Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!
  • Welcome to Talk Jesus Christian Forums

    Celebrating 20 Years!

    A bible based, Jesus Christ centered community.

    Register Log In

Scripture about if Animals have sentience ?.

Sebastian

Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2015
Messages
95
I'm looking into if the Bible says Animals have sentience or not. I'm anticipating to review that the Scriptures says they are not, since ((and I'm not 100 about this yet)) the Bible teaches Animals aren't possessed by souls, and because I believe it takes a soul to be sentient(?), - because otherwise Beings in question is "just Dirt"(Earth (Matter (Stuff, u know))), - no "Breath of Life" in'em. Very interested about this :D - heavy stuff u know. idno.. cheers.

Thank you.

((I will get back with results from my research.))

.
 
I'm looking into if the Bible says Animals have sentience or not. I'm anticipating to review that the Scriptures says they are not, since ((and I'm not 100 about this yet)) the Bible teaches Animals aren't possessed by souls, and because I believe it takes a soul to be sentient(?), - because otherwise Beings in question is "just Dirt"(Earth (Matter (Stuff, u know))), - no "Breath of Life" in'em. Very interested about this :D - heavy stuff u know. idno.. cheers.

Thank you.

((I will get back with results from my research.))

.

UM That would be rather obvious... You may or may not find verses to this subject. The bible is the 'owners manual' for people. How does sentience of animals affect our life or salvation? How is it important to yours? Simply put...Don't you have important things to think about?
sentient

[sen-shuh nt]


adjective
1.
having the power of perception by the senses; conscious.
2.
characterized by sensation and consciousness.
noun
3.
a person or thing that is sentient.
4.
Archaic. the conscious mind.
 
I'm looking into if the Bible says Animals have sentience or not. I'm anticipating to review that the Scriptures says they are not, since ((and I'm not 100 about this yet)) the Bible teaches Animals aren't possessed by souls, and because I believe it takes a soul to be sentient(?), - because otherwise Beings in question is "just Dirt"(Earth (Matter (Stuff, u know))), - no "Breath of Life" in'em. Very interested about this :D - heavy stuff u know. idno.. cheers.

Thank you.

((I will get back with results from my research.))

.

In the sense chosen by eastern religions like Hinduism and Buddhism, and animal welfare advocates, the Bible doesn't support whatever might be construed as sentience in animals would matter to God as far as man should be concerned about. God gave the animal kingdom to man for food and clothing materials, as well as for sacrificial purposes. There being no discussion about that in the Bible, other than a talking serpent or donkey by direct manipulation from God or influence of Satan, makes the issue one of curiosity rather than substantive for us.

Taking sentience in animals too far has a lot of adverse consequences for an orderly, productive human existence. Many are qualifying animals as sentient because they suffer pain and hunger, so every ant on the planet would be a candidate for protection from the shoe soles of people. Jesus caught,cooked, and ate fish, to the dismay of animal rights people. They will bombard a Christian forum with accusations of hypocrisy for eating animal flesh. Well, Paul wrote by direction of the Holy Spirit that all foods are approved, along with thanksgiving for it.

The issue has become one of deep division, perilous anti-Christian sentiments. For us it is believe the scriptures as truth. For them the scriptures are advice from non-scientific goat herders, and would eliminate every Bible for the sake of one worm in the ground.

Animals realistically have enough sensory capability to react to stimulus similarly to humans sometimes, so some humans think that makes them equal conscious beings. God made a commonly held sense of smell, that sense had through a variety of means. Whatever the sense, like hunger, enables all life to initiate search for nutrition. That doesn't make a dog as conscious as a human, or resemble us at all since man can choose to remain hungry with food all around us, fasting for some subjective factor. Animals are not wired that way. They can't choose to go hungry for any reason, unable to reason why that might be beneficial.
 
In the sense chosen by eastern religions like Hinduism and Buddhism, and animal welfare advocates, the Bible doesn't support whatever might be construed as sentience in animals would matter to God as far as man should be concerned about. God gave the animal kingdom to man for food and clothing materials, as well as for sacrificial purposes. There being no discussion about that in the Bible, other than a talking serpent or donkey by direct manipulation from God or influence of Satan, makes the issue one of curiosity rather than substantive for us.

Taking sentience in animals too far has a lot of adverse consequences for an orderly, productive human existence. Many are qualifying animals as sentient because they suffer pain and hunger, so every ant on the planet would be a candidate for protection from the shoe soles of people. Jesus caught,cooked, and ate fish, to the dismay of animal rights people. They will bombard a Christian forum with accusations of hypocrisy for eating animal flesh. Well, Paul wrote by direction of the Holy Spirit that all foods are approved, along with thanksgiving for it.

The issue has become one of deep division, perilous anti-Christian sentiments. For us it is believe the scriptures as truth. For them the scriptures are advice from non-scientific goat herders, and would eliminate every Bible for the sake of one worm in the ground.

Animals realistically have enough sensory capability to react to stimulus similarly to humans sometimes, so some humans think that makes them equal conscious beings. God made a commonly held sense of smell, that sense had through a variety of means. Whatever the sense, like hunger, enables all life to initiate search for nutrition. That doesn't make a dog as conscious as a human, or resemble us at all since man can choose to remain hungry with food all around us, fasting for some subjective factor. Animals are not wired that way. They can't choose to go hungry for any reason, unable to reason why that might be beneficial.

Interesting yes, but still irrelevant to our salvation What would you say to looking into all the ramifications so our salvation. What all does it cover? How does it affect you? How does the fact that you are saved impact those around you?
 
Interesting yes, but still irrelevant to our salvation What would you say to looking into all the ramifications so our salvation. What all does it cover? How does it affect you? How does the fact that you are saved impact those around you?

Well, start your own thread about that, putting less time into responding to existing threads. I find it difficult to make time to tend to my own thread, so don't post them until I am no longer running this business. I mange to reply here and there, whatever free time growing being spent in local ministry.
 
Interesting yes, but still irrelevant to our salvation What would you say to looking into all the ramifications so our salvation. What all does it cover? How does it affect you? How does the fact that you are saved impact those around you?

As already explained, the OP is a topic being used world-wide to attack the Bible, putting Christians under a lot of pressure to conform to world views. I answer such things to present truth to such people who seek to discourage us. Many yield to that kind of persecution even though never encountering it in person where they live, forsaking whatever little belief they had. Why evangelize for new believers, then leave them to destruction from the wolves?
 
In the sense chosen by eastern religions like Hinduism and Buddhism, and animal welfare advocates, the Bible doesn't support whatever might be construed as sentience in animals would matter to God as far as man should be concerned about. God gave the animal kingdom to man for food and clothing materials, as well as for sacrificial purposes. There being no discussion about that in the Bible, other than a talking serpent or donkey by direct manipulation from God or influence of Satan, makes the issue one of curiosity rather than substantive for us.

I appreciate your sight on this.



Taking sentience in animals too far has a lot of adverse consequences for an orderly, productive human existence. Many are qualifying animals as sentient because they suffer pain and hunger, so every ant on the planet would be a candidate for protection from the shoe soles of people. Jesus caught,cooked, and ate fish, to the dismay of animal rights people. They will bombard a Christian forum with accusations of hypocrisy for eating animal flesh. Well, Paul wrote by direction of the Holy Spirit that all foods are approved, along with thanksgiving for it.

The issue has become one of deep division, perilous anti-Christian sentiments. For us it is believe the scriptures as truth. For them the scriptures are advice from non-scientific goat herders, and would eliminate every Bible for the sake of one worm in the ground.

Animals realistically have enough sensory capability to react to stimulus similarly to humans sometimes, so some humans think that makes them equal conscious beings. God made a commonly held sense of smell, that sense had through a variety of means. Whatever the sense, like hunger, enables all life to initiate search for nutrition. That doesn't make a dog as conscious as a human, or resemble us at all since man can choose to remain hungry with food all around us, fasting for some subjective factor. Animals are not wired that way. They can't choose to go hungry for any reason, unable to reason why that might be beneficial.

The quoted just here above is, according to my sense of things, completely irrelevant to the topic at hand: But then again; - I am particularly strict about what I deem to be off-topic.
Nevertheless: I appreciate if the writers in this thread will keep to Scripture, and if own interpretations, or comments, or anything else is wanted to be added on-top (derived) out of the Verses, then do keep it close to the Scripture "thought upon". In other words; only Scriptures -please-, and if you want to give your own thoughts "out-of" or based on the Scriptures then please do keep it close or consistent to the Word. (no extensive extravagations please),


Exception to what I wrote above: The statement which is bold and underlined might be of interest to my "research about this". I shall appreciate if anyone tells me where I can read "that" (that God made a commonly held sense of smell). Thank you in advance. :)
 
I appreciate your sight on this.

The quoted just here above is, according to my sense of things, completely irrelevant to the topic at hand: But then again; - I am particularly strict about what I deem to be off-topic.
Nevertheless: I appreciate if the writers in this thread will keep to Scripture, and if own interpretations, or comments, or anything else is wanted to be added on-top (derived) out of the Verses, then do keep it close to the Scripture "thought upon". In other words; only Scriptures -please-, and if you want to give your own thoughts "out-of" or based on the Scriptures then please do keep it close or consistent to the Word. (no extensive extravagations please),


Exception to what I wrote above: The statement which is bold and underlined might be of interest to my "research about this". I shall appreciate if anyone tells me where I can read "that" (that God made a commonly held sense of smell). Thank you in advance. :)

At peril of continuing off topic, we read in Genesis 1:24-25 (KJV)
24 And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so.
25 And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good.


He made them to reproduce after the kind he made. Evolution was not necessary. If they evolved, then they couldn't reproduce after the kind that God made. So, science finds olfactory senses in animals are based on much the same process of neuro-transmission of data from volatile organic molecules to the brain. The main difference among animals is sensitivity, some detecting an odor from nearly 20 miles away, like bears. Others rely more on other senses, like bats. Those that depend on the sense of smell have benefited well from it.

God said what he made was "good" about the animals, in other words, complete, not needing improvement.

Back on topic, you are guessing rightly about animals having no "soul" like a human, made by God a living soul. We know from that the animals received no such soul. They are organic creatures, many enabled to breathe the same air humans breathe. They were not made to resemble God, but have many of the same design features shared by humans that God found....good. You will find a general account of creation in chapter 1 covering all 6 days, then a more focused whole chapter 2 covering mainly man's beginning and of the first woman on that one day of creation.

 
I appreciate your sight on this.


The quoted just here above is, according to my sense of things, completely irrelevant to the topic at hand: But then again; - I am particularly strict about what I deem to be off-topic.
Nevertheless: I appreciate if the writers in this thread will keep to Scripture, and if own interpretations, or comments, or anything else is wanted to be added on-top (derived) out of the Verses, then do keep it close to the Scripture "thought upon". In other words; only Scriptures -please-, and if you want to give your own thoughts "out-of" or based on the Scriptures then please do keep it close or consistent to the Word. (no extensive extravagations please),

In an effort explain that I was in fact very much on topic and making a relevant statement to the OP, it's necessary to point out that you have found your way to a Christian forum. We are not a science/animal/psychology forum. Your interest is what God has to say about things, so I'm using some science to link a psychological term to spiritual terms. The OP topic is, as you might not be aware, a hot topic in Christian forums, used by many objectors to Christianity to distract many. The issue is directly related to a wide discussion of why Christians don't generally support animal rights groups which tend to desire a cessation of humanity to save the world. I'm not saying yu are part of that, but your question is in that category on any Christian forum unless it hosts a science section focusing on science.

From a Christian perspective the balance of that post is certainly applicable to our overall mission.
 
So after about 2-3 hours of looking into this I have come to the conclusion that it will take far too long for me to find out if the Bible says anything "meaty"("substantial") about this at-hand. Due to a variety of reasons; ranging from that I would have to weigh carefully how God relates to animals in different situations (to try to read into if God's decisions etc seem to weigh in 'animal sentience' or if God's decisions etc seem to be in accordance with animals not being sentient), to going to Hebrew and Greek "language-roots" for linguistic accuracy etc, to this that and the other.

Well one thing I found out was that the word 'Soul' is seemingly not the right one to use here ("Spirit" is). According to definitions I found - two of them quoted here below:

1:

The word “spirit” in both the Hebrew (ruwach and neshamah) and the Greek (pneuma) literally means “wind.”
Soul in the Hebrew (nephesh) and the Greek (psuche) literally means a breathing creature, or in other words life.
2:
Soul
The Hebrew and Greek words that are translated as ‘soul’ in our Bibles are also translated many times as ‘life’ or ‘person’ or ‘anyone’ or ‘creature’. The word that is used depends very much on the Bible translation. For example, in Leviticus 4:2, the KJV has ’If a soul sin through ignorance against any of the commandments of the LORD …’, while the ESV has ‘If anyone sins unintentionally in any of the LORD’s commandments …’.

In Hebreew, the word is nephesh and means a living being. It can also apply to animals. See, for example, Genesis 1:24; 2:19; Lev 11:46.

Sometimes the word ‘soul’ might appear to refer to our inner feelings. For example, in Deuteronomy 6:5, ‘You shall love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your might.’ However, it is likely that we are reading the idea into the text because of our modern understanding of the English word “soul”. More likely, the Hebrew meant to love God with “mind, body and strength”. (In ancient Hebrew, the heart was the place of thinking.)

Interestingly, the term ‘immortal soul’ does not occur anywhere in the Bible. In fact it says in Ezekiel 18:4 that the soul is mortal — ‘The soul who sins shall die’. Nor does the Bible ever suggest that we have a soul that can exist apart from the body.

Spirit
The words that are translated as ‘spirit’ are also translated many times (in the Old Testament) as breath or wind. For example in Genesis 6:3, the LORD says, ‘My Spirit shall not abide in man forever, for he is flesh’, and in verse 17, ’I will bring a flood of waters upon the earth to destroy all flesh in which is the breath of life.’ The same Hebrew word is translated spirit in one case and breath in the other.

And so the word 'Spirit' or 'Wind' ('Ruwach'/'Neshamah') is then the right word, and not 'Soul'.



And another point I found was this following quote, which I find worthy of mention:
"17th-century Catholic philosopher René Descartes argued that animals were just like machines, and they could not feel pain because they did not have a spiritual mind (an idea that later became widely accepted)"

So I shall probably look into what René Descartes wrote about it all. However it is my firm belief that animals can't possibly be "just like machines"(-mainly due to animals fundamentally being living and machines "dead"), -and I believe Descartes were of the same mind. But now we're drifting.. What is meant is probably and hopefully that René Descartes 'made a case for' animals not possessing sentience, - which of course is the question that this thread is all about.
- So I just wanted to share that quote in case anyone might become interested and stuff, -and also to inform that I will probably return on a later occasion to give a review on René's writings referred to above here.

Lastly, after giving this a little consideration, I like to share how 'if animals doesn't have sentience' would dispel "a great contradiction between God's Loving Nature and His creation"; if I may:

So. There is seemingly a looooooot of **** going on for animals, or rather, 'in' animals: Greaaaaat sufferings here and there, immeeeeense pain, hooooorrible terrors and fear, and just, a lot and lot and lot and looot of suffering and fear taking place - a lot (seemingly). Anyone who disagrees clearly isn't well-acquainted with just how nasty and horrible it can get in nature. Excruciating pain for hours or days, slooow deaths, extreme fear or even terror, - and that's only some aspects of the dread. Basically: Unarguably a loooot of ****. - And don't get me wrong; I don't hold the typical western view that animal life is almost solely a fight for survival and a life of hardship and stuff; -I'm quite the opposite,,, but nevertheless; there is still aaaa loooooooot of suffering and **** going on -seemingly.

- And how can such an immense degree of pain and suffering coincide with God's Great Benevolant and Loving Nature? Doesn't add up. Why have all that horrible suffering and pain? I mean, humans we have pain and stuff because humans chose and are choosing to sin and stuff you know,,, but,,,,, Animals? Why do They get to seemingly suffer to such a 'worthy-of-a-billion-tears' extent? It's a hard one... But there are actually one or two, maybe three (to me atm), answers to that dilemma - and 'animals having no sentience' is one of the "possible realities" which would dispel 'That Great Contradiction'. (Another one being that the principle "As Above So Below" being real, and God deeming it right for all bad to exist because it includes/enables it's counter-opposite good etc etc etc.. - but that's highly off-topic and irrelevant to this topic.).

Over. Thank You.
 
... In other words; only Scriptures -please-, and if you want to give your own thoughts "out-of" or based on the Scriptures then please do keep it close or consistent to the Word. (no extensive extravagations please)...


Lastly, after giving this a little consideration, I like to share how 'if animals doesn't have sentience' would dispel "a great contradiction between God's Loving Nature and His creation"; if I may:

So. There is seemingly a looooooot of **** going on for animals, or rather, 'in' animals: Greaaaaat sufferings here and there, immeeeeense pain, hooooorrible terrors and fear, and just, a lot and lot and lot and looot of suffering and fear taking place - a lot (seemingly). Anyone who disagrees clearly isn't well-acquainted with just how nasty and horrible it can get in nature. Excruciating pain for hours or days, slooow deaths, extreme fear or even terror, - and that's only some aspects of the dread. Basically:Unarguably a loooot of ****. - And don't get me wrong; I don't hold the typical western view that animal life is almost solely a fight for survival and a life of hardship and stuff; -I'm quite the opposite,,, but nevertheless; there is still aaaa loooooooot of suffering and **** going on -seemingly.

- And how can such an immense degree of pain and suffering coincide with God's Great Benevolant and Loving Nature? Doesn't add up. Why have all that horrible suffering and pain? I mean, humans we have pain and stuff because humans chose and are choosing to sin and stuff you know,,, but,,,,, Animals? Why do They get to seemingly suffer to such a 'worthy-of-a-billion-tears' extent? It's a hard one... But there are actually one or two, maybe three (to me atm), answers to that dilemma - and 'animals having no sentience' is one of the "possible realities" which would dispel 'That Great Contradiction'. (Another one being that the principle "As Above So Below" being real, and God deeming it right for all bad to exist because it includes/enables it's counter-opposite good etc etc etc.. - but that's highly off-topic and irrelevant to this topic.).

LOL
 
There was a serpent in the garden, that talked to Eve.
There was a dove that spoke when Jesus was baptized.
Balaam's donkey asked him why he hit him three times.
A fish swallowed Jonah at exactly the right moment, and "spat" him out at exactly the right place.

Some say the animals walked into the ark on their own accord, others say they were herded in.
What does any of this prove? Did the animals have intelligence, or was it the power of God (perhaps also Satan in some cases)
causing these things to happen?
 
1 Thessalonians 5:23 (KJV) And the very God of peace sanctify you wholly; and I pray God your whole spirit and soul and body be preserved blameless unto the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.

Transliterations:
spirit is from Gr. pneuma
soul is from Gr. psyche
body is from Gr. soma

Animals came before man, not said to have had life breathed in, and have been doing that ever since. They are simply living bodies, not made living souls.
Animals were created by speaking to the waters to bring them forth, not being formed by God of the dust of the ground as was Adam. Right away he was capable of comprehending God, communicating, performng tasks in cooperation with God. The animals were eating and reproducing before Adam existed.


A human is an eternal spirit, possessing a sentient awareness (mind for logic/reason, will, emotions, memory, conscience, etc., living in an organic body made alive by that initial breathed blast of air.

The Hebrew word translated soul in Gen 2:7 is transliterated "nepesh", in the KJV version used as soul 475 times, life 117 times, person 29 times, mind 15 times.

The spirit of man is mentioned in the OT (Heb. ruah) used as spirit 232 times, wind 92 times, breath 27 times.
We already know that can't mean the breathing of flesh bodies, but means the breath of God in a man, not merely air by a body. A good reference to it is
Zechariah 12:1 (KJV) The burden of the word of the LORD for Israel, saith the LORD, which stretcheth forth the heavens, and layeth the foundation of the earth, and formeth the spirit of man within him.
and Proverbs 20:27 (KJV) The spirit of man is the candle of the LORD, searching all the inward parts of the belly.

The man was made far superior to animals, having been given dominion over them, that is, to subdue all earth and rule over the animals.

That's the shortest explanation I thought useful.
 
There was a serpent in the garden, that talked to Eve.
There was a dove that spoke when Jesus was baptizedBalaam's donkey asked him why he hit him three times.
A fish swallowed Jonah at exactly the right moment, and "spat" him out at exactly the right place.

Some say the animals walked into the ark on their own accord, others say they were herded in.
What does any of this prove? Did the animals have intelligence, or was it the power of God (perhaps also Satan in some cases)
causing these things to happen?

Just clarifying for the thread; sentience does not mean 'intelligence', oor, 'cognitive capability/functioning', ooor,, 'mental ability' etc etc etc as the poster above here thought. Sentience, while the word probably have some more narrow definitions (probably due to it's meaning being quite tricky to point out & grasp etc), basically means 'awareness'. - Not awareness in the sense of it's intellectual "version" (I'm well aware of the situation, or, I'm aware of why u did that bro), but awareness in it's widest scope possible; entailing all forms of, -hmm, what word to use as a synonym,,, -entailing all forms of experience (sounds, colours, perceived dreams and thoughts, feelings, felt attitudes, tastes, bodily sensations, etc etc etc all forms of experience/sentience/sensation/awareness). -Like for example a part of your sentience right now is hearing the voice in your head reading these words, the 'sight-experience' of these black shapes (letters) surrounded by white space, maybe there's a desk being seen also, sounds happening -maybe hearing the fan of the computer, how the body feels, etc etc etc etc... I hope that clarifies what sentience means in this thread.
(And a last note, which for some obscure reason might become useful: For example robots, with lenses for eyes, and microphones for ears, and this that and the other, can be said to "be aware" of their surroundings and the world, that they "perceive" what is going on, and can process, respond, adapt and act upon 'what is going on' - but they are Not Sentient - they have no "tangible experience", no "real experience", no,, ehm,, "awareness"... It's quite tricky to pin these conceptions down in a satisfactory manner.

So now hopefully I've made it abundantly clear for all what the word 'sentience' is supposed to mean in this thread.


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am now going to read up on that René-guy to see if he has anything biblically anchored well and good to bring forth for this thread. Thank you all for your time so far those of you who have been engaged so far in a servile state-of-mind.
-It might take a day or two before I'll be back with my review of how "the whole René-business" went or turned out, -might be just a couple hours or so tho, but I'm right now feeling like putting all of this "on the slack" for some time hereover.

Over, bye. :)

take it easy

.
 
Well basically René Descartes writings referred to by the quote seen above, was, well... Let's just say it's not relevant at all to this thread, -to say the least.

And now I'm conceding my investigation on 'if the Bible says animals are sentient or not'; it seems this topic isn't apparently "taken up"/"discussed" in the Scriptures of the Bible, -and I now have no intention at all to at depth look into, research and weigh the Scriptures to look for 'under-the-surface' indications regarding this. -Who knows, maybe it's left out, so that crude men won't treat animals poorer than they otherwise would,,.-Probably Not :p ^^ ..

And lastly, to tie off and -on my end- conclude what I brought up about "the incongruence between 'God's Loving Nature' and 'all the **** and pain in nature'", I would like to quote the following by C.S. Lewis:
"Part One: The data which God has given us enable us in some degree to understand Human Pain. We lack such data about beasts.
We know neither what they are nor why they are. All that we can say for certain is that if God is good (and I think
we have ground for saying that He is) then the appearance of cruelty in the animal world must be a false appearance.
What the reality behind the false appearance may be we can only guess.

Part two: And here are some of my own guesses... "
(-The quote is from the excerpt-book -'Animals & Christianity - A Book of Readings' edited by Andrew Linzey & Tom Regan- (here's a link to a remarkably extensive "preview" of the book: Animals and Christianity: A Book of Readings - Google Böcker in case anyone becomes interested in reading the rest of the text the quote is from.)).

And by that I take my leave. - I shall appreciate if I don't get called back for no good reason (i.e. anything other than the furthering of this thread's investigative purpose) - Thank you.

May you be blessed
 
There isn't mention of this issue in the scriptures, but the lack of mention of animals acknowledging the presence of the Spirit of God with either positive or negative fear should be enough. They simply can't proceed from mere reaction to stimuli to subjective thoughts, which then would produce unexplained actions not typical of them at present. Animal lovers tend to mistake a monkey's desire for a banana held by another monkey as a sentient desire, while that still is explained by simple hunger and acquisition of food. Animal rights activists then cite sentience on the basis of "suffering", which is also explainable as a genetically programmed reaction to some stimulus, their problem being their own subjectivity concerning what suffering is.
Sentience is meant for man.
Modern science still doesn't understand sentience (mostly a philosophical concept), especially concerning subjectivity, and particularly in animals, which can't give conscious feedback to researchers. If the Bible had anything substantive about it, then the mystery would be at least partially solved.
 
Back
Top