Join Us Today!

Join our non-denominational community with 10,000+ members and more than 50,000 monthly visitors today. Engage in bible discussions, studies, prayer support and friendly fellowship.

Skeptic's Instructions for Reading

Discussion in 'Evidence & Prophecy' started by Chad, Dec 15, 2007.

Random Thread
  1. Skeptic's Instructions for Reading the Bible
    • Always read it completely literally in isolation and never take into account the social, historical, literary and cultural context in which it was written.
    • Have a wrong concept of how God should have done things and then throw the rattle out of the pram when he does things differently - this is otherwise known as setting up a straw man and then knocking him down.
    • Assume that God dictated it rather than using men in the social, historical and cultural context of the day.
    • If there is a difficult passage never consult a commentary written by someone who understands the social, historical, literary and cultural context.
    • Never compare scripture with scripture to find the meaning of difficult texts
    • Never use different bible versions, never check out the Greek or Hebrew.
    • Always assume that if you cannot understand something then it cannot ever be true.
    • Ignore the fact of progressive revelation
    • Never try to understand the human-divine nature of Jesus or the Trinity, never consult a theologian who can explain these difficult things.
    Mistakes the critics make by Norman Geisler.

    Norman Geisler in 'When Critics Ask' says: The Bible is without mistake, but the critics are not. All their allegations of error in the Bible are based on some error of their own. Their mistakes fall into the following main categories.
    1. Assuming that the unexplained is not explainable
    2. Presuming the Bible guilty until proven innocent
    3. Confusing our fallible interpretations with God's infallible revelation
    4. Failing to understand the context of the passage.
    5. Neglecting to interpret difficult passages in the light of clear ones
    6. Basing a teaching on an obscure passage
    7. Forgetting that the Bible is a human book with human characteristics
    8. Assuming that a partial report is a false report
    9. Demanding that NT citations of the OT always be exact quotations
    10. Assuming that divergent accounts are false ones
    11. Presuming that the Bible approves of all its records
    12. Forgetting that the Bible uses non-technical, everyday language
    13. Assuming that round numbers are false
    14. Neglecting to note that the bible uses different literary devices
    15. Forgetting that only the original text, not every copy of scripture, is without error
    16. Confusing general statements with universal ones
    17. Forgetting that latter revelation supersedes previous revelation
    apocalipsis.org
     
  2. Thanks for sharing Chad, it was a good read.

    God bless
     
  3. Sorry but isn't this a bit harsh and stereotypical
     
  4. Grace and peace,

    The bible is the book of the heart.
    It will read as the heart reads.
    Since JESUS is LOVE, if love is not in the heart, then the BIBLE will be a very difficult read!
    Blessed are the pure at heart!

    GOD BLESS US ALL!!
     
  5. A Little Confused

    Hello, I am a skeptic and am here to be convinced. Why is it that I should forget prior historical knowledge, others opinions, and my own previous opinions in order to understand the Bible? Thank you for helping.
     

Share This Page

Users Who Have Read This Thread (Total: 0)