Hi,
I have been reading and talking with people about certain topics discussed here on TJ and it has upset that people refuse to "come all the way" and explain and prove their views from scripture in a way you could agree with them in the light of the bible. Unfortunately this is not often so. Many people seem to be just interested in showing their view about a topic and I think this is ok but when they want to argue without waterproof scripture evidence. it really upsets me.
Sometimes I ask people how do they know this is like they say and there is never no answer and always when I ask for evidence the people leave just so they can come back with their view thats not yet disproven.
Whats up with this?
Why do people claim things true when challanged they cannot prove it all the way? and rather leave their view partially a mystery even to them self and yet preach it again!
I dont understand. I think most depates have people who dont claim to know but argue anyway for their perhaps merely potential view but not about something they can prove. I dont judge, i think it just creates a lot of debates around here. Good thing about TJ has requirement to backup what you say with scripture although many people dont seem to be interested in scripture but rather what they feel is right in the first place. But thats a whole another story.
What do you think? Shouldnt post be backed up with scripture more?
I have been reading and talking with people about certain topics discussed here on TJ and it has upset that people refuse to "come all the way" and explain and prove their views from scripture in a way you could agree with them in the light of the bible. Unfortunately this is not often so. Many people seem to be just interested in showing their view about a topic and I think this is ok but when they want to argue without waterproof scripture evidence. it really upsets me.
Sometimes I ask people how do they know this is like they say and there is never no answer and always when I ask for evidence the people leave just so they can come back with their view thats not yet disproven.
Whats up with this?
Why do people claim things true when challanged they cannot prove it all the way? and rather leave their view partially a mystery even to them self and yet preach it again!
I dont understand. I think most depates have people who dont claim to know but argue anyway for their perhaps merely potential view but not about something they can prove. I dont judge, i think it just creates a lot of debates around here. Good thing about TJ has requirement to backup what you say with scripture although many people dont seem to be interested in scripture but rather what they feel is right in the first place. But thats a whole another story.
What do you think? Shouldnt post be backed up with scripture more?
Last edited: