DHC
Member
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2013
- Messages
- 1,002
It's not me saying these scriptures=it's Jesus, the sole authority of the Bible and it's writings.
It is not legalistic to obey God's Law.
Legalism usually applies to the strict traditions of men strictly for ceremonial sake.We don't want to be like the Pharisees Jesus warned.
If you do actions that violate the 10 Commandments you will not be saved Paul said under the New Covenant- 1 Cor 6:9-10
I know we are saved by God's grace but how do you apply God's laws which defines the standards of righteousness to your life?
If keeping the 10 Commandments is legalism then God's descriptions of His church and saints is wrong- " Here is the patience of the saints:here are they that keep the Commandments..." Rev 14:12
If anybody is legalistic it would be those that keep the commandments and traditions of men like easter and christmas.
Hello Judge not.
You said. "It is not legalistic to obey God's Law".
Legalism is the belief that obedience to the law is the fundamental requirement of God for His followers. That not breaking the law in the flesh is
what Godliness actually means. If you obey the ten commandments as a lifestyle then you are saved. A simple benchmark of laws established by God,
failure to obey them is the distinction between the true believers and the false believers. To obey Jesus is to obey the ten commandments.
There does arise a very serious problem on a number of levels with this legalistic interpretation.
When Paul lists the deeds of the flesh, or sins of the flesh, it is immediately evident that Paul is identifying sin which the law does not mention.
Paul categorizes sin which have no basis within the framework of the law. For example "outbursts of anger", there is not a literal, specific law
against anger in the Ten words. Well how does the legalistic deal with this shortfall in the law? Well, by expanding the literal interpretation of
the ten commandments into a much broader definition of the law.
So the legalist will choose the law "You shall not murder". Anger then will be seen to be covered simply by the stretching of this commandment.
In fact the legalist will quote;
Matthew 5:21-22
You have heard that the ancients were told, You shall not commit murder...
But I say to you that everyone who is angry with his brother shall be guilty...
Here is the critical problem we have, is Jesus expanding the very law itself or is Jesus going beneath the law and exposing the corrupt flesh of man?
Is Jesus really preaching obedience to the expanded law or is Jesus announcing that the flesh of mankind is deeply flawed.
So deeply flawed that the flesh is never able to obey any law. These two alternate views on the purpose of the law in the
Christian life is the gulf that separates many churches. A theological war between these two views started early in church history
and is still being fought today. A fascinating division between two sides and make no mistake, there is only one correct view.