By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!Cone back when you're ready to address your false premise
Same old, same old.....
Exactly God is not a man as usGOD has never been born again.
Ostrich syndrome:You are both guilty of the below:
Ostrich syndrome:
Ostrich syndrome:
"Ostrich syndrome," also known as the "ostrich effect," is a cognitive bias where individuals avoid potentially negative or unpleasant information, often by pretending it doesn't exist or ignoring it, much like the myth of an ostrich burying its head in the sand.
OS is now known as the COGNITIVE DISSONANCE that you suffer from.
What sort of grain do ostriches eat?
How are you going to argue the point when you don't know the premise? Come back when you're willing to address your false premise.It is addressed. The premise is that with a non-trinitarian mindset, God would be evil and unjust for sending Jesus to the cross for sins He did not commit. You simply move the goal posts by stating ''God did not send Him, God did not punish Him', and I have shown you this. You are nothing more than a wilfully ignorant troll on this topic.
You are both guilty of the below:
Ostrich syndrome:
"Ostrich syndrome," also known as the "ostrich effect," is a cognitive bias where individuals avoid potentially negative or unpleasant information, often by pretending it doesn't exist or ignoring it, much like the myth of an ostrich burying its head in the sand.
Wilful ignorance:
The deliberate decision to remain uninformed or to avoid acknowledging facts, evidence, or reality, even when one has the ability to know or understand them. It often involves intentionally avoiding knowledge in order to maintain a comfortable belief, avoid responsibility, or escape inconvenient truths. Essentially, it’s choosing not to know something when you could easily learn it.
You really should stop while you're behind. I'm embarrassed for you. What you stated above is not the premise. It's the argument. The premise is what the argument is based on.It is addressed. The premise is that with a non-trinitarian mindset, God would be evil and unjust for sending Jesus to the cross for sins He did not commit. You simply move the goal posts by stating ''God did not send Him, God did not punish Him', and I have shown you this. You are nothing more than a wilfully ignorant troll on this topic.
You're like an old record stuck in a groove and always failing to have he last word.You are not guilty of OS because you say it? I am guilty because you merely say I am?
To prove you are not guilty of it, answer my accusations directed at your belief (IE not my belief) in post # 22. (More OS and WI incoming?)
You have a cognitive bias and are avoiding the unpleasant truth of your belief by pretending my post and accusations don't exist / you are ignoring them. Your and @Butch5's posts in this thread are both brilliant case studies for OS.![]()