done outside of religious liturgy. My wife and I stopped participating in religious liturgical meetings several years ago. I too, like to study the scriptures for myself and have found some religious doctrines to be errant.

Welcome to TJ Mr Scripture, look forward to discussing scriptures with you.
 
"I have been un-churched for over a year and in that time I have become a Bible only Christian. I see it like this... scripture over doctrine because scripture is the Word of God and doctrine is the invention of man."

You are right in using the Bible as the primary tool. It is God's record for mankind of HIS perfect plan, for the reconcilliation of man to God.
I would not know Jesus without the Bible.

It also has to be said that without the Holy Spirit an understanding of what the Bible actually says is fraught with peril.

Doctrine is man's attempt to collect scriptural passages to support a theme. Say for example, the diety of Christ. This is a clear and undeniable doctrine of the New Testament. In this case the methodology of doctrine formation is correct.

Now holding to this methodology and keeping the KISS (keep it simple stupid) principle in mind, there are some more doctrines that are rightly doctrines.

But, it may also be said that remaining meek (teachable) while reading the Bible is also invaluable.

So doctrines are necessary to guard against heresy. Further, try to keep the number of doctrines to a minimal level. This avoids strolling into theology. In theology, everthing becomes blurred, as each school exerts its influence. Man in this case cannot resist distorting the Word of God. Which church history is full to the brim of.

Yes you are on the right track. Others will no doubt know much more than I.

Very nice post David.
 
Why thankyou Sir

I can see by the number of posts you have made that you no doubt have defended Christianity on many occassions. I do appreciate your comment. We celebrate Jesus Christ.
 
Back
Top