rjones
Member
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2007
- Messages
- 314
I'm studying about the differences between the tabernacle of Moses and the tabernacle of David. I'm finding some amazing stuff. I'd love to have some imput from anyone who has wisdom on this subject.
Here's some of my findings:
The tabernacle of David was a tent, just like the tabernacle of Moses, erected to serve as a place of worship. But while the tabernacle of Moses remained at Gibeon, with all the articles of furniture (except the Ark of the Covenant itself), the tabernacle of David was on Mount Zion. It had none of the other furniture - only the Ark. And unlike Moses' tabernacle, it did not have three compartments - the Outer Court, the Holy Place and the Holiest of All (where the Ark was supposed to be placed). It had only one compartment, the Holiest of All! Yet people flowed in and out of David's tabernacle around the clock to worship before the Lord (2 Sa. 6:1-23; 1 Chr.13:1-14; 15:1-16:43).
The Ark of the Covenant had been removed from the Tabernacle of Moses many years previously. When Israel was losing in a battle with the Philistines, they had brought the Ark from the Tabernacle into their midst, believing, superstitiously, that its presence would give them victory. However, they were miserably defeated and the Ark was taken captive into Philistine territory and put into the temple of Dagon. The Philistines, however, soon sent it back into the land of Israel because of the judgments that began to come upon them. It ended up in a house in the border town of Kiriath Jearim, and remained there for 20 years, until David became king of all Israel. Read the full account in (1 Sa. 4 to 7).
Both the golden candlestick and the table of shewbread were conspicuously absent. Why?
"And they brought in the ark of the LORD, and set it in his place, in the midst of the tabernacle that David had pitched for it: AND DAVID OFFERED BURNT OFFERINGS AND PEACE OFFERINGS BEFORE THE LORD" (2Sa. 6:17).
Offering burnt offerings and peace offerings was the priest's function. Saul did it in impatience and fear, and his action of usurping the priestly office led to his loss of the kingdom as prophesied by Samuel (I Sa. 13:13,14).
David did it and was not chastised at all. Why?
In Acts 15 the early Church was discussing what New Testament worship was supposed to look like. James answers this question by quoting from (Amos 9:11-12) and states that the Mosaic order has passed and the Davidic order of worship is the pattern for New Testament believers.
Here's some of my findings:
The tabernacle of David was a tent, just like the tabernacle of Moses, erected to serve as a place of worship. But while the tabernacle of Moses remained at Gibeon, with all the articles of furniture (except the Ark of the Covenant itself), the tabernacle of David was on Mount Zion. It had none of the other furniture - only the Ark. And unlike Moses' tabernacle, it did not have three compartments - the Outer Court, the Holy Place and the Holiest of All (where the Ark was supposed to be placed). It had only one compartment, the Holiest of All! Yet people flowed in and out of David's tabernacle around the clock to worship before the Lord (2 Sa. 6:1-23; 1 Chr.13:1-14; 15:1-16:43).
The Ark of the Covenant had been removed from the Tabernacle of Moses many years previously. When Israel was losing in a battle with the Philistines, they had brought the Ark from the Tabernacle into their midst, believing, superstitiously, that its presence would give them victory. However, they were miserably defeated and the Ark was taken captive into Philistine territory and put into the temple of Dagon. The Philistines, however, soon sent it back into the land of Israel because of the judgments that began to come upon them. It ended up in a house in the border town of Kiriath Jearim, and remained there for 20 years, until David became king of all Israel. Read the full account in (1 Sa. 4 to 7).
Both the golden candlestick and the table of shewbread were conspicuously absent. Why?
"And they brought in the ark of the LORD, and set it in his place, in the midst of the tabernacle that David had pitched for it: AND DAVID OFFERED BURNT OFFERINGS AND PEACE OFFERINGS BEFORE THE LORD" (2Sa. 6:17).
Offering burnt offerings and peace offerings was the priest's function. Saul did it in impatience and fear, and his action of usurping the priestly office led to his loss of the kingdom as prophesied by Samuel (I Sa. 13:13,14).
David did it and was not chastised at all. Why?
In Acts 15 the early Church was discussing what New Testament worship was supposed to look like. James answers this question by quoting from (Amos 9:11-12) and states that the Mosaic order has passed and the Davidic order of worship is the pattern for New Testament believers.